dbhawley All American 3339 Posts user info edit post |
We have a new Linksys e1000 Wireless-N router, but we havent been able to get very good performace out of it. I tweaked the settings a bit, which made it alot faster. Is there anything else I can change to get more power out of it? We have 7-10 computers, etc using the router (normally not more than 4 or 5 at a time though.
Here's the advanced settings menu. Everything is default, except i changed Basic rate to All and Beacon Interval to 200 (just guessing on what to change). Like I said it boosted speeds up quite a bit..anything other suggestions? Thanks guys
AP Isolation: Enabled Disabled(Default: Disabled) Frame Burst: Enabled Disabled(Default: Enabled) Authentication Type: Auto (Default: Auto) Basic Rate: All (Default: Default) Transmission Rate: Auto (Default: Auto) N Transmission Rate: Auto (Default: Auto) CTS Protection Mode: Auto (Default: Auto) Beacon Interval: 200 (Default: 100, Milliseconds, Range: 20 - 65535) DTIM Interval: 1 (Default: 1, Range: 1 - 255) Fragmentation Threshold: 2346 (Default: 2346, Range: 256 - 2346) RTS Threshold: 2347 (Default: 2347, Range: 0 - 2347) 7/10/2010 3:35:36 PM |
El Nachó special helper 16370 Posts user info edit post |
] 7/10/2010 3:42:46 PM |
dbhawley All American 3339 Posts user info edit post |
^fail 7/10/2010 3:43:50 PM |
El Nachó special helper 16370 Posts user info edit post |
^,^^^ fail 7/10/2010 3:45:46 PM |
dbhawley All American 3339 Posts user info edit post |
anyone with tips? 7/10/2010 7:15:32 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
what exactly are you expecting/experiencing? 7/10/2010 8:03:56 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
overclock it 7/10/2010 8:27:50 PM |
dbhawley All American 3339 Posts user info edit post |
mainly the speeds are very bad. i was under the assumption that wireless-n would boost speeds...not do the opposite 7/10/2010 8:39:26 PM |
stowaway All American 11770 Posts user info edit post |
what speeds are you referring to? Accessing from a networked server? downloading from websites? even a proper wireless g is more than enough for 99% of residential internet accounts, let alone n. even most business accounts are not going to push a g router's throughput.
[Edited on July 10, 2010 at 8:47 PM. Reason : wasted money.] 7/10/2010 8:45:42 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
so your router is wireless-N
are your wireless devices also wireless-N
if all are, you could set up the router so that it doesn't even support old wireless-G devices 7/10/2010 8:47:58 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "i was under the assumption that wireless-n would boost speeds...not do the opposite" |
speeds to what? you do realize that your internet connection is probably, by far, the bottleneck if you're referring to internet speeds, yes?
[Edited on July 10, 2010 at 8:54 PM. Reason : and that that router isn't anything special. it's pretty much bottom of the barrel for N]7/10/2010 8:53:12 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
unless you're in Japan lol (61Mb/s on average, or so I've heard)
seriously, in America 16Mb/s is considered "fast", and a typical speed is like 1.6Mb/s and the fastest Internet access, the third tier of FiOS, goes to 50Mb/s while even wireless-G tops out at 54Mb/s and ordinary Ethernet tops out at 100Mb/s and wireless-N tops out at 600Mb/s (although most current devices are around 150Mb/s) and finally that newfangled gigabit Ethernet goes up to 1Gb/s I've even heard of theoretical speeds above 100Gb/s
The point is that the network speed of the router and the devices is only fully used for networking within the LAN, like transferring files between PCs or streaming media from a PC to a TV or something 7/10/2010 9:03:34 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
basically, my point. 7/10/2010 9:15:45 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
I wanted to have my lol
and flesh out the point
btw I'm not some weeaboo here, just stating facts 7/10/2010 9:18:27 PM |
gs7 All American 2354 Posts user info edit post |
You should press the Turbo button. 7/10/2010 9:26:10 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
TURBOOOOOO 7/10/2010 9:49:53 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
HAI GUIZE I'D LIKE TO CHANGE A SETTING TO INCREASE THE SPEED OF SAID RFC STANDARD AND MY CHEAP ASS ROUTER 7/10/2010 11:33:25 PM |
wwwebsurfer All American 10217 Posts user info edit post |
Despite all the haters your problem is most likely caused by the devices connected. If you're talking internet speed then nothing is wrong, just a bad day. If you're transferring within the network make sure all your adapters are wireless-N so the network doesn't degrade. You may also want to verify they are of similar chipset, or if possible the same line of products. Consumer products are notorious for pissing on competitors products - usually a result of poor implementation of the standard.
Also, I've never seen changing ANY setting inside the router properties change the throughput unless you're using a high-gain external/yagi antenna. Reset it to defaults, roll with it. 7/11/2010 12:21:28 AM |
gs7 All American 2354 Posts user info edit post |
Also ...
Quote : | "We have 7-10 computers, etc using the router (normally not more than 4 or 5 at a time though." |
And how many of them are doing file-sharing or other downloading? That is actually a lot of simultaneous computers (if all are being used heavily) for a typical household internet connection. Which brings up another question, you never mentioned what type of internet connection you are all sharing; do you know?7/11/2010 12:32:44 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "you do realize that your internet connection is probably, by far, the bottleneck if you're referring to internet speeds, yes? " |
Not necessarily, when wifi is involved.7/11/2010 3:16:06 AM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
dbhawley, no one can help you until you clearly define the problem.
"poor performance" and "the speeds are very bad" are not valid problem descriptions. 7/11/2010 5:00:32 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
^^you must have some primo Internets, at least 5MB/s 7/11/2010 6:08:46 PM |
Wyloch All American 4244 Posts user info edit post |
7/16/2010 8:47:19 AM |
Lokken All American 13361 Posts user info edit post |
5Mbs is primo? Or was that tongue in cheek 7/16/2010 8:50:10 AM |
brianj320 All American 9166 Posts user info edit post |
gotta put some "fast-lookin" stickers all over it; get extra fastness with each sticker! 7/16/2010 1:21:12 PM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=5MB+to+Mb 7/16/2010 1:44:10 PM |
disco_stu All American 7436 Posts user info edit post |
Yeah, but c'mon. lewisje didn't intentionally refer to megabytes. He meant 5Mbs and you know it. 7/16/2010 2:07:16 PM |
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
I meant 5MB/s 7/17/2010 5:11:53 PM |
m52ncsu Suspended 1606 Posts user info edit post |
i did this: http://lifehacker.com/5580636/change-your-wi+fi-routers-broadcast-channel-for-a-stronger-connection 7/18/2010 8:57:53 AM |
Wickerman All American 2404 Posts user info edit post |
Are you losing any packets when you ping the router? 7/18/2010 9:38:42 AM |