The liberal media's most difficult task post-election will be to connect:

"America first" nationalism

with

"White nationalism"

It isn't an easy task, but creating a false narrative of racism is what they do best. Lord knows we have a ton of brainwashed SJW sheep ready to support it.

11/22/2016 2:37:03 AM

It isn't really.

'White America First' or if you want to Trump-ify it 'Make America White Again'.

See, that was easy. And is literally what we'll be seeing for 4 years. With huge preferences given to wealthy, christian, straight and cisgendered subsets of the White portion.

11/22/2016 9:04:27 AM

Oh lawd, you just triggered him by saying "cisgendered"

11/22/2016 9:28:17 AM

11/22/2016 10:00:28 AM

What news organization will be first to have its White House Press credentials revoked? How days into the Trump Presidency will it be?

11/22/2016 11:07:54 AM

Cis and trans? Guys this is not organic chemistry!

11/22/2016 11:13:20 AM

Quote :

" With huge preferences given to wealthy, christian, straight and cisgendered subsets of the White portion."

so just like the last 8 years then

11/22/2016 11:24:28 AM

so just like the last 8 yearsevery year then

11/22/2016 1:53:31 PM

Like I said.

Quote :

"Lord knows we have a ton of brainwashed SJW sheep ready to support it."

Holy shit the liberal media, instead of learning from it's mistake, has completely doubled-down on the ___ism ___phobia narrative. Any miniscule, unsubstantiated incident, even if a hoax, is now fair game for front page news. Everyone tweet any instance of ____ism or ____phobia! We have a narrative to spin!

Guys someone with a Trump avatar said "FAGGOT" in a youtube comment... FRONT PAGE NEWS! THE NARRATIVE!

[Edited on November 23, 2016 at 12:16 AM. Reason : sheep]

11/22/2016 11:56:35 PM

It's amazing how triggered JCE and his ilk get when they hear racist, sexist or ____ist.

They start foaming at the mouth and begin posting fanatically.

11/23/2016 2:02:03 AM

You realize "trigger warnings" and that bullshit is all from your side, right?

What triggers me is obliviousness to media bias. You're supposed to be smarter than that.

11/23/2016 4:38:15 AM

Oh you triggered

11/23/2016 10:19:53 AM

JCE talking about how certain terms are bullshit because they came from another side...please man, keep this shit coming!

[Edited on November 23, 2016 at 10:35 AM. Reason : asdf]

11/23/2016 10:35:13 AM

yall are both right

and both assholes

[Edited on November 23, 2016 at 11:16 AM. Reason : JCE and Dentaldamn]

11/23/2016 11:16:07 AM

Oh please

11/23/2016 12:49:55 PM

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/24/journalists-charged-felonies-trump-inauguration-unrest

Not sure where this should go but this obviously can't happen. I'm sure the charges will be dropped.

1/24/2017 7:50:03 PM

Didn't Obama go after journalists stronger than any President since the Alien and Sedition Acts?

1/25/2017 7:09:14 AM

Don't know statistically but he was wrong when he tried to strong-arm FNC.

Not sure how that has anything to do with what I posted though.

1/25/2017 8:31:32 AM

Quote :

"Didn't Obama go after journalists stronger than any President since the Alien and Sedition Acts?"

Is that what people are saying?

1/25/2017 8:51:24 AM

I can't recall a single instance of reporters charged with felonies for doing their job under the Obama administration.

1/25/2017 9:24:13 AM

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/jan/10/jake-tapper/cnns-tapper-obama-has-used-espionage-act-more-all-/

1/25/2017 9:27:40 AM

I actually do not have an issue with "America First". I agree with moderates on a number of topics. But my interpretation of that means to not go into war and to remain focused on the people in America from executives down to teachers, garbage men, and fast food workers. I also think "America First" means cleaning up relations with countries we have invaded before we turn our back so we do not have to have unresolved issues with foreign entities.

I also take issue with the media in general, but I think calling everything except fox "liberal" and subsequently blaming people that you don't agree with that they must be in cahoots with all "liberal (nonfox) media" is going too far, just like calling something racist that isn't clear cut enough to be calling it racist.

1/25/2017 9:37:35 AM

^^yes please compare the leaking of classified documents to the arrest of reporters covering the civil unrest after the presidential inauguration.

1/25/2017 9:41:03 AM

i was replying to what kdogg was confused about

1/25/2017 9:42:54 AM

Oh, well he's confused about a lot of things.

1/25/2017 9:49:09 AM

Quote :

"https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jan/24/journalists-charged-felonies-trump-inauguration-unrest Not sure where this should go but this obviously can't happen. I'm sure the charges will be dropped."

They need to be charged with something. You don't get to hang out with a group that's smashing windows and burning cars only to claim "It's cool - I'm just filming this for my youtube channel" when the cops round you up.

I'm more interested in what's going to happen to the attorneys that got arrested along with the Antifa protesters. I'm sure they were there for the purpose of later defending the rioters in court, but can they do that when they were arrested for the same crime?

1/25/2017 12:10:57 PM

Quote :

"You don't get to hang out with a group that's smashing windows and burning cars only to claim "It's cool - I'm just filming this for my youtube channel""

Who is an who isn't allowed to be a journalist? What's your qualification?

1/25/2017 12:54:23 PM

Quote :

"You don't get to hang out with a group that's smashing windows and burning cars only to claim "It's cool - I'm just filming this for my youtube channel" when the cops round you up."

So now we've entered an era where just being in proximity to a crime is an offense punishable by detention?

1/25/2017 1:01:20 PM

^"enticing a riot by organizing, promoting, encouraging and participating in acts of violence in furtherance of the riot" is a crime.

Quote :

"Who is an who isn't allowed to be a journalist?"

I think this is a valid question. Can anyone who has access to recording media and a youtube account call themselves a journalist?

1/25/2017 1:23:54 PM

jesus fucking christ

1/25/2017 1:28:39 PM

Quote :

"Who is an who isn't allowed to be a journalist? What's your qualification?"

you've got it backwards; being a journalist doesn't disqualify you from being a rioter. When you're 5' away from a guy that's torching a car, you're filming it, and both of you are wearing hoodies, masks, and duct taped pants and shirt sleeves to combat tear gas, then you fit the bill of a rioter.

1/25/2017 1:35:40 PM

these are the same people who worry about democrats knocking down your door to trample on your civil rights

fucking morons

1/25/2017 1:46:10 PM

^^ do you know that's what they were wearing?

Quote :

"organizing, promoting, encouraging and participating"

I'm missing the part where filming something while not participating is also grounds for arrest

1/25/2017 1:50:51 PM

When the masses of brainless, unemployed liberals are rioting in the streets, burning down their local CVS pharmacies and cutting fire hoses trying to put out the fire, I'd say it is fairly reasonable for cops to want to clear the streets.

We don't need "journalists" taking pictures of the rioters, we need law and order so the respectable citizens can go to work the next day to pay for the parasitic scum that just burnt down their own city.

Btw, I think its hilarious that the side that controls 99% of the mainstream media is complaining about the state of the press.

1/25/2017 1:51:00 PM

lol, you can do better than that post. that was low energy.

1/25/2017 1:52:02 PM

Quote :

"We don't need "journalists" taking pictures of the rioters"

Good thing the Constitution isn't based on what you think we need, and instead based on what the government should, but mostly shouldn't be allowed to punish someone for

1/25/2017 1:53:08 PM

Quote :

"When you're 5' away from a guy that's torching a car, you're filming it, and both of you are wearing hoodies, masks, and duct taped pants and shirt sleeves to combat tear gas, then you fit the bill of a rioter."

so "real" journalists make no effort to shield themselves from tear gas?

1/25/2017 2:07:14 PM

We aren't talking about the constitution, we are talking about anti-riot laws in DC.

Rioting isn't free speech. Unfortunately for leftists their "protests" often turn into riots so they get the two confused.

1/25/2017 2:09:59 PM

lol

low energy

1/25/2017 2:23:06 PM

Oh ok, I see you're back to just straight ridiculous responses...It was nice to have you putting a tiny bit of thinking into your posts a couple days ago, but back to usual I guess

1/25/2017 2:54:30 PM

If JCE was around 250 years ago and had his way we'd all be speaking propa engish!

1/25/2017 3:45:52 PM

Quote :

"^^ do you know that's what they were wearing?"

that's what the attorneys in the Antifa video I saw were wearing. I'm assuming that the so-called journalists in that group were dressed the same as well.

Quote :

"I'm missing the part where filming something while not participating is also grounds for arrest"

Quote :

"organizing, promoting, encouraging and participating"

are you missing the part where livestreaming these shenanigans on social media is promoting and encouraging the riot?

You had to expect a response like this after James O'Keefe released video of some Antifa jackasses making statements like this doozie:

"The message has to be, we do not recognize the city government either. If you try to close us down we will look for your house, we will burn it. We will physically fight the police if they try to steal one of our places. We will go to war and you will lose.”

1/25/2017 4:03:25 PM

Where does it end then? Say someone edits a tape to make it look like an organization is doing something awful. This tape drives a man to murder three innocent people in a branch of that organization and cite it as the reason.

Should that be incitement? I say it's irresponsible at worst but that person shouldn't be held accountable for inciting the violence.

1/25/2017 4:07:46 PM

Quote :

"Oh ok, I see you're back to just straight ridiculous responses..."

Not wanting violent riots on the street = ridiculous.

Par for the course with ya'll

1/25/2017 4:29:45 PM

1/25/2017 4:54:35 PM

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/25/cokie_roberts_shutting_out_syrian_refugees_like_shutting_the_jews_out_during_world_war_ii.html

Quote :

"And if you shut out Syrian refugees at this moment, it's like shutting the Jews out during World War II."

Um...no.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dan-rather-alternative-facts_us_58859227e4b0e3a7356a0bc6

Quote :

"Longtime broadcast journalist and former CBS News anchor Dan Rather fired off a rallying cry to the media on Facebook, urging them to “step up” and call out “lies” from the White House of President Donald Trump. "

1/25/2017 7:12:40 PM

Quote :

"Should that be incitement? I say it's irresponsible at worst but that person shouldn't be held accountable for inciting the violence."

if that "journalist" went to the planned parenthood clinic and stood over the assailant's shoulder filming the whole thing and informing the guy of what the police are doing around him, then yeah.

1/25/2017 8:40:18 PM

Part of the danger with mob mentality is that blame and responsibility are diffused among so many people in a crowd that individuals do actions they would never do in isolation, especially with riot gear cops nearby. When there is a crowd of animals rioting and looting, just being nearby when the cops are ordering you to disperse, is adding to the problem and chaos. If "journalists" want to be there that is their call, I don't think they should be surprised when they get caught up in the consequences though.

1/25/2017 10:32:02 PM

Quote :

"@VICE A fleet of tanks drove around Kentucky this weekend flying a Trump flag: http://bit.ly/2jRopcb "

[Edited on January 31, 2017 at 2:23 PM. Reason : Vice doesnt know what a tank is]

1/31/2017 2:23:12 PM

So apparently anti-Trump SJW Juan Thompson, a former writer for the leftist news site The Intercept, was caught as the suspect that called in the bomb threats to Jewish targets.

This is after Juan was fired for getting caught fabricating comments/sources on stories involving race.

So much for the "anti-Semitism from Trump" narrative.

3/3/2017 11:56:41 AM