Do not confuse intelligence for compassion. I have no compassion towards any of the peope that did this. I am saying that if ignorant people like you were in charge, there would be chaos everywhere. People like you feel that nukes are the answer to everything.
9/11/2001 10:34:12 PM
i'll finish this later...got some other stuff to do...make up your mind...peace or action...can't have both at once...
9/11/2001 10:35:45 PM
Gotta go cause you know you are wrong. Fucking idiot.
9/11/2001 10:36:18 PM
timothy mcveigh was one pale arab i guess.
9/11/2001 10:37:00 PM
did he even say nukes ??
9/11/2001 10:37:28 PM
gonna be around say midnite??? far from wrong motha fucka...tell me that most if not close to all terrorists are not arabs...
9/11/2001 10:37:49 PM
Never said they weren't
9/11/2001 10:38:29 PM
was that not the idea of this thread?
9/11/2001 10:40:40 PM
i dobut that there are any surviors.they keep searching but 200 firefighters and many policemen are missing too.damn.
9/11/2001 10:47:32 PM
that's so sad about the firefighters that died.. they showed an interview of a firefighter that was about to go back into the rubble after the first building had collapsed.. it went something like "are you concerned that the second building may fall down soon?.. yeah, deffinately.. but I have buddies in there and I have to go back for them".. he prolly got killed by the second collapse[Edited on September 11, 2001 at 10:52 PM. Reason : .]
9/11/2001 10:51:32 PM
well to make matter worse MSNBC jsut reported that FBI have stopped a van on the Geo. Wash bridge in NY....van may have explosives with it...as i said this isnt over yet sadly
9/11/2001 10:52:51 PM
lets stay on subject....i am in agreement with ironmike
9/11/2001 11:31:23 PM
They say you're not supposed to generalize, but everyone does it.
9/11/2001 11:32:59 PM
... And every generalization has some shred of truth to it... in this case, look at the long list of Arab-related terrorist attacks Republican18 listed.
9/11/2001 11:35:10 PM
what good is a generalization that holds no truth...it wouldn't exist...
9/11/2001 11:41:40 PM
exactly
9/11/2001 11:41:53 PM
so...anyone disagree??
9/11/2001 11:43:11 PM
9/11/2001 11:44:31 PM
Generalizations are exactly that. By definition, they arent all inclusive, but ARE based largely on facts and hold true for the majority, else they wouldnt be generalizations.Yes, im in agreement.[Edited on September 11, 2001 at 11:47 PM. Reason : .]
9/11/2001 11:46:43 PM
9/11/2001 11:47:11 PM
I think it is appropriate to include the Muslim Student Association of NCSU's statement on the events that occurred today here:
9/11/2001 11:52:28 PM
Republican...CORRECTION! It is not ALL arabs. It is a few select Arabs that seem to have nothing better to do with their day. I know many people of Arab distinction that take pride in the United States and feel extraordinarily bad about what their antionality is suspected of doing today.Thank you.
9/11/2001 11:52:57 PM
um...was it said that ALL arabs were terrorists...NO...i beleive the statement was MOST TERRORISTS are arabs..
9/11/2001 11:54:15 PM
9/11/2001 11:54:41 PM
9/11/2001 11:55:02 PM
i NEVER FUCKING SAID ALL ARABS ARE TERRORISTS I SAID MOST INTERNATIONAL TERRORISTS HAVE BEEN ARAB. READ THE HISTORY BOOKS.
9/11/2001 11:55:43 PM
I think he's trying to say that 99% of terrorists are arabs. But 99% of Arabs are NOT terrorists.J
9/11/2001 11:55:44 PM
Yeah, you guys seem a little confused. It is a stone cold FACT that MOST terrorist attacks are initiated by Arabs. Period. Don't try to argue with it. No one is saying that ALL ARABS ARE TERRORISTS, we are simply saying that most terrorists are Arabs. We're all in college, aren't we? Can't you mofos differentiate between those two statements?
9/11/2001 11:56:11 PM
exactly 30th
9/11/2001 11:56:21 PM
Dude, you are not using good logic..."terrorist=arabs"ok...this is a conditional statement...If you are a terrorist then you are an arab.Ok, if you can come up with a counterexample then the conditional is not valid.oh and with a counterexample you have to keep the hypothesis(if you are a terrorist) trueso Tim McVeigh is my counterexample to your fuzzy logic...and don't try to refute me...I am a mathmatician
9/11/2001 11:57:20 PM
Republican-it was YOU who wrote this several hours earlier:
9/11/2001 11:59:24 PM
Tim McV is one incident. Arabs are MANY. Besides most INTERNATIONAL terror has been by arabs, quit defending them. All arabs are not terrorists, most terrorists are arabs
9/12/2001 12:00:20 AM
yes joe, you deleted it and i apologized...............I was angry give me a fuckin break
9/12/2001 12:01:02 AM
Your a fucking moron.
9/12/2001 12:02:12 AM
shut up
9/12/2001 12:02:27 AM
9/12/2001 12:02:52 AM
hmm...who is the fucking moron...the guy who speaks his mind or the one who censors himself?
9/12/2001 12:03:09 AM
I emphasize fucking.
9/12/2001 12:03:17 AM
I emphasize fucking too. I emphasize it as much as I can.J[Edited on September 12, 2001 at 12:04 AM. Reason : *]
9/12/2001 12:03:38 AM
haha @ WadHead
9/12/2001 12:03:52 AM
There are plenty of terrorist groups in South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa that have nothing to do with being Islamic.
9/12/2001 12:06:06 AM
9/12/2001 12:07:13 AM
"most terrorists are arabs"the ONLY way this can be verified is if an all-inclusive list of terrorist activities, say, in the last 1,000 years, is drawn up, no matter where the activities took place, and it is found that the majority are arabs. to my knowledge, i have seen no such list by any of the proponents of the assertion yet.
9/12/2001 12:07:45 AM
well well well what have we hear. trap my friend its nice to hear from you SARCASM
9/12/2001 12:09:15 AM
9/12/2001 12:10:07 AM
Thank you Metalred. Trap you need to think before you post.
9/12/2001 12:11:40 AM
Trap, what happened 1 thousand years ago is of no consequence to us now. Most, if not all, of the countriesinvolved now didnt exist a thousand years ago. Draw up a list of all the acts of terrorism committed againstthe United States and see where the majority lies.....
9/12/2001 12:12:40 AM
Repub18, what's the matter, don't have that list handy, do you?
9/12/2001 12:12:53 AM
9/12/2001 12:13:19 AM
well, i haven't seen anyone disprove the generalization...
9/12/2001 12:13:36 AM