User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » the problem with independents... Page [1]  
drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

there would be too many different independent candidates to win president

10/31/2007 4:55:13 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148127 Posts
user info
edit post

you sure you're ready to be a mod?

10/31/2007 4:56:09 PM

392
Suspended
2488 Posts
user info
edit post

isn't there an Independent Party?

(not national though)

10/31/2007 5:02:38 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

yeah but it doesnt seem like you can make an independent cause there would be so many random ones vying for it

i wish there was a good independent that could threaten the dem/repub

10/31/2007 5:05:44 PM

beatsunc
All American
10731 Posts
user info
edit post

i thought your were going to say that clinton won with 43% of popular vote

10/31/2007 5:09:22 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

if i posted that i dont remember it

i think i'm really gonna think about it a long time this election year

it will be my first time voting since i've been able to

10/31/2007 5:14:08 PM

agentlion
All American
13936 Posts
user info
edit post

having a single "Independent" party is retarded, because by definition, they don't fit well in a group.

But it is entirely possible to have multiple smaller parties where people can much more closely fit their own beliefs to their party.

Germany, for example, has 5 parties that each have >8% representation in the parliament
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Germany#The_parties

France has too many parties to count, but they pretty much have to form Right/Left alliances to get anything done
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_France#Nationwide_parties

10/31/2007 5:41:14 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

so its super liberal in france?

10/31/2007 5:46:10 PM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

Because president is the only elected position in the United States.

10/31/2007 7:55:58 PM

RedGuard
All American
5596 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"having a single "Independent" party is retarded, because by definition, they don't fit well in a group.

But it is entirely possible to have multiple smaller parties where people can much more closely fit their own beliefs to their party."


Makes sense though in the end, when the governing alliances form, I imagine that they will look much like the Democratic and Republican Party we see today.

10/31/2007 9:31:40 PM

spöokyjon

18617 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"France has too many parties to count, but they pretty much have to form Right/Left alliances to get anything done"

Isn't this the case in a lot of parliamentary systems? I really don't know, I'm asking.

p.s. this thread has super retard strength.

10/31/2007 10:06:59 PM

drunknloaded
Suspended
147487 Posts
user info
edit post

your mom has stupid retard strength troll

[Edited on November 1, 2007 at 3:11 AM. Reason : j/k]

11/1/2007 3:11:25 AM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » the problem with independents... Page [1]  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.