NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
you's a hoe ?
o
you's a pimp ?
10 guys or more ? Girl, then you's a hoe
10 girls or more ? Guy, then you's a pimp 11/9/2007 2:09:28 PM
|
chembob Yankee Cowboy 27011 Posts user info edit post |
![](images/rolleyes.gif)
11/9/2007 2:09:50 PM
|
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
lol 10 girls 11/9/2007 2:10:09 PM
|
NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
this applies to guys under 22. You old fucks 11/9/2007 2:11:29 PM
|
pilgrimshoes Suspended 63151 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "this applies to guys under 22. You old fucks" |
(i think ive had more girls since 22 than before 22. )] 11/9/2007 2:13:25 PM
|
jackleg All American 170962 Posts user info edit post |
lets play hypothetical
lets say i have 10 and i am therefore a "pimp" - and ive dated girls who have engaged in more one night stands than i have had sex partners. would that make them "super hos" ot what?
i think the numbers are too low for the 21st century, unfortunately. 11/9/2007 2:15:21 PM
|
Sputter All American 4550 Posts user info edit post |
maybe he means all at once 11/9/2007 2:18:04 PM
|
NyM410 J-E-T-S 50085 Posts user info edit post |
Who cares?? As long as the girl is clean, not loose as a canyon and into you, why does it matter?
If I meet a girl, I can honestly care less about how many guys she has slept with if she meets the above..
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:20 PM. Reason : x] 11/9/2007 2:19:27 PM
|
NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
what the hell..... I think 10 girls is plenty to be considered a pimp, or 10 guys to be considered a hoe.
Although, I know a lot of girl with 10+ guys. And only a couple guys with 10+ girls.
^ true true. but its still unsettling to know that your girl fucked 20+ guys. you know, its like the " she's sucked 37 dicks " kinda thing.
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:23 PM. Reason : x]
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:24 PM. Reason : x] 11/9/2007 2:20:29 PM
|
jackleg All American 170962 Posts user info edit post |
also, i think the word for males that you're looking for would be gigolo or something like that. like deuce bigalow. which was one of the funniest movies i ever saw (while having low expectations going in)
cause pimps are the dudes that market the hos, ya know. and im not sure they all get to test the merchandise, so i dont think you can assume they're getting lots of coug
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:24 PM. Reason : missed a word!] 11/9/2007 2:23:20 PM
|
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
10 is not that many
for anyone in the grand scheme of things
wait until you're 25... then wait until you're 30
by the time you're 25 you won't even ask a girl how many dudes she's been with 11/9/2007 2:25:06 PM
|
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
What will y'all say once quality virtual sex becomes an option? 11/9/2007 2:28:20 PM
|
NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
i dont think the numbers are that high for the majority of people.
then again, im not a good looking guy and ive been with 6. But then again, I know guys who are better looking but are still virgins.
And really.... you think 10 is too low? Damn 11/9/2007 2:28:20 PM
|
pilgrimshoes Suspended 63151 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "by the time you're 25 you won't even ask a girl how many dudes she's been with" |
and never, ever ask how many poles she's smoked 11/9/2007 2:30:11 PM
|
StillFuchsia All American 18941 Posts user info edit post |
^^So you're trying to tell us you have low standards? Okay, good for you.
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:30 PM. Reason : .] 11/9/2007 2:30:29 PM
|
NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
^ dont get your hopes up. 11/9/2007 2:33:00 PM
|
StillFuchsia All American 18941 Posts user info edit post |
hahahahaha
aside from the fact that I'm not a slut, you know I'd never sleep with you 11/9/2007 2:33:34 PM
|
sylvershadow All American 7051 Posts user info edit post |
do you know how easy it is for an attractive girl to get laid? Or how hard it is to find a decent guy to date steadily? Or even just to find a guy who's decent at sex to be fuck buddies with.
Yes, 10 is too low, especially during college years. maybe 10/yr is "ho"ish.
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:38 PM. Reason : kj] 11/9/2007 2:34:18 PM
|
wlb420 All American 9053 Posts user info edit post |
The only thing that changes between the time you don't know and the time you do know is your level of insecurity.....sig. other is the same, sex is the same, but you're different....if you really care that much, you'd better get married with the quickness, cause it won't get any better the older you get. 11/9/2007 2:35:18 PM
|
NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
^^^darling, dont get your hopes up. you exceed the weight limit to ride this.
Sorry,
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:35 PM. Reason : x] 11/9/2007 2:35:18 PM
|
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Or even just to find a guy girl who's decent at sex to be fuck buddies with. " |
11/9/2007 2:35:45 PM
|
pilgrimshoes Suspended 63151 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Yes, 10 is too low, especially during college years. maybe 10/yr is "ho"ish." |
holy crap
10/year?
so
from 18->25, nailing 68 dudes is ok?
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:36 PM. Reason : e] 11/9/2007 2:36:18 PM
|
NC86 All American 9134 Posts user info edit post |
good god sylvershadow... you must be a super hoe 11/9/2007 2:36:46 PM
|
NyM410 J-E-T-S 50085 Posts user info edit post |
Haha. I wonder what the probability is that you get multiple VDs nailing 68 different people on a 7 year period.
I know some people who have far outdone that 10/yr in that age set... and they all have had multiple VDs..
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:38 PM. Reason : x] 11/9/2007 2:37:19 PM
|
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
Yes, STDs are a problem.
One of the many reasons why virtual sex will be better. 11/9/2007 2:39:09 PM
|
pwrstrkdf250 Suspended 60006 Posts user info edit post |
no, virtual sex will not be better
and no one cares about it but you 11/9/2007 2:40:06 PM
|
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
And Ray Kurzweil. 11/9/2007 2:41:16 PM
|
jackleg All American 170962 Posts user info edit post |
yep, anyone i knew who had more than 5 or so per year has had a VD or 2.
mine is actually pretty low. i think i'm still under 10 and i'll be 30 in... 10 months. i tend to pick girls that i really like and stick with em for a while, if at all possible. WHICH MEANS THAT IN SHEER VOLUME OF SEX, I WIN!!!1
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:42 PM. Reason : ha ha] 11/9/2007 2:42:16 PM
|
sylvershadow All American 7051 Posts user info edit post |
I didn't say nailing 10/yr is a good thing. Just like being a "ho" isnt counted as a good thing. Tho being a pimp is. ![](images/sick.gif)
Forgot to add: Yes, I must have slept with 80+ guys and be a superho since I'm defending women's rights to being sexual without being labeled in a negative fashion.
[Edited on November 9, 2007 at 2:53 PM. Reason : sdf] 11/9/2007 2:44:35 PM
|
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
Oddly enough, having sexual control of many women is considered a male ideal. 11/9/2007 2:51:21 PM
|
pilgrimshoes Suspended 63151 Posts user info edit post |
IT'S JUST NATURE BABY 11/9/2007 2:53:23 PM
|
GoldenViper All American 16056 Posts user info edit post |
That I doubt. 11/9/2007 2:53:53 PM
|
pilgrimshoes Suspended 63151 Posts user info edit post |
why not?
males want to spread their seed
women want to choose a seeder that will provide the best chromosomal combination for their offspring...
which, would be being more selective and less partners 11/9/2007 2:55:17 PM
|
sylvershadow All American 7051 Posts user info edit post |
if it was purely for procreational purposes, and the males where too busy spreading their seed to be readily available, then having only 10 partners/year could be seen as being pretty selective.
Unless the woman is also trying to select for a male that will protect her offspring, so she'd pick one that wasnt spreading his seed as much. 11/9/2007 2:58:57 PM
|