[Edited on August 31, 2006 at 10:24 PM. Reason : lk]

[Edited on August 31, 2006 at 10:25 PM. Reason : opener]

[Edited on February 1, 2007 at 11:11 AM. Reason : .]

8/31/2006 10:24:05 PM

could some of those be considered child pornography?

Might want to take those down, not that I'd say anything, but somebody might

8/31/2006 10:25:23 PM

^^Wow...

All the boys have REALLY tiny penises.

8/31/2006 10:27:24 PM

I babysit a for a family and they are pretty...odd. like, make beer in the guest bathtub and have a hookah on the dining room table.
The mom had a giant belly cast made during both of their pregnancies, and they are all glittery and one is covered in feathers and fake gems and the other looks like an african savannah. they also have creepy pictures in one of their family albums, where them and a bunch of other middle aged adults are standing in the backyard...covered in paint...totally naked.

8/31/2006 10:27:43 PM

anyone ever notice the correlation between body fat percentage and affinity for creepy sexual fetishes?

8/31/2006 10:28:27 PM

1. Pregnancy casts. Not that unusual.
2. A bunch of nudists.
3. Hilarious.

8/31/2006 10:28:34 PM

I thought the pregnancy cast thing was kind of cool, actually.

8/31/2006 10:30:27 PM

for some reason, I think it's funny that all the nudists are wearing shoes

8/31/2006 10:31:12 PM

I see nothing wrong with the pregnancy cast

8/31/2006 10:31:20 PM

[Edited on August 31, 2006 at 10:51 PM. Reason : s]

8/31/2006 10:31:31 PM

What the fuck is this shit!?

8/31/2006 10:32:00 PM

That pregnancy cast thing kind of freaks me out...

I'll settle for a photo of the pregnant individual in maternity clothes, thank you.

[Edited on August 31, 2006 at 10:32 PM. Reason : That sounds terrible... Might as well just add FAP FAP FAP to the end of that...]

8/31/2006 10:32:38 PM

The nudists are wearing hats and ankle whohaa things.

8/31/2006 10:35:46 PM

why are there never any hot nudists

8/31/2006 10:36:43 PM

natalie, was the family wiccan

8/31/2006 10:42:18 PM

holly kiddie porn-

8/31/2006 10:43:50 PM

no, they are just....odd. not bad odd, they're really funny. just...eccentric, i guess. the dad is a total new york jew who went to stuyvesant, and got an MD from Duke and works at a Medical Software Company now...and the mom is a "dance therapist". Whatever that is. They don't eat red meat, and their kids are vegetarians (ages 2 and 5). Sam (age 5) is very cute and plays the tiniest violin ever, and someone apparently approached them about him being a child model, but they said no. The other kid, Leo, is just...a baby. He's working on that talking thing. They both joke about being stoned an awful lot, and are in their mid-40s, so they were pretty old when their kids were born.

8/31/2006 10:46:14 PM

uh- ok



?

8/31/2006 10:53:45 PM

do you people understand the difference between porn and pictures of naked people

not that i want to see kids naked but do any of you see those kids fucking, sucking or in the act?

didnt think so.....so its not porn

9/1/2006 12:20:02 PM

correct, it is not porn however I didn't want to misspell "pedophelia" (sp?)..... It is still naked kids and in some sense must not be legal

and gross to boot-

9/1/2006 12:28:11 PM

my only "wtf" thought is you posting the nudist photos considering there are kids in them. as pointed out, it's not pornographic. and i actually don't think it's gross. it's just naked people afterall. still, i don't think it's an appropriate thing to be posting, even on t-dub.

and i can't help but wonder how in the world you came across those. i mean, it looks to be german nudists or something. i doubt even a google image search would come up with those. actually, i'm wondering pregnant woman's casting too. that shit is just random as fuck (not what she's doing, but where you would see the pictures).

[Edited on September 1, 2006 at 12:41 PM. Reason : ]

9/1/2006 12:39:04 PM

agreed on the naked kids, I think once you get past like 5-7 yr olds it stops being cute baby pictures and starts being pedophile.

9/1/2006 12:41:38 PM

it's not pedophillic. they're nudists. they're not getting sexual gratification from seeing naked kids. * i'm assuming there aren't any actual pedophiles in the group, nor is the photographer a pedophile.

[Edited on September 1, 2006 at 12:44 PM. Reason : ]

9/1/2006 12:42:52 PM

Where in the hell are those pics from?

9/1/2006 12:45:02 PM

well if a playboy centerfold is a nudist its still porn

9/1/2006 12:45:17 PM

yeah in the US any naked pics of kids are a no-no

9/1/2006 12:45:20 PM

^^ not every naked image is porn; nor is posing nude always a pornographic act. difference between porn, art, or whatever else is is that porn's aim is to sexually arouse. my interpretation of those photos is that they're not pornographic. still, i just don't think it's wise to display naked kids. although i'd wager the parents of those kids don't find it shameful (not saying it is), i doubt they'd want those photos viewed by people outside their group or other nudists. it's like you taking pictures of a girlfriend, and having it leaked out. you two don't find anything wrong with it, but that shit is meant for you two, not the whole world.

[Edited on September 1, 2006 at 12:54 PM. Reason : ]

9/1/2006 12:49:58 PM

dude- u are arguing that naked pictures of little kids is "ok"... think about that-

Quote :

"prohibit all depictions of nudity of minors, whether or not the minor is depicted in an erotic pose or as engaging in a sex act"

[Edited on September 1, 2006 at 1:16 PM. Reason : .]

9/1/2006 1:07:18 PM

no, i'm arguing that photos of naked kids shouldn't be posted.

oh, i see what you meant. well, i don't think naked kids are a bad thing. i just don't see what the big deal about nudity is. my mom has naked photos of me when i was a baby and toddler; and i don't care. hell, she had a naked baby photo of one of my brothers in a frame on the hallway wall forever, and nobody cared. when i lived in korea until i was 5, and we'd go to the public bathhouses. the bathhouses there, at the time, were segregated by sex. however, mothers were allowed to take their sons under the age of 8 (or somewhere around there) with them to the female side. i don't ever remember being uncomfortable. the last time i was in korea, i was in high school. i went to a public bathhouse a couple of times, and again, i wasn't ever uncomfortable. there were boys and men of all ages, but no one gave a shit. i was only concerned with getting clean, and chillin' in the sauna.

I'M NOT SAYING PEDOPHILIA IS OKAY. I'M NOT SAYING THAT I ENJOY SEEING NAKED KIDS. i'm just saying simple nudity, regardless age, shouldn't be such a big deal to anyone. it complelely depends on how a person is being portrayed, or if they're being exploited. if you feel icky about seeing a nude child, then you may have some issues of your own. do you freak out if a relative changes their child's diapers in front of you? if you see some kid run out of the bathroom butt naked, do you blush? i don't, because my mind isn't polluted with ill thoughts.

with all that said, i still don't think such photos should be posted outside that community, for the simple fact that there are pedophiles out there, and probably even on tww.

[Edited on September 1, 2006 at 1:32 PM. Reason : ]

9/1/2006 1:18:19 PM

everyone's parents take pictures of them when they're babies when they get their first bath and what not. however, a lot of photo lab techs have turned the parents into the cops for saying the pictures were child pornography...this was discussed at great length in a debate-club session

9/1/2006 1:20:14 PM

NOOOO!

NOT NAKED CHILDREN!!

don't you know that their bodies are EVIL

that's the message we have to send out to kids as early as possible

9/1/2006 1:24:14 PM

So if you are a nudist is it awkward if you are just haning out with a bunch of nudists and randomly get a boner?

9/1/2006 1:24:21 PM

that shit would be excellent.... No need for pick up lines on chicks- just walk up and poke that bitch in the belly button

9/1/2006 1:28:00 PM

http://naturacom1ru.53.com1.ru/FotoBig/092.jpg

9/2/2006 7:03:12 PM

I too think the pregnancy casts are kinda neat..... i could have done without the photo in the making but the casts themselves are ...well frankly i think they're interesting art. But hey, that's me.

No comment on the rest.

9/2/2006 7:17:06 PM

its better when you post hot chicks, no more kids, K, thnx

9/2/2006 7:25:35 PM

Quote :

"August 27, 2006 On my birthday... I received a package with the following pictures inside. The first photo is of my son Johnny, shortly after he was kidnapped on Sept. 5th, 1982. He was still wearing the clothing he had on the day he was taken. He is bound and gagged. The second photo is three boys all bound gagged... the boy on the far right is my son, Johnny. We do not have the identity of the other two boys. We are currently working with the police and the National Center for Missing Children in hopes of learning the identity of the other two boys. There are two families who would probably like to have news of their children. If anyone viewing the second photo knows who these boys are, please contact me. Noreen Gosch"

http://www.johnnygosch.com/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14625808/

Quote :

"Photos surface in 1982 missing child case Mother finds them at front door, asks, 'Why are they doing this?' The Des Moines Register file Johnny Gosch is shown in a photo taken shortly before he disappeared on Sept. 5, 1982, while delivering newspapers in West Des Moines, Iowa. Police are examining photographs left Sunday at the front door of Johnny's mother, to determine if they are of the missing boy. Updated: 11:25 p.m. ET Sept 1, 2006 DES MOINES, Iowa - The mother of a boy abducted 24 years ago said she’s bewildered by two photographs left at her front door, apparently showing her son and two other children bound and gagged. The old photos appear to show 12-year-old Johnny Gosch with his mouth gagged and his hands and feet tied. The boy is wearing the same sweatpants Johnny was wearing when he disappeared while delivering newspapers on the morning of Sept. 5, 1982, his mother said. “It’s like reliving it,” Noreen Gosch told The Associated Press on Thursday night. “But the bigger picture is, ’Why are they doing this?’ “Whoever had these photos had them for 24 years. I don’t understand why they would do this now. It must be some kind of message.” Gosch said investigators confirmed the photos were authentic and likely taken within “hours or days” of the abduction. She said they were checking for fingerprints that could lead them to the source and possibly a breakthrough in a case that has long baffled authorities. The other boys in the photo were unidentified. Police checking photos “We are in the process of researching where they came from and whether they’ve been doctored up,” West Des Moines police Lt. Jeff Miller told the Des Moines Register. The Register said it had received digital copies of the photos but would not publish them “because it's not clear where the images came from, whether they are real or who the (other)boys are.” Johnny’s disappearance triggered nationwide fears of child abductions. He was one of the first faces of missing or abducted children to appear on milk cartons across the country. Several theories have developed since he vanished before dawn while delivering Sunday newspapers. His newspaper wagon was discovered near his West Des Moines home, but few substantial clues have surfaced since then. Child pornographers? Gosch believes her son was taken by child pornographers. She told authorities he briefly contacted her in 1997 but feared for his life and declined to give details about where he was. She believes his abductors got him involved in crimes, which is why he is hiding his identity. The National Center for Missing Children is examining the other boys in the photograph and trying to match it with its database of missing children. “These kids have parents someplace,” Gosch said. “I’m sure they feel the same way I did. ... Hopefully we can do some good and give these parents some peace.” Johnny was Gosch’s youngest of three children, and she has devoted her life to finding him, from raising money for private detectives to following her own leads and prodded police to try harder. She also wrote a book called “Why Johnny Can’t Come Home.” © 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed."

[Edited on September 2, 2006 at 7:45 PM. Reason : w]

9/2/2006 7:41:48 PM

^^ yeah i like the cast idea too

9/2/2006 7:42:16 PM

it's a "WTF?!" thread

what did you expect?

9/2/2006 7:42:21 PM

i don't really think that any of that was worth a "WTF"

Pregnancy cast - normal
Nudists - lots of 'em
Hello Kitty Darth Vader - i'm sure there's stranger at Dragon*Con this weekend.

9/2/2006 8:48:18 PM

One of the bigger oddities is the urban camo/spandex reindeer guy.

9/2/2006 9:21:15 PM

wtf

9/2/2006 9:21:49 PM

9/3/2006 4:35:44 PM

those titties are hot yo

9/3/2006 4:49:45 PM

in the nudist picture, I am most freaked out by the santa claus looking preist dude and the guy next to the tree. wtf is he wearing and why?

9/3/2006 4:51:16 PM

^^^that has to be a guy right?

9/3/2006 5:01:08 PM

the girl on the left looks like she had an itch.....

9/3/2006 5:33:33 PM

haha that's funny they wear shoes

9/3/2006 6:32:01 PM

Wtf, those are kids

9/3/2006 6:44:28 PM

very observant

9/3/2006 6:51:47 PM