sawahash All American 35321 Posts user info edit post |
didn't want that to be at the top of the page.
[Edited on November 21, 2010 at 4:40 PM. Reason : ] 11/21/2010 4:39:44 PM |
AstralAdvent All American 9999 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Christians are so afraid of muslims they use it as a reason to pat down naked boys.
Oh wait, they did that before." |
I'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message.11/21/2010 4:41:22 PM |
sawahash All American 35321 Posts user info edit post |
Here is my question.
When will it come out that pedophiles are now working as TSA agents so they have a valid reason to rub an 8 year old boys junk?
Also...you know you can carry matches on an airplane. Finger nail clippers, no way! Knitting needles, don't even think about it. Matches, sure, us smokers gotta lite up someway don't we? 11/21/2010 4:48:16 PM |
BigMan157 no u 103354 Posts user info edit post |
this shit is unconstitutional, i'm not brown, leave me be 11/21/2010 4:53:30 PM |
Joie begonias is my boo 22491 Posts user info edit post |
these are terrible.
[Edited on November 21, 2010 at 4:59 PM. Reason : the second one is BY FAR the worst imo]11/21/2010 4:59:14 PM |
skokiaan All American 26447 Posts user info edit post |
TSA is the agency of the federal government that I most want dismantled. It only started around 2001.
It's the perfect embodiment of what is wrong with government. Bloated, completely ineffectual, not accountable to anyone, and strictly harmful to citizens. The bureaucrats who run it are completely incompetent.
They are worse than the DMV. They should be the poster child for anyone who hates bad government. 11/21/2010 5:16:55 PM |
Str8BacardiL ************ 41754 Posts user info edit post |
11/21/2010 5:17:35 PM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
Muslim women may be exempt from TSA pat downs and body scanners
http://www.thoughtsfromaconservativemom.com/?p=15430
Quote : | "The Blaze reports:
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued a travel notice to Muslim airline passengers, warning them that new regulations from the Transportation Security Administration violate certain religious rules.
According to CAIR, the TSA’s new “enhanced pat down” policy should be limited to searching only around Muslim women’s head and neck if they are wearing a hijab and that Muslims objecting to the enhanced full-body scans have the right to request the pat-down procedure be done in a private place.
In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.
“It is a violation of clear Islamic teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” the ruling states. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Qu’ran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”
According to the Detroit Free Press, CAIR endorsed the fatwa.
When asked if Muslim women would indeed be given an exemption from TSA security screening procedures, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refused to answer:
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has avoided answering a question about whether hijab-wearing Muslim women would be given the same security X-rays – or full-body pat-downs – as other passengers.
The issue of the invasion of privacy created by the newly enhanced procedures – passengers are given a choice of an X-ray that essentially reveals their nude body for a TSA agent to review or a full-body pat-down that includes touching private body areas – has been raging for the last few days.
It was at a news conference that Napolitano was asked by CNSNews.com, “On the pat-downs, CAIR has recommended that Muslim women wearing hijabs refuse to go through the full body pat-downs before board plans. Will you insist that they do go through full body pat-downs before boarding planes?”
Napolitano didn’t answer the question. Instead she talked about the need to keep powders and gels and liquids off passenger jets.
What she did say was, “We are doing what we need to do to protect the traveling public and adjustments will be made where they need to be made.”
She continued, “With respect to that particular issue, I think there will be more to come.”
WND reported several days ago how CAIR, the Islamic group that was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a terror-funding case, was telling Muslim women how to instruct Transportation Security Administration agents at airport checkpoints.
Floyd Reports opines:
Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.”
So, Muslim women will not be subject to a full body scan or a pat-down on much of their elaborately concealed bodies. Feeling secure yet?
Add this to the growing proof that political correctness is not merely totalitarian but suicidal. The president made an exception to airline security protocol big enough to drive a jihad through — and applied it only to the adherents of Islam. Roman Catholic nuns can be groped en masse, but Obama rushed to defend the dignity of Muslim women.
Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear.
So, as Laura Ingraham has commented, if you want to avoid an intrusive screening, just wear a hijab. " |
11/21/2010 5:24:02 PM |
OldBlueChair All American 5405 Posts user info edit post |
incompetent assholes on a power trip ftl. made me recall the time I was forced to remove and throw away the carabiner that I keep all of my keys together with. It was in my purse and the lady told me I had to take all the keys off and throw the thing away because "it could be used as a weapon"
...bc I'm obvs going to use makeshift brass knuckles to punch an opposing fan in the face.
^ OH GREAT IDEA.
[Edited on November 21, 2010 at 5:27 PM. Reason : ^] 11/21/2010 5:26:25 PM |
raiden All American 10505 Posts user info edit post |
yeah, the TSA just needs to fucking go away.
I'm glad I'm not flying anywhere this holiday season. 11/21/2010 5:30:21 PM |
JBaz All American 16764 Posts user info edit post |
Hey guess what, you do have a choice Muslims. Don't fly on airplanes, go travel with your god damn camels this holiday season, thanks for playing. 11/21/2010 7:38:04 PM |
AlaskanGrown I'm Randy 4694 Posts user info edit post |
^haha 11/21/2010 7:42:11 PM |
elduderino All American 4343 Posts user info edit post |
My union just got us exempt from this bullshit.
Hopefully this whole issue causes the downfall of the TSA and we finally decide to adopt a security policy alla Israel. Not some bloated beaureaucratic entity that wastes tax money and employs the inept. 11/21/2010 7:46:25 PM |
dave421 All American 1391 Posts user info edit post |
^ who are you / what do you do that you're exempted? 11/21/2010 8:32:13 PM |
elduderino All American 4343 Posts user info edit post |
A ninja. They keep trying to harass us because of our katanas and throwing stars. It's profiling, if you ask me. 11/21/2010 8:36:14 PM |
EMCE balls deep 89772 Posts user info edit post |
11/21/2010 8:38:56 PM |
JBaz All American 16764 Posts user info edit post |
I would like to propose the use of porn stars as part of the new TSA pat down procedures. Hell of a lot cheaper than expensive machines and they have enough experience to know whats what during a pat down and who wouldn't want that option? It would make the air travel experience a lot better, plus if a Terrorist does get past TSA, we just send in a bunch of naked chicks with double D's on hand to distract them... 11/21/2010 8:39:32 PM |
EMCE balls deep 89772 Posts user info edit post |
^ STD's would spread like wildfire 11/21/2010 8:42:40 PM |
aaronburro Sup, B 53071 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Those who would sacrifice a little liberty for a little security deserve neither, and will lose both." |
11/21/2010 8:53:49 PM |
smc All American 9221 Posts user info edit post |
California Man Arrested for Stripping Down to Bike Shorts During Pat Down. 11/21/2010 9:01:15 PM |
AndyMac All American 31922 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/11/18/another-tsa-outrage/
Another TSA Outrage " |
There should be some sort of screening process for pilots.
If you're willing to give control of the plane over to a guy with fingernail clippers, you can't be a pilot.
[Edited on November 21, 2010 at 9:08 PM. Reason : ^ What's illegal about that?]11/21/2010 9:08:09 PM |
elduderino All American 4343 Posts user info edit post |
^It's already been set in motion.
Misinterpreted your post.
Also nailclippers are allowed. So unless that story is old, I'd take it with a grain of salt.
[Edited on November 21, 2010 at 9:32 PM. Reason : .]
11/21/2010 9:25:40 PM |
Str8BacardiL ************ 41754 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.wral.com/news/technology/story/8664433/ 11/21/2010 11:10:09 PM |
EMCE balls deep 89772 Posts user info edit post |
lawl 11/21/2010 11:11:44 PM |
Doc Rambo IV All American 7202 Posts user info edit post |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBL3ux1o0tM&NR=1&feature=fvwp 11/21/2010 11:17:40 PM |
AstralAdvent All American 9999 Posts user info edit post |
there better be some good porn spoofs coming out
I'm AstralAdvent and i approved this message 11/21/2010 11:18:30 PM |
Str8BacardiL ************ 41754 Posts user info edit post |
If Islamic people get any exceptions to airport security its fucking ridiculous. ] 11/21/2010 11:53:22 PM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^ you really think a website called "comments from a conservative mom" from someone who idolizes laura ingraham has any credibility? 11/21/2010 11:55:53 PM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
^All of those statements were direct quotes from news websites 11/21/2010 11:56:55 PM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^ and none of those quotes come remotely close to saying muslims won't be screened... seriously, don't be fooled by conservatardism.
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:01 AM. Reason : ] 11/22/2010 12:01:28 AM |
ThePeter TWW CHAMPION 37709 Posts user info edit post |
Seriously just read what's on the screen. Its raising an issue that may come up very soon.
Quote : | "Muslim women may be exempt from TSA pat downs and body scanners" |
11/22/2010 12:03:31 AM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^ haha, you are an idiot. Or you may be an idiot. 11/22/2010 12:05:19 AM |
Samwise16 All American 12710 Posts user info edit post |
I don't see how he's an idiot, I read it as something that could be in the works... fatwas are serious bizness 11/22/2010 12:06:26 AM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^ he's an idiot because he's basing the entirety of his fear based on a headline written by someone who is intentionally trying to misrepresent reality for the purposes of calling Obama a muslim-loving terrorist. It's bog-standard propaganda, and it's sad that an allegedly college-educated person would fall for it.
It's sad I even have to explain this.
Not to mention the qualifier "may be" gives them carte blanche to make any unsubstantiated claim they want to make, which is precisely what they've done.
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:16 AM. Reason : ] 11/22/2010 12:10:43 AM |
Samwise16 All American 12710 Posts user info edit post |
Am I missing something? Where did he say he was scared?
Sounds like you take things way too seriously... :\ 11/22/2010 12:16:22 AM |
walkmanfades All American 3139 Posts user info edit post |
Channel 17 news in Raleigh just showed an interview of Kid of Kid n' Play where he discussed the airport full body scans.
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:17 AM. Reason : d] 11/22/2010 12:17:05 AM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^^The point is there is no basis to the headline if you actually read it, but ThePeter has succeeded in poisoning the information surrounding this debate with idiocy that he chose to spread.
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:18 AM. Reason : ] 11/22/2010 12:18:28 AM |
Samwise16 All American 12710 Posts user info edit post |
I don't see how there supposedly wasn't an basis for it. So, obviously that's just your opinion. From what I gathered, it could happen, it could not happen. Which would be the same as "may be." It could go both ways.
And PS - you weren't "explaining" anything. You're just ranting. 11/22/2010 12:21:15 AM |
Vulcan91 All American 13893 Posts user info edit post |
BREAKING NEWS: Terrorists may detonate nuclear bombs in 25 American cities on Thanksgiving day 11/22/2010 12:23:39 AM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^^ It's not my opinion, it's fact, just read the thing he posted. No one made any statement indicating that muslims wouldn't screened. You have just been fooled apparently. 11/22/2010 12:25:12 AM |
walkmanfades All American 3139 Posts user info edit post |
I can't believe reasonably smart people are defending this bullshit. Typical Glenn Beck style fear-mongering. Raising wild hypotheticals for the purpose of whipping the ignorant into a frenzy. 11/22/2010 12:26:12 AM |
Samwise16 All American 12710 Posts user info edit post |
Ok you obviously don't understand the meaning of "may." Your point is subjective, not factual.
You seem to be an insufferable douche. 11/22/2010 12:27:20 AM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^ but that's the point... just because you throw "may" into a statement doesn't mean you can say what you want without any good reason.
"The world may end tomorrow" is a true and valid statement. But it won't, and there's no good evidence for it.
"muslims may be exempt" is true, but there is likewise no good reason to believe that given any available information.
It's not hard to understand. Don't be so stupid. 11/22/2010 12:29:30 AM |
walkmanfades All American 3139 Posts user info edit post |
It's dishonest to say something may happen when it will, in fact, not happen.
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:31 AM. Reason : Samwise may be a bible-thumping Muslim hater.] 11/22/2010 12:30:10 AM |
Samwise16 All American 12710 Posts user info edit post |
That is one of the most retarded arguments I have ever read. You can't just throw the word "may" into everything. "I may have a baby tomorrow." Not so. "You may be a dumbshit." Ok, I can see that.
Like I said, your thoughts on that article are subjective and I don't think it's fair for you to just randomly call people stupid because they posted something that had the word "conservative" in it. In my opinion, you're just as bad as the extremist conservatives. The article wasn't anything spectacular nor was it anything outrageous. Calm down, broseph.
Anyway, this made me lawl:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etRjjRsGP-A
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:34 AM. Reason : ^ How did you know?!] 11/22/2010 12:33:51 AM |
GoldenGirl All American 6475 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Hey guess what, you do have a choice Muslims. Don't fly on airplanes, go travel with your god damn camels this holiday season, thanks for playing." |
Wow I have lost all respect for you, not that I had a lot to begin with.11/22/2010 12:35:15 AM |
walkmanfades All American 3139 Posts user info edit post |
The purpose of that article wasn't to inform the public of an important issue. The purpose of that article was to fuel anti-Muslim sentiment. 11/22/2010 12:35:18 AM |
moron All American 34148 Posts user info edit post |
^^^ he's not stupid because of the word "conservative" (someone posted something from redstateblog that wasn't dumb earlier), he's stupid (and apparently you are too) for thinking there was some credibility to the statement "muslims may be exempt" when the factual, objective reality is that there is absolutely no indication that is the case.
^^ i think JBaz was joking...
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM. Reason : ] 11/22/2010 12:38:12 AM |
Samwise16 All American 12710 Posts user info edit post |
For real dude? I don't see any anti-Muslim statements in the article, but whatever.. I thought the last sentence was more of a smart ass statement than one composed by a bigot.
This is what happens when people are too politically correct and take everything so f'ing seriously
^ Where did I ever say I thought that it was really going to happen? OH THAT'S RIGHT, I didn't.
Ya know what, this is why I never talk politics with people... because of asshats like you who feel the need to shove their opinions down other's throats and put them down if they don't completely agree with you and your opinions
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:40 AM. Reason : this thread is no longer fun] 11/22/2010 12:38:49 AM |
walkmanfades All American 3139 Posts user info edit post |
No, it's what happens when dumb cunts get on the internet and spread dumb cuntery.
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:41 AM. Reason : At best, the article is uninformed. At worst, it's an outright lie.]
[Edited on November 22, 2010 at 12:42 AM. Reason : Also, calm down. Jesus.] 11/22/2010 12:39:31 AM |