Eulogist All American 6261 Posts user info edit post |
and shit 11/6/2001 6:36:07 PM |
Joe Lucky 1902 Posts user info edit post |
not a bad idea. Might be hard to implement w/some people using crazycode and others using straight HTML. 11/6/2001 6:46:09 PM |
GiZZ All American 6982 Posts user info edit post |
what thread doesnt have pictures... 11/6/2001 7:46:25 PM |
Eulogist All American 6261 Posts user info edit post |
this one 11/6/2001 11:22:30 PM |
mdaldrich All American 1564 Posts user info edit post |
what if the person who started topic got to decide whether or not pictures would be allowed?
so that the icon would denote that pictures could be in the thread. (lack of icon would obviously be just text - ignoring ascii pics) 11/7/2001 4:14:35 PM |
FroshKiller All American 51911 Posts user info edit post |
There's a decent idea. How about letting a user decide which users wouldn't be allowed to post, too? 11/7/2001 4:16:17 PM |
Maugan All American 18178 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah I would kind of appreciate a feature like this... I can't count the number of times my boss has been in the room and I'll click on a seemingly innocent thread and a big ole pair a titties will spring up on my screen.
not good. 11/7/2001 4:17:08 PM |
InsaneMan All American 22802 Posts user info edit post |
or just a small link at the top "new mail - logout - profile - pictures: off"
joe Quote : | "not a bad idea. Might be hard to implement w/some people using crazycode and others using straight HTML." |
dont know if this would take too much processing power, but just find the all the "[image]" and "< i m g" and convert them to links or just remove them.
[Edited on November 8, 2001 at 8:42 PM. Reason : wont show half html tags]11/8/2001 8:38:43 PM |
Joe Lucky 1902 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah I know how to do it insaneman Just doing it efficiently since we get 100,000+ pageviews/day is a problem.
*I was referring to the camera icon...I wasn't talking about the pictures on/off thing. I don't like the idea of the topic originator specifying whether pictures are to be allowed. I think that should be more of a user thing.
[Edited on November 9, 2001 at 12:25 PM. Reason : blah] 11/9/2001 11:36:00 AM |
Fireman357 All American 1617 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "what if the person who started topic got to decide whether or not pictures would be allowed?" |
ah, no. a person only creates a thread, then it basically belongs to the users of TWW. besides, it wouldn't allow us to express ourselves as well.
the warning icon is a good idea though. I'd probably check out some threads because of a picture icon with them.
[Edited on November 9, 2001 at 12:12 PM. Reason : l]11/9/2001 11:48:35 AM |
InsaneMan All American 22802 Posts user info edit post |
ya i thought yo shit might not be able to handle it joe.
I really dont give a damn about turning pictures off, but if soembody else does, they should use netscape 3 which i think has an option to turn off pictures. 11/9/2001 11:34:45 PM |
mdaldrich All American 1564 Posts user info edit post |
the idea to let the originator of the thread choose whether images would be allowed was that it might be easier to implement.
i think the best way is the option whether to display images in the message boards or not, but if implementation isnt' easy - the idea shouldn't necessarily be abandoned because the best way won't work. 11/11/2001 6:55:37 PM |
InsaneMan All American 22802 Posts user info edit post |
I think the best way is for those who do not want pictures to use netscape 3 and turn them off from there. 11/11/2001 7:59:10 PM |
mdaldrich All American 1564 Posts user info edit post |
that does not seem like a viable option for those in campus labs. 11/11/2001 10:33:30 PM |