StingrayRush All American 14628 Posts user info edit post |
opinions on these? i went to best buy's private sale last night where they had a demo set up, and i really couldn't tell a difference between it and a high end plasma. i was also disappointed that it has that obnoxious glare like plasmas do, so i would imagine i'll still be getting lcds in the future 5/18/2009 1:00:29 PM |
EmptyFriend All American 3686 Posts user info edit post |
are you talking about the new Sonys? I was under the impression that they are still LCD, just LED backlit instead of bulb.
and the glossy screen is just an aspect of that particular model, not of any specific kind of TV. at least as far as I know. 5/18/2009 1:06:19 PM |
StingrayRush All American 14628 Posts user info edit post |
no i mean the samsungs, and it definitely had a plasma-like glass front 5/18/2009 1:22:51 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
plasma screens are glass ^^ so they tend to be more glossy/reflective. 5/18/2009 1:30:33 PM |
darkone (\/) (;,,,;) (\/) 11610 Posts user info edit post |
The LED backlit LCDs are supposed to have more uniform backlighting, better contrast ratios, and consume less power. 5/18/2009 1:37:47 PM |
se7entythree YOSHIYOSHI 17377 Posts user info edit post |
^^not all of them have a glossy screen. panasonic plasmas have a matte coating on the screen. i've never had an glare problem.
motion is way better in a plasma than a lcd imo. 5/18/2009 1:57:33 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
yea, that's why i said tend to be instead of always were 5/18/2009 2:11:37 PM |
stopdropnrol All American 3908 Posts user info edit post |
yea they are still lcds .the leds are prone to uneven wear and rated for only about 50,000 hrs vs 100,000+ on a lot of plasmas. being new tech they are priced a lot higher than most sets. i say give them another generation or 2 to fall in price and work out up the longevity. for now imho plasma is still king of performance esp considering price.
[Edited on May 18, 2009 at 4:15 PM. Reason : .] 5/18/2009 4:15:06 PM |