He is going overboard with his moderating privledges.

This is not about me being mad he locked a thread, but he is locking other threads and moving crap to the trash bin that isn't even remotely offensive.

Even in one of my recent threads (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491069) he thought it would be cool to edit my post link. He edits (or his words "fix") the post link and adds "AND YOU SUCK AT LINKING THE RIGHT WAY". Not only does he not have the ability keep out of my posts but he also feels the need to be a cock sucker about it.

Then he locks a thread by bbehe (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491081) that is just a nerdy nsfw collage of girls. his reason was "fail".

He also locks my thread about a girl i liked on facebook then went into a relationship. (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491189) citing that i make to many facebook threads. Where in the rules does it say "no facebook threads". I can't find it.

Now he wants to clutter up chit chat with old crap that isn't even funny anymore (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491190)

When i joined TWW 4 years ago shit was cool. Good threads were rampant and the lock was hardly seen in chit chat.

I respect the other moderators: beardawg for keeping sports talk clean (as it should be) and entertainment relevant to etertainment (spookyjon).

Signed,

Novicane


[Edited on August 22, 2007 at 11:59 AM. Reason : dd]

8/22/2007 11:57:11 AM

i feel you dog, only problem is this wont change anything

8/22/2007 11:58:26 AM

FAIL

8/22/2007 11:59:56 AM

Fire him??? He just got promoted you dumb shit!

gunzz ftw

8/22/2007 12:02:42 PM

Have you ever really wondered who it is that we are complaining to in the Feedback Forum?

I have.

The Feedback forum just seems like a long, dark, empty hallway where you can scream out TWW injustices.

No one will listen, but if it makes you feel better, scream away.

8/22/2007 12:04:46 PM

i listen

8/22/2007 12:05:06 PM

nvm

[Edited on August 22, 2007 at 12:06 PM. Reason : i'm screaming on the inside]

8/22/2007 12:05:29 PM

I listen.

And when it's not absurd I pay serious attention.

This does not qualify.

8/22/2007 12:09:39 PM

Quote :

"^^for real"

Don't edit that shit out!

Agree with me, dammit!

8/22/2007 12:09:56 PM

i basically just said how like beardawg says he got promoted on tww but then posted a internet serious business pic

kinda seems oxymoronish

8/22/2007 12:12:37 PM

that's cool, i assumed this would fall on deaf ears (or blind eyes?)

Maybe one day TWW will return to free speech and all that jazz.

8/22/2007 12:13:49 PM

i gotta admit...if i were one of the mods i'd probably act like them too

8/22/2007 12:15:16 PM

I agree, but the difference is that IRL, people listen.

and by listening, I dont mean posting in the thread, I mean actually making an effort to keep this website from running into the ground.

Honestly, I am curious to know what teh mods have done to better the website other than locking, moving, deleting and suspending.

Moderators, are you all being proactive or reactive?

8/22/2007 12:19:36 PM

Quote :

"Even in one of my recent threads (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491069) he thought it would be cool to edit my post link. He edits (or his words "fix") the post link and adds "AND YOU SUCK AT LINKING THE RIGHT WAY". Not only does he not have the ability keep out of my posts but he also feels the need to be a cock sucker about it. "

if you would link the proper way i wouldnt have to edit your posts.

Quote :

"Then he locks a thread by bbehe (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491081) that is just a nerdy nsfw collage of girls. his reason was "fail". "

all the pictures were big red X's / there was a topic already made about this subject

Quote :

"He also locks my thread about a girl i liked on facebook then went into a relationship. (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491189) citing that i make to many facebook threads. Where in the rules does it say "no facebook threads". I can't find it."

there are no rules that say no facebook threads but you, sir, make a stupid facebook thread everyday. there is no need to continue making a thread everyday about that site. if you want to advertise for facebook then buy an advertisement. TWW offers "by the click" packages.

furthermore, you threads about facebook can be all put into one of your other 345083458 facebook threads.

Quote :

"Now he wants to clutter up chit chat with old crap that isn't even funny anymore (/message_topic.aspx?topic=491190)"

clutter is all your facebook threads. since chit chat is on auto purge and TWW doesnt offer sticky threads then these need to be saved. if you actually posted something funny once in a while then im sure this wouldnt be an issue.

Quote :

"When i joined TWW 4 years ago shit was cool. Good threads were rampant and the lock was hardly seen in chit chat."

now, good threads are not rampant...thats the reason for the massive bumping of all the older "good" threads. we would love it if you would try to be a part of the solution instead of being part of the problem

8/22/2007 12:23:06 PM

Quote :

"Moderators, are you all being proactive or reactive? "

ask qntmfred

8/22/2007 12:23:39 PM

[Edited on August 22, 2007 at 12:29 PM. Reason : the mods are very sincere in their efforts here. y'all just can't take some guidance or criticism]

8/22/2007 12:28:06 PM

Quote :

"if you would link the proper way i wouldnt have to edit your posts. "

You ask me to edit my posts and i will. If you feel the need to edit my posts please leave your snide comments out of it and just send me a PM if you feel that you want to make a commentary on it.

Quote :

"all the pictures were big red X's "

please show me in the rules where red X's = lock the thread.

Quote :

"you, sir, make a stupid facebook thread everyday"

and most of them get atleast 22 or so replies. (do a search for "facebook"). You're the only one complaining. I have only done it this week and a little bit last week. calm down.

Most of them apply to a unique situation. You can't group them into a huge pool. Oh wait you can because you'll just lock my shit and move it to the trash bin.

Quote :

"clutter is all your facebook threads. since chit chat is on auto purge and TWW doesnt offer sticky threads then these need to be saved. if you actually posted something funny once in a while then im sure this wouldnt be an issue. "

clutter is you BTTing all these old threads. How is clutter, 1 facebook thread that i made once a day. It's been a decent discussion in each one if you actually go read them. Once a gain you're the only complaining in each one. Lets not turn this into me vs. you thing. It's not. I have seen your moderating on other threads and it's just not the TWW way.

Saved? shit gets old. let it die. don't clutter up the first page with old shit i have seen for over a year. I want to see some new stuff that people are posting.

maybe you should be constructive and create another forum section titled "epic threads" or something shit and have it reply only (mirrored from chit chat). That way you can keep the topics you want stickied in one whole forum.



[Edited on August 22, 2007 at 12:36 PM. Reason : ds]

8/22/2007 12:33:10 PM

Quote :

"You ask me to edit my posts and i will. If you feel the need to edit my posts please leave your snide comments out of it and just send me a PM if you feel that you want to make a commentary on it. "

i shouldnt have to do this / thats the point guy....you have been for over 4 years as you have stated. are you just dumb?

Quote :

"please show me in the rules where red X's = lock the thread"

oh fucking please...again, are you dumb? if there is no content in said thread what then is its use or purpose? not to mention a more successful topic with the same theme was made months before. now you are just nit picking

Quote :

"and most of them get atleast 22 or so replies. (do a search for "facebook"). You're the only one complaining. I have only done it this week and a little bit last week. calm down. "

and 22 replies that could all be grouped together. again..if you want to advertise for facebook then buy an ad. simple as that.

calm down?!?!? you are the one who is suffering from a hurt pussy

Quote :

"Most of them apply to a unique situation. You can't group them into a huge pool"

actually, you can. Sports talk has a everything PRiv thread. Most of all that stuff has unique situations and the posters are fine with it. Better expample is college basketball 07 thread. lots of different stuff in that thread and everyone can differentiate

Quote :

"clutter is you BTTing all these old threads. How is clutter, 1 facebook thread that i made once a day. It's been a decent discussion in each one if you actually go read them. Once a gain you're the only complaining in each one. Lets not turn this into me vs. you thing. It's not. "

no, im not...other user have noticed these usless threads

Quote :

"I have seen your moderating on other threads and it's just not the TWW way"

hahah, wonder why you were never asked to be a moderator?

Quote :

"Saved? shit gets old. let it die. don't clutter up the first page with old shit i have seen for over a year. I want to see some new stuff that people are posting"

1. why dont you let the moderators, as a collective group, make this decision. and guess what?..we did and thats why i made the thread.
it was either that or move them to old school....and new users can post in old school
2. we have group discussions in the mod forum about this kind of stuff....its not always shooting from the hip.
3. thewolfweb.com isnt about you, son. its about everyone. new users and old users.
new users would enjoy reading over the classic threads and older users have responed in a positive way about saving them from being purged. you are the only one that has a problem with it.

8/22/2007 12:54:31 PM

Now you're just being a massive pussy.

Quote :

"please show me in the rules where red X's = lock the thread. "

He'd have locked the thread anyways: there was already one in existence.

Quote :

"clutter is you BTTing all these old threads. How is clutter, 1 facebook thread that i made once a day."

old threads: not adding new threads
new threads: ...adding new threads

The point of BTTTing the old threads is to keep them in the unspecified number of threads allowed in CC. When you make a new one, you're forcing another thread off CC. BTTTing doesn't do that. It's not hard to understand.

Quote :

"Saved? shit gets old. let it die. don't clutter up the first page with old shit i have seen for over a year."

Why not? You're never gonna wanna show someone the news14 shenanigans? or get another laugh out of it?

Quote :

"maybe you should be constructive and create another forum"

The mods do what they can. Guess what something they can't do is? Make new sections.

If you want, I'll stop by Target on my way to campus to get you a douche. We could build a sandcastle from your mangina.

8/22/2007 12:54:43 PM

Quote :

"Now you're just being a massive pussy."

good one. original.

Quote :

"He'd have locked the thread anyways: there was already one in existence."

why didn't he post a link to it? why didn't he give a better reason than "fail"? Beardawg and all the other moderators politely give links as a reply and lock. simple as that.

Quote :

"old threads: not adding new threads new threads: ...adding new threads The point of BTTTing the old threads is to keep them in the unspecified number of threads allowed in CC. When you make a new one, you're forcing another thread off CC. BTTTing doesn't do that. It's not hard to understand."

old threads: old content.
new threads: new content.

new content > old content

I understand the mechanics of dates and posting and CC. You don't have to remind me sweetheart.

Quote :

"Why not? You're never gonna wanna show someone the news14 shenanigans? or get another laugh out of it?"

there is already a wikipedia page dedicated to it.

Quote :

"The mods do what they can. want "

Quote :

"If you want, I'll stop by Target on my way to campus to get you a douche. We could build a sandcastle from your mangina."

another funny. keep them coming sweetheart.

8/22/2007 1:02:04 PM

YOU PEOPLE

8/22/2007 1:03:42 PM

omg clearly this must be /signed - how could you be so crazy gunzz - the destruction - the lies - the insanity

....

novicane you suck

8/22/2007 1:04:53 PM

Quote :

"why didn't he post a link to it?"

You can't use the search function?

You are making a massive douche of yourself. I recommend you cut your losses, let it go, and since you seem to need help with links I'll throw you a bone...

ad.aspx

8/22/2007 1:05:40 PM

oh lawd

8/22/2007 1:06:01 PM

Quote :

"new content > old content"

Rarely so. Amsterdam718? [link]randomskankattnwhore[/user]? You really are joking around now.

Quote :

"there is already a wikipedia page dedicated to it."

So?

Quote :

"The mods do what they can. want"

Uh...[NO]

If that were the case, I'm pretty certain at least one of the mods, and perhaps two, would have created a porn section for me to rule over.
If the framework isn't there for them to use, how the fuck are they going to use it just because they want to? Exactly. Shut the fuck up and go cry in a corner.

[Edited on August 22, 2007 at 1:09 PM. Reason : I said in the chatterbox, and I'll say it for your benefit: you whine more than my 13yo sister]

8/22/2007 1:08:10 PM

8/22/2007 1:10:25 PM

The Feedback Forum =

8/22/2007 1:12:34 PM

lol just as i thought.

the moderators (and moderator cock suckers) unite and try to troll me into some oblivous state of anger with their epeens.

Which is not going to happen.

so i'm just going to leave it as is. I have said what i have to say and defended what i said.

~Novicane

8/22/2007 1:14:26 PM

8/22/2007 1:15:59 PM

Novicane: Defender of TWW - King of the People

why are there no novicane for mod threads yet - how could this gem have been missed

8/22/2007 1:20:20 PM

I dunno why but opening this thread made me poke my eye really bad.

8/22/2007 1:26:22 PM

Quote :

"why didn't he post a link to it? why didn't he give a better reason than "fail"? Beardawg and all the other moderators politely give links as a reply and lock. simple as that"

MAYBE BECAUSE I BUMPED THE FREAKING THREAD RIGHT AFTER I LOCKED THE OTHER ONE
AND HOT GAMER GIRLS SHOULD BE ENOUGH OF AN INDICATOR FOR SMART FOLKS

8/22/2007 1:27:56 PM

ok lemme say

1. I don't care if I get suspended.
2. Ambrosia is a cunt with no reasoning capabilities at all.
3. Moderators do more harm than good to this site.
4. I wouldn't moderate this crap if I were paid $60k a year.
5. IRL, all this attitude/ego is indirectly proportionate to your social skills.
6. If mods get pissed off because someone showed them the light, they shouldn't post...or in other words, should remain neutral.

Feel free to take this post as you wish...it's the truth, and I am done in this thread.

PS: My eye hurts from the poking

8/22/2007 1:31:03 PM

None of what I posted applies to Gunzz, specifically.

I have no issues with him.

8/22/2007 1:32:19 PM

Quote :

"maybe you should be constructive and create another forum section titled "epic threads" or something shit and have it reply only (mirrored from chit chat). That way you can keep the topics you want stickied in one whole forum."

thats not a bad idea.

8/22/2007 3:22:50 PM

nawh, they cant do that, him along with Beardawg tww is there life, without it, they have nothing......

8/22/2007 5:48:47 PM

some impressive rounds of quoteboxing going on in this ring

8/22/2007 5:52:37 PM

i actually agree with gargs here

8/22/2007 6:58:08 PM

Quote :

"3. Moderators Users do more harm than good to this site."

there, fixed it for you
the mods arent the ones getting TWW on WRAL

8/22/2007 7:11:40 PM

man

you really could have done so much more with the thread title here

8/22/2007 7:52:14 PM

Quote :

"nawh, they cant do that, him along with Beardawg tww is there life, without it, they have nothing......"

Are you drinking? That's a fairly unintelligible post. At any rate if you are saying that my life is tdub, I'd have to agree with you. As you can see from my photo gallery, I don't get outside much.

8/22/2007 9:44:07 PM

oh shit

8/22/2007 9:53:28 PM

Quote :

"As you can see from my photo gallery, I don't get outside much. "

aha.

8/22/2007 10:20:42 PM

ha gargs ended this thread everyone else aint said shit after he wrecked yall

8/22/2007 10:53:17 PM

Quote :

"None of what I posted applies to Gunzz, specifically. I have no issues with him. "

sounds like gunzz put the smackdown on gargs

8/22/2007 10:58:40 PM

couldn't these complaints been put in a pm straight to gunzz?

i mean it's not like he made a public "revoke novicane from moderator" thread



the mods are aight. any problems, shoot 'em a pm.

8/22/2007 11:17:52 PM

chit chat is not overmoderated by any stretch. if it were up to me, I'd probably lock a fuckton more of the stupid shit than gunzz ever does.

if you're getting your chitchat threads locked or edited regularly enough that you need to complain here, well, that's just fucking sad. take a 3 month break from TWW and develop some hobbies.

8/23/2007 3:06:36 AM

Quote :

"if you're getting your chitchat threads locked or edited regularly enough that you need to complain here, well, that's just fucking sad. take a 3 month break from TWW and develop some hobbies."

haha, gg

8/23/2007 7:54:19 AM

Lemme give you a piece of advice


Gunzz cares about this site WAAAAAAAYYYYY more than you'll ever overcome. Just consider he is approaching 30 years old, and he is still waist deep in this shit and sinking fast.

OmarBadu and Beardawg run a close second for the care factor. They get a nice little kick out of exerting their suspension powers and running amuck on this board.

Seriously, these three guys are moderating a bunch of sub-adults that do stupid shit on this board AND THEY LOVE DOING THEIR JOB.

Do you really want to bother with that?

8/23/2007 8:14:05 AM

^ and you don't care way too much about this site? Don't you have like 3 or 4 names on here, and create a new one and bitch like a woman every time you get suspended?

8/23/2007 9:01:08 AM