Quote :

"From The Bad Idea File: Texting Daughter's Nude Photo To Teach Her A Lesson Parenting in the digital age offers all kinds of new questions: Should you know your children’s passwords? Should you track their activity on computers and smartphones? Should you track their location at all times? Should you forward their nude photos to everyone in their smartphone contact list if they do a scandalous photo shoot? I’m not sure about the others, but on the last question, the answer is absolutely not. But that’s what Arizona man, Eugene Foster, 31 did when he found a naked photo of his girlfriend’s daughter on her phone. After an argument about the photo, he decided to “teach her a lesson” about what could happen and “sexted” it out on her behalf: “Foster found a photo the girl, who is a student at Poston Butte High School in San Tan Valley, had taken of herself, and decided to teach her a lesson by sending the photo to [38] contacts in her phone. Now Foster is learning a lesson — that’s it’s illegal to send naked photos of minors. He’s been arrested for sexual exploitation of a minor, reports 3TV. It’s unclear whether he’ll also be charged with distributing child pornography. Meanwhile, the school district and detectives are hoping the photo doesn’t go viral, asking those who received it not to send it on."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/01/30/from-the-bad-idea-file-texting-daughters-nude-photo-to-teach-her-a-lesson/

1/30/2012 7:09:02 PM

What a dumbass

1/30/2012 7:11:20 PM

Sounds like a creepy perv for a step-father figure.

1/30/2012 7:12:00 PM

Useless without pics

1/30/2012 7:13:43 PM

1/30/2012 7:13:58 PM

Is there a category that's similar to Darwin awards but involves removing yourself from the free-walking, not-imprisoned majority?

1/30/2012 7:23:18 PM

world's dumbest criminals

1/30/2012 8:03:17 PM

Quote :

"Foster found a photo the girl, who is a student at Poston Butte High School in San Tan Valley"

sounds like she was just following the directions of her high school!

1/31/2012 7:24:13 PM

Thread does not deliver ...

1/31/2012 11:56:15 PM

2/1/2012 12:43:39 AM

is that said picture? because if so, that girl is under 18, sir.

[Edited on February 1, 2012 at 12:53 AM. Reason : -]

2/1/2012 12:46:29 AM

Those are interesting looking nipples.

2/1/2012 7:21:22 AM

poston butte

more like postin butt

amirite

2/1/2012 8:05:21 AM

^this

2/1/2012 8:17:33 AM

I'm praying that picture is not of a underage girl....

2/1/2012 9:09:30 AM

^ Because you already fapped to it?

2/1/2012 9:23:00 AM

this guy is a 31 year old boyfriend. i'm just glad this story isn't about him raping her.


and for some reason i really like those boobs.

2/1/2012 9:25:58 AM

those boobs are less than desireable. They look fake.

2/1/2012 9:32:57 AM

I hope that's not her, because posting it can get you in the same boat this dumbass is in right now. If it is, I'd take it down about now.

And qntmken should probably hard delete it from the server.

2/1/2012 9:35:31 AM

it's not her, no way

2/1/2012 9:37:42 AM

to me she looks under 18 to me

2/1/2012 9:38:44 AM

2/1/2012 9:41:04 AM

I've never really figured out the law with posting that stuff. I know when the gay TMZ like dude posted Miley Cyrus' crotch it was considered legal for some reason.

2/1/2012 9:41:44 AM

Not her. That is an artistic representation of said photo to allow TDUB members to beat it. Compliments to papsmear

2/1/2012 9:46:34 AM

rofl

2/1/2012 12:33:00 PM

Quote :

"I've never really figured out the law with posting that stuff."

nudity is not the same thing as pornography. they make legit movies with underage titties

2/1/2012 1:15:06 PM

aren't most actresses who play underage parts like 25?

2/1/2012 1:22:05 PM

I mean I remember seeing underage tits in sex ed classes.

2/1/2012 1:24:07 PM