Im not upset by our recent loses. They are non-conference games, and primarily thats the purpose of them; to fine tune, get the kinks out before conference play. I never said we have a shot at a national title (I said conference contenders). Yes, I still believe this. Its week three and Im still not impressed with acc play.

rallydurham quotes;

Quote :

"This year the ACC is notably stronger."

Boy was he wrong about that. I mean, for a feller who claims they know so much about sports. I thinks he's talking about futbol mexicano. The truth is, the acc is in shambles! You peeps saw what WVU did to maryland (and they were "contenders"?!?). UM and FSU need not to mention. Those are the top three programs right there getting obliterrated.

We lost games to some decent underrated teams also. They are not the "Dukes" or the "early 90's Rutgers' or their conferences. Give me a break. However, our problem lies not with our team but with our play calling in correlation with our talent. Yeah, you can point back to coah Amato. But Id rather point at the OC.

This is the deal. Replacing M. stone is not the answer. We need to call plays that fit our scheme of talent. He is a great qb, reminds me of a Eric Crouch type player. Eric Crouch wasn't a "passer" he was a runner. Same with Stone. He's just not a passer, don't make him be one. When we had Norm Chow, he knew how to use our talent. We have tons of talent, its just not being used correctly.

Now im not going to bash you guys anymore about being a good fan, this or that. You already know where you stand. All I have to say is, when someone is down you guys sure are supportive

9/19/2006 8:51:58 PM

fucking titty shit

9/19/2006 8:54:15 PM

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 8:58 PM. Reason : ]

9/19/2006 8:57:47 PM

GTFO, seriously, GTFO

9/19/2006 8:58:44 PM

i wish this was earl in this video

9/19/2006 8:59:42 PM

I wish I was Andre too!! sweet.

9/19/2006 9:05:52 PM

Quote :

"Im not upset by our recent loses."

How in the fuck could you not be????

9/19/2006 9:14:08 PM

I gave you reasons in my opening statement. I really wish you would read them, or maybe get someone to read them for you.

9/19/2006 9:16:15 PM

you are dumb.

I don't know how else to put it.

9/19/2006 9:17:41 PM

not again

9/19/2006 9:19:03 PM

^^And you are a terrible horrible fan, I don't know how else to put it. Listen, you must have something against me, may I ask what?

9/19/2006 9:20:23 PM

haha

you guys thought i made bad threads

9/19/2006 9:21:18 PM

ra ra yea! go wolfpack! beat bc~

9/19/2006 9:21:32 PM

i'm not a horrible fan. you're just dumb. I don't have anything personal against you besides you calling me a horrible fan, but your intelligence is just lacking.

9/19/2006 9:22:18 PM

cuntbitchassfaggot

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:23 PM. Reason : ^not you]

9/19/2006 9:23:28 PM

please to disregard anything that earl says to anyone.

9/19/2006 9:24:18 PM

How is intelligence displayed im my statement?????????? Please explain to me. I speak nothing but the truth. You're just a person who isn't happy with himself, so how can I expect you to be happy with anything else. You're like Mariah Carey for crying out loud. Quit being a diva!!

9/19/2006 9:24:42 PM

not happy with myself?

this is what i'm talking about, you have no analytical skills yet you keep posting this stuff and you completely lack any trace of logical thinking ability.

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:26 PM. Reason : fhds]

9/19/2006 9:26:18 PM

Quote :

"please to disregard anything that earl says to anyone."

^stop feeding the monster

9/19/2006 9:27:13 PM

i'll do what i wawnt

9/19/2006 9:27:35 PM

Quote :

"Eric Crouch wasn't a "passer" he was a runner. Same with Stone. He's just not a passer, don't make him be one"

Spoken like someone who has NO idea how the dynamics and co-dependencies between the running game and passing game work.

9/19/2006 9:27:43 PM

Quote :

"you have no analytical skills yet you keep posting this stuff and you completely lack any trace of logical thinking ability."

Im really begining to think that you just like amusing yourself. Analytical skills eh? Me breaking down our offense and relaying what the apparent problem is has absolutely nothing to do with analyzing huh?

Logical thinking eh? Making stone a passer, when he's clearly not. Me suggesting that he should be a running qb (option E crouch type) is not being logical. Quit your dad-gom trolling right this second! I am sick of you. I went to the last game!! Did you go? No.


^ you stop while you're ahead. Because you've lost already!!

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:31 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 9:30:19 PM

Quote :

"Those are the top three programs right there getting obliterrated."

\

I guess you just forget about Vtech, Clemson, BC, and Gtech who all are pretty well off this year so far.

and our play calling is not the problem, u dont see screen passes on 3rd and 30 again.

the plays are FINE the OC play calling is FINE, the problem is the correlation between calling the plays and running them properly.

I dont know if you noticed this or not but our D line is virtually gone, therefore our D is the problem.

when u go from being a team that relied on D and just put up enough points to win to a team that has to throw and score points to even contend, thats a tough transition.

/thread and shut up Earl, stop makin threads

9/19/2006 9:32:45 PM

i'm not talking about you "analyzing our offense," more your earlier predictions of us having a year "like 2002."

sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this team is not going to any gator bowl.

I could have told you that before the first game, yet you are still talking that stuff after losing to akron and southern miss.

the ONLY CHANCE we have of having a really good year is if evans is the freaking man, in which case you still suck as you have defended stone so much.

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:37 PM. Reason : hfsd]

9/19/2006 9:35:33 PM

Quote :

"I guess you just forget about Vtech, Clemson, BC, and Gtech who all are pretty well off this year so far."

Next question.

Quote :

"and our play calling is not the problem, u dont see screen passes on 3rd and 30 again."

Next question.

Quote :

"the plays are FINE the OC play calling is FINE, the problem is the correlation between calling the plays and running them properly."

Hello, we're not putting points on the board. Our play calling is NOT fine. We cannot pass the ball, b/c our qb is not a freggin passer!!! If we ran more diverse plays and used the field, things would work. We have a scrambling qb who is just not being used. Point blank.

You guy all have very very very limited sports knowledge. You think Stone is the problem, that sais it all right there!!!

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:40 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 9:38:35 PM

aha, you act like you say "next question" dismissively, but it's really because YOU DON'T HAVE A LEGITIMATE COUNTERPOINT.

you have incredibly limited sports knowledge. you think we will have a gator bowl-esque year. that "sais" it all right there!!!

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:47 PM. Reason : fas]

9/19/2006 9:46:26 PM

False, that was me Drew rosenhaus'ing your weak points.

Geez, they arn't even worthy of counter points because they are so redundant. And they also display your little faith in sports. They also display how you either; don't know the definition of parity or don't know the existense of parity in the world of college sports.

Whenver things arn't going your way, you just result in mutiny.



[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 9:53 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 9:48:58 PM

you can't fucking have your QB scramble when the opposing team loads the box because they don't fucking respect the pass.

why is this so fucking hard for you to grasp?

9/19/2006 9:49:19 PM

STOP ARGUING WITH HIM !!!!!!!!!!






FUCK!!!

9/19/2006 9:51:42 PM

Quote :

"False, that was me Drew rosenhaus'ing your weak points. "

fist of all they weren't my points.

second of all, I'm aware that you were "Drew Rosenhaus'ing," but the points were good and your attempt at wit was just an attempt to compensate for the lack of a legitimate response.

9/19/2006 9:52:03 PM

what the mother heezy

Quote :

"fist of all they weren't my points."

then

Quote :

"but the points were good "

wow

9/19/2006 9:54:56 PM

Ok, i just realized we're arguing with a freshman who owns a gerbil.


This is like debating DLP vs. LCD with an Amish guy.

9/19/2006 10:00:04 PM

now im not agreeing with you earl, but we don't use Stone at all. That is true. maybe if we did as an option style more often or just simply using him to move around more we might have more luck. but the rest of the shit you say is just garabage.

^ROFL awww damn. Hes right

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:01 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 10:00:50 PM

^^^ok? I said they weren't my points, they were someone else's points... are you completely stupid? have you no reading comprehension skills?

or were you referring to my typo? If that's the case I will glady point out your numerous spelling and grammar errors, most of which are NOT typos but idiocy

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:03 PM. Reason : fshd]

9/19/2006 10:01:11 PM

Quote :

"b/c our qb is not a freggin passer!!!"

You just answered your own statement.

Trestman can only do so much.

9/19/2006 10:02:17 PM

stone sure looked nice on that option vs akron

o and

Quote :

"haha you guys thought i made bad threads"

9/19/2006 10:04:33 PM

okay, well then I was talking to whoever wrote them. Jubuckey or whatever his name is. Yeah, my classification and the pets I own have alot to do with my take on sports. Another sign of immaturity from brent-roaders.

My points;

user Stone more effectively, like WVU uses their qb.
don't force him to pass so much, b/c he's not a "good" passer. Note i said GOOD.
spread out the offense with off balance plays

this will take pressure off our defense

we profit.

hey, stateBADfan24 get off my back already. Now you're clearly just trolling. If you cant talk sports man...

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:08 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 10:06:37 PM

yeah or we can put in a QB who can throw a football.

^HOW AM I "CLEARLY" TROLLING?

YOU QUOTED TWO OF MY POSTS ACTING LIKE WHAT YOU POSTED PROVED SOMETHING ABOUT ME, WHEN IT WAS ACTUALLY YOUR MISREADING.

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:09 PM. Reason : GEE]

9/19/2006 10:08:18 PM

did you see the last game?

did ANY of you see the last game?

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:11 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 10:11:28 PM

^^^thats what we've been doing for the past 2 years. only problem is we're not wvu. we dont have olinemen who run 4.7s and hbs who run 4.3s. we have spread the field horizontally with our screens. you just described the trestman offense.

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:12 PM. Reason : nobody saw the last game]

^,^^ get a room, you two

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:16 PM. Reason : dont you wanna come to my hotel]

9/19/2006 10:11:46 PM

^^I saw evans go 8-11 while stone went 10-24.

10-24

10-24

10-24

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:15 PM. Reason : fds]

9/19/2006 10:14:50 PM

were you there? did you ATTEND the game? Stop running from me. Stats don't lie, but the don't tell the whole truth! Now answer the question.

9/19/2006 10:16:57 PM

NO I DID NOT ATTEND THE GAME, BUT 10-24 WITH 2 PICKS IS HORRID. AS IS 36 PASSING YARDS AGAINST A D-1AA SCHOOL

IT'S TIME TO SEE WHAT SOMEONE ELSE CAN DO.

THE COACHES OBVIOUSLY DON'T LIKE YOUR WVU IDEA, SO WE'LL JUST HAVE TO SEE HOW A DIFFERENT QB DOES INSTEAD.

SHUT

UP

AND

DEAL

WITH

IT

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:21 PM. Reason : FHD]

9/19/2006 10:18:24 PM

it is time to see what someone else can do but one of the picks was a perfect throw.


[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:36 PM. Reason : bahaha]

9/19/2006 10:19:46 PM

Quote :

"GTFO, seriously, GTFO"

9/19/2006 10:20:03 PM

^^^ okay, you were not there. So you did not see what was going on. All you did was read the stats and formulated an opinion.

I was there. I saw what happened and I formulated an opinion. Who's more credible?[

and wolfAApack what do you bring to sports talk. I never see you contribute to anything but measly one liners. What is the dealy my man?

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:28 PM. Reason : .]

9/19/2006 10:26:56 PM

it doesn't matter, you being there does not change the fact that stone was ~40% while evans was >72%. you cannot tell me some shit like stone was only 10-24 because there were 14 dropped passes.

you seeing stone at one more game than me does not make you a stone expert.

the fact is, this is a 1-2 team that obviously needs a change.

STONE IS 0-2 AGAINST REAL OPPONENTS THIS YEAR

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:34 PM. Reason : HFDS]

9/19/2006 10:29:32 PM

Quote :

"This is the deal. Replacing M. stone is not the answer. We need to call plays that fit our scheme of talent. He is a great qb, reminds me of a Eric Crouch type player. Eric Crouch wasn't a "passer" he was a runner. Same with Stone. He's just not a passer, don't make him be one."

you moron...eric crouch had one major thing marcus stone will never have.

AN OFFENSIVE LINE.

dont compare our shitty players w/ questionable heismann winners, its an insult to them (the heismann winners).

9/19/2006 10:41:34 PM

oh fuck

[Edited on September 19, 2006 at 10:49 PM. Reason : damn he was so close i want it back]

9/19/2006 10:48:51 PM

Quote :

"aha, you act like you say "next question" dismissively, but it's really because YOU DON'T HAVE A LEGITIMATE COUNTERPOINT."

Actually, sadly he does have a point here. EVERYONE is saying the ACC is the weakest BCS conference from top to bottom and there are no legitimate title contenders. VT is good, but I haven't seen anything to show me they are a Top 5-6 team...

State is still going to get killed but this is certainly a down year in conference..

9/19/2006 10:51:47 PM