for this post:

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=556009&page=1#12582372

oh, and please remove that post as well.

kkthxu

2/1/2009 9:36:05 AM

+1

2/1/2009 10:01:50 AM

IT WAS CLEARLY OFF TOPIC AND SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY!

2/1/2009 10:05:10 AM

i to support this thread

2/1/2009 10:08:59 AM

i got suspended for posting the faceless cat picture, without warning I might add.

and that picture is WAY worse.

2/1/2009 10:16:25 AM

yea, i gotta say that was uncalled for.

2/1/2009 10:21:05 AM

vote yes

2/1/2009 11:21:42 AM

at the very least take down the picture and give him a warning

2/1/2009 11:39:13 AM

I took me about 0.01 seconds to close that tab.

2/1/2009 1:29:17 PM

didn't click

what is it?

[Edited on February 1, 2009 at 1:55 PM. Reason : .]

2/1/2009 1:55:13 PM

yeah I don't wanna click it either, what is it?

2/1/2009 2:00:17 PM

^ A thread breaker, totally uncalled for. We'll just leave it at that.

A shame really. It was a promising thread.

2/1/2009 2:26:03 PM

the fuck is it yo

2/1/2009 3:57:09 PM

2/1/2009 4:39:31 PM

Quote :

"at the very least take down the picture and give him a warning"

not a dude

2/1/2009 4:54:08 PM

I guess I just assumed she was a dude because of the nastiness of that picture.

The fact that she is a broad makes it even worse.

2/2/2009 12:50:28 PM

sexist.

2/2/2009 2:13:16 PM

Well she is in Japan right now

2/2/2009 8:39:03 PM

Agreed suspend for 1 day. I got suspended for the faceless cat picture and that's not that bad.

2/2/2009 9:09:26 PM

whoa whoa i think we're breaking new ground here

a bf asking for his gf to be suspended

2/2/2009 11:51:59 PM

This needs to be taken care of.

2/7/2009 7:39:47 AM

just because it was nasty is no reason to suspend, in my opinion. a reason would be that it was not on topic, but then again, that's no reason in chit chat.

so, if you don't like the pic, move on. don't be such wusses.

btw, i don't understand what's disgusting at all about the faceless cat...? wow, some people really do have thin skins.

2/8/2009 10:12:39 PM

My point here is that there needs to be some consistency. If I can get suspended (WITHOUT WARNING) for posting a picture of a faceless cat, then why can someone get away with posting a picture of a prolapsed asshole?

2/9/2009 10:19:38 AM

^ yeah, i am with you on this. consistency is a must. but this is tww, so throw any notions of consistency out the window.

i still don't understand what's so terrible about that cat pic that they suspended you? it is just a cat.

2/9/2009 12:21:46 PM

if I remember correctly, someone got in trouble from TWW for posting the kitten stomping picture series.
Ever since then, people have been kind of butthurt over animal cruelty type stuff.

Then a few mods took a personal interest in that monorail cat thread in chit chat. they wouldn't let anyone fuck it up. (which was pretty silly in my opinion. I mean, I've made pretty popular threads before, and no mods started suspending people when they trolled the thread. wtf?!)
Anyway, someone posted faceless cat in that monorail cat thread, and got suspended.

...so I think there was some confusion as to whether or not faceless cat was a suspendable offense. I don't think it is, unless it's in the COVETED MONORAIL CAT THREAD!!1...CAUSE THAT'S APPARENTLY THE LAST GOOD THING TWW HAS GOING FOR IT!!1.

which is why some of these little personal mod rules are silly. and there should be warnings before suspensions.
In the case of djeternal, the guy took a few year long hiatus from TWW. there's no way he could have known about some silly little rule.

2/9/2009 12:39:48 PM

Quote :

"and there should be warnings before suspensions."

I'd imagine that would take all the fun out of suspending someone.

2/9/2009 4:43:31 PM

^^ i understand about the stomping of kittens being suspendable.

but the faceless cat is just the way it is, from what i understand from looking at the pic. or did someone torture the cat and made it that way?

if it is a freak of nature, how can users be suspended for posting a pic of it?

2/9/2009 5:13:21 PM

Quote :

"there should be warnings before suspensions"

i shoot out a ton of warning before i actually suspend someone.

and yeah, i thought that monorail cat crap was silly as hell...

2/9/2009 5:23:04 PM

right

I wasn't pointing fingers or anything. Just saying...

[Edited on February 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM. Reason : I actually want to have gunzz's babies]

2/9/2009 5:28:53 PM

awww, jeff, i know you were not pointing fingers as i was just making a point esp. regarding the sanctity of the monorail cat thread

2/10/2009 8:42:27 AM

another offender:

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=550954&page=3#12613582


and I didn't have a problem with the fact that the picture was banned. I just wish someone would have told me. you guys know me well enough by now to know that if you ask me to take down a picture then I will. the suspension was uncalled for

[Edited on February 10, 2009 at 4:27 PM. Reason : a]

2/10/2009 4:26:44 PM

^ Jesus christ you are one butthurt bitch. It's in a thread about sex accidents and it looks like a pretty bad sex accident.

I got suspended with no warning over the no-face cat pictures. I'd really like to know which mod it was. I got suspended even after I made my own thread about them.

2/10/2009 4:37:55 PM

it was Beardawg or whatever that suspended me

and no, I am not butthurt, but the dude in that picture most certainly is

bitch

[Edited on February 10, 2009 at 4:42 PM. Reason : a]

2/10/2009 4:42:18 PM

^ Oh bam, you really brought it. It's in a thread about porn. Get over it.

2/10/2009 4:45:40 PM

oh bam, he could have just posted the link to the pic instead of the pic itself

2/10/2009 5:35:45 PM