page 11

1/23/2012 12:49:56 PM

If you don't mind me asking, who were you dismissed by? (Judge, Prosecution, Defense?) And can you confirm the rumors that there were 12 jurors paneled by the prosecution before going on to the defense?

I bet you're relieved not to have to sit through this. As interesting as I would find sitting on a high profile jury, I couldn't imagine missing 6-8 weeks from work, etc...

1/23/2012 12:58:58 PM

I was dismissed by the Defense. And yes, there were 12 jurors paneled by the prosecution, then the Defense dismissed 3 of us.

I don't know if the Defense knew they were going to dismiss me, but the public defender was a TOTAL DICK. He questioned me for about 30 minutes and was so rude I was thisclose to going "fuck you buddy, I'm not on trial here, peace out." Then a few other jurors said he was a jerk to them too, so I didn't feel as bad.

1/23/2012 3:10:12 PM

That's ridiculous. I hate pompous assholes. That just tells me he knew all along he was going to dismiss you, and was just going through the motions. Bet it didn't sit well with the rest of the jurors though.

[Edited on January 23, 2012 at 3:13 PM. Reason : He may come to regret that. Trials are won or loss in jury selection.]

1/23/2012 3:13:05 PM

yo should have "tripped" on the way past him and punched him in the nuts. "Ooops, sorry"

1/23/2012 3:54:04 PM

I wouldn't have been able to keep my mouth shut, and i'm sure it would have gotten me in trouble.

1/23/2012 4:01:05 PM

Quote :

"Raleigh, N.C. — Attorneys in the second trial of a man accused of beating his pregnant wife to death more than five years ago had seated nine jurors in the case as of Monday morning. Jason Young, 37, is charged with first-degree murder in the death of Michelle Marie Fisher Young, who was found beaten to death in their home just south of Raleigh on Nov. 3, 2006. He was arrested in December 2009 and went to trial in June, but a jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict, forcing a judge to declare a mistrial. Jury selection began Tuesday in Young's retrial with a pool of 75 potential jurors. Prosecutors ask each prospective jurors about their exposure to coverage of the case and whether they can put aside any preconceived notions in order to serve. Prosecutors also ask prospective jurors if they watch any TV crime dramas, whether their religious beliefs would prevent them from passing judgment and whether their lives have been touched in any way by domestic violence. Once the state has selected 12 potential jurors, defense attorneys then have the chance to interview them and excuse up to six in the entire jury selection process. The process continues until the state and defense have agreed on the full complement of 12 jurors and a number of alternate jurors yet to be determined. So far, five women and four men have been seated. After deliberating for more than 12 hours in Young's first trial, the jury of seven men and five women appeared to be leaning toward an 8-4 not-guilty verdict. During more than two weeks of testimony, the state contended that the Youngs' marriage was strained because Jason Young didn't want to be married or have children because the responsibility conflicted with a bachelor-like lifestyle that consisted of an affair, football tailgate parties, drinking and partying with friends. Young, who was among the 48 witnesses to testify, said he was out of town when someone else killed his 29-year-old wife and that he had no involvement in the crime. But prosecutors claimed that he checked into a Virginia hotel, drove 169 miles back to his home, beat his wife to death and drove back to the hotel. Defense attorneys argued that two people could have been involved in the crime, pointing out that DNA evidence found inside the house didn't match Jason Young and that he didn't have time to commit the crime in the timeframe laid out by the state. Opening statements in the retrial are tentatively scheduled for Feb. 6, and testimony could last as long as six weeks. Young, meanwhile, is out of jail on a $900,000 secured bond. If convicted, he faces life in prison without the possibility of parole."

http://www.wral.com/specialreports/michelleyoung/story/10633113/

1/23/2012 4:05:17 PM

what's the likelihood that the defense knows about tww, knows about this thread, saw that 2 users were in the jury pool, checked out their pictures, and knew who to dismiss?

1/23/2012 6:10:36 PM

about the same likelihood that your boo didn't know you were cheating on him for a while?

eventually they'll figure it out as he did

just sayin'

1/23/2012 6:17:03 PM

Best insult I'll read all day.

1/23/2012 6:18:20 PM

There is not even a router involved in this case.

1/23/2012 6:20:56 PM

1/23/2012 6:21:22 PM

^^ maybe. Maybe not. But there is a fax machine!

1/23/2012 6:22:57 PM

and an Automatic Teller Machine Machine

1/23/2012 6:23:37 PM

Quote :

"what's the likelihood that the defense knows about tww, knows about this thread, saw that 2 users were in the jury pool, checked out their pictures, and knew who to dismiss? "

Even if the defense were reading TWW, why waste 2 of their 6 dismissals, when they could have just dismissed them for cause (reading/posting in this thread). And, I would think that the defense would prefer two seemingly intelligent users, and their post history would be indicative of intelligence level. And we don't know that Sayer has been dismissed yet anyways. If they read TWW, they wouldn't have wasted a dismissal on begonias. Those are too valuable if there is ANY other way to remove someone you don't want.

1/23/2012 6:31:33 PM

Quote :

"about the same likelihood that your boo didn't know you were cheating on him for a while? eventually they'll figure it out as he did"

daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmn

1/23/2012 7:16:02 PM

FIRST OF ALL, I am a MODERATOR of a forum on an INTERNET MESSAGE BOARD. I put that shit on my RESUME. Bitches would looooooooove for me to sit on their jury cause I got mad postin history. boyeeeeeeeeee


and

Quote :

"The process continues until the state and defense have agreed on the full complement of 12 jurors and a number of alternate jurors yet to be determined. So far, five women and four men have been seated."

Sayer is one of those four men.

SUCKS FOR YOU DUDE

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 2:03 AM. Reason : miss you friend!]

1/25/2012 2:00:59 AM

Oh shit. TWW right smack dab in the middle of this! Can't wait for the trial to be over so we can get some good jury room gossip!

1/25/2012 7:22:20 AM

Shit, that does suck for him.

1/25/2012 8:00:37 AM

Has he posted in this thread?

1/25/2012 8:21:13 AM

he posted that he was on jury duty, but he hasn't posted in it since, probably cause he didn't want to be sent to the butt hut.

1/25/2012 8:25:53 AM

http://m.wral.com/w/localnews/story/52360005/

looks like the defense attorney found this thread

1/25/2012 7:04:56 PM

see I told you they'd find out

1/25/2012 7:11:00 PM

1/25/2012 7:11:11 PM

hahaha the defense attorney is probably butt hurt because we talked shit about him ITT.

I mean he's probably a public defender because he sucks at being a real lawyer.

1/25/2012 7:12:21 PM

WHA

I stopped posting ITT on Tuesday, before I had even been interviewed

does this mean Sayer is getting dismissed?!

1/25/2012 7:29:09 PM

woah woah woah. now i feel like i should read all of this thread.

1/25/2012 7:30:53 PM

That means the DA's office will be scrutinizing this forum now! Just wait till they see the Brad Cooper thread!!!!!1

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 7:44 PM. Reason : Here's a quote for WRAL, "Oh shit!" proclaimed one user of the message board.]

1/25/2012 7:41:13 PM

Damn this is .

1/25/2012 7:52:22 PM

This thread is on page 3 google search for

Quote :

"Jason young murder trial"

1/25/2012 7:54:37 PM

HAHAHAHHAAH this is fucking awesome

someone please please pleeeeease mention TWW in an article

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 8:01 PM. Reason : by the way, jurors, Jason Young is guilty]

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 8:03 PM. Reason : nigger is a perfectly normal word]

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 8:03 PM. Reason : those Penn State kids were asking for it]

1/25/2012 7:59:22 PM

ibtl

1/25/2012 8:10:45 PM

my bf's immediate response was "get quantumfred to delete your posts!!!!"

but that ain't how we do round hurrrr

FREE SPEECH ON TDUB

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 8:28 PM. Reason : cake and ice cream for all]

1/25/2012 8:27:49 PM

1/25/2012 8:35:05 PM

they just mentioned this on the 10pm news....I think I need to rewind just to hear it again haha

1/25/2012 10:13:56 PM

The important thing is whether they mentioned tww or not.

1/25/2012 10:16:33 PM

they just said internet message board

1/25/2012 10:17:19 PM

^^


Or

It's probably that stupid websleuths site


^ WHY ARENT YOU WATCHING YOUR BOY DAVID?!?!

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 10:18 PM. Reason : .]

1/25/2012 10:17:31 PM

^^Do you know how to post videos to facebook?

1/25/2012 10:18:24 PM

DAVID IS ON?!?!?!?! SNAPS

also they quoted specific posts from this thread, but left out important parts of each post

1/25/2012 10:19:14 PM

He's been on for like 2 hours.


What did they quote?

1/25/2012 10:20:16 PM

Quote :

"I was dismissed by the Defense."

Quote :

"I guess we will know if you are, if all posting in this thread stops. You can however send PMs, and we will keep it private"

Quote :

"we're going to be the worst jurors ever"

(watching QVC now!!!)

1/25/2012 10:23:47 PM

Quote :

"we're going to be the worst jurors ever"

hahahahahaahaaah

1/25/2012 10:24:41 PM

oh my god. do they not get sarcasm? they are not going to be the worst jurors ever, literally.

1/25/2012 10:24:59 PM

Damn. Wonder if they read all 11 pages.

And WTF else did they read

1/25/2012 10:25:51 PM

Someone should hax this thread to make it look like sayer is saying really inflammatory things...

1/25/2012 10:25:55 PM

Quote :

"oh my god. do they not get sarcasm? they are not going to be the worst jurors ever, literally."

It's what the media does: takes words out of context to sensationalize the situation to create ratings.

1/25/2012 10:33:12 PM

WRAL!!!! quick

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 11:06 PM. Reason : TWW post were just displayed on WRAL]

1/25/2012 11:04:36 PM

WTVD didnt say anything about message board stuff

1/25/2012 11:07:52 PM

They quoted a few of begonias posts

[Edited on January 25, 2012 at 11:09 PM. Reason : d]

1/25/2012 11:09:37 PM