User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Dead Teen Sued4Losing Control of Flying Body Parts Page [1] 2, Next  
GeniuSxBoY
Suspended
16786 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"You think you've heard it all until I tell you that an appeals court in Illinois recently ruled that a woman is allowed to sue a dead teen's estate for injuries caused by his flying body parts. The 18-year-old boy was running across the Amtrak tracks to catch another train but didn't make it -- he was hit by an oncoming train going 70 mph and his body was torn apart by the force and flung onto a nearby passengers' waiting platform. The woman, 58, was struck by a sizable chunk of the boy's body and was knocked to the ground, breaking her leg and wrist. The court ruled that the boy's death was "reasonably foreseeable" and that his estate can be held responsible for his negligence.

I'm sorry, but who goes around suing a dead teen whose body was ripped to shreds in one of the most gruesome ways imaginable?

I can't say that my first or even fiftieth instinct after being pummeled to the ground by half of a bloody torso would be to raise my fist in the air and declare that whoever had the nerve to let their body explode and land on me will most certainly pay in court. Even if my leg was shattered, I still can't imagine going after the dead teen's estate.

The family of the deceased has suffered enough -- their son was blasted by a train. It doesn't get much worse than that. And to think that they have to endure a woman nitpicking her way into their bank accounts is disgusting. It's not like this kid had millions -- what is she hoping to gain from this lawsuit?

It won't make her leg any better. I can't imagine it'd help her heal in any way, shape, or form. I don't think a normal person would feel good about suing for injuries caused by a dead teen's flying body parts. Yeah, he did something incredibly stupid, but I think he paid the price. He's dead. His body was blown to bits. No need to drive the point home with what seems like a frivolous, greedy, and hurtful lawsuit."



http://thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/130874/dead_teen_sued_by_victim?fb_ref=post_top&fb_source=home_multiline




Is this old? Did someone already make a thread about this? Please tell me in the subsequent posts! Your opinion matters!

1/21/2012 9:44:12 PM

freshmonkey
HULK SMASH
3870 Posts
user info
edit post

yep

1/21/2012 9:47:21 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

if she wants to sue, sue the city/train station

its still a bullshit lawsuit, but if you win at least its govt money and not some grieving family

1/21/2012 9:57:16 PM

Jax883
All American
5562 Posts
user info
edit post

I mean, it was reasonably foreseeable...he shouldn't have ran across the track.

When you run in front of a train, you run the risk of getting hit.

If you get hit by a fast moving train, it can tear your body apart.

Flying chunks of bone and meat hurt. They've been known to bring down airplanes.

All of these are foreseeable. And its reasonably foreseeable because the vast majority/all of us had the dangers of crossing shit like roads and train tracks instilled to us by our parents as children. And just using what little I know of tww parents as a guide, my guess is the vast majority/all of their children will also be taught the same dangers.

Stupidity becomes negligence when an innocent bystander gets hurt...The lesson here is don't be a fucktard because it can kill you and get your grave spit upon.

1/21/2012 10:13:03 PM

bottombaby
IRL
21952 Posts
user info
edit post

If he hadn't died, he would have been held liable for at least her medical bills.

1/21/2012 10:13:49 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"The lesson here is don't be a fucktard because it can kill you and get your grave spit upon."


true and agreed 100%

but at the same time, i've heard of kicking someone while they were down, but i don't know how often you hear about kicking someone's family while their kid is 6 feet under

1/21/2012 10:27:33 PM

AndyMac
All American
31922 Posts
user info
edit post

It's his fault. He should be sued.

Quote :
"It won't make her leg any better. I can't imagine it'd help her heal in any way, shape, or form."


Um yes it will. Clearly this guy doesn't know how hospitals operate.

You give them money, and they make you better.

[Edited on January 21, 2012 at 10:47 PM. Reason : ]

1/21/2012 10:46:12 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

why not sue the train station or city/county? i thought all the douchebags that cry wolf lawsuit all the time also hated the government and corporations too? especially if you're cash savvy, you gotta figure a municipality or corporation will have more money to give in a lawsuit than some non-rich individual

and i doubt corporate lawyer advantages would come into play since i'm sure there would be plenty of lawyers willing to take it on pro bono

1/21/2012 10:54:16 PM

Grandmaster
All American
10829 Posts
user info
edit post

Yeah I'm sorry that your son was a dumbfuck and died but why should I have to pay for the injuries sustained by his actions?

Just because it's depressing doesn't make him (or his estate) any less liable.

1/21/2012 11:03:12 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

its not like he robbed a bank and some innocents got shot...its not like he was even trying to commit suicide

if he got hit by a car instead of a train, and his skull busted my headlight, should i sue his estate for a new headlight

1/21/2012 11:05:02 PM

Grandmaster
All American
10829 Posts
user info
edit post

your analogy is baseless sir.

1/21/2012 11:08:54 PM

saps852
New Recruit
80068 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Stupidity becomes negligence when an innocent bystander gets hurt...The lesson here is don't be a fucktard because it can kill you and get your grave spit upon."

1/21/2012 11:14:16 PM

rufus
All American
3583 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"if he got hit by a car instead of a train, and his skull busted my headlight, should i sue his estate for a new headlight"


if you want him to pay for it because it's his fault, yes

1/21/2012 11:20:15 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

i'd sue Amtrak for creating trains that create unsafe environments for future passengers

and this happened in Chicago, so again i reiterate, i could find a scumbag lawyer pro bono to sue the city just like this lady is finding a scumbag lawyer to sue a dead guy whose actions had no malicious intent whatsoever

^IRL, Geico would pay for my headlight repair assuming I didn't run a red light or something...health insurance is a different animal though

[Edited on January 21, 2012 at 11:22 PM. Reason : .]

1/21/2012 11:20:55 PM

Grandmaster
All American
10829 Posts
user info
edit post

getting drunk as fuck and choosing to drive arguably has no malicious intent, but there are still consequences.



[Edited on January 21, 2012 at 11:49 PM. Reason : can't tell if trolling...]

1/21/2012 11:48:03 PM

Snewf
All American
63348 Posts
user info
edit post

the judge should rule in her favor

and garnish the boy's future wages as repayment

1/22/2012 2:41:34 AM

Troop
All American
849 Posts
user info
edit post

^ I'll allow it.

1/22/2012 7:46:10 AM

MisterGreen
All American
4328 Posts
user info
edit post

^^haha, that would be such a slap in the face and would never happen, but would be so epic

1/22/2012 7:50:26 AM

wizzkidd
All American
1668 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"why not sue the train station or city/county"


How the fuck is it the train stations fault that a person willingly ignored ALL warnings, and was THEN hit by a train.

Quote :
"Yeah I'm sorry that your son was a dumbfuck and died but why should I have to pay for the injuries sustained by his actions?

Just because it's depressing doesn't make him (or his estate) any less liable."

THIS!

Quote :
"but if you win at least its govt money"

I hate it when people say this... Govt money is OUR money, why do people encourage others to just take from public funds... [/soapbox]

[Edited on January 22, 2012 at 11:00 AM. Reason : .]

1/22/2012 10:58:38 AM

Klatypus
All American
6786 Posts
user info
edit post

sued4losing sounds like a band name.

1/22/2012 11:02:58 AM

AndyMac
All American
31922 Posts
user info
edit post

I thought it sounded like some kind of sleazy company

Like Cash4Gold but even worse.

1/22/2012 11:43:04 AM

Klatypus
All American
6786 Posts
user info
edit post

ah, it would be a good personal injury lawyer's office

1/22/2012 11:50:35 AM

Skack
All American
31140 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Just because it's depressing doesn't make him (or his estate) any less liable."


The whole incident is unfortunate, but I have to agree with this.

1/22/2012 12:18:30 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

what the fuck is this woman expecting to get from the "estate" of an 18-year-old? his XBox360?

1/22/2012 12:30:41 PM

Skack
All American
31140 Posts
user info
edit post

They're probably hoping the parents have some sort of umbrella insurance policy on him that they can draw from. If he was still a dependent they were probably carrying car insurance and health insurance on him, so an umbrella policy is not far fetched.

[Edited on January 22, 2012 at 12:38 PM. Reason : s]

1/22/2012 12:37:02 PM

GrayFox33
TX R. Snake
10566 Posts
user info
edit post

It's Raining Limbs! Hallelujah! - It's Raining Limbs! Amen!
I'm gonna go out to run and let myself get
Absolutely soaking wet!

It's Raining Limbs! Hallelujah!
It's Raining Limbs! Every piece-o-them!
Arms, legs, hands and feet
Blood and bones and bits of meat!

1/22/2012 12:38:22 PM

LeonIsPro
All American
5021 Posts
user info
edit post

1/22/2012 12:40:37 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

it was a dude in chicago. dumb enough to run across the train tracks at a train station. what in the flying fuck makes you think that kid's parents showed any other aspect of responsibility such that there would be money saved up or available in any fashion.

1/22/2012 1:16:45 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I hate it when people say this... Govt money is OUR money"


in Chicago, Govt money is CORRUPT POLITICIANS' money

1/22/2012 1:24:29 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

that they got from taxpayers

1/22/2012 1:25:15 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

and gangbangers and mafia

better it pay some lady's medical bills, than buy Blagojevich a new car

1/22/2012 1:26:02 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

and taxpayers. you think the city would pay money from the politician's pockets? come on

1/22/2012 1:26:43 PM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

When you got plenty of money, you can afford to be graceful and tactful about these kinda things.

But if you're hurt, you're hurt; and if you don't have extra money to pay surprise hit-by-flying-body-parts bills, then you have to sue.

[Edited on January 22, 2012 at 2:03 PM. Reason : sucks]

1/22/2012 2:03:20 PM

Krallum
56A0D3
15294 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"if she wants to sue, sue the city/train station"


It is definitely the stations fault that this kid was retarded.

I'm Krallum and I approved this message.

1/22/2012 2:16:07 PM

theDuke866
All American
52765 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"the judge should rule in her favor

and garnish the boy's future wages as repayment
"


That would be perfect.

1/22/2012 2:32:22 PM

Hiro
All American
4673 Posts
user info
edit post

Maybe it's just me, but I see nothing wrong with suing the estate. His stupidity got him killed and injured another person. That 58 year old woman isn't responsible for her injuries, that 18 year old was. His estate should pay for cost of doctors visits as well as some pain and suffering.

1/22/2012 2:34:50 PM

Smath74
All American
93277 Posts
user info
edit post

^agreed.

1/22/2012 2:35:38 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

again. what estate does an 18-year-old boy have? his math homework?

1/22/2012 2:37:03 PM

Krallum
56A0D3
15294 Posts
user info
edit post

should probably look up the definition of estate

I'm Krallum and I approved this message.

1/22/2012 2:37:49 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

really looking forward to getting his MP3 player

1/22/2012 2:38:21 PM

AndyMac
All American
31922 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm sure the family is gonna be getting something from the train station even if it was the kid's fault. That's where her money should come from.

1/22/2012 3:06:23 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

and that money still wouldn't be part of the KID'S estate, would it?

1/22/2012 3:07:16 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

^^i can agree with that wholly

look i agree the lady got her leg broken and it wasnt her fault, it was the kids fault...but the kid has already been punished by death by train...hasnt he paid enough?

1/22/2012 3:08:06 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"if she wants to sue, sue the city/train station"


And she would most likely lose in court and have wasted her time and money. Suing the kid's estate is more likely to get her medical bills paid since there is a direct cause and effect that can be proved in court.

1/22/2012 3:11:14 PM

AndyMac
All American
31922 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ Unless the money goes to his estate, which would then go to his parents. Also even as a legal adult he was likely still a dependent.

Quote :
"hasnt he paid enough?"


What more could he pay? It's not like giving money out of his estate is punishing the kid in any way, he's dead.

[Edited on January 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM. Reason : ]

1/22/2012 3:12:40 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148227 Posts
user info
edit post

^^i think its a bullshit lawsuit period, said so in my first post

you guys keep acting like its the kids' parents' direct fault

[Edited on January 22, 2012 at 3:14 PM. Reason : .]

1/22/2012 3:13:36 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Suing the kid's estate is more likely to get her medical bills paid since there is a direct cause and effect that can be proved in court."

except, short of an Xbox360, an iPod, and a cell phone, the kid doesn't have much of an estate, so now she's just wasting everybody's time and money.

1/22/2012 3:14:51 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

None of us know what kind of money this kid's family has. We don't even know if he was still legally a dependent. He could have nothing or he could have made a sizable chunk of cash making a porn app for Android. I'm sure the lawyers she hired figured out that he had enough of an estate to go after or else they wouldn't be wasting their time.

1/22/2012 3:17:26 PM

aaronburro
Sup, B
52879 Posts
user info
edit post

yes we do. he was a kid in chicago who was dumb enough to run across train tracks at a train station. people that stupid don't have money

1/22/2012 3:19:51 PM

wolfpackgrrr
All American
39759 Posts
user info
edit post

1/22/2012 3:20:51 PM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » Dead Teen Sued4Losing Control of Flying Body Parts Page [1] 2, Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.38 - our disclaimer.