chocolatervh All American 22986 Posts user info edit post |
btw, nikon is pretty much going strickly digital now too... wassup with that? 1/20/2006 11:39:47 AM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
because it's the future? 1/20/2006 11:46:37 AM |
chocolatervh All American 22986 Posts user info edit post |
welp apparently not for minolta.
but i guess nikon feels that the wave of digital overshadows film enough to just pull out of film and stick to straight digital cameras.
minolta just couldn't keep up with all of the technology, who's CCD is bigger rat race. 1/20/2006 12:40:43 PM |
EhSteve All American 7240 Posts user info edit post |
in cameras it's always Nikon this and Canon that.
hardly anyone around here talks about minolta afaik. 1/20/2006 1:00:26 PM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
minolta's been more about medium to high level printers and scanners for years anyway 1/20/2006 1:10:40 PM |
chocolatervh All American 22986 Posts user info edit post |
true, but stopping camera production (besides the dslr thing with sony) all together is kinda crazy... yet HP cameras keep on going...
i'd pick a minolta over a kodak anyday... 1/20/2006 2:08:34 PM |
Docido All American 4642 Posts user info edit post |
When it comes to the higher end (dslr's) no one would buy a HP though. Pretty much same with Minolta.
Its Canon/Nikon >>>>>>> Olympus/Mintolta/Fujifilm etc.
This is hardly a surprise they're quitting. I've never even seen a Minolta point-n-shoot. 1/20/2006 2:42:15 PM |
Protostar All American 3495 Posts user info edit post |
I love those Pentax Optio commericials. Opptio!!!! 1/20/2006 5:40:07 PM |
phildog Veteran 236 Posts user info edit post |
does anyone have some hard evidence about the nikon deal? I heard about it, I would just like to have some hard evidence... 1/20/2006 7:55:09 PM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
what nikon deal? 1/20/2006 8:02:53 PM |
MacGyver Suspended 6745 Posts user info edit post |
I dont even know anyone who uses a non digital camera anymore. 1/20/2006 8:18:57 PM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
I still get better prints from negatives than I do from digital cameras. Camera costs ~700, film is ~2.50 a roll, 20x24 and larger prints have better sharpness and color compared to any camera costing less than 12k. 1/20/2006 8:26:54 PM |
Docido All American 4642 Posts user info edit post |
1/20/2006 9:12:52 PM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.cnn.com/2006/BUSINESS/01/12/nikon.camera.ap/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/01/12/nikon.film.ap/index.html
all it means is that consumers buy a film camera every 5-15 years and a new digital cameras every 2-3 years. there is no need to spend money producing cameras that very few buy when their manufacturing and R&D $$$ can go to new digital cameras.
[Edited on January 20, 2006 at 9:38 PM. Reason : ] 1/20/2006 9:34:00 PM |