J_Hova All American 30984 Posts user info edit post |
Says T.O.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5053182 11/4/2005 5:25:41 PM |
Ernie All American 45943 Posts user info edit post |
i was gonna post this
gg hova 11/4/2005 5:28:58 PM |
dweedle All American 77386 Posts user info edit post |
i was gonna post
[old] says dweedle
but i couldnt find it posted and remember i read it on ESPN.com a few hours ago 11/4/2005 5:29:55 PM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Favre 11/4/2005 7:18:37 PM |
Quinn All American 16417 Posts user info edit post |
TO DOESNT KNOW SHIT ABOUT FOOTBALL
HE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT VICK 11/4/2005 7:23:30 PM |
J_Hova All American 30984 Posts user info edit post |
hahah my bad
when i was thinkin of how to spell it I said it like Ben Stiller in Something about Mary 11/4/2005 7:54:27 PM |
Sleik All American 11177 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | ""It's just T.O. being T.O. It's just him talking," Rayburn said." |
uh oh... Sam Rayburn just made TO's shit list11/4/2005 11:06:02 PM |
gforce All American 2107 Posts user info edit post |
I would take Favre over McNabb too....it's a no brainer.....but I think McNabb is a good QB... 11/4/2005 11:35:29 PM |
MacGyver Suspended 6745 Posts user info edit post |
TO and Irvin said with Favre, the Eagles would have no losses. And you agree with what he has said. This shows you think a QB can win and lose games. However, when it comes to Vick, you say a QB cant win or lose games. Make up your mind. 11/5/2005 12:37:25 AM |
packboozie All American 17452 Posts user info edit post |
Can we have a sports thread w/o Vick in it? 11/5/2005 12:41:28 AM |
MacGyver Suspended 6745 Posts user info edit post |
Ummm, no. Shaq, Tiger, and Vick are sports. And we all know Vick doesnt play basketball or golf, so he won't be in those threads.
[Edited on November 5, 2005 at 12:43 AM. Reason : .] 11/5/2005 12:43:12 AM |
Stein All American 19842 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "However, when it comes to Vick, you say a QB cant win or lose games. Make up your mind. " |
We're not saying a QB can't.
We're saying Vick doesn't.11/5/2005 2:13:55 AM |
Ernie All American 45943 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "TO and Irvin said with Favre, the Eagles would have no losses. And you agree with what he has said. This shows you think a QB can win and lose games. However, when it comes to Vick, you say a QB cant win or lose games. Make up your mind." |
you
are
a
fucking
idiot
if favre played with the eagles, he wouldn't be winning games by himself. he is a better qb than mcnabb, so the eagles would hypothetically be a better team with favre. naturally, this would mean more victories. favre wouldn't be out there winning games by himself.11/5/2005 10:21:34 AM |
strudle66 All American 1573 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "if favre played with the eagles, he wouldn't be winning games by himself. he is a better qb than mcnabb, so the eagles would hypothetically be a better team with favre. naturally, this would mean more victories. favre wouldn't be out there winning games by himself." |
your logic eludes me11/5/2005 11:55:35 AM |
Ernie All American 45943 Posts user info edit post |
x = no. of eagles wins
mcnabb + eagles = x
favre + eagles = x'
favre > mcnabb
THEREFORE
x' > x 11/5/2005 12:10:11 PM |
strudle66 All American 1573 Posts user info edit post |
^ i was kidding, but thats a very nice proof 11/5/2005 12:31:41 PM |
Sleik All American 11177 Posts user info edit post |
^^
11/5/2005 12:46:32 PM |
mbbruch Veteran 274 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The Eagles have had enough. They suspended Terrell Owens indefinitely for conduct detrimental to the team after his interview with ESPN.com contributor Graham Bensinger." |
On the ESPN.com frontpage
[Edited on November 5, 2005 at 12:52 PM. Reason : ]11/5/2005 12:52:09 PM |