11/12/2011 11:10:46 PM

no, but I think it's pretty stupid

11/12/2011 11:13:41 PM

over it. get there.

11/12/2011 11:14:19 PM

No and yes

11/12/2011 11:18:12 PM

the unreleased full version has this line at the end:

even this very video that we are uploading to youtube has a going rate of 70 cents per ad and is going directly to some executive at Google

and google is nothing but rich crony 'businessmen' with no well paid and insured employees whatsoever. and does nothing to improve society but be greedy with their technology and money and rob from the poooooor yay!!!

so lets raise the corporate tax once again so that we can lower the profit of companies like these that in turn force them to layoff jobs and not spend more money in the marketplace


[Edited on November 12, 2011 at 11:25 PM. Reason : ,]

11/12/2011 11:23:21 PM

haha, "google...does nothing to improve society"

:roll:

11/13/2011 12:13:02 AM

Is that Gooch and a more alien-looking Phoebe?

11/13/2011 12:13:59 AM

I love how people in the 1% are being all like "yeah, go 99%" but then in the long run they really don't give a shit....they are just doing it for the good publicity.

11/13/2011 2:42:34 AM

the 1%, by and large, is not the fucking problem, or AT LEAST isn't where the effort should be focused. They don't owe you anything and you can't affect their actions nearly as easily as that of an elected official whose job it is to answer to constituents and set proper framework for the 1% to operate in.

11/13/2011 7:43:50 PM

DING DING DING

11/13/2011 8:50:38 PM

over it. get there.

11/13/2011 9:35:33 PM

Optimum itt

11/13/2011 9:37:16 PM

I'm back. Big as life and twice as ugly.

11/13/2011 9:37:53 PM

Quote :

"the 1%, by and large, is not the fucking problem, or AT LEAST isn't where the effort should be focused. They don't owe you anything and you can't affect their actions nearly as easily as that of an elected official whose job it is to answer to constituents and set proper framework for the 1% to operate in. "

Yeah, but that's the point of the protesters. They are trying to enact political action, not really cause the 1% to start handing out checks to the homeless.

The name "Occupy Wall Street" though is kind of a misnomer against the "we are the 99%" line. Wall Street and the 1% are different.

11/13/2011 9:39:37 PM

I'll bet they feel like righteous crusaders now, they've really done their part

And wtf is up with the blonde's eyes, they're practically on her temples

11/13/2011 9:41:05 PM

Quote :

"Yeah, but that's the point of the protesters. They are trying to enact political action, not really cause the 1% to start handing out checks to the homeless."

No shit, but they're barking up the wrong tree.

[Edited on November 14, 2011 at 12:27 AM. Reason : Both practically and in principle]

11/14/2011 12:27:18 AM

it's refreshing to occasionally hear someone say "i don't agree with these dirty hippies and i think their tactics are misguided, but as long as they're peaceful i don't think they deserve to be beaten by police"

11/14/2011 12:44:04 AM

Quote :

"No shit, but they're barking up the wrong tree."

Where they protest doesn't really matter at this point. They've gained enough traction to be politically relevant, and its popularity is forcing those in the political sphere to take action (or, better yet, to provide lip-service and pretend to take action).

As a movement, they've highlighted the disconnect between democracy and the American people, and they've illuminated the needs of the vast majority of Americans and brought them to the forefront of political discussion.

Besides, marches on capitol hill are soooo 60s.

11/14/2011 12:58:23 AM

yes, they've highlighted the disconnect

the disconnect is that they represent the thoughts of the american people no more than the tea party does, and the prudent thing would be to start listening to everyday americans instead of wackjobs, no matter which wing they're on

11/14/2011 1:04:35 AM

everyday americans don't know shit, the right has ensured that through centuries and centuries of tireless dedication to keeping real privilege and advantage to themselves

11/14/2011 9:05:37 AM

18500 posts of sheer stupidity.

11/14/2011 9:22:34 AM

i forgot to point out the lesser morphotype in the conservative ecology, the lower-caste neo-peasant

thanks for stimulating my memory burro

11/14/2011 10:00:56 AM

did you come up with neo-peasant yourself? i dont like you, but i liked this term.

mind if i use it?

11/14/2011 10:09:25 AM

yea dude whatever

i'm sure somebody else has said it but it sprung to mind. it's what i call modern day authoritarians (those who support the dominance of private capital with the same anti-intellectual, animal fervor of lower class loyalists/monarchists)

11/14/2011 10:24:19 AM

Yes, I do.

11/14/2011 12:19:48 PM

Quote :

"Besides, marches on capitol hill are soooo 60s."

Well, a lot of shit got changed back then...

11/14/2011 12:31:14 PM

I believe government should consist of one man in a room who's responsibility it would be to decide who and what to nuke. He should be selected by intelligence tests and perhaps some sort of athletic ability. He should also be brought women if and when he desired them.

11/14/2011 12:31:38 PM

Haha, that's definitely the Gooch. Ever since Scrubs was canned she's just been doing the occasional commercial

11/14/2011 2:10:15 PM

and several other shows.

raising hope, for instance.


(not that i watch it, just noticed her on a commercial )

11/14/2011 2:12:25 PM

I haven't watched this season, but last season of Raising Hope was good so you should probably watch it.

11/14/2011 2:13:58 PM

Quote :

"I believe government should consist of one man in a room who's responsibility it would be to decide who and what to nuke. He should be selected by intelligence tests and perhaps some sort of athletic ability. He should also be brought women if and when he desired them."

THIS AIN'T SOVIET RUSSIA

11/14/2011 2:22:37 PM

^we're gettin close though

11/14/2011 2:23:57 PM

Quote :

"He should be selected by intelligence tests and perhaps some sort of athletic ability. He should also be brought women if and when he desired them. "

11/14/2011 2:35:53 PM

People still think that's funny?

11/14/2011 2:53:00 PM

[Edited on November 14, 2011 at 5:33 PM. Reason : Just Chuck Testa]

11/14/2011 5:25:06 PM