aaronburro Sup, B 53068 Posts user info edit post |
pretty self explanatory. How the heck can I figure out what version of IGMP a router is implementing? 1/22/2007 2:29:30 PM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
If it's a cisco router use "show ip igmp interface"
R1# show ip igmp interface Ethernet1 is up, line protocol is up Internet address is 192.168.9.3/24 IGMP is enabled on interface Current IGMP version is 2 CGMP is disabled on interface IGMP query interval is 60 seconds IGMP querier timeout is 120 seconds IGMP max query response time is 10 seconds Last member query response interval is 1000 ms Inbound IGMP access group is not set IGMP activity: 22 joins, 18 leaves Multicast routing is enabled on interface Multicast TTL threshold is 0 Multicast designated router (DR) is 192.168.9.5 IGMP querying router is 192.168.9.3 (this system) Multicast groups joined (number of users): 224.0.1.40(1) ]]1/22/2007 3:12:21 PM |
pmcassel All American 1553 Posts user info edit post |
*whip*
^Back to the queue. 1/22/2007 5:08:08 PM |
aaronburro Sup, B 53068 Posts user info edit post |
let's assume it's not a cisco router... how can I get to such a console for a consumer router? 1/22/2007 8:44:32 PM |
Bakunin Suspended 8558 Posts user info edit post |
through the power of imagination 1/22/2007 8:50:25 PM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
what consumer router is even capable of routing multicast? 1/22/2007 10:11:26 PM |
aaronburro Sup, B 53068 Posts user info edit post |
that's what i'm tryna figure out 1/22/2007 10:12:06 PM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
as far as your console question, I've never seen a consumer router with a CLI, just a web interface.
And even then, the ones that do more than just NAT simply have support for RIP and not much else. it's more a firewall than a true router. 1/22/2007 10:22:20 PM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "what consumer router is even capable of routing multicast" |
linksys WRT54GL, (~$70) with third-party open source firmware.1/24/2007 8:26:14 AM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
link? 1/24/2007 9:05:32 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
Linksys makes the WRT54G wireless router. the firmware has been open-source to comply with the GPL
so thirdparties have been making some awesome firmware for it. I like DD-WRT
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
there are others
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRT54G
later versions of the "G" series have decreased flash memory and changed OS, thus making it more difficult to use third party firmware, and more chances you'll brick the router when trying to upgrade.
i suggest you spend about 10 more dollars on the "GL" version which has more flash and the OS is based on the linux kernel. 1/26/2007 12:42:58 AM |
Earl Suspended 1374 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "i suggest you spend about 10 more dollars on the "GL" version which has more flash and the OS is based on the linux kernel. " |
100% correct in my book.
[Edited on January 26, 2007 at 2:00 AM. Reason : Man I <3 routers]1/26/2007 1:55:56 AM |
Bakunin Suspended 8558 Posts user info edit post |
even if you do flash the WRT54 it's still a piece of shit that crashes every other hour 1/26/2007 8:34:48 AM |
TypeA Suspended 3327 Posts user info edit post |
My L has been up for a couple of weeks now witth dd-wrt running on it. 1/26/2007 8:37:49 AM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
^^^^
Still nothing about routing multicast. I googled the shit out of this, and can find no reference to the ability for a linksys router to route multicast. I seriously doubt that a linksys router has enough horsepower to run PIM, act as an RP, perform RPF checks on every multicast packet coming in, etc. The ASICs certainly don't support it, and the CPU and memory are not enough to handle it. 1/26/2007 9:30:00 AM |
brentron2000 New Recruit 14 Posts user info edit post |
Agree with Bobby here. Not sure why you would want to do this anyway as the multicast would be limited to your internal network. There is not much value in multicast to MOST home users unless they are the proud administrator of a 100 node wireless network and need to use ghost to upgrade everything at the same time 1/26/2007 10:32:31 AM |
joe_schmoe All American 18758 Posts user info edit post |
oh, well.
guess i need to look up wtf multicast really means.
still, its a good wireless router. 1/26/2007 8:16:48 PM |
cdubya All American 3046 Posts user info edit post |
The only multicast functionality that you'll traditionally need out of a C-PE router is IGMP proxy/snooping. An upstream multicast filter (for non IGMP traffic) is also a feature sometimes sought out by service providers. 1/27/2007 11:49:27 AM |