and walk awayhttp://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/cleared-jury-decides-that-threat-of-global-warming-justifies-breaking-the-law-925561.html?ic
9/11/2008 9:24:12 PM
I'd say just shut down all coal plants right now and see how the people like it with no power.
9/11/2008 9:25:12 PM
9/11/2008 9:27:06 PM
And the threat of hundreds of people having no power justifies using the law to keep power plants the fuck on line.Retarded damn Europeans.
9/11/2008 9:31:51 PM
Try that shit at a nuke plant and see what it gets you. I'll give you a hint. It involves automatic weapons.
9/11/2008 9:37:45 PM
yeah, they don't really play nicely at the npp
9/11/2008 9:42:35 PM
It was due for replacement. I say go ahead and build a nuke plant there instead. It'll be worth it in the long run provided you've got water to cool the beast.
9/11/2008 9:48:37 PM
9/11/2008 10:29:24 PM
Obligatory: Those damn treehugging hippy environazis rawr rawr rawr!!! I applaud their principles but not their actions.
9/11/2008 10:47:04 PM
mantisstunna wins
9/11/2008 10:48:23 PM
No power plant is a match for tanya
9/11/2008 11:13:55 PM
<3 Red Alert series
9/11/2008 11:25:19 PM
you idiots didn`t even read it. they did nothing to actually cause the plant to malfunction in any way. they spraypainted the prime minister`s name on the smokestack.
9/11/2008 11:33:22 PM
I read the first three paragraphs, which mentioned that they did £35000 worth of damage to it, which made me assume that actual damage was actually done. I suppose that indicates some degree of media bias given that spray-painting vandalism can hardly be considered "damage" by a reasonable person.
9/11/2008 11:36:47 PM
they said it cost £35.000 to remove the freaking paint. guess there aren`t any broke homies hustlin to pressure wash stuff in the UK.
9/11/2008 11:47:02 PM
35.000? there's one too many 0'sIt was 35.00 to remove the spray paint.
9/11/2008 11:48:26 PM
no it's £35,000
9/29/2008 11:25:06 PM
9/29/2008 11:27:25 PM