User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » DO NOT INSTAGRAM YOUR BALLOT Page [1] 2, Next  
vinylbandit
All American
46821 Posts
user info
edit post

You are publicly admitting to a crime.

11/3/2012 3:20:04 PM

lewisje
All American
8638 Posts
user info
edit post

depends on the state IMO

11/3/2012 4:21:12 PM

Dentaldamn
All American
7396 Posts
user info
edit post

people instagram themselves doing illegal shit all the time.

11/3/2012 4:31:23 PM

shanedidona
All American
728 Posts
user info
edit post

what crime?

11/3/2012 6:11:44 PM

jaZon
All American
24963 Posts
user info
edit post

In North Carolina it's illegal to record anything inside of a polling place and it's illegal to post images of marked ballots (even your own)

[Edited on November 3, 2012 at 6:48 PM. Reason : ]

11/3/2012 6:48:24 PM

shanedidona
All American
728 Posts
user info
edit post

oh ok

11/3/2012 8:02:25 PM

GeniuSxBoY
Suspended
16786 Posts
user info
edit post

you can publicly suck my dick and take your law and stick it up your ass

11/3/2012 8:05:46 PM

tchenku
All American
17884 Posts
user info
edit post

it's also illegal to do it IDB

11/3/2012 8:52:56 PM

LaserSoup
All American
5193 Posts
user info
edit post

It should be illegal to instagram period. Just like twitter, people think every little thing they do is so fucking important to everyone else.

11/3/2012 10:01:47 PM

dyne
All American
6321 Posts
user info
edit post

Its all about social validation. Everyone is fb friends with that girl who takes a self portrait of themselves everyday to fish for likes

11/3/2012 10:25:33 PM

GeniuSxBoY
Suspended
16786 Posts
user info
edit post

twitter: If you see something, say something.

11/3/2012 10:58:40 PM

lewisje
All American
8638 Posts
user info
edit post

It turns out that it's probably illegal in Ohio too: http://www.citmedialaw.org/state-law-documenting-vote-2012#Ohio

General tips on documenting the vote are here: http://www.citmedialaw.org/documenting-vote-2012

11/4/2012 12:03:40 AM

oneshot
 
1181 Posts
user info
edit post

its also illegal to rig voting machines which I have successfully done, I hope all you Romney supporters enjoy your votes turning into Obama votes... all your votes R BELONG 2 US

11/4/2012 12:07:24 AM

lewisje
All American
8638 Posts
user info
edit post

It would be a good counterbalance to what has actually been done: http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-retired-nsa-analyst-proves-gop-is-stealing-elections/article20598.html

11/4/2012 12:49:54 AM

DjGohan
All American
2534 Posts
user info
edit post

Fuck a cameraphone

11/4/2012 2:07:42 AM

MattJM321
All American
3953 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"You are publicly admitting to a crime."


Unless it was a picture of your sample ballot that is available on the State Board of Election's website. https://www.ncsbe.gov/voterlookup.aspx

11/4/2012 9:38:33 AM

moron
All American
24927 Posts
user info
edit post

What's the rationale behind blocking pics of your own ballot?

11/4/2012 11:19:08 AM

SkiSalomon
All American
4155 Posts
user info
edit post

^ To prevent a modern form of carousel voting would be my guess.

11/4/2012 11:26:42 AM

lewisje
All American
8638 Posts
user info
edit post

I had to look this up, and the practice has been used as recently as the previous decade, but in (post-)Soviet Russia: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Carousel_voting

11/4/2012 2:25:33 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

theres no need for photo IDs though, i mean they might be inconvenient for some people to get

11/4/2012 2:27:07 PM

sumfoo1
Selfpwn poster
39476 Posts
user info
edit post

this could be the greatest election ever... all the hipster voters get arrested !

11/4/2012 2:28:04 PM

lewisje
All American
8638 Posts
user info
edit post

^^how about definitely are

11/4/2012 2:41:50 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

for who?

11/4/2012 2:46:46 PM

lewisje
All American
8638 Posts
user info
edit post

poor people, dumbass

11/4/2012 2:48:33 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

do any of those poor people collect welfare, unemployment, food stamps, etc?

cause photo IDs are required for all those things

11/4/2012 2:52:04 PM

moron
All American
24927 Posts
user info
edit post

Photo ID laws probably could have been passed if republican law makers hadnt been caught saying how it'll help them win, then further writing the laws in a way clearly designed to disenfranchise certain demographics.

11/4/2012 3:32:39 PM

NeuseRvrRat
MOLON LABE
30635 Posts
user info
edit post

i personally think it's a little strange that anyone who knows my name and address (public information) can go and cast my vote.

11/4/2012 3:36:56 PM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
7656 Posts
user info
edit post

Putting a camera in every voting location would be one way to detect in-person voter fraud without disenfranchising those who have a difficult time obtaining an approved photo ID.

11/4/2012 4:19:22 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

seems like requiring a photo ID would be easier than monitoring tens of millions of people on tens of thousands of cameras

11/4/2012 4:21:56 PM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
7656 Posts
user info
edit post

It's not as effective. Anyone can fake an ID. Isn't the idea here to prevent fraud at whatever cost?

11/4/2012 4:25:31 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

anyone can fake an ID with a barcode on the back that scans into a DMV/government database? we're not talking about 19 year olds with facial hair trying to buy a 12-pack

or would you require everyone who enters a voting location to directly face the camera so they can use facial recognition software to verify tens of millions of people then cross-reference them?

11/4/2012 4:29:33 PM

Meg
All American
6200 Posts
user info
edit post

What this country needs are national ID cards and #s for every individual.

11/4/2012 4:32:20 PM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
7656 Posts
user info
edit post

Ah so now we are setting up barcode scanners that link to "government databases" at every location? How is that cheaper than a camera?

11/4/2012 4:32:30 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

a cop can scan the back of your drivers license and pull up all your information from a "government database" i'm sure government issued IDs have the same type barcodes

but i guess you'd rather rely on old men security guards to monitor cameras watching thousands of people walking past cameras at angles that dont always show their faces clearly

11/4/2012 4:35:57 PM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
7656 Posts
user info
edit post

And what happens if the connection goes down? I guess the election is canceled.

No one has to monitor the cameras real-time. Record the images in case there is an issue so we can go back and identify violators. Plus it acts as a deterrent.

11/4/2012 4:40:07 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

so we're able to identify 150,000,000 people by camera footage?

why not just get a free government issued ID?

you need a photo ID to receive free healthcare, welfare, social security, food stamps, medicare, unemployment benefits, get a job, etc, whats the big deal about getting an ID to vote?

11/4/2012 4:43:12 PM

Meg
All American
6200 Posts
user info
edit post

Elections are a joke. We need kings and queens. Lords and ladies. Absolute power.

11/4/2012 4:44:08 PM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
7656 Posts
user info
edit post

What's the big deal about the government putting cameras in every polling location? This is obviously a serious problem that must be stopped. I don't see why you are so opposed to stopping voter fraud.

11/4/2012 4:46:36 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

i don't have a problem with cameras in every single voting location, i just don't know how effective they'd be, especially compared to something as simple as free ID cards

you'd pretty much need to take a picture of everyone who entered, and i mean a clear frontal picture of their face, and then keep track of over a hundred million people's pictures, probably using facial recognition software

using a photo ID that costs you no money seems much, much easier

i really dont get all the opposition to this, considering you already need a photo ID for so many other basic things in society

11/4/2012 4:51:24 PM

OopsPowSrprs
All American
7656 Posts
user info
edit post

Some people can't get photo ID very easily. Maybe someone mugged them the day before the election and took it. Or maybe they are lazy and just dont feel like getting one. That shouldn't take away their right to vote. And it doesn't have to when there are other ways to prevent fraud.

11/4/2012 4:54:58 PM

TreeTwista10
2Claps&ANatureBoy
122914 Posts
user info
edit post

lol

11/4/2012 4:56:21 PM

HaLo
All American
11259 Posts
user info
edit post

I don't think anyone is arguing that photo id for voting is a bad idea. The republican plans to implement it were intended to disenfranchise citizens though in their application and timelines.

[Edited on November 4, 2012 at 4:58 PM. Reason : And now someone has taken the very position I supposed didn't exist, and using a terrible example to]

11/4/2012 4:57:31 PM

mrfrog

15010 Posts
user info
edit post



A Ron Paul supporter's wet dream.

Quote :
"It would be a good counterbalance to what has actually been done: http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-retired-nsa-analyst-proves-gop-is-stealing-elections/article20598.html"

11/4/2012 4:58:57 PM

Meg
All American
6200 Posts
user info
edit post

There would be no need for ID cards if everyone just mesmerized their National Identification #

[Edited on November 4, 2012 at 5:27 PM. Reason : ]

11/4/2012 5:27:31 PM

seedless
All American
25785 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ttM3EEIAOo

11/4/2012 5:42:00 PM

Meg
All American
6200 Posts
user info
edit post

Lol I said mesmerized up there. Woops

11/4/2012 6:03:53 PM

dtownral
All American
10614 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ wouldn't an inflection point be a sign of fraud? Where is the fraud in that chart?

11/4/2012 6:04:59 PM

vinylbandit
All American
46821 Posts
user info
edit post

^ The decline in Paul votes matches the increase in Romney votes, suggesting the machine changed Paul ballots to Romney ballots.

11/5/2012 9:54:56 AM

SkiSalomon
All American
4155 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I had to look this up, and the practice has been used as recently as the previous decade, but in (post-)Soviet Russia"


It's actually a pretty common way of committing voter fraud and relatively easy to implement. And it happens in elections all over the world.

Interestingly, I personally witnessed it on a number of occassions in the previous decade in post-soviet countries.

Quote :
"Putting a camera in every voting location would be one way to detect in-person voter fraud without disenfranchising those who have a difficult time obtaining an approved photo ID."


Photographing voters in a polling station could raise serious ballot secrecy issues which could lead to increased voter intimidation. It would be fairly easy (at least in some places) for a determined poll worker to review camera footage and be able to sync ballots with individual voters

11/5/2012 10:04:22 AM

Str8BacardiL
prevailing
37564 Posts
user info
edit post

I support a photo ID requirement at the polls... as soon as the DMV stops charging for Licenses and ID cards.

11/5/2012 10:16:09 AM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » DO NOT INSTAGRAM YOUR BALLOT Page [1] 2, Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2014 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.37 - our disclaimer.