jcg15 All American 2131 Posts user info edit post |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcf79/bcf79a5b4d7aec1df3b15b4ce2d34b9afe8d5018" alt=""
This mug was straight trippy mane, yadig?
5/24/2013 12:23:03 AM
|
jcg15 All American 2131 Posts user info edit post |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cbcc/6cbcc98a3ec0fa0393535a647eae4c848d2e68ff" alt=""
5/24/2013 12:24:03 AM
|
jwb9984 All American 14039 Posts user info edit post |
I, a universe of atoms, an atom in the universe. 5/24/2013 12:39:59 AM
|
dustm All American 14296 Posts user info edit post |
One of my favorite reads ever- "The Pleasure of Finding Things Out" is a collection of his short writings and some transcribed speeches. Guy has some hilarious stories and some fascinating points of view. I need to read that again soon. 5/24/2013 12:43:14 AM
|
paerabol All American 17118 Posts user info edit post |
second central moment to the mean less one. if you can tell me what this value is for a purely-poisson distribution I have a paper for you to read 5/24/2013 1:43:42 AM
|
lewisje All American 9196 Posts user info edit post |
Well the second central moment (a.k.a. the second moment around the mean) is known as the variance (square of the standard deviation), and for a Poisson distribution with parameter L, both mean and variance are L: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution 5/24/2013 6:48:39 AM
|
mrfrog ☯ 15145 Posts user info edit post |
I would generally think that a moment would be about the mean. Seems even more redundant to say the central moment in addition to that.
And does paerabol just want us to subtract 1 after that? not clear on that.
Or maybe the 2nd moment about {the mean minus 1}
[Edited on May 24, 2013 at 10:55 AM. Reason : ] 5/24/2013 10:54:42 AM
|
bronco All American 3942 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "To those who do not know mathematics it is difficult to get across a real feeling as to the beauty, the deepest beauty, of nature ... If you want to learn about nature, to appreciate nature, it is necessary to understand the language that she speaks in. " |
Quote : | "God was invented to explain mystery. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand. Now, when you finally discover how something works, you get some laws which you're taking away from God; you don't need him anymore. But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave him to create the universe because we haven't figured that out yet; you need him for understanding those things which you don't believe the laws will explain, such as consciousness, or why you only live to a certain length of time — life and death — stuff like that. God is always associated with those things that you do not understand. Therefore I don't think that the laws can be considered to be like God because they have been figured out. " |
5/24/2013 11:19:22 AM
|
marko Tom Joad 72861 Posts user info edit post |
Awesome feller!
Him and Dave Brubeck went through crazy similar hair phases.
[Edited on May 24, 2013 at 11:28 AM. Reason : !] 5/24/2013 11:26:35 AM
|
simonn best gottfriend 28968 Posts user info edit post |
anyone with even a passing interest in the universe should watch his Cornell lectures. it's not too much of an overstatement to say that with the right mindset they can be life altering. 5/24/2013 11:38:55 AM
|
Fermat All American 47007 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "If all of mathematics disappeared, physics would be set back by exactly one week." | - Dick Feynman in response to a lecture given by Mathematician Mark Kack
lol Mark Kack had a damn good comeback though
Quote : | "Precisely the week in which God created the world." |
[Edited on May 24, 2013 at 12:18 PM. Reason : angry feet] 5/24/2013 12:12:25 PM
|
Arab13 Art Vandelay 45180 Posts user info edit post |
He has a great response to some idiot reporter asking about magnetism. 5/24/2013 2:10:23 PM
|
JeffreyBSG All American 10165 Posts user info edit post |
I'm a mathematician, so the following quote kinda irks me...but it's still pretty bad-ass
Quote : | "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." |
5/24/2013 2:21:01 PM
|
nastoute All American 31058 Posts user info edit post |
Murray Gell-Mann talks about Richard Feynman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnMsgxIIQEE 5/24/2013 2:52:49 PM
|
jcg15 All American 2131 Posts user info edit post |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95c54/95c547915acb2def9e79652a77bee6a8f5b8c8dc" alt=""
SO MUCH WIN MANE
6/12/2013 11:25:46 PM
|
paerabol All American 17118 Posts user info edit post |
I was admittetly being intentionally vague. The Feynman-Y parameter is just a ratio of the variance to the mean of a distribution, minus 1. It's a measure of excess variance, so a purely-Poisson distribution (where the two are at unity) yields Y=0 6/13/2013 9:00:24 AM
|
Krallum 56A0D3 15294 Posts user info edit post |
Is this the dude from lost?
I'm Krallum and I approved this message. 6/13/2013 9:24:57 AM
|