Yep. They would basically have to skin you, tighten you up, and sew you back together.

http://www.ijps.org/articles/2008/41/3/images/ijps_2008_41_3_114_43607_u2.jpg

[Edited on December 29, 2013 at 4:05 PM. Reason : my bad]

12/29/2013 4:05:10 PM

Quote :

"How are we miscommunicating on this?"

they explained it very clearly, how can you not figure it out?

12/29/2013 4:16:21 PM

Quote :

"theDuke866: I think she's correct in a sense, in that she could resistance train her way to the body of a Greek goddess, but she's never going to be attractive until she gets that Jabba the Huttess-turned Frederica Krueger skin fixed."

Correct. She would putting in an enormous amount of effort and enduring a great deal of athletic strain on her knees and body...in order to still look terrible. Most women don't add muscle to their bodies very easily either...so it would be an extraordinary task to put on the amount of muscle necessary to even begin to somewhat fill those areas out, and again, it would still look awful--fat/skin would still be drooping down and off her body.

It is clear that she could benefit from surgery, but even surgery can't fix this stuff nearly as well as people assume. It's best to just not be vain.

12/29/2013 4:38:31 PM

Wait, what would be a ton of effort and strain on her body? Squats and deads, or piling on enough muscle to fill that skin (which would be impossible and undesirable to boot, not just difficult and straining)?

12/29/2013 8:43:44 PM

Piling on enough muscle to "even begin to somewhat fills those areas out."

But, if you're confused about the strain that I mentioned, I can direct you to any openly "active" person's Facebook wall so you can read all about the different injuries they love to whine about.

[Edited on December 29, 2013 at 9:22 PM. Reason : ]

12/29/2013 9:22:11 PM

You can't fill that skin, I don't care how often she squats. It's not the skin per se, but it's the integrity of the layers under the skin that has been loss due to the weight loss.

I don't know how else to explain this.

12/29/2013 11:27:04 PM

^^ I should have phrased it "squats and deads in general, or enough volume, weight, and intensity of squats and deads to try to fill out that skin, which would be impossible anyway."

and yeah, if you're exercising significantly, you're going to have sports-related injuries from time to time. it beats the shit out of maladies from being a slob, though...and if you don't go at it like either an idiot or a serious competitor, i think you're unlikely to have anything chronic or significant.

(i say this from the perspective of someone with a physical therapy appointment tomorrow for shoulder and elbow, due to years of full-retard weight training...huge weight, overtraining, working out injured, etc.)

12/30/2013 12:20:31 AM

guyz, I'm not sure if you're still referring to my comment or not...but I WASNT TALKING ABOUT HER EXCESS SKIN, OR THAT SQUATS WOULD EVEN BEGIN TO FIX HER PROBLEMS. JUST SAYING SHE SHOULD PROBS DO SOME SQUATS

12/30/2013 2:58:22 AM

what she should do is invent a time machine and never post her pics on the internet

12/30/2013 3:09:38 AM

No worries Slapster, we are just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.

12/30/2013 12:26:32 PM

^^lol

^i figured as much

1/2/2014 3:20:27 AM

God damn

1/2/2014 5:29:02 PM

she squeezed that photo to make herself look thinner

1/2/2014 5:30:44 PM

1/2/2014 9:27:11 PM

i've met several big girls through the years that would be so hot if they had just been 50-60 lbs lighter.

1/2/2014 10:13:56 PM

careful, you're gonna incite fattyrage.

1/3/2014 12:03:52 AM

Not weight loss, rather weight (muscle) gain.

Wow, if it is true! DAT ASS deserves a medal

1/4/2014 3:08:01 PM

better posture and posing would go a long way for the pic on the left, if she stood in the same pose as the pic on the right she would look fine.

1/5/2014 2:55:44 PM

Yes, it would go a long way, but there is no denying that there is a obviously a butt-load of extra booty mass in the after pic (and on arms, shoulders, and thighs).

1/5/2014 3:00:28 PM

she is also standing on her toes and flexing

1/5/2014 3:02:23 PM

What's your point?

I'm not following.

1/5/2014 3:05:09 PM

1/15/2014 7:04:06 PM

I'm sorry, I think the girl on the left looks good.

1/16/2014 1:10:41 AM

What do you like more her tree trunk legs, her FUPA, her pooch belly, her man sized arms, or her (guessing here) dumpy butt?

The girl on the right is fine as shit. She's got a freaking V and camel toe wrapped between two toned legs, a pretty flat stomach, and chick arms.

People see a toned girl and say "wow thats kinda like fucking a dude" But most dudes i know weigh 200 lbs not 115. I'll take the girl who weighs 115 on the right. The whale on the left resembles most dudes i see

1/16/2014 3:48:46 AM

^ Truer words have not been spoken... preach it bro.

Cue synapse and occamsrezr, who will call her "roided out", an "animal", "disgusting", and "almost man". How small must their dicks/minds be to be intimidated by fit toned chicks....

1/16/2014 8:05:06 AM

I, too, prefer the chick on the left.

1/16/2014 8:34:51 AM

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? CHICK ON THE RIGHT IS BANGING....CHICK ON THE LEFT NOT SO MUCH.

1/16/2014 8:39:57 AM

I also vote for chick on the right

1/16/2014 8:49:22 AM

i like my women diabetic with heart and vein problems, so left!

1/16/2014 8:54:14 AM

I can't see past the chin.

1/16/2014 8:56:26 AM

theres a difference between a toned, fit girl....and a girl so buff she looks like a dude. Toned, fit girls are very nice looking. The girl last posted would fit that.

The girls so buff they look like dudes though...no, that's gross

1/16/2014 8:57:21 AM

I'd knock boots with both left and right. I give a slight edge to right side for being tighter.

1/16/2014 9:08:04 AM

The only way she ways 115 is if she's 4'10".

1/16/2014 9:18:24 AM

She is hella skinny and also doesn't have big muscles, so even at 5' 2" -- which she looks like she is -- she would be 115 lbs.

And for those who say they prefer the left, perhaps they need to see such a body nude to see all the lovely rolls where they can jam their boner in. Maybe that's what the pull is? Extra areas to do bonerjamz 04?



P.S. See first pic on previous page and theDuke's post after it.


[Edited on January 16, 2014 at 9:29 AM. Reason : ]

1/16/2014 9:28:02 AM

Quote :

"But most dudes i know weigh 200 lbs not 115. I'll take the girl who weighs 115 on the right. The whale on the left resembles most dudes i see"

the average American male, ladies and gents

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/14/average-american-male-body_n_4080007.html

1/16/2014 10:42:09 AM

thighs don't touch

1/16/2014 10:50:36 AM

god dude i bet that chicks vag on the right would strangle my d. left looks like id be stirring up a pot of cream cheese with it.

1/16/2014 11:46:08 AM

So you want to jam your boner into a passive mushy puddle rather into an active tight tunnel?

1/16/2014 11:50:55 AM

You're assuming you could pry her out of the gym (when she's not posing in a mirror) long enough to bang her.

Also, congrats, you learned how to userlink. We get it, you're clever.

1/16/2014 11:52:46 AM

Your point: irrelevant

(This is a hypothetical situation to begin with, no one here banged, is banging, or will bang that girl)

Quote :

"theDuke866 All American 48981 Posts user info edit post I can't figure out whether we've become so collectively warped that people genuinely prefer her fat body, or if it's just fatties telling themselves what they need to hear. 12/20/2013 11:41:02 PM"

[Edited on January 16, 2014 at 11:57 AM. Reason : ]

1/16/2014 11:55:12 AM

I never said the girl on the right was NOT attractive to me, just that I thought the girl on the left looked good. I don't think the two have to be mutually exclusive.

I do NOT think the pic on the right looks manly, overly built, whatever. and perhaps it's the angle - after closer inspection her thighs have more mass to them than I initially thought. my first reaction was that she was much too skinny/sinewy for my tastes. I could use a few more pics, thx

1/16/2014 12:49:04 PM

slappy1, are you overweight yourself?

1/16/2014 1:11:09 PM

no.

1/16/2014 1:17:12 PM

^

1/16/2014 1:30:18 PM

looks like chunky as a child

[Edited on January 16, 2014 at 1:48 PM. Reason : .]

1/16/2014 1:48:27 PM

now you're criticizing people for being chunky as a child? what's wrong with you?

1/16/2014 1:51:38 PM

^^who the fuck are you talking to/about?

[Edited on January 16, 2014 at 2:01 PM. Reason : I look like I was chunky as a child? what does that even mean?]

1/16/2014 2:01:20 PM

This is a difficult one to choose from

1/18/2014 12:30:14 PM

NFW that chick is 130 there on the right.

1/18/2014 12:34:56 PM

Yeah I don't know, but I am talking about choosing froths pics, regardless of weight.

1/18/2014 12:45:22 PM