Quote :

"Not saying I would want my wife in either relationship but somehting about your wife confiding in another man at a deep level feels worse than screwing a guy."

i agree and don't...the two people i'd consider my "best" friends (after my girlfriend, of course) are both women...i (personally) have more female friends than not, and i think that if my gf had a problem with that, she would have told me...as it stands, she really likes both of them, and doesn't seem to mind me confiding in them at times

that said, i'd probably be pretty jealous if the situation was reversed

ah, and while we're on it, something about the idea of a woman giving a guy a bj is worse than having sex with him...the bj seems so degrading, while the sex (to me) seems to imply a certain level of trust...so if all she did was give him a bj or something, i think that'd hurt pretty bad, too

actually, no matter what, it'd all hurt...this situation sucks donkey balls for just about everyone

[Edited on July 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM. Reason : .]

7/25/2008 10:10:39 AM

^^ it's no so much misinterpreting the information as it is makign shit up. There are two little snippits of info on this. Everyone is just throwing things out there.

^ ever see Lost In Translation, that's an example of what I'm talking about. Not just friends but a deep connection. I remember thinging that it would suck to be that chicks husband.

AGAIN i'm sure this is not the case at all, but it would make for a more interesting made-for-tv movie.

[Edited on July 25, 2008 at 10:14 AM. Reason : .]

7/25/2008 10:10:56 AM

^ i have NOT seen lost in translation...might give that a shot, though, since i'm bored as balls at work right now

7/25/2008 10:15:09 AM

Quote :

"that her relationship with the other man only happened once"

thats the part that gets me. if it was sexual and they slept together i can see that only happening once, but, what, did she emotionally confide in a guy only once, i doubt it. something about that seems fishy, and if she admitted to it in the settlement proceedings as an affair i doubt that it was something so light where affair didn't accurately apply. they are very specific about things and from as hard nosed as her lawyer appears that is something that would have been absolutely worded in the most non-maliciously sounding manner. i stand by my belief that she slept with the dude. its the only thing that really makes sense.

7/25/2008 10:15:36 AM

Bitches lie, yo


and the way I see it, if you tell your wife you cheated on her, and she comes back with "Well there was this one guy, once, but nothing happened" why the hell would she even bring it up unless she were in fact lieing.

[Edited on July 25, 2008 at 10:18 AM. Reason : also]

7/25/2008 10:16:16 AM

^^ yeah, but that's the husband's affidavit...don't you think that his purpose would have been best served by telling the truth in its entirety instead of making it sound more harmless? or are you saying that it's the opposite - that it's in his best interests to sound like the bad husband, so it seems like there's less of a reason for him to be bitter and angry and more likely to be the killer? it just seems that after all things are considered, it wouldn't hurt to just say "yeah, she boinked another guy once"

7/25/2008 10:20:08 AM

^i'm saying that he is repeating in his affidavit what she stated in their divorce proceedings, and is stating it verbatim so that it can be verified by the documents from said proceeding. my point being that she delivered to him a vague and incomplete account of the events which in turn leads me to suspect that she had more going on than he knows about, in that one situation alone .

7/25/2008 10:26:29 AM

Quote :

"but nothing happened"

yea fucking right

7/25/2008 11:13:26 AM

Brad's Affadavit could have been condensed into 2 statements:

1.) The bitch is dead.

2.) I win!

7/25/2008 12:35:53 PM

3) Life insurance.

7/25/2008 12:40:43 PM

GAWD

when will we hear the results of the custody hearing?!?!?

7/25/2008 1:19:05 PM

BREAKING NEWS

Brad Cooper and the family of his slain wife have reached an agreement regarding temporary custody of their two children.

7/25/2008 3:34:06 PM

Yea, I just saw that too. Only it doesn't say what the agreement was!

7/25/2008 3:34:53 PM

you people

7/25/2008 3:40:25 PM

Quote :

"but wasn't it stated that when she "cheated" on brad it was "non sexual" or something else that was kind of strange? she had a "relationship" with a guy, it doesn't say that she slept with him or gave him a blow job or anything...while brad actually spent the night with some chick"

when a chick says non-sexual or emotional friend and it was just once

that means that she was fucking him on the regular

7/25/2008 3:45:19 PM

grandparents have custody for 75 days.

7/25/2008 3:52:10 PM

i want kids lemme have them!

7/25/2008 3:58:51 PM

they can take them back to Canada and everything...

7/25/2008 4:00:56 PM

7/25/2008 4:01:46 PM

as messed up as that seems, it might NOT be the worst choice

for 75 days they can keep the kids away from the media and the crap that's going down in regards to their mother's murder...it's not like they're going to abscond with them to canada and never come back, since it's in the agreement and canada plays nice with the US (for the most part) when it comes to legalities

7/25/2008 4:46:14 PM

i agree that it's probably better that the grandparents have the children... i just wish Brad would be able to see them more :/

7/25/2008 4:47:39 PM

yeah, it's just sad for him (esp if he's innocent in it all). i agree that they are best kept out of the media "spotlight". oh, and i seriously hope the family doesn't mess the girls' heads up (aunt dressing up as mom type stuff i mean).

[Edited on July 25, 2008 at 4:53 PM. Reason : sts]

7/25/2008 4:49:47 PM

women

7/25/2008 4:50:00 PM

75 days is just long enough for the grandparents to have a paternity test performed on the kids and determine that Brad isn't even their father. Then the grandparents can keep the kids permanently.

7/25/2008 5:37:52 PM

Man, that would be some terrible shit.

7/25/2008 6:31:24 PM

the whole thing sucks.

7/25/2008 9:22:59 PM

how long till he loses his job?

7/25/2008 9:23:25 PM

you know, it seems like he has a pretty flexible position...he might be fine

or not

whatever

7/25/2008 9:24:20 PM

if they fire him before he's convicted of anything (and if they fire him only on what's going on) I would think he could sue the fuck outta them

7/25/2008 9:26:22 PM

Idk if they will but they can walk in tomorrow fire him, not give a reason, and he really has no grounds to sue.

7/26/2008 11:38:43 AM

depends on what their policy is, and this ordeal could have made in inefficient, so that's enough right there to let him go. i hope he at least salvages his job, but in a situation like this its almost inevitable that he's gonna get the axe.

7/26/2008 11:42:05 AM

NC is a Right to Work state

they can fire him just because

but i have a feeling they won't if nothing comes of this

7/26/2008 2:06:53 PM

Quote :

"Not saying I would want my wife in either relationship but somehting about your wife confiding in another man at a deep level feels worse than screwing a guy."

Quote :

"Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa... stop right there. Eatin' a bitch out, and givin' a bitch a foot massage ain't even the same fuckin' thing. It's not. But it's the same ballpark. Ain't no fuckin' ballpark neither. Now look, maybe your method of massage differs from mine, but, you know, touchin' his wife's feet, and stickin' your tongue in her Holiest of Holies, ain't the same fuckin' ballpark, it ain't the same league, it ain't even the same fuckin' sport. Look, foot massages don't mean shit. Have you ever given a foot massage? Don't be tellin' me about foot massages. I'm the foot fuckin' master. Would you give a guy a foot massage? ... Fuck you."

[Edited on July 26, 2008 at 9:51 PM. Reason : ]

7/26/2008 9:48:34 PM

i don't think a voip ccie is going to have any trouble finding work.

7/26/2008 9:56:34 PM

one that ppl think killed his wife sure as fuck is

..hopefully he's not a suspect though

7/26/2008 10:10:09 PM

Either he is incredibly smart, or incredibly stupid..

7/26/2008 10:40:30 PM

cisco probably let him take a leave of absence to deal with all this.

7/26/2008 10:57:04 PM

Quote :

"oh, and i seriously hope the family doesn't mess the girls' heads up"

Considering what the grandparents have been saying about Brad so far, my money is on they're going to totally mindfuck the kids.

7/27/2008 11:03:22 AM

any new news??

7/28/2008 4:47:47 PM

news.google.com

7/28/2008 5:58:55 PM

Yeah, they could most definitely fire him before he is charged with anything.

But you are beyond retarded if you think they would.

7/28/2008 6:13:12 PM

anything new?

7/29/2008 8:55:14 AM

oh people still care about this? =/

7/29/2008 10:28:28 AM

^

It's fun as hell to argue with my step mom about.

7/29/2008 10:30:44 AM

SO did he do it or what - I watch way too much "Another 48"

I want results!

7/29/2008 2:15:20 PM

CPD executed a sealed search warrant today at his office at Cisco, according to abc11

7/29/2008 6:49:37 PM

boom!


its goin' down, Beau.

7/29/2008 6:50:46 PM

didn't see any cops today..but it is a big lab.

7/29/2008 6:53:56 PM

from abc

Quote :

"More warrents in Nancy Cooper murder Tuesday, July 29, 2008 | 4:57 PM Nancy Cooper, 34, was found dead July 14, 2008. The wife and mother of two. By Ed Crump CARY (WTVD) -- More search warrants have been served in the murder case of Nancy Cooper, including one for her husband's office at Cisco systems in RTP. The warrants are sealed and they do not say much in writing. But one legal expert says they speak "volumes" about where the case is headed. The seal orders only show the address that's been searched and that the warrants have been sealed to protect the investigation and the right of a defendant to a fair trial. When Cary Police searched Nancy Cooper's home and cars, and when they said publicly the search warrant also allowed them to get DNA from Nancy Cooper's husband --speculation rose. But the search of the house and DNA warrant did not do much for Defense Attorney Karl Knudsen. "It simply is a process by which a person can be included or excluded. So that doesn't necessarily say anything," Knudsen said. But he says the seal order for a search warrant at Cisco systems says a lot. Sources tell Eyewitness News the address listed on the seal order --a specific office in building 9 at 71 Kit Creek Road --is Brad Cooper's office. That search took place out of the public eye and Knudsen says it means more than the earlier search. "In order to even acquire a warrant to search a separate place connected to an individual there has to be probable cause for a judge to believe that that individual was connected with the commission of an offense and evidence would be found there," he said. Knudsen, a former prosecutor and longtime defense attorney, suspects one of the things the search at Cisco concentrated on was Cooper's computers. Exactly what, if anything was turned up on Cooper is sealed up in the search warrant. "It's pretty clear now that he's a suspect. Not just a person of interest, but a suspect," Knudsen said. Also a third warrant has been issued in the case. And the order sealing it does not describe where or who it was for, only that it regards the Nancy Cooper homicide investigation. "Since we have no clue what place got searched or what they were looking for, this doesn't tell either the general public or either the suspect where the investigation is going or where it is likely to lead," Knudsen said. Cary Police continue to say they do not have a person of interest or a suspect in the case. Brad Cooper's attorneys say he has told police he didn't kill his wife and he has been charged with nothing. A hearing on unsealing the search warrant in the case will be held Thursday."

hooray for more speculation

[Edited on July 29, 2008 at 7:29 PM. Reason : .]

7/29/2008 7:28:40 PM

I TOLE JOO HE DONE DID IT

7/29/2008 8:11:44 PM