ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
reinstall the graphics drivers manually. then theres something in control panel about performance you go to and let it run some tests..then it'll turn it on for you
or that's what i had to do anyways 6/2/2009 3:06:15 PM |
gs7 All American 2354 Posts user info edit post |
Yup, need to have a proper graphics card ... those Intel Integrated Graphics cards don't support Aero ... because they suck. 6/2/2009 3:06:17 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
^Actually, most Intel chipsets support the full Aero experience in Win7.
I would HIGHLY advise that you NOT upgrade the drivers from whatever comes preinstalled with Windows 7, unless Aero is off/broken out of the box. I've had to roll-back the Beta Intel video drivers multiple times (Intel drivers SUCK BALLSSSS). 6/2/2009 3:12:28 PM |
gs7 All American 2354 Posts user info edit post |
^Oops, you're correct, I was wrong: http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/cs-023606.htm#8
Quote : | "Intel will support the Windows Vista Aero desktop theme beginning with the Intel 945G/GM Express chipset and Intel 965 Express chipset families, as well as with future desktop and mobile chipsets." |
The more you know.6/2/2009 3:21:32 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
^ you are complete right on this point though: Quote : | "... because they suck." |
Avoid intel graphics like the plague.6/2/2009 3:29:15 PM |
RSXTypeS Suspended 12280 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "Yup, need to have a proper graphics card ... those Intel Integrated Graphics cards don't support Aero ... because they suck." |
he has a MB unibody. they are nvidia chipsets not Intel Integrated Graphics
[Edited on June 2, 2009 at 3:34 PM. Reason : .]6/2/2009 3:33:40 PM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
installing windows 7 in virtualbox on my MBP... we'll see how this goes. 6/2/2009 3:40:06 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
^^correct. and to further clarify, i just downloaded the latest driver off the nvidia site and installed it and aero worked fine after that. win 7 said it had installed it on its own but gave me like a 2.0 rating on the performance index under graphics. after installing that latest drive it's at 5.0 which is still my lowest but high enough to get aero working
[Edited on June 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM. Reason : asdf] 6/2/2009 3:40:18 PM |
Arab13 Art Vandelay 45180 Posts user info edit post |
so windows 7 will allow all (or most) of my current programs to keep working right? (x64 version of 7) 6/2/2009 3:55:46 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
yup. i've had much better luck getting some stuff to work on 7 than Vista 6/2/2009 4:08:22 PM |
Prospero All American 11662 Posts user info edit post |
Windows 7 Gets Official Release Date: October 22 http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=15312 6/2/2009 6:07:02 PM |
RSXTypeS Suspended 12280 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "installing windows 7 in virtualbox on my MBP... we'll see how this goes." |
the OS works great! I'm running it in Parallels 4.0 on my MBP unibody. My only complaint is that the rest of the Mac OS X becomes a little slow even though I have Parallels optimized for Mac OS X and not the VM. (Windows 7 x64)6/2/2009 6:23:37 PM |
joe17669 All American 22728 Posts user info edit post |
I couldn't get 7 to install on Parallels - it kept locking up immediately after the first screen of the installer.
This was with the RC version, too. 6/2/2009 6:25:08 PM |
RSXTypeS Suspended 12280 Posts user info edit post |
odd. thats the version I'm running as well. In fact I actually have both the x86 and x64 installed and working in Parallels 4.0 6/2/2009 6:26:52 PM |
joe17669 All American 22728 Posts user info edit post |
I'm pretty sure v4 is the version I bought when I got my MBP. Maybe there's a software update for it or something. I'll have to look into this.
Did you boot directly from the ISO file or did you burn to disc first? 6/2/2009 6:29:11 PM |
RSXTypeS Suspended 12280 Posts user info edit post |
I went directly from the iso. 6/2/2009 6:30:32 PM |
qntmfred retired 40726 Posts user info edit post |
i've also been using the RC with Parallels 4 with no problems 6/2/2009 6:56:57 PM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
I'm also having trouble with my 3 monitors sometimes. When it does what it does to ask me if I'm sure I want to install something, for instance, it blanks the screen for a second. A couple of times it came back up with only two of my monitors. I've been having to go into the device manager and disable/enable one of the video cards to get it working again. Granted I installed the ATI drivers manually, but only so I can turn off/on crossfire and because crossfire seemed to be enabled by default by windows w/o any way to turn it off. Maybe I was wrong and there was a way, but I couldn't tell. 6/3/2009 11:04:24 AM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
for those of you that use UltraMon (and subsequently discovered it fails at working in win7)
check out DisplayFusion: http://www.binaryfortress.com/displayfusion/
it's awesome - i don't think i'm going back to UltraMon this time. 6/4/2009 9:15:29 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
too bad you can't trial the multi takbar thing.
[Edited on June 4, 2009 at 9:26 AM. Reason : my bad, the pro trial is on a separate part of their site.] 6/4/2009 9:23:35 AM |
evan All American 27701 Posts user info edit post |
yeah, 30 day free trial of pro... and it's only $18 to buy.
that's in the realm of impulse buy for me; i have no problem paying such a reasonable price for something that helps me every day. 6/4/2009 9:31:28 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
lmfao, it even lets me go into and back out of crossfire mode without crashing. UltraMon pwnt, stay home. 6/4/2009 9:39:02 AM |
BobbyDigital Thots and Prayers 41777 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the OS works great! I'm running it in Parallels 4.0 on my MBP unibody. My only complaint is that the rest of the Mac OS X becomes a little slow even though I have Parallels optimized for Mac OS X and not the VM. (Windows 7 x64)" |
yeah, so far so good. Running it in seamless mode on Virtualbox. It's been so long since i've used a windows product regularly, that I don't even know what I want to do with it (beyond the 3 or 4 things that I need windows for (visio, and a few windows only apps built in house).
I do need more RAM though. I'm nearly maxing out my 2gigs when running all my apps. Is anyone running 6gigs on an MBP? is there a noticeable difference vs. 4GB?6/4/2009 10:40:26 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
With respect to:
Quote : | "3) I would have to start by dual booting, and Win 7 would go on the latter half of my disk. I did this exactly with Vista and it was a huge pain in the ass once I was ready to get rid of the XP partition on the beginning of my disk." |
I fucked BOTH my Win7 and Vista partitions last night by deciding "Hey, GParted kinda worked before when I moved the one partition I want to keep forward on the disk, I guess I'll try switching my two partitions on disk!" Neither partition ended up bootable, and neither was even repairable with the installation disks (got to the point where it couldn't find any boot problems with either, but wouldn't run explorer.exe on startup). On the plus side, since Win7 installs itself so quickly and installs programs so quickly, I was able to get back up to where I was in the two hours I had before work this morning.
I also noticed the older available ATI drivers don't have this problem:
Quote : | "I'm also having trouble with my 3 monitors sometimes. When it does what it does to ask me if I'm sure I want to install something, for instance, it blanks the screen for a second. A couple of times it came back up with only two of my monitors." |
So there you go, Noen, 7x64 is my primary OS now. HAPPY?!?!?!6/8/2009 12:25:33 PM |
bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
binary fortress displayfusion: cx71642a.zip
[Edited on June 8, 2009 at 10:16 PM. Reason : ] 6/8/2009 10:15:48 PM |
Donogh5 All American 971 Posts user info edit post |
7^ displayfusion does look awesome
does it show proper taskbar buttons in windows 7? 6/9/2009 9:01:14 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
yeah, really close. 6/9/2009 9:06:41 AM |
bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
about to install build 7201 x64 on main rig 6/9/2009 9:57:39 AM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "displayfusion does look awesome
does it show proper taskbar buttons in windows 7?
" |
the new version does it damn near perfectly. WAAAAAAAY better than ultramon
(OH SHIT error count: 12)
and full background..
[Edited on June 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM. Reason : moar]6/9/2009 10:27:21 AM |
Donogh5 All American 971 Posts user info edit post |
^ nice, thanks
looks like i'll be switching from ultramon 6/9/2009 1:28:06 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
I just found some problems when having multiple instances of Excel open. Can't really explain it but basically it's having a hard time figuring out which task bar which windows should be on.. It's fine for everything else though. Strange 6/9/2009 2:59:51 PM |
bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
build 7201 is great. don't know any difference between 7100 yet though 6/9/2009 5:52:57 PM |
davidkunttu All American 2490 Posts user info edit post |
^4 hell yes. cya ultramon! 6/9/2009 6:36:02 PM |
confusi0n All American 5076 Posts user info edit post |
is 7201 a public build?
[Edited on June 9, 2009 at 7:19 PM. Reason : ?] 6/9/2009 7:14:59 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
No. It's an internal build, and it's old. 6/9/2009 7:50:59 PM |
confusi0n All American 5076 Posts user info edit post |
Well if that's the case and 7100 is the RC...how many builds a day are there ? I mean it can't possibly be *that* old. 6/9/2009 7:55:55 PM |
Prospero All American 11662 Posts user info edit post |
7201 was June 1st, so yes, it's 8 days old and most likely have a new build for this week already. 6/9/2009 8:12:41 PM |
bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
i'd assume they do 1-3 builds a day?
my icons chose to disappear on me, but i just right clicked on desktop | view | show desktop icons and they came back.
other than that and a couple of weird window resizing bugs (where you resize a window on the bottom and your mouse goes over an icon on the taskbar it does some weird window draws) all is well. 6/9/2009 8:42:57 PM |
Noen All American 31346 Posts user info edit post |
^I can't talk about any of that. Suffice to say, as I have many times in this thread, you should stick to public releases. Unless you have been given a private build for a specific fix from a Microsoft representative, there is no value in installing these leaked internal builds.
You lose all support and update compatibility with non-public builds, and there's a very high chance that it may not be release quality, or may contain viruses, trojans and malware (as there's no way to verify the authenticity of the image). 6/9/2009 9:41:23 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "my icons chose to disappear on me" |
a lot of mine keep doing this too.. mainly just shortcuts to network locations.
weird6/9/2009 9:57:37 PM |
bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
Noen: but then i wouldn't be leet, c'mon now! 6/9/2009 11:58:47 PM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
They could have done a better job with the XP mode. 6/9/2009 11:59:33 PM |
Grandmaster All American 10829 Posts user info edit post |
speaking of resizing, when you move a maximized window, is it really supposed to snap back to the same spot when you release? If so, why even allow the window to unhook? 6/10/2009 8:59:46 AM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
if you move it far enough it doesn't snap back
nvm.. in the original version i installed it worked how it should (i.e. would kind of "un snap" when you moved it..) but it seems to be snapping back all the time now no matter what.
wtf
[Edited on June 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM. Reason : asdf]
ok now it's working how it should and i've changed nothing. PLZ TO FIX THIS BUG Noen ?
[Edited on June 10, 2009 at 9:27 AM. Reason : moar]
6/10/2009 9:04:27 AM |
gs7 All American 2354 Posts user info edit post |
Windows 7 build 7227 leaks http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/06/10/windows-7-build-7227-leaks
I don't care to upgrade to each new build, but it's fun to watch the leaks. 6/10/2009 9:31:08 AM |
Grandmaster All American 10829 Posts user info edit post |
^^I cannot test this theory with remote desktop 6/10/2009 9:56:09 AM |
bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
just grabbed 7229 to put on my home theater pc. hadn't put 7201 on there yet, so may as well try the latest. i don't care 6/12/2009 11:48:21 AM |
scud All American 10804 Posts user info edit post |
[Edited on June 12, 2009 at 8:49 PM. Reason : ugh]
6/12/2009 8:48:28 PM |
ScHpEnXeL Suspended 32613 Posts user info edit post |
Anybody know why the fuck a process called "system" keeps taking 50% of my resources for no apparent reason? Some days it doesn't do it at all and sometimes it's constant.. like right now. I'm not doing anything out of the ordinary. I can't do anything when it happens..all windows lock up completely..even the mouse locks sometimes. 6/15/2009 11:08:35 AM |
dakota_man All American 26584 Posts user info edit post |
install ProcessExplorer and see if it gives you any more information about what started it. 6/15/2009 12:07:10 PM |