you know what this means? the troops knew IN ADVANCE where cities and subarbs would be, i mean how else would they have known where to walk. this really goes to show how much control and planning the zionists had.

4/11/2006 4:40:53 PM

Quote :

"why make the leap from some jews being in charge to all jews being in charge?"

I NEVER said all Jews were in charge. You are putting words in my mouth.

All Jews are clearly not involved. As I have consistently stated, it is a small group of elite Zionists who exercise the power and are directing the drive for this "new world order."

Quote :

"which side were the zionists on in the civil war?"

They don't foment wars always with the purpose of having one side win. They often do not care which side officially "wins" the war. Their primary objective is to make lots of money by loaning out money during the war, make money for their arms and defense contracting companies, kill off thousands/millions of non-Jews, or otherwise advance their agenda (eg, destroying regimes unfavorable to them).

Quote :

"did jews start ww2?"

Yes. Zionist bankers supported the Nazi Government and funded the Hitler War Machine. They directed FDR and the U.S. Government to allow the Pearl Harbor attack to occur in order to draw the U.S. into the war.

The Zionists used WWI and WWII to advance their agenda for world government (under Zionist rule). After WWI, they proposed the League of Nations. And after WWII, the United Nations was created.

Quote :

"So I guess that you won't admit that you were dead wrong about the non-existant Afghan oil pipeline"

I never said the pipeline was built or completed. All I alluded to was the plans to build a pipeline.

Once again, you are desperately grasping at straws to try to "get one" on me. Keep trying.


[Edited on April 11, 2006 at 4:57 PM. Reason : ```````]

4/11/2006 4:43:06 PM

shit yeah

not only were the rothschilds bankers

they were fucking city planners

and you know what

they fucking knew cary would be full of edomites
so they designed it like a fucking toiletbowl maze

4/11/2006 4:43:12 PM

Quote :

"Perhaps their goal was to prevent the building of the pipeline. "

YOU ARE OFFICIALLY A FUCKING FUCKED UP FUCK

THIS FUCKIN GUY



GOOD FUCKING JOB THE DUKE

4/11/2006 4:45:07 PM

if they ever invent a time machine, i'm going back in time to give salisbury's mom a coathanger.



THIS FUCKIN' GUY

4/11/2006 4:48:25 PM

Quote :

"Yes. Zionist bankers supported the Nazi Government and funded the Hitler War Machine. They directed FDR and the U.S. Government to allow the Pearl Harbor attacks in order to draw the U.S. into the war."

never before, in all the theories ive read on PH, have i come across anything at all claiming this. please provide proof for this that doesnt come from some anti-semetic source.

4/11/2006 4:49:11 PM

Quote :

"since salisburyboy is now telling us 9/11 was done for an oil pipeline"

You're focussing on just one small reason, and attempting to set up a straw man argument. The overall goal of securing control over oil and other natural resources in the Middle East and Central Asia, including the issue of a future oil pipeline in Afghanistan, was part of the reason for carrying out the 9/11 attacks, but there were clearly many other reasons--including serving as the pretext for the wars in Iraq and possibly Iran, Syria, etc...as well as the pretext for expanding government power and racheting up the police state in the United States, the Western nations, and other nations around the world.

4/11/2006 4:51:19 PM

Quote :

"I never said the pipeline was built or completed. All I alluded to was the plans to build a pipeline. Once again, you are desperately grasping at straws to try to "get one" on me. Keep trying."

Building an Afghan oil pipeline is completely unnecessary now that the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline is finished. You didn't allude to anything, you explicitly stated that Afghanistan was invaded so that a pipeline could be built across it. You were 100% wrong and you will never admit it because you are so close minded and dead set on what you think is the truth that you ignore all of the facts that show the opposite.

Quote :

"Perhaps their goal was to prevent the building of the pipeline."

You just said that Afghanistan was invaded so that a pipeline could be built. Now you're saying that the zionists wanted to prevent the building of a pipeline - just like how Iraq was invaded to secure the oil supply even though the zionists don't care about the oil supply. How do you reconcile all of the conflicting information that you spout off on here?

By the way, how did the zionists cause the US Civil War and the Revolutionary War?

[Edited on April 11, 2006 at 5:00 PM. Reason : 666]

4/11/2006 4:59:08 PM

Quote :

"you explicitly stated that Afghanistan was invaded so that a pipeline could be built across it"

FALSE. I never said that. And you cannot find an "explicit" statement where I did say that. You are putting words in my mouth again, even after I have made myself more than clear.

Quote :

"I never said that the elite want the pipeline built right now. I simply stated that Afghanistan was crucial (as a location) for the building of such a pipeline. Again, this is all about CONTROL of the oil resources, including being able to manipulate the supply levels to control price and profits. Perhaps they don't want the pipeline built for now. And perhaps they would like to build it, but cannot due to the current chaotic situation inside Afghanistan or for other reasons."

4/11/2006 5:03:13 PM

Quote :

"never before, in all the theories ive read on PH, have i come across anything at all claiming this. please provide proof for this"

U.S. GOVERNMENT HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF JAPANESE ATTACK ON PEARL HARBOR AND ALLOWED IT TO OCCUR TO DRAW AMERICA INTO WORLD WAR II

As we all know, the United States was drawn into WWII by the attack on Pearl Harbor. The U.S. put Japan into a situation where they had to attack the U.S. Pacific fleet, and the U.S. government and military knew that Japan was planning an attack on the U.S. Pacific Fleet. The elite engineered and allowed the attack to occur. They needed it to create U.S. public support for entering the war. The History Channel has even aired programming documenting that the U.S. government had prior knowledge of the attack.

Documentation:

Topeka Capital-Journal: "FDR knew attack was coming"
http://web.archive.org/web/20040223032130/http://www.cjonline.com/stories/120601/pea_fdrknew.shtml

The BBC made a documentary, which asserts that the U.S. government allowed the attack at Pearl Harbor to occur. The entire video can be watched online here:

BBC Documentary: "Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor" (video)
http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/sacrificeatpearlharbor.ram

NY Press: "FDR Knew It Was Coming"
http://www.nypress.com/14/23/news&columns/wildjustice.cfm

Newsmax: "Unlike George W. Bush, FDR Had Specific Warnings"
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/4/13/94615.shtml

The McCollum Memo: The Smoking Gun of Pearl Harbor
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/McCollum/index.html

whatreallyhappened.com's Pearl Harbor Archive
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/pearl.html

prisonplanet.com's Pearl Harbor Archive
http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#harbor

"Pearl Harbor Historiography: A Lesson in Academic Housecleaning"
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north26.html

"December 7, 1941: A Setup from the Beginning"
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=103

Yamamoto's radio message intercepted in Hawaii on Nov. 24th: attack on Pearl Harbor was NOT a total surprise
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SH.html


[Edited on April 11, 2006 at 5:15 PM. Reason : ```]

4/11/2006 5:10:18 PM

Quote :

"Oh, so you don't think I and others know about the importance of Afghanistan in regards to the oil pipeline that was to be built there to transport the oil in the Caspian Sea region to the coast? "

soooo you just talk like this so when people challenge you - you can italicize the word "explicit" and move along eh




THIS FUCKIN' GUY

find one soap box poster that thinks your ideas are benefitting the soap box

4/11/2006 5:32:50 PM

but then we went from being attacked by the japanese to fighting hitler and the japanese within days, ultimately saving many jewsedomites.

this thread makes me laugh. thanks woodfoot.

4/11/2006 5:33:53 PM

hey man

JUST KEEP LIVING

J.K.L.

4/11/2006 5:36:51 PM

personally i think the zionist/civil war connection is a lot more interesting

lets continue down that route



im trying to figure out why they would head out all the way to gettysburg for such a key battle. any ideas? too many jews in new york city so they had to stop early?

4/11/2006 5:48:00 PM

the claim i was referring to was the claim of zionists interfering to allow PH to happen.

the cause of PH was the same cause of 9/11: compartmented intel, fragmented command structure. FDR should have been ready for it.

now show me the proof that the Zionists were the root cause

4/11/2006 6:19:34 PM

Quote :

"The Evidence Filter Any scenario constructed to account for the events of September 11 2001 must pass a graduated test, as embodied in the following items. These fall into three classes: Suspicious circumstances 1. Four of the named hijackers were not in the United States. 2. The WTC towers collapsed without adequate heat stress. 3. Smaller aircraft accompanied Flights 77 and 93. 4. Most of the alleged hijackers were rather poor pilots. 5. Evidence of the alleged hijackers developed too quickly. 6. Westward excursion of Flights UA93 and AA77 are inexplicable as terrorists hurrying to targets." Anomalies 1. The US Air Force failed to intercept any of the flights. 2. The hijackers' names did not show up on passenger lists. 3. The hijackers' faces did not appear on boarding gate videos. 4. Black boxes were missing from all but one flight. Contradictions 1. The Pentagon was not struck by a large passenger aircraft. 2. Cellphone calls alleged to have been made by passengers were essentially impossible. A successful scenario must at least explain the contradictions and account for a majority of the anomalies. It is of course desirable that it also account for the suspicious circumstances, but no scenario need stand or fall in this regard. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm"

4/11/2006 7:08:04 PM

Hello alias.

4/11/2006 7:11:56 PM

lets smear me because i am new

figures

4/11/2006 7:32:31 PM

You must think we're dumber than shit.

4/11/2006 7:33:56 PM

AHAHAHAHA

You had the exact same user info as salisburyboy, but as soon as I called you on it you changed it.

You're a joke, little buddy.

[Edited on April 11, 2006 at 7:36 PM. Reason : you even have the same hot chick-9/11-gun collage in your photos]

4/11/2006 7:34:20 PM

overthrower is also the name he uses on UNC's msg board spouting the same shit

4/11/2006 7:36:27 PM

AHAHAHAHA

This is too funny.

4/11/2006 7:38:08 PM

Guth...is that you?

4/11/2006 7:46:01 PM

Many of you may be confused by the term zionist. You may be thinking that the Israelites are the Zionists and thats not true. The people behind the 9/11 conspiracy are the same people that controll the government and the media, secret societies such as the skill & bones.

You can find some more information on them here.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2004/10/27/notes102704.DTL

Quote :

" ... After all, there is indeed ample evidence that the U.S. government, long before 9/11, had already discussed the quite plausible possibilities and strategic benefits of unleashing a "Pearl Harbor"-type event on America for the purposes of creating havoc and fear and furthering certain agendas. This much is a given. And it's just the tip of the iceberg. Look. There are plenty of strangely unanswered questions about 9/11, about the stunning inaction of NORAD and Bush's stupefying nonreaction upon hearing of the attack, not to mention his administration's incredible attempts to halt any independent 9/11 investigations, and have you ever read a fully satisfying account of how this whole atrocity could have happened, one that answered all your questions and quelled your lingering doubts and squashed, once and for all, any hints of dread you had about our government's potential role in the tragedy? Neither have I. Neither has anyone. Of course, no one in any major media will touch this stuff. It is professional suicide to dare suggest an alternate truth to the one supplied by the Pentagon and regurgitated by the media, despite the fact that most every journalist, trained as they are to be suspicious and wary and fully cognizant of the fact that there is always more to a given apocalypse than meets the eye, every journalist knows that buried just beneath the slippery surface of any good conspiracy theory is a gem or three of real truth, a question that begs to be solved or at least researched and, yet, most likely never will, because it has been cast into the madhouse of "outrageous" impossibility and is therefore rendered impotent and hopeless."

4/11/2006 8:06:08 PM

It's gotta be Guth. salisburyboy knows how to spell "Skull & Bones."

4/11/2006 8:07:11 PM

wait, what is this

4/11/2006 8:12:49 PM

no it's salisburybot. he uses overthrower on other msg boards posting the same exact material. yet he's tryin to fool us into thinkin it's some other person. nice try ace!

4/11/2006 8:16:51 PM

I think somebody's trolling salisburyboy, trying to get him suspended again.

4/11/2006 9:09:29 PM

Quote :

""The Evidence Filter Any scenario constructed to account for the events of September 11 2001 must pass a graduated test, as embodied in the following items. These fall into three classes: Suspicious circumstances 1. Four of the named hijackers were not in the United States. 2. The WTC towers collapsed without adequate heat stress. 3. Smaller aircraft accompanied Flights 77 and 93. 4. Most of the alleged hijackers were rather poor pilots. 5. Evidence of the alleged hijackers developed too quickly. 6. Westward excursion of Flights UA93 and AA77 are inexplicable as terrorists hurrying to targets." Anomalies 1. The US Air Force failed to intercept any of the flights. 2. The hijackers' names did not show up on passenger lists. 3. The hijackers' faces did not appear on boarding gate videos. 4. Black boxes were missing from all but one flight. Contradictions 1. The Pentagon was not struck by a large passenger aircraft. 2. Cellphone calls alleged to have been made by passengers were essentially impossible. A successful scenario must at least explain the contradictions and account for a majority of the anomalies. It is of course desirable that it also account for the suspicious circumstances, but no scenario need stand or fall in this regard. "

are you fucking kidding? 90% of those are just plain lies.

4/11/2006 9:11:09 PM

I started reading this thread.


Then I started scrolling through it with my mouse.



Then I asked myself "Why the fuck am I wasting my time browsing this thread?"

4/12/2006 12:05:05 AM

i would think there would be better places to have discussions like this than...the...wolf...web? i mean, *this* is where you want to unload all of your theories?

4/12/2006 3:59:54 PM

ARE YOU A PSYCHIC?
DO YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS THE ONLY PLACE HE IS DOING THIS AT?

4/12/2006 10:32:35 PM

ARE YOU AN ENGLISH TEACHER?
HOW DARE YOU END A SENTENCE WITH A PREPOSITION!

4/13/2006 3:25:36 AM

Quote :

"Hello alias."

It's NOT me. It's someone trying to imitate/parody me.

Quote :

"I think somebody's trolling salisburyboy, trying to get him suspended again. "

That is quite likely. There is no reason to suspend me for anything I have done, so you must fabricate all kinds of false reasons (eg, your cheese threads) to try to get me suspended.

4/13/2006 8:13:46 AM

Someone should count up how many people have made ch__s_ threads

and then someone should count up how many people have ever vocally supported you

4/13/2006 8:16:48 AM

I just wana put this out there.

salisburyboy is my nightmare. It scares me there are humans in this world like him.

That's all.

4/13/2006 8:36:04 AM

Quote :

"and then someone should count up how many people have ever vocally supported you "

there have been several people who have voiced support for me

people should not be silenced/censored because they have real (or perceived) unpopular viewpoints (however "extreme" those opinions may be)

and I realize these boards don't have true freedom of speech, but last time I checked they don't subscribe to a policy that you supsend and silence users for their viewpoints

4/13/2006 8:38:15 AM

FUCKER THEY SUSPEND AND SILENCE USERS FOR ALL SORTS OF FUCKING REASONS

YOU THINK THEY HAVE SOME LINE THEY WON'T CROSS?

THE ONLY REASON YOU'RE STILL HERE IS BECAUSE DUKE HAS SOME PHILOSOPHICAL REASON FOR NOT BANNING YOU OUTRIGHT

ANY NORMAL PERSON WOULD HAVE TAKEN A 1 THREAD RULE ULTIMATUM AND GONE PACKING

BUT YOU, NO NOT YOU. YOU HANG AROUND FOR SOME UNKNOWN GOD-FORSAKEN REASON TO SPOUT UTTER AND COMPLETE BULLSHIT THAT NO ONE WITH MORE THAN 2 BRAIN CELLS STRUNG TOGETHER CAN SEE AS THE RAMBLING OF A DISTURBED MIND. THE MUSINGS OF THE MAD ARE NOT ENTERTAINING, THEY ARE NOT ENLIGHTENING, THEY ARE DISTURBING.

YOU DO MORE DAMAGE TO YOUR "CAUSE" THAN YOU HELP. YOU ARE TWW'S JESSE JACKSON, AN OUTRIGHT KOOK THAT NO ONE WILL EVER TAKE SERIOUSLY.

YOU LIKE THE LOOK OF YOUR OWN POSTS AND COULD CARE LESS WHAT ANYONE HAS TO SAY ABOUT IT. THE VERY ACT OF HANGING AROUND WHILE EVERYONE HATES YOUR FAGGOT ASS GETS YOU OFF. YOU ARE PATHETIC.

[Edited on April 13, 2006 at 8:44 AM. Reason : *]

4/13/2006 8:43:56 AM

Quote :

"FUCKER THEY SUSPEND AND SILENCE USERS FOR ALL SORTS OF FUCKING REASONS YOU THINK THEY HAVE SOME LINE THEY WON'T CROSS? THE ONLY REASON YOU'RE STILL HERE IS BECAUSE DUKE HAS SOME PHILOSOPHICAL REASON FOR NOT BANNING YOU OUTRIGHT ANY NORMAL PERSON WOULD HAVE TAKEN A 1 THREAD RULE ULTIMATUM AND GONE PACKING BUT YOU, NO NOT YOU. YOU HANG AROUND FOR SOME UNKNOWN GOD-FORSAKEN REASON TO SPOUT UTTER AND COMPLETE BULLSHIT THAT NO ONE WITH MORE THAN 2 BRAIN CELLS STRUNG TOGETHER CAN SEE AS THE RAMBLING OF A DISTURBED MIND. THE MUSINGS OF THE MAD ARE NOT ENTERTAINING, THEY ARE NOT ENLIGHTENING, THEY ARE DISTURBING. YOU DO MORE DAMAGE TO YOUR "CAUSE" THAN YOU HELP. YOU ARE TWW'S JESSE JACKSON, AN OUTRIGHT KOOK THAT NO ONE WILL EVER TAKE SERIOUSLY. YOU LIKE THE LOOK OF YOUR OWN POSTS AND COULD CARE LESS WHAT ANYONE HAS TO SAY ABOUT IT. THE VERY ACT OF HANGING AROUND WHILE EVERYONE HATES YOUR FAGGOT ASS GETS YOU OFF. YOU ARE PATHETIC."

30thAnnZ is my hero.

4/13/2006 8:47:06 AM

this is bush country!

4/13/2006 8:51:57 AM

Quote :

"there have been several people who have voiced support for me"

count them
list them
show me posts

4/13/2006 8:56:25 AM

Quote :

"THE ONLY REASON YOU'RE STILL HERE IS BECAUSE DUKE HAS SOME PHILOSOPHICAL REASON FOR NOT BANNING YOU OUTRIGHT "

There is absolutely no reason to even suspend me, let alone ban me. I have broken no rule warranting such extreme action. The only thing I have done "wrong" is hold viewpoints that the ruling clique of trolls in the soap box will not tolerate.

You are advocating suspending and banning people based on their viewpoints. Bottom line.

Quote :

"THE VERY ACT OF HANGING AROUND WHILE EVERYONE HATES YOUR FAGGOT ASS GETS YOU OFF. YOU ARE PATHETIC.""

No. YOU (and the other little bitches who devote their lives to trying to silence me) are pathetic, not me.

Not everyone hates me. Just you and a few of your friends.

Now, why are you and this small group of trolling pathetic losers trying to silence me? The only logical reason I see is that you are afraid of the information I'm posting.


"To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore. The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them -- except force."

--JBR Yant

4/13/2006 9:00:10 AM

there is a difference between being annoyed by your rants and disgusted by your racism

and being afraid

4/13/2006 9:04:23 AM

People can want to silence someone for a host of reasons. Inconvenient truth is only one small reason in a world of possibilities. Some people silence others b/c they don't want them telling lies, or saying hurtful things, or being annoying, acting inappropriately, speaking out of turn, or spreading misinformation, inciting a riot, because the speaker is incoherent, because they are tired of hearing someone who wont listen to reason, or being blatantly disrespectful etc.

4/13/2006 9:10:22 AM

Quote :

" Some people silence others b/c they don't want them telling lies CHECK saying hurtful things CHECK being annoying CHECK acting inappropriately CHECK speaking out of turn not a big deal spreading misinformation CHECK inciting a riot COULDN'T IF HE WANTED TO because the speaker is incoherent while being batshit crazy, his posts are suprisingly easy to read because they are tired of hearing someone who wont listen to reason CHECK DOUBLE PLUS MARK being blatantly disrespectful CHECK - fuck your edomite bullshit "

[Edited on April 13, 2006 at 9:19 AM. Reason : and thats the fact jack]

4/13/2006 9:17:44 AM

Quote :

"People can want to silence someone for a host of reasons. Inconvenient truth is only one small reason in a world of possibilities. Some people silence others b/c they don't want them telling lies, or saying hurtful things, or being annoying, acting inappropriately, speaking out of turn, or spreading misinformation, inciting a riot, because the speaker is incoherent, because they are tired of hearing someone who wont listen to reason, or being blatantly disrespectful etc."

If telling lies, saying hurtful things, acting inappropriately, speaking incoherently, or being annoying was grounds for suspension, then 60-75%+ of those posting on tww would need to be immediately suspended. Yet, some people here in the soap box are only targetting me for censorship. Why is that? Why not go after the hundreds of other trolls and useless posters on tww?
Being "annoying" is not grounds for suspension. That is entirely subjective. What most of the people post here is "annoying" to me, but I'm not whining like a little bitch to have people suspended.

Neither is telling lies or falsehoods grounds for suspension. Most users are spreading at least some false information. You do not silence those who tell lies because lies and false information can be countered with the truth. And otherwise "dangerous" or false information can thus be "weeded out" in the marketplace of ideas. For this reason, there is no reason to silence or censor false information. Also, there is the problem of who determines which information is "false" and deserving to be censored. So, it is best to let ALL information and viewpoints be heard, and things will work out.

And how about the fact that I'm currently confined to my own threads, and can only create one thread per week? My threads are now a small fraction of the new threads created in the soap box. And if I'm so "annoying"/"speaking falsely"/etc, then simply don't click on or respond to those few threads. But when people are still trying to silence me even under these restrictions, it demonstrates that they are scared of the information I'm posting, and want me silenced for the reason of suppressing that information.

4/13/2006 9:31:38 AM

Quote :

"it demonstrates that they are scared of the information I'm posting"

or how about any number of other things they dont like about you or your information.

4/13/2006 9:39:44 AM

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_ZionSummary.html

Quote :

"Why do we believe Zionists are the masterminds of the September 11 attack? Let us count the reasons... by Daryl Bradford Smith 10 April 2006 1) The Five Dancing [ISRAELIS] Five [Mossad agents] -- dressed in Arab clothing -- were seen celebrating after the World Trade Center towers were hit with airplanes. Later that day he police spotted their van and stopped the. The police discovered that they were Israeli army veterans, not Arabs. Their Arab clothing was discovered in their van, along with box cutters and weapons, and their visas had expired, so they were in the country illegally. There were arrested and put in a federal jail in Brooklyn. However, they were not investigated. Rather, they were released from jail and sent back to Israel. About 60 other young Israeli Jews were arrested in the weeks following the 9-11 attack. They were also sent back to Israel without any investigation. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A3879-2001Nov22 Reports several months later claim that up to 200 young Israelis, some of them former members of military intelligence units, had been arrested and sent back to Israel without any investigation. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/03/07/wspy07.xml&sSheet=/news/2002/03/07/ixworld.html 2) The Israeli spy ring [...] 5) The 9/11 attack follows a pattern [ie, historical examples of Iraeli "false flag" attacks] Israelis have been caught many times as they stage terrorist attacks and blame them on Arabs...For some examples: • Zionists got caught after they blew up the King David Hotel • Zionists got caught in Egypt in 1954 • The Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967 [...] 7) The media is controlled by Zionists One the most important pieces of evidence that Zionists are the masterminds to almost all the world's corruption is that they dominate the media of Europe, North America, and Australia. No crime network could get away with a crime as enormous as the September 11 attack unless they can suppress investigations and evidence. The media executives must either be under the control of the crime network, or they must be part of the crime network. [...] Conclusion Standing up to Italian crime gangs is not anti-Italian; standing up to American crime gangs is not anti-American;... So don't be fooled into thinking that standing up to Zionist crime gangs is anti-Semitic!"

4/13/2006 10:22:55 AM

100% PROVEN FACT!!

4/13/2006 10:28:09 AM

EUROPE
NORTH AMERICA

AND

AUSTRALIA

!!!

4/13/2006 10:29:55 AM