Boone All American 5237 Posts user info edit post |
I thought I had heard of this somewhere, but now I can't find any info.
Two drives partitioned in two.
Partitions from each drive make a RAID 0, the other partitions from each drive make a RAID 1.
So say you had two 100gb drives, you could have a 100gb RAID 0, and a 50gb RAID 1. 9/13/2007 11:37:43 AM |
Prospero All American 11662 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/matrixstorage_sb.htm
Quote : | "For those users who wish to combine the benefits of two RAID levels, matrix RAID is the solution. When using two hard drives, matrix RAID allows RAID 0 and RAID 1 functions to be combined," |
[Edited on September 13, 2007 at 11:48 AM. Reason : /]9/13/2007 11:45:27 AM |
Boone All American 5237 Posts user info edit post |
Thanks for the answer. It turns out that my mobo doesn't support that option.
So. I have a large, constantly shifting media collection on my drive. I just got a new, identical drive. I don't play games with this PC anymore, but speed is still appreciated. Should I:
A) Keep my system files on one drive and my media files on another B) RAID 0 the drives, and have everything
It really boils down to: is formatting and reinstalling all my stuff worth the performance gain of a RAID array if I'm only using it for Office and CS3? 9/14/2007 5:26:17 PM |
Shaggy All American 17820 Posts user info edit post |
A.
And the performance increases of raid 0 are debatable. And totally not worth it if you're storing any important data since it increases your chances of data loss. 9/14/2007 5:36:58 PM |