how long will some people live in denial?

5/25/2006 11:44:45 AM

WORLD TRADE 7 WAS DAMAGED DURING 9/11

DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR

THEY HAD TO REBUILD IT

WHAT THE FUCK ELSE ARE WE SUPPOSED TO GET FROM THAT ARTICLE

5/25/2006 11:46:09 AM

I guess bin Laden's magical evil superpowers caused the collapse of WTC 7.

5/25/2006 11:46:54 AM

THIS FUCKIN' GUY

5/25/2006 11:54:46 AM

salisburyboy, listen very carefully

even if the US govt set off bombs in the twin towers to collapse them as a zionist orchestrated government inside job

it doesnt fucking matter in regards to the article on building 7

the fires and explosive forces that collapsed the twin towers, whatever may have caused them, damaged WT7

your "article" you just quoted just says collateral damage from the twin towers damaged wt7 beyond repair so they had to rebuild it

the article is about as insightful as "New Study finds kids who over-eat more likely to be obese"

5/25/2006 11:57:56 AM

Quote :

"your "article" you just quoted just says collateral damage from the twin towers damaged wt7 beyond repair so they had to rebuild it"

Well, they're wrong on that point. WTC Building 7 was NOT significantly damaged by debris from the north tower. WTC 7 was located about a block away from the north tower. It recieved light to negligible damage from the debris from the towers.

5/25/2006 12:21:42 PM

THIS FUCKIN' GUY

Seriously, you're the hugest waste of bandwidth on this site. Your threads are an obstacle to intelligent discussion on these boards if anything.

[Edited on May 25, 2006 at 12:25 PM. Reason : .]

5/25/2006 12:24:35 PM

are you gonna try to ban me from the SB if you become SB mod McDanger?

5/25/2006 12:25:36 PM

Absofuckinglutely.

And if I become mod, there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

You'll sit on the time out chair and think about the poisonous effect you have on this board.

[Edited on May 25, 2006 at 12:32 PM. Reason : .]

5/25/2006 12:30:22 PM

Ok, what am I doing wrong? How am I messing up the SB at all? I'm not the one trolling and spamming other users. And I've only created 6-7 threads in the last few months.

Aren't you just for censoring me because of my views?

5/25/2006 12:33:14 PM

It's because your views are so ridiculous, obviously false, and you're so adamant about them. It it VERY hard to distinguish between you and the classic, textbook troll. I'm not even convinced you AREN'T a troll. That should say something about your posting methods.

Either way, it spawns an environment where people have stopped bringing any actual intellectual discourse here, for a good while. This board has lacked content, and mostly because people can't seeing the eyesore of your threads. The frustration of faux-debate with you has squeezed value from these boards, and I don't intend to let that continue if I become a mod here. Sorry.

5/25/2006 12:36:39 PM

Quote :

"It's because your views are so ridiculous, obviously false, and you're so adamant about them."

Ok. You're for viewpoint censorship.

5/25/2006 12:39:23 PM

No, I'm for promoting actual intellectual discourse. It's what the soap box is designed to do.

Since your views promote the OPPOSITE, I'd prevent you from bringing harm. This isn't censorship so much as it is protecting the interests of the board.

5/25/2006 12:40:59 PM

this is the first time i could see supporting mcdanger for soap box mod

5/25/2006 12:44:03 PM

Quote :

"Either way, it spawns an environment where people have stopped bringing any actual intellectual discourse here, for a good while. This board has lacked content, and mostly because people can't seeing the eyesore of your threads. "

This current environment is NOT my fault. 30thAnnz, aboronio, JonHGuth, Woodfoot and others MAKE THEIR OWN DECISION to spam the SB with crap (eg, cheese threads and other parody threads).

It's just a small minority of people who hate me (because of my views/opinions) who are messing up the SB. They spam the SB and have degraded it to nothing but trolling and chit chat level crap. They are constantly campaigning to silence me (WHEN I'M DOING NOTHING WRONG OTHER THAN HAVING VIEWS THEY HATE).

These trolls are degrading the SB, not me. I try to have serious discussions. They want to turn the SB into another Chit Chat.

5/25/2006 12:45:59 PM

who's the crying bitch now, asshat?

WAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!

Quote :

"I try to have serious discussions."

YEAH, RIGHT.

[Edited on May 25, 2006 at 12:48 PM. Reason : *]

5/25/2006 12:47:09 PM

You can't silence me.

Keep trying.

5/25/2006 12:49:53 PM

mcdanger for mod.

your time nears.

5/25/2006 12:52:01 PM

salisburyboy, very few people hate you because of your views. They hate you for posting the same stuff repeatedly while completely avoiding rational discussion.

Stop playing the censorship card because that isn't the case at all.

Thats like an edomite playing the anti-semitism card whenever someone criticizes them.

5/25/2006 12:56:06 PM

Hate me all you want. I don't care about that.

Just don't try to censor/silence me because of your hatred of me and my views/opinions.

5/25/2006 12:58:08 PM

5/25/2006 12:59:00 PM

I don't hate you. I've never tried to censor you.

I just want you to grow up and have a rational discussion for once instead posting what other people have written.

Quote :

"Stop playing the censorship card because that isn't the case at all."

[Edited on May 25, 2006 at 12:59 PM. Reason : .]

5/25/2006 12:59:29 PM

Is the only way for us to stop the edomites to spam tdub?

Does posting a bunch of stuff that no one reads or cares about really do anything to stop the NWOJEWCOMMIFEMINAZI conspiracy?

5/25/2006 1:01:30 PM

there are no conspiracies

don't you know that?

5/25/2006 1:11:05 PM

there is no logic in your posts

no logic

5/25/2006 1:11:46 PM

go away woodtroll

5/25/2006 1:16:16 PM

THATS VIEWPOINT CENSORSHIP

I HAVE AS MUCH RIGHT TO TALK SHIT IN YOUR THREADS AS YOU HAVE TO POST THEM

5/25/2006 1:23:55 PM

If you guys want me to become mod, support me here: http://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=410996

I'll get rid of this guy until he decides to STOP MAKING THE SOAPBOX A FUCKING CESSPOOL CENTERED AROUND HIS BULLSHIT.

It's up to him. If I become a mod (and I hope to), it'll be his decision if he wants to contribute to the soap box or get banned under every name I see him pop up on.

Oh it'll be wack-a-mole time, motherfuckers.

5/25/2006 1:24:21 PM

Quote :

"It's up to him. If I become a mod (and I hope to), it'll be his decision if he wants to contribute to the soap box or get banned under every name I see him pop up on. "

Oh, so you'll at least give me the opportunity to post in the SB, under your own specific rules and guidelines I presume?

5/25/2006 1:34:29 PM

Quote :

"It it VERY hard to distinguish between you and the classic, textbook troll. I'm not even convinced you AREN'T a troll."

I'm with you on that one. Every time I think of salisburyboy I think of someone sitting behind a computer trying to think up the most ridiculous thing possible just to make people flame back. I really can't see someone believing/thinking what salisburyboy purports to think/believe.

If you are a troll I will say gg salisburyboy with respect to holding to the crazy charade for so long without cracking.

5/25/2006 1:34:49 PM

i wonder if salisburyboy knows that virtually nobody takes his extremist views seriously and basically everybody laughs at his threads

so yes salisburyboy, you can continue to post and state your views because its a free country and you are not suspended

just realize that your views arent swaying anyone's opinions to your side...hell you're probably swaying 9/11 conspiracy theorist fence riders back into the view of "terrorists caused 9/11"

i am a fucking idiot for thinking that some arab muslims hate the US and figured a way to hit us

5/25/2006 1:35:19 PM

Quote :

"Oh, so you'll at least give me the opportunity to post in the SB, under your own specific rules and guidelines I presume?"

After your time-out, when you've had a while to think about your bad behavior.

Or -- never at all, if I deem you're just not capable of intellectual discourse.

[Edited on May 25, 2006 at 1:38 PM. Reason : .]

5/25/2006 1:37:41 PM

ITS JUST A VERY VOCAL MINORITY

5/25/2006 1:49:49 PM

Hey, salisburyboy, can you refute the photographic evidence regarding WTC 7 provided by brianj320 and the Popular Science analysis of the collapse using more than a single blurry picture and an out of context quote by Larry Silverstein?

What you call "evidence" doesn't stand up in light of it.

5/25/2006 2:38:38 PM

Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Heysalisburyboy, Hey[user]



youre a fucking moonbat.


[Edited on May 26, 2006 at 1:08 AM. Reason : ]

5/26/2006 1:04:52 AM

OMG
THE BAD GUY IN "ENEMY OF THE STATE" WAS BORN 9/11/1940
CLEARLY
WILL SMITH, JON VOIGHT, AND GENE HACKMAN ARE PART OF THE ZIONIST CONSPIRACY

THEY DIDN'T JUST PICK THAT DATE FROM RANDOM
THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IN 1998

5/27/2006 10:14:44 PM

http://chaoticsequence.googlepages.com/thewolfwebuserblocker_0.2.xpi

5/27/2006 11:43:44 PM

i have no clue what just happened there

5/28/2006 1:37:26 AM

god no wonder nobody can get rid of this guy

his thread has somehow gotten to like 43 pages

5/28/2006 2:08:40 AM

^^^ what, is that your Cancelbunny?

not that im ever going to download an executable script from someone's personal webpage

5/28/2006 3:29:22 AM

OMG YOUR EXTREME VIEWS ARE SO EXTREME THEY DAMAGE MY MIND!!

YOU MUST GO!


thats the most pathetic shit ever, McDanger.

If anything Salisburyboy gives all of you an opportunity to express how omnipotent you are...I agree, he posts some crazy shit..SO? DONT RESPOND TO IT IF YOU DONT WANT TO. I dont understand how everyone goes apeshit over this guys consipiracy theories.

5/28/2006 1:14:30 PM

You have less than 50 posts in the soap box
and less than a thousand posts on the wolf web

5/28/2006 1:59:43 PM

turbo: blocked

5/28/2006 2:10:13 PM

yes i certainly feel omnipotent because of salisburyboy. he makes me feel all-knowing, and like a god.

5/28/2006 4:26:30 PM

^i laffed

So is it a race to 54000?

because we all know that posting a shit load makes you smarter

5/28/2006 4:43:04 PM

posting a lot doesn't make you smarter

it just helps you understand WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON

go back to chit chat or wherever the other 951 of your posts came from

5/29/2006 10:31:31 PM

Flashback...

Howard dean blasts those who say Zionists/Israelis were behind the Iraq War or involved in the 9/11 attacks as "anti-Semites"
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=860517

Quote :

"Dean Condemns 'Anti-Semitic Literature' Jun 18, 2005 [...] According to Dean, some material distributed within the DNC conference room implied that Israel was involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. One witness, former intelligence analyst Ray McGovern, told Conyers and other House Democrats that the war was part of an effort to allow the United States and Israel to "dominate that part of the world," a statement Dean also condemned. "As for any inferences that the United States went to war so Israel could 'dominate' the Middle East or that Israel was in any way behind the horrific September 11th attacks on America, let me say unequivocally that such statements are nothing but vile, anti-Semitic rhetoric," Dean said."

Not the A-S word!!1!

5/30/2006 11:45:40 AM

why are you posting shit from a year ago

5/30/2006 11:46:29 AM

If you say that Jewish neocons or the Israeli lobby was the driving force behind the Iraq War, you're a "vile bigotted evil anti-Semite."

It doesn't matter if what you say is the truth.

The truth is "anti-Semitic."

5/30/2006 11:48:30 AM

Thats funny coming from someone who admits that he hates jews and lives to propogate unsubstantiated claims about jews seeking world domination.

Prove that its the truth and no one will say that.

[Edited on May 30, 2006 at 11:50 AM. Reason : .]

5/30/2006 11:50:09 AM