http://www.digitaltrends.com/gadgets/dominos-tests-pizza-delivering-drones/

6/6/2013 9:56:40 PM

Shoot drone down
Steal pizza
???
Profit

6/6/2013 10:03:55 PM

Pepperdroney is a way better name than DomiCopter.

6/6/2013 10:03:57 PM

agreed

6/6/2013 10:07:17 PM

Whats the proper amount to tip your drone pilot?

6/6/2013 10:43:43 PM

In before someone says Dominoes needs to make better pizza before they start using drones for delivery.

6/6/2013 10:46:46 PM

so that means brixx needs to start using drones they have the best pizzas

6/6/2013 10:47:48 PM

This idea will never takeoff.

6/6/2013 10:52:28 PM

It will takeoff if it's on a treadmill

6/6/2013 10:58:13 PM

Quote :

"Shoot drone down Steal pizza ??? Profit"

Train teams of fat kids to act as hunting dogs for downed pizzas.

6/7/2013 7:43:40 AM

Quote :

"In before someone says Dominoes needs to make better pizza before they start using drones for delivery."

a few years ago someone probably would have said that but I have to give them credit for changing things and being pretty on point now

6/7/2013 7:52:31 AM

6/7/2013 8:32:38 AM

Not sure this idea will fly with the FAA.

6/7/2013 9:51:20 AM

Quote :

"No flying permits are needed to operate the drone up to 126 meters off the ground; only permission of the landowner is required."

6/7/2013 10:21:13 AM

Teenagers will see to it that delivering pizzas with drones will not be a sustainable business venture.

6/7/2013 10:35:33 AM

the future is now

6/7/2013 1:50:41 PM

This is a pretty smart (and now seems obvious) idea and WILL be the wave of the future.

6/7/2013 1:51:31 PM

i hope they implement this nation wide before region testing in shady areas

GONNA GET ME A DRONE FOR TWENTY BUCKS SON

http://www.loksak.com/

6/7/2013 8:55:12 PM

6/7/2013 10:11:00 PM

ive tried delivering beers a couple times..it is hard


wonder how they could do this cost effectively..

flight time with a payload would be well under 10 minutes..


http://brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=634851

6/8/2013 10:22:25 AM

6/8/2013 12:23:24 PM

porperty rights go up forever so I can legally shoot down this drone if its over my proeperty.

thats why it won't work.

6/8/2013 12:45:08 PM

so if a commercial jet crosses overhead you can legally shoot it down too?

6/8/2013 12:48:00 PM

^I was about to post that exact thing

6/8/2013 12:48:25 PM

you can't accidentally shoot down a jet. these things are going to fly low enough for plausible deniability and trespassing issues.

Quote :

"The landowner's claim raises some fundamental legal principles about the ownership of land and the airspace above the land. These principles have been developing over time. In early common law, when there was little practical use of the upper air over a person's land, the law considered that a landowner owned all of the airspace above their land. That doctrine quickly became obsolete when the airplane came on the scene, along with the realization that each property owner whose land was overflown could demand that aircraft keep out of the landowner's airspace, or exact a price for the use of the airspace. The law, drawing heavily on the law of the sea, then declared that the upper reaches of the airspace were free for the navigation of aircraft. In the case of United States v. Causby,[3] the U.S. Supreme Court declared the navigable airspace to be "a public highway" and within the public domain. At the same time, the law, and the Supreme Court, recognized that a landowner had property rights in the lower reaches of the airspace above their property. The law, in balancing the public interest in using the airspace for air navigation against the landowner's rights, declared that a landowner owns only so much of the airspace above their property as they may reasonably use in connection with their enjoyment of the underlying land. In other words, a person's real property ownership includes a reasonable amount of the airspace above the property. A landowner can't arbitrarily try to prevent aircraft from overflying their land by erecting "spite poles," for example. But, a landowner may make any legitimate use of their property that they want, even if it interferes with aircraft overflying the land."

6/8/2013 1:09:32 PM

Quote :

"The law, in balancing the public interest in using the airspace for air navigation against the landowner's rights, declared that a landowner owns only so much of the airspace above their property as they may reasonably use in connection with their enjoyment of the underlying land. In other words, a person's real property ownership includes a reasonable amount of the airspace above the property. A landowner can't arbitrarily try to prevent aircraft from overflying their land by erecting "spite poles," for example. But, a landowner may make any legitimate use of their property that they want, even if it interferes with aircraft overflying the land.""

6/8/2013 1:19:01 PM

Spite poles


logged and dogeared

thxu tww

6/8/2013 1:43:26 PM

great, now I don't have to tip the delivery boy

6/8/2013 3:49:19 PM