salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Nations Historically Consist of Racially and Culturally Homogeneous Populations
For starters, think about the Jewish state of "Israel." It is a nation founded as a homeland for racial "Jews." Think about nations like China and Japan, which have historically restricted virtually all immigration into their lands in order to preserve their racial and cultural identity.
Historically, nations have always consisted of racially homogenous populations. Mixing the races only results in societal discord, conflict, and ultimately war and separatist movements...(including present racial/ethnic separatist movements in the Balkans, Iraq, and other places all over the world).
"Supremacy" vs. Separatism & Mere Survivalism
Supremacy and separatism are two different concepts. Separatists simply want to live among their own people apart from other races. It has nothing to do with ruling over or subjecting people of other races.
Furthermore, given the current low white birthrates worldwide along with massive non-white immigration into white homelands, white separatism and nationalism is primarily concerned with the very survival of the white race as we know it. How is it wrong to want your own kindred and family to surive? Those opposed to white separatism and nationalism are actually alligning themselves with a position that effectively is against the survival of the white race.
Cries of "Racism" and smear-by-association tactics
So-called "racism" is not the great evil that the establishment & media would have you believe. When you stop to think of it, "racism" is nothing more than concern for your own family and kindred. Furthermore, it is only wrong (according to the standards of the Jewish-controlled media) for whites to show pride or concern for their own people. It is perfectly acceptable for every other race to do so.
In order to smear those who advocate white separatism and those opposed to non-white immigration and race-mixing, the ruling Jewish interests create and/or control various "false opposition" groups. These groups advocate many otherwise legitimate positions, such as white separatism, opposition to non-white immigration, and opposition to race-mixing. In order to tarnish these legitimate beliefs, many illegitimate and notably ridiculous doctrines/beliefs are incorporated into the belief structure of the groups, such as elements of occultism, promotion of national socialism (ie, "Nazism"), and veneration of the Jewish stooge Adolf Hitler.
Furthermore, the literature, marches, and other things produced by these controlled/false opposition groups are intentionally of poor quality. Finally, the Jewish-controlled mainstream media, television, and Hollywood hypes, makes reference to, and demonizes these groups when discussion of certain issues come up....even when these groups have very small memberships and are virtually of no consequence on the national scene. The intention of frequently referring to these groups is clearly to demonize by association those who hold legitimate beliefs such as white separatism, opposition to non-white immigration, and opposition to race-mixing.
Massive Non-White Immigration as Attempted Genocide Against the White Race
Notice that it is only the Western white nations that are forced to accept massive levels of foreign immigration. The non-white nations are not forced to accept massive foreign immigration into their lands. Despite the opposition of the vast majority of the indigenous white populations, their (Jewish/Zionist-controlled) governments are forcing them to accept massive levels of non-white immigration. This is specifically designed to weaken these nations, and to reduce the white population via race-mixing.
The Bottom Line
Massive non-white immigration and race-mixing pose the biggest threat to the survival of the white race. The white peoples of the world have every right to live among themselves in countries of their own separate from the other races. There can be no serious question as to that. It is legitimate by every measure.
10/24/2006 12:37:53 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
WHITE POWER!
10/24/2006 12:39:14 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
You should just pm Mr Joshua, he is the only one that is going to respond to this shit. 10/24/2006 12:40:17 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Meanwhile, the mainstream media glorifies the black power & black panther movements...giving legitimacy to non-white organizations and movements designed to increase the power of hispanics, asians, blacks, etc.
Obvious double standard? Of course not!10/24/2006 12:42:47 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
i agree theres a double standard
i dont think the mainstream media glorifies black panther movements though 10/24/2006 12:44:24 PM |
marko Tom Joad 72828 Posts user info edit post |
i think they cover it cause they think it's cute 10/24/2006 12:45:23 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Meanwhile, the mainstream media glorifies the black power & black panther movements...giving legitimacy to non-white organizations and movements designed to increase the power of hispanics, asians, blacks, etc." |
But media about how whites currently dominate, and will continue to dominate, everything is pretty boring and I wouldn't want to see that shit on my TV.10/24/2006 12:46:11 PM |
Dentaldamn All American 9974 Posts user info edit post |
black power to overcome oppresion = white power to...have a party?
which one is silly 10/24/2006 12:47:25 PM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the Jewish stooge Adolf Hitler." |
10/24/2006 12:52:42 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "i dont think the mainstream media glorifies black panther movements though" |
How about ESPN (recenlty) and others in the media praising the two black American medal winners who gave the black-power salute during the national anthem at the Olympics in Mexico City in 1968?10/24/2006 12:52:50 PM |
Dentaldamn All American 9974 Posts user info edit post |
that was because black peopel were getting the shit beat out of them in the streets by cops.
HISSSSSSSSSSTORRRRRRRRY BOOKSSSS
oh right the jews wrote all the history books.
bummer 10/24/2006 12:54:13 PM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
I'm really fond of his use of the word "extinction" as though at some point the remaining white people would simply be killed off, denied the chance to reproduce either with each other or with people from other races. 10/24/2006 12:55:11 PM |
30thAnnZ Suspended 31803 Posts user info edit post |
YEAH! FUCK PEOPLE WHO WANT CIVIL RIGHTS!!!!
YEAH!!!! 10/24/2006 12:55:14 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "How about ESPN (recenlty) and others in the media praising the two black American medal winners who gave the black-power salute during the national anthem at the Olympics in Mexico City in 1968? " |
1968 huh
so your evidence of something happening right now is an instance of something from 38 years ago10/24/2006 12:57:22 PM |
jwb9984 All American 14039 Posts user info edit post |
like WMDs i guess 10/24/2006 12:58:12 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
i dont think we have any CIA intelligence that tipped us off about some Olympians in the 60s existing or not existing in the 21st century
you know if you really really try, you might actually be able to come up with a worse analogy 10/24/2006 1:01:01 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Here's my question to those adverse to white nationalism and the idea of racial separatism....
Do not whites have the right--as every other race of people apparantly has--to have countries of their own and to look out for the interests of their own people?
Or must whites submit to (in effect) genocide by having their countries overrun with hoardes of non-whites? 10/24/2006 1:01:37 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Or must whites submit to (in effect) genocide by having their countries overrun with hoardes of non-whites?" |
Do I have to fuck a non white? I'm pretty sure I can still bwn down with a whitey. Get this genocide shit out of your vocabulary in this thread.10/24/2006 1:14:35 PM |
GrumpyGOP yovo yovo bonsoir 18191 Posts user info edit post |
Explain to me how having Mexicans come into the country kills white people. Please. 10/24/2006 1:19:09 PM |
RedGuard All American 5596 Posts user info edit post |
Whites have Europe. The Native Americans used to have the American continent. Seems someone spoiled that "right" for them. 10/24/2006 1:20:11 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Whites have Europe." |
Not for much longer at the current rate.10/24/2006 1:37:59 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Not for much longer at the current rate." |
How much longer are we talking here until all whites are genocided out of existence?10/24/2006 1:39:54 PM |
TreeTwista10 minisoldr 148441 Posts user info edit post |
salisburyboy i think there are double standards, probably because whites have been in power lately, therefore if you offend them, "hey at least they are still in power, they wont get as offended as some other people"
but theres a big difference in simply pointing out some of those things, and going over the top to some genocidal type accusations
btw ethnic women are hot 10/24/2006 1:42:25 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Here's an excellent article on the myth of the benefits of "diversity" (ie, massive non-white immigration into formerly white countries):
The Myth of Diversity http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/10/the_myth_of_div.php 10/24/2006 1:45:16 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "How much longer are we talking here until all whites are genocided out of existence?" |
10/24/2006 1:51:00 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Notice that it is only the Western white nations that are forced to accept massive levels of foreign immigration. The non-white nations are not forced to accept massive foreign immigration into their lands." |
People follow jobs and money. This has nothing to do with race. Sadly, the vast majority of developed countries are "white", although migration happens in every part of the world. I wish that you would actually do some research into socioeconomics instead of just pulling theories out of your ass.
By the way:
Whats up with the ethnic women in your cute little collages?
Are you some kind of race traitor?10/24/2006 1:52:48 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Do not whites have the right--as every other race of people apparantly has--to have countries of their own and to look out for the interests of their own people? " |
What do you mean by "white"? I know that Germany has very strict immigration policies, as well as some Scandinavian countries. I think when you say white, you're referring to "white" americans, which is funny b/c "white" americans are mostly mixed in race as well.10/24/2006 1:54:57 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "How much longer are we talking here until all whites are genocided out of existence?" |
Speaking of that, here's an article I just happened upon...
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2006/10/17/dont_it_make_my_blue_eyes_brown/
Quote : | "Don't it make my blue eyes brown
Americans are seeing a dramatic color change
By Douglas Belkin The Boston Globe October 17, 2006
[...]
Once a hallmark of the boy and girl next door, blue eyes have become increasingly rare among American children. Immigration patterns, intermarriage, and genetics all play a part in their steady decline. While the drop-off has been a century in the making, the plunge in the past few decades has taken place at a remarkable rate.
About half of Americans born at the turn of the 20th century had blue eyes, according to a 2002 Loyola University study in Chicago. By mid-century that number had dropped to a third. Today only about one 1 of every 6 Americans has blue eyes, said Mark Grant, the epidemiologist who conducted the study." |
Race-mixing destroys the white race. Nordic characteristics (eg, blond hair and blue eyes) are destroyed when whites mix with non-whites. That is how the white race (as we know it) could be destroyed.10/24/2006 1:56:57 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
I'm not understanding your point here.....I have blue eyes. I'm predominantly Irish/German with who knows what else....so i'm mixed in race. 10/24/2006 2:03:16 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
I don't have blue eyes. Does that mean that I'm not a part of the white race? 10/24/2006 2:03:23 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
^exactly.....what is the "white" race? 10/24/2006 2:06:19 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Whats up with the ethnic women in your cute little collages?
Are you some kind of race traitor?" |
Having a picture of someone in your gallery hardly means you want to mate and raise children with them.
Quote : | "I'm predominantly Irish/German with who knows what else....so i'm mixed in race." |
Irish, Germans, English, & Scandinavians are kindred peoples. They are all part of the white/Nordic race. It is akin to whites in North Carolina, Tennesee, Virginia, California, etc....people of the same racial type, but separated by national/state boundaries.10/24/2006 2:07:16 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
i'm failing to see the problem here.... 10/24/2006 2:07:48 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Having a picture of someone in your gallery hardly means you want to mate and raise children with them." |
Then why is she there? Are you attracted to the physical characteristics of non-whites?
by the way:
Quote : | "I don't have blue eyes. Does that mean that I'm not a part of the white race?" |
10/24/2006 2:09:44 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
i have blue eyes! but brown hair my infestation has begun...... 10/24/2006 2:11:14 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
I just want a straight up definition of the white race 10/24/2006 2:12:22 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
i'll bet that his definition mentions the lost tribes of israel 10/24/2006 2:15:02 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Racial separatism is supported by the Bible...
God Commands Racial Segregation and Purity for Israelites
God commanded the Israelites to maintain their racial purity and not intermix with other races, including a commandment that a "bastard" (ie, person of mixed race) could not be one of His people.
NOTE: Biblical and archaelogical evidence supports the fact that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples of European descent are the true descendants of the Israelites.
Do you think that those old laws (which existed in America until the 1960s) forbidding interracial marriage and requiring racial segregation were just the product of "backward thinking"? Do you not think they had legitimate reasons and a perhaps a religious basis for such strong beliefs?
Deuteronomy 7:3 "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son."
Exodus 33:16 "So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth."
Deuteronomy 23:2 "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD."
Ezra 9:2 "For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the HOLY SEED have MIXED themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this TRESPASS ."
Nehemiah 9:2 "And the seed of Israel separated themselves from all STRANGERS and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers."
Nehemiah 13:3 "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the MIXED multitude."
Hosea 5:7 "They have dealt treacherously against YAHWEH: for they have begotten STRANGE children:"
Note: "Strangers" above in Nehemiah 9:2 is from the Hebrew word "nekar" (meaning "a foreigner" or an "alien"). And the word "strange" from Hosea 5:7 is from the Hebrew word "zuwr" meaing "a foreigner." "Bastard" in Deuteronomy 23:2 is the Hebrew word "mamzer", which means "a mongrel i.e. born of an Israelite father and a heathen mother."
If you don't believe me, check in Strong's Concordance and a Hebrew/Greek lexicon.
Strong's Concordance: http://www.tgm.org/bible.htm Hebrew and Greek Lexicon: http://www.eliyah.com/lexicon.html 10/24/2006 2:18:18 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
if God won't have you b/c of something you as an individual have no control of, I really don't want to be a part of that anyway.
btw...the bible has been used to quasi prove some pretty stupid things over the course of history. 10/24/2006 2:22:11 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Do you think that those old laws (which existed in America until the 1960s) forbidding interracial marriage and requiring racial segregation were just the product of "backward thinking"? " |
How does the fact that something was done in the past give it legitimacy? Thats like arguing that bleeding patients is a valid medical procedure simply because it was done in the past.
Quote : | "Biblical and archaelogical evidence supports the fact that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and kindred peoples of European descent are the true descendants of the Israelites." |
It really doesn't. A number of people tried to skew archaelogical evidence in order to give their feelings of white supremacy some sort of scientific/historical background. I'm surprised that people like you still buy into race propoganda from the 19th century.
What historical evidence do you have that proves that the bible is accurate? As much as you piss and moan about other people not questioning what they are told, you really buy into an old book wholeheartedly.
Also:
Quote : | "Are you attracted to the physical characteristics of non-whites?
I don't have blue eyes. Does that mean that I'm not a part of the white race?" |
Do you have blue eyes?10/24/2006 2:26:33 PM |
Waluigi All American 2384 Posts user info edit post |
So what exactly would your ideal America be like as far as race mixing and separation, sals? 10/24/2006 2:30:09 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Do you want to get rid of all of the black people? 10/24/2006 2:30:47 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
On a related note, all of the different races are NOT related by blood (ie, did not come from a common ancestor). It is impossible for Adam and Eve (or some other common ancestor) to have birthed pure-blooded black, white, and asian offspring. The black, white, and asian races (in their pure-blooded states...absent any mixing among the races) are of completely different lineage. They were created separately, and are like different "species" of human kind.
The Bible confirms this fact. There were other people on the earth before Adam was created. That is why Cain feared other people would kill him when he was banished from the garden of Eden, and how Cain was able to find a wife, have his own descendants, and build a city after being banished.
Who are the descendants of Adam then? I believe it is the white races. The word "Adam" in the Hebrew is "aw-dam'", which means "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy".
See for yourself in Strong's Hebrew Lexicon here: http://www.eliyah.com/cgi-bin/strongs.cgi?file=hebrewlexicon&isindex=Adam
Further, this makes logical sense when you consider that the white (or part white) peoples have been those originally (and still primarily) concerned with the Abrahamic & Old Testament traditions. The black, asian, and indian races were not concerned with it for the greater part of history until very recently.
The "mainstream" Judaized "Christian" churches teach the lie that all humans came from Adam. This is a central basis/foundation for the promotion of race-mixing, and the diversity/multicult melting pot ("one world") propaganda. 10/24/2006 2:35:05 PM |
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
HEIL!!!!!!!!!! 10/24/2006 2:37:13 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Why can't you answer questions?
Quote : | "It is impossible for Adam and Eve (or some other common ancestor) to have birthed pure-blooded black, white, and asian offspring." |
If you want to continue with this, please prove that Adam and Eve were real people and not just an amalgamation of other creation myths that existed prior to Christianity. You're basing every part of your argument on a book that is thousands of years old and has extremely questionable origins.10/24/2006 2:37:32 PM |
salisburyboy Suspended 9434 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Cries of "Racism" and smear-by-association tactics" |
10/24/2006 2:39:28 PM |
umbrellaman All American 10892 Posts user info edit post |
PRAISE WHITE JESUS!!!1
10/24/2006 2:40:07 PM |
agentlion All American 13936 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "The black, white, and asian races (in their pure-blooded states...absent any mixing among the races) are of completely different lineage. They were created separately, and are like different "species" of human kind.
The Bible confirms this fact. There were other people on the earth before Adam was created. That is why Cain feared other people would kill him when he was banished from the garden of Eden, and how Cain was able to find a wife, have his own descendants, and build a city after being banished." |
wow, that is awesome10/24/2006 2:40:35 PM |
Mr. Joshua Swimfanfan 43948 Posts user info edit post |
Bitch bitch bitch. However you have no problem calling others names.
Back to business:
Why can't you answer questions?
Quote : | "It is impossible for Adam and Eve (or some other common ancestor) to have birthed pure-blooded black, white, and asian offspring." |
If you want to continue with this, please prove that Adam and Eve were real people and not just an amalgamation of other creation myths that existed prior to Christianity. You're basing every part of your argument on a book that is thousands of years old and has extremely questionable origins.
Quote : | "They were created separately, and are like different "species" of human kind." |
Different species can't interbreed. This disproves your theory.
You yourself are attracted to non-whites. From a biological perspective this is your recognition that Adriana Lima is a potential mate.
[Edited on October 24, 2006 at 2:44 PM. Reason : .]10/24/2006 2:40:50 PM |
State409c Suspended 19558 Posts user info edit post |
Will this thread make it to 50 pages before I get this questioned answered
Quote : | "How much longer are we talking here until all whites are genocided out of existence?" |
10/24/2006 2:42:26 PM |