User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
 School Tool » »
Name of course : Introduction to Computing-FORTRAN
Description : Problem solving through writing FORTRAN programs. Particular elements include: careful development of FORTRAN programs from specifications; documentation and style; appropriate use of control structures, data types and subprograms; abstractions and verification; engineering applications.
Prerequisites : E 115, MA 141
Corequisites :
Comments :
Average user rating : 2.58
Average GPA of classes in course : 3.45
Std. dev. of classes in course : 0.17
Percentile within all courses : 70%
Percentile within department courses : 63%
 Spring 2010
Class Instructor Days Time Books Users
CSC 112 section 001 Freeh MW 1120AM-1210PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 002 Rodman TuTh 300PM-350PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 210 Anderson Tu 1015AM-100PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 211 Anderson Tu 410PM-655PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 212 Anderson Tu 710PM-955PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 214 Anderson W 805AM-1050AM 0 0
CSC 112 section 215 Anderson W 1225PM-310PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 216 Anderson W 410PM-655PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 217 Anderson W 710PM-955PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 218 Anderson W 710PM-955PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 219 Anderson Th 1015AM-100PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 220 Anderson Th 410PM-655PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 221 Anderson Th 710PM-955PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 222 Anderson F 805AM-1050AM 0 0
CSC 112 section 223 Anderson F 1225PM-310PM 0 0
CSC 112 section 224 Anderson Th 710PM-955PM 0 0
 Spring 2006
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Rodman % 5
CSC 112L section 210 % 1
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
CSC 112L section 213 % 1
CSC 112L section 214 % 1
CSC 112L section 215 % 2
CSC 112L section 216 % 0
CSC 112L section 217 % 0
CSC 112L section 218 % 1
CSC 112L section 219 % 0
 Fall 2005
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Funderlic % 0
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
CSC 112L section 213 % 0
CSC 112L section 214 % 0
CSC 112L section 215 % 0
CSC 112L section 216 % 0
CSC 112L section 217 % 0
CSC 112L section 218 % 0
 Spring 2005
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Rodman % 3
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 1
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 0
CSC 112L section 205 % 0
CSC 112L section 206 % 0
 Fall 2004
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt % 5
CSC 112 section 002 Funderlic % 4
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 0
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 1
CSC 112L section 205 % 0
CSC 112L section 206 % 0
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 0
CSC 112L section 209 % 0
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
CSC 112L section 213 % 1
 Spring 2004
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Rodman % 18
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 0
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 0
CSC 112L section 205 % 0
CSC 112L section 206 % 1
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 0
CSC 112L section 209 % 1
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
CSC 112L section 213 % 0
 Fall 2003
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Funderlic 3.47 1.11 60% 31
CSC 112H section 002 Funderlic 3.83 0.71 100% 3
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 2
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 1
CSC 112L section 205 % 1
CSC 112L section 206 % 1
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 1
CSC 112L section 209 % 2
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
CSC 112L section 213 % 0
 Spring 2003
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Rodman 3.48 1.07 70% 26
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 1
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 1
CSC 112L section 205 % 2
CSC 112L section 206 % 0
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 0
CSC 112L section 209 % 0
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
 Fall 2002
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt 3.55 0.91 90% 25
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 0
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 0
CSC 112L section 205 % 0
CSC 112L section 206 % 0
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 0
CSC 112L section 209 % 0
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
CSC 112L section 212 % 0
 Spring 2002
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Rodman 3.26 1.28 20% 19
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 0
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 0
CSC 112L section 205 % 0
CSC 112L section 206 % 0
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 0
CSC 112L section 209 % 0
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
 Fall 2001
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt 3.34 1.15 30% 7
CSC 112L section 200 % 0
CSC 112L section 201 % 0
CSC 112L section 202 % 0
CSC 112L section 203 % 0
CSC 112L section 204 % 0
CSC 112L section 205 % 0
CSC 112L section 206 % 0
CSC 112L section 207 % 0
CSC 112L section 208 % 0
CSC 112L section 209 % 0
CSC 112L section 210 % 0
CSC 112L section 211 % 0
 Spring 2001
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt 3.53 0.93 80% 24
 Fall 2000
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt 3.47 0.86 60% 13
 Spring 2000
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt 3.40 1.06 40% 7
 Fall 1999
Class Instructor GPA Std. Dev. Percentile Users
CSC 112 section 001 Honeycutt 3.21 0.99 10% 1
 User Ratings
Monkey
New Recruit
1 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :
class :Fall 2001 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :
aaronburro
BigMan rules
46838 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :pretty basic FORTRAN course. Material was somewhat bland, though the book totally sux. The labs are also kinda lame, but I'm a TA, so take my section!
class :Fall 2001 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Again, pretty easy. Honeycutt helps u with stuff, though, if you ask. He can be off the wall at times, to. Project was difficult to understand.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :Pretty good guy. Genuinely cares about students and teaching. Take him INSTEAD of Rodman. Rodman doesn't know FORTRAN at all.
Aegis5
All American
1238 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :signed up for this class before i switched majors. this class is worthless to me, unless I can pass it off as an elective. pretty simple programming course
class :Spring 2002 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :do all the labs and you'll get a good grade. little under 300 people in the lab, maybe 30 show up for class. teh syllabus had one of teh days sceduled as a test review, and most of teh class showed up. all the tests were given on webct, and the system was screwing up, so tehree was no test. Rodman proceeded to appologise to teh calss and told how he did not try to trick us into coming to class. he gave teh class a few minutes to leave if they wanted to.
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :This guy does not usually teach FORTRAN. this is his first time teaching FORTRAN. class notes are online. his doctorate is in theoretical linguistics, go figure. i think it is also his last time, the regular came back. http://www.brentroad.com/photos/Aegis5/fullsize/9365.jpg
FeebleMinded
Finally Preemie!
4455 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :1 - Bad
course comments :This really sucked. By the end, all the lab instructor did was feed us the code. I had no clue what was going on.
class :Spring 2002 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :No attendance policy. I literally forgot where the classroom was 3 months into the semester. Go to the labs and get your stuff done there, then do your best on the (online) tests. They don't count for too much of your grade anyways (I got a D on the final and still got an A+ in the class).
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :He seems like a nice guy. I only went to class twice the whole semester (and I didn't have any prior programming) but from what others told me he was a good guy.
jblee
All American
1262 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :Fortran is better than Java
class :Spring 2002 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :no attendance required.. about 10 people comes each class and class size was 200.. all 200 came when he gave us bonus points
zerus
All American
2575 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :
class :Spring 2001 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :
strandist
New Recruit
1 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :
class :Spring 2001 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :Bad time, the lecture was boring but the labs were easy.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :
Tom Green
All American
1322 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :Ah yeah, it's Fortran. You learn the language, and basic programming concepts across all computer languages.
class :Fall 2000 section 001
grade received :N/A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :Can't really rate this, since the graduate student that semester was the one who taught the class. Honeycutt stood back and let him do most of the stuff ......
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :..... but when Honeycutt DOES step to the front of the room, you have no idea what to expect. Yeah, he might do a LITTLE bit of teaching. Otherwise, he'll go off on the strangest tangents which have nothing to do with the class. It can be a riot, but other times you just walk out scratching your head, trying to figure out why you went to class just to hear the man ramble on. But he is INCREDIBLY nice.
kmrodden
All American
1258 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :ha a joke
class :Fall 2000 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :so easy. no attendence. tests were sorta difficult.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :what a man. haha awesome class!
Magnet
All American
1624 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :useless computer programing
class :Spring 2000 section 001
grade received :B
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :this class was too early, and too boring.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :he's a knowledgable man, but fortran needs to be cut from the course catalogue.
tl
All American
8400 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :
class :Spring 2000 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :
jgibelttil
All American
7565 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :waste of time going to class except for tests, go to lab and you'll do fine
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :boring boring boring, its programming in an old language, how fun can it be?
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :1 - Bad
instructor comments :lets just say he is a walking tangent and misguided conversationist
SupaDave
Veteran
109 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :1 - Bad
course comments :Boring and useless
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :Easy class . . . never went
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :Hes from the stone age but wait on posotive note he'll help you a lot to get a good grade
Wolfpackman
All American
1775 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :The class was pretty easy, although altogether boring. It was required for my major, but other than that I wouldn't really recommend it. But if you need an easy computer language, it's fortran all the way
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :A-
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :The lectures are pretty much useless. I'd go every now and then to see what's on the test. The main thing is the labs!
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Huneycutt is a cool guy. He pretty much makes the tests as easy as possible, and gives you all the chances he can to get a good grade. He's funny and likes to say "hell" and "damn" a lot for some reason.
nonlogic
All American
1252 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :Fortran is teh best!
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :Great policy -- do a hard assignment correctly in the first two weeks and get an A+ for the semester.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Great guy. Willing to help in any way possible.
wolfnuke
All American
875 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :Not too hard. Different from C++, might have to unlearn some things.
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Only went to the class one day and then took his placeout plan. Just have to do two semi-difficult(lots of math) problems for the class and not have to show up for the 8:05 class.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :Good teacher, very understanding. Very entertaining to learn from.
camello2
New Recruit
1 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :FORTRAN is like programming on your calculator.
class :Fall 2002 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :Big lectures, no attendance policy. Three tests, if I recall correctly. You don't even have to attend the labs... you can just do them from your own computer and then stop by to turn 'em in to your TA.
instructor :Honeycutt
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :I don't really know 'cause I never went to class, but he seemed alright.
JP
All American
14168 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :Fairly easy to understand w/ help from TAs.
class :Spring 2003 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :Even with Ds on the midterm and final. 70% of your grade is labs, 20% is the final project(easy as hell), and 10% is midterm and final w/ the extra credit being a possible 12%. Book is somewhat necessary.
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :Boring enough to keep you going to class.....I went through January and went maybe once since.
abrosheen
New Recruit
0 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :I say good, but what I mean is, I only went to ONE DAY of class, so i don't know. The lab, however, was great.
class :Spring 2003 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :Well, I'd say if you can take a class and never go to it, and get an A+, it is an awesome class. There were 2 exams, and they were only FIVE PERCENT of your final grade each. I got a C on one, and a D on the other, and STILL got an A+. They were given online, so, once again, I didn't have to go to class.
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Once again, I'm giving him a good rating because I never had to go to class. I just went to the lab, and learned what i needed there. I hear he's a really nice and funny guy though. Even though I didn't do well on the tests, I still learned the actual programming of fortran well enough to use it correctly.
rallydurham
Suspended
11317 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :If you understand computer science then this is easy... if you dont understand computer science then hope you get an easy TA.
class :Spring 2003 section 001
grade received :B-
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :Class is optional, and by optional I mean no one goes.
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :He's a relatively funny guy and is very nice. The course is 70% lab grade. I made a 0 on the Final Exam and still got a B- overall.
JP
All American
14168 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112L
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :
class :Spring 2003 section 205
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :
instructor :
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :
Gonzo18
All American
2180 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :
instructor :Funderlic
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :some quirks, but a nice guy overall
NoidRoid
All American
7611 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :Not a required course, I was just trying for the easiest availible. I don't think I'll ever use the language again.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A-
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :No attendence policy, lab was 80% of your grade. All you need to do is spend the 3 hours in lab doing the programs with the TA's help. Oh, and don't buy the book.
instructor :Funderlic
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Very cool and funny. Unfortunately I learned absolutely nothing from the lecture until the very end when he helped us with the projects. He was also very understanding when I needed an extension for an assignment, I owe him one.
Byrn Stuff
backpacker
17934 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :most of the stuff you learn in the course is vocab and doesn't have anything really to do with practical programming. that was learned in the labs.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Funderlic was a nice guy, very willing to help out and answer any questions. It's just his class is quite boring and not really although helpful in your programming until the project. The things you learn in class are vocab and the idosyncracies of various variable types and commands. Your TAs will teach you the actual programming in lab. The class is easy if you show up to lab. Attendence is not required for class, but is for lab. The book isn't necessary unless you plan to do the practice prob
instructor :Funderlic
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :Boring but helpful. If you have a problem, he'll try and resolve it and was very active on the messageboard and via e-mail when the project-time came. Don't expect to learn actual programming from him.
KMS06NCSU
Starting Lineup
50 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :I guess this is a little bias, since I have no idea what I'll use programming for as an Education Major.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :I never, ever went to class, just lab. I didn't even buy the book. Did as little work as possible, and still got an A, but mainly because my lab TA rocked!
instructor :Funderlic
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :He's got a dry sense of humor, and doesn't talk about anything that relates to the class during lecture. He admitted to not liking teaching Fortran, so this may be different for higher level courses.
mbp6
All American
858 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :3 - Good
course comments :I've never taken a programming course and I though Fortran was pretty easy and interesting.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :The labs and project were confusing sometimes, but if you went to lab and lecture, then you could find out what the labs and project were all about. All of his notes were online, but were often times hard to follow.
instructor :Funderlic
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :Funderlic was a cool guy. He always liked to crack subtle jokes in lecture and was very helpful.
lecatpuke
Veteran
170 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :1 - Bad
course comments :Ugh. High school programming was more interesting than this. This was easier than high school, as well.
class :Fall 2003 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :1 - Bad
class comments :A large lecture hall for Fortran? A horrible concept and boring lecture material to begin with. Just read the notes on webct and get 100's on your labs, then you're set.
instructor :Funderlic
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :He's still a nice guy--although quite boring. Maybe he'd teach a better class in a smaller class size.
lecatpuke
Veteran
170 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112L
course rating :4 - Awesome
course comments :Didn't attend more than one lab. Easy labs.
class :Fall 2003 section 205
grade received :A+
class rating :4 - Awesome
class comments :Doesn't make you attend if you don't want to, only electronic submits.
instructor :
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :I can only assume he knows his stuff, and he has good grading policies.
Lox Mullet
Starting Lineup
76 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :This class is a joke.
class :Spring 2004 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :I only went to the first lecture. I learned everything I needed to know in the lab while writing the programs.
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :3 - Good
instructor comments :I don't really know anything about him.
laundryeater
New Recruit
19 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :The class could have easily just been a lab.
class :Spring 2004 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :3 - Good
class comments :Hardly anybody goes to class. It may not be a bad idea to drop in every now and then or when the material in lab gets tough. Go to class to learn about the project.
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :4 - Awesome
instructor comments :Really nice, funny, and gave a lot of help on the project.
hood face
New Recruit
30 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :1 - Bad
course comments :dumb class...reallly easy...should be self study
class :Spring 2004 section 001
grade received :A
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :i never went to class...he told us we didnt have to come so i went twice. i just went to lab for like 5 min then did the labs on my own later
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :i dont really know...never went to class
sccrdude1
All American
611 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :The labs were kind of interesting, and it was the only part of the class worth going to.
class :Spring 2004 section 001
grade received :A-
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :Ha, went to class twice, don't know much about him.
Lutz
All American
1084 Posts
user info
course :CSC 112
course rating :2 - Average
course comments :Boring material, no real application for my major but i needed to take it.
class :Spring 2006 section 001
grade received :A+
class rating :2 - Average
class comments :Easy class if you do the work. Labs were 3 hours and took all 3 plus around 1 more for the outlab. 10 random quizzes forced me to get up at 8 AM
instructor :Rodman
instructor rating :2 - Average
instructor comments :Never really talked about fortran in class, liked theory of computation and what not. Seemed like a nice guy tho. CSC is not my favorite subject tho.

© 2013 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.37 - our disclaimer.