indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
I don't believe that I can. 6/8/2010 4:10:59 PM |
ncsuapex SpaceForRent 37776 Posts user info edit post |
please to try 6/8/2010 4:12:09 PM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
lol
6/8/2010 4:12:41 PM |
Arab13 Art Vandelay 45166 Posts user info edit post |
not in this country 6/8/2010 4:12:58 PM |
arog20012001 All American 10023 Posts user info edit post |
eat Ramen 3 meals a day?
Welcome to Shitsville, poopulation YOU! 6/8/2010 4:14:54 PM |
Snewf All American 63348 Posts user info edit post |
beans and rice for sure 6/8/2010 4:18:58 PM |
TKE-Teg All American 43405 Posts user info edit post |
malnourishment ITT 6/8/2010 4:23:39 PM |
wwwebsurfer All American 10217 Posts user info edit post |
heck yea I can. Lunch alone was like $10. 6/8/2010 5:14:51 PM |
G.O.D hates 4 lokos 4694 Posts user info edit post |
that wouldn't even cover my daily mt. dew. 6/8/2010 5:16:57 PM |
Snewf All American 63348 Posts user info edit post |
I had beans and greens with tortillas and some pouched tuna
that was probably like $1.89 or so 6/8/2010 5:53:18 PM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^^^ lol wrong thread?
^^ Sodas are out. Brand names are out. Restaurants are out. Snacks and candy are out. note: I am not counting booze. Booze isn't food unless added to it.
It might just be possible. $0.71 * 365 = $259.15
beans: $0.79/lb rice: $0.29/lb cayenne: $4.99/lb? salt: $0.49/lb?
2 parts rice to 1 part beans, so:
185 lbs beans = $146.15 370 lbs rice = $107.30 1 lb cayenne = $4.99 1 lb salt = $0.49
1095 meals -- comes to approx 2.7 oz beans and 5.4 oz rice per meal. A half-pound (uncooked) of beans and rice, 3 times a day. Plus all the beer and wine you want. 6/8/2010 6:09:12 PM |
colter All American 8022 Posts user info edit post |
give me .71 worth of ammo and I can 6/8/2010 6:13:32 PM |
Tarun almost 11687 Posts user info edit post |
poor students ITT 6/8/2010 6:18:21 PM |
jtw208 5290 Posts user info edit post |
salty, spicy beans and rice every day for a year?
i'd probably eat my own leg after a few months 6/8/2010 6:22:05 PM |
porcha All American 5286 Posts user info edit post |
you could live off 12 whole eggs/day for a pretty long time, I'm sure in bulk they're way less than $.71/dozen...18 whole eggs/day is feasible, especially in different parts of the country, I bought eggs in Michigan last summer @ $.39/dozen via super wal-mart 6/8/2010 6:28:51 PM |
G.O.D hates 4 lokos 4694 Posts user info edit post |
but..but.. my MY MT.DEW.
I NEED YOU! 6/8/2010 6:30:04 PM |
benXJ All American 925 Posts user info edit post |
well you'd die of high cholesteral with all those eggs, and you'd need some sort of fruit or you'd get scurrvy. that how you spell it? might still be doable. 6/8/2010 6:45:11 PM |
ambrosia1231 eeeeeeeeeevil 76471 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "well you'd die of high cholesteral with all those eggs" |
6/8/2010 6:47:01 PM |
benXJ All American 925 Posts user info edit post |
oh, did i spell it wrong? 6/8/2010 6:49:06 PM |
benXJ All American 925 Posts user info edit post |
and buy 2 liter sodas..$1 or less on sale for mtn dew. 6/8/2010 6:50:01 PM |
Snewf All American 63348 Posts user info edit post |
you can avoid scurvy if you eat cabbage which has vitamin C and is really cheap
I say this as a fan of cabbage and former sufferer of scurvy 6/8/2010 6:55:35 PM |
ambrosia1231 eeeeeeeeeevil 76471 Posts user info edit post |
^^I actually didn't notice til you pointed that out.
It was overshadowed by other stupidity 6/8/2010 6:56:04 PM |
benXJ All American 925 Posts user info edit post |
good call on the cabbage
how do eggs not have a high amount of cholesterol? i would think 12-18 eggs a day would not be that healthy. you could get ripped though. 6/8/2010 7:05:16 PM |
ambrosia1231 eeeeeeeeeevil 76471 Posts user info edit post |
Did I say they don't have a high amount of cholesterol? 6/8/2010 7:08:28 PM |
wolfpackgrrr All American 39759 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Can you eat 71¢/day worth of food" |
Quote : | "heck yea I can. Lunch alone was like $10." |
Wat.6/8/2010 11:02:45 PM |
eleusis All American 24527 Posts user info edit post |
are you the child I'm sponsoring in Ethiopia? If so, you better be eating the 71 cents a day I'm sending to you. 6/8/2010 11:06:34 PM |
porcha All American 5286 Posts user info edit post |
^3 just correct his mistake already
ok, so yes, while eggs are high in cholesterol, your dietary cholesterol != serum cholesterol, your serum cholesterol levels(the cholesterol you should are worried about) are controlled via your dietary fats
mono and poly raise good cholesterol saturated and trans raise bad cholesterol
a whole egg will have saturated fats, so there is a correlation between whole eggs and increasing serum cholesterol, but the dietary cholesterol of the egg is not to blame.
You really would just need a replacement for some fiber and important micronutrient. Bananas are dirt cheap, high in fiber and potassium and loaded with some more micronutrients. This could be possible. 6/8/2010 11:29:42 PM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^
Quote : | "just correct his mistake already" |
I think she's having fun trolling him. ...and good idea with the bananas. (too bad about their carbon footprint )
shopping list: -------------- dry beans rice salt cayenne powder cabbage bananas
potatoes? celery?6/9/2010 7:53:46 AM |
TrjnMan007 All American 32511 Posts user info edit post |
many days i eat 0cents/day worth of food 6/9/2010 7:55:25 AM |
ncstatetke All American 41128 Posts user info edit post |
i have no doubt whatsoever that I could live off $0.71/day of food.
i am thrifty as hell, i have a garden, i buy in bulk and I generally only eat 2 small meals a day (or just one moderate-sized meal) 6/9/2010 10:50:00 AM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^ According to the scenario "Can you eat 71¢/day worth of food", you'd have to take note of the market price of the home-grown vegetables. You wouldn't be allowed to eat more than 71¢ worth of food in a day, regardless of whether you bought it, or say, got it at a pot-luck, with free coupons, picked it from the garden, etc.
If the scenario was "Can you spend no more than 71¢/day on food", then gardening, dumpster diving, etc. would be okay. I could definitely spend no more than 71¢/day on food under those circumstances.... 6/11/2010 7:49:46 AM |
m52ncsu Suspended 1606 Posts user info edit post |
i can definitely eat 71¢/day, hell my lunch alone was like $10
oh did you mean only? 6/11/2010 8:13:03 AM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^ No, and I didn't need to say "only". If you spent $10 one day, you didn't spend 71¢, did you? (Because 10.00 isn't equal to 0.71 -- Do you see how that works?)
I said, "Can you eat 71¢ [per] day worth of food." I didn't say, "Can you eat [at least] 71¢ worth of food in a day." Your interpretation is flat out wrong, and you know it. (keep trolling though -- I want this to reach page 2.)
[Edited on June 11, 2010 at 9:25 AM. Reason : ] 6/11/2010 9:23:04 AM |
m52ncsu Suspended 1606 Posts user info edit post |
i can eat 71 cents a day, in fact i do it by breakfast
you are wrong 6/11/2010 9:27:44 AM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
so your day ends right after breakfast?
[Edited on June 11, 2010 at 9:30 AM. Reason : you are wronger] 6/11/2010 9:30:04 AM |
m52ncsu Suspended 1606 Posts user info edit post |
you do not need to say at least
you do, however, need to say only
try it this way: "Can you bench press 71 lbs?" "Yes, in fact I can bench press 100lbs."
[Edited on June 11, 2010 at 9:33 AM. Reason : ,] 6/11/2010 9:32:12 AM |
wolfpackgrrr All American 39759 Posts user info edit post |
They see me trollin'.... 6/11/2010 9:36:11 AM |
McDanger All American 18835 Posts user info edit post |
has this thread descended into a semantics discussion
you guys realize that "only", "at least", and "at most" readings are typically determined by context, right? clearly it's easy to eat 71c/day worth of food ... hmm... I WONDER WHAT THE OP MEANT 6/11/2010 9:36:56 AM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^ Yep
Quote : | "you do not need to say at least
you do, however, need to say only
try it this way: "Can you bench press 71 lbs?" "Yes, in fact I can bench press 100lbs." |
You clearly aren't saying it the way I did. It isn't 71¢ -- it's 71¢ per day. As in -- the total amount for the entire day is 71¢. No more. No less.
you are so wrong.
[Edited on June 11, 2010 at 9:43 AM. Reason : ]6/11/2010 9:40:57 AM |
Ernie All American 45943 Posts user info edit post |
So is indy hooksaw or willy nilly 6/11/2010 9:43:02 AM |
m52ncsu Suspended 1606 Posts user info edit post |
"Can you move 71 lbs of apples per day?" "Yes, in fact I can move 300 lbs of apples per day."
per day doesn't change shit 6/11/2010 9:44:47 AM |
TKE-Teg All American 43405 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "...and good idea with the bananas. (too bad about their carbon footprint " |
lol, if you're gonna worry over something stupid like that I hope you don't eat any meat or do any online shopping.6/11/2010 9:52:58 AM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^ Meat? I don't eat much, and it's mostly organic or local. ...used to eat even less. Online shopping? Only as a last resort. Really though, it's pretty fucking stupid to think that carbon footprints aren't important considerations. (Now, I could stereotype you as the idiot meat-head frat loser you probably are, but I won't do that. Oh, wait... )
^^ Wrong -- and doesn't matter:
Quote : | "you guys realize that "only", "at least", and "at most" readings are typically determined by context, right? clearly it's easy to eat 71c/day worth of food ... hmm... I WONDER WHAT THE OP MEANT" |
[Edited on June 11, 2010 at 10:02 AM. Reason : ]6/11/2010 10:00:24 AM |
m52ncsu Suspended 1606 Posts user info edit post |
i'm still right though, he was just pointing out that i am trolling you 6/11/2010 10:02:59 AM |
ncstatetke All American 41128 Posts user info edit post |
haha this dude is trying reallllly hard
it's adorable 6/11/2010 10:03:04 AM |
indy All American 3624 Posts user info edit post |
^
Quote : | "i am trolling you" |
Well duh. I asked you to 40 minutes ago. (Thanks, by the way.) You're still wrong.
[Edited on June 11, 2010 at 10:06 AM. Reason : ]6/11/2010 10:06:09 AM |
wolfpackgrrr All American 39759 Posts user info edit post |
6/11/2010 10:09:53 AM |
TKE-Teg All American 43405 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Really though, it's pretty fucking stupid to think that carbon footprints aren't important considerations." |
I'm all ears. Tell me how something essential for all life on this planet is bad.6/11/2010 10:12:46 AM |
ncstatetke All American 41128 Posts user info edit post |
i'm exhaling CO2 as we speak 6/11/2010 10:13:36 AM |
wolfpackgrrr All American 39759 Posts user info edit post |
set em up 6/11/2010 10:14:05 AM |