alright..might be sounding stupid but was reading this article..

Although North Carolina State got its final three points from the free throw line, there was a huge disparity in foul shot opportunities. NC State fouls like Kentucky. However, the only team that doesn't have those fouls called in games worked by Southeastern Conference officials is Kentucky.

We foul like kentucky??....really do we??

12/25/2005 4:41:00 PM

sorry, not following this at all

12/25/2005 4:43:04 PM

Well...ok..this is the article..

http://story.scout.com/a.z?s=178&p=2&c=481799&refid=400

what does the paragraph i mentioned earlier really mean>??

12/25/2005 4:48:20 PM

that Kentucky does the same thing State does but never gets called for fouls in the SEC

12/25/2005 4:53:09 PM

The guy was just taking a cheap shot at the way Kentucky gets unfiar treatment from the refs.


Much like we say Duke gets unfair treatment from the refs.



I dont know whether Kentucky does really or not, but I do know for a fact that Duke is the recipient of some outrageous calls on a routine basis.

12/25/2005 4:53:46 PM

Quote :

"but I do know for a fact that Duke is the recipient of some outrageous calls on a routine basis."

100% accurate since Dean Smith retired.

12/25/2005 8:53:56 PM

you guys are rediculous. the better players or players with better reps usually get the calls, not schools, but the best programs usually have the best players so dukes uconns kentuckys are gonna have a rep of getting calls

12/25/2005 9:34:27 PM

In general, yes, which creates a vicious cycle (player who is already good is allowed to cheat to appear even better).

But in the college game there are DEFINITELY coaches who are responsible for getting their teams ridiculous calls.

12/25/2005 10:17:19 PM

KFC

12/25/2005 11:31:58 PM