Page 2 says:

Quote :

"pryderi: Bill Clinton is 100 times the man Bush is, and 1,000 times the president."

9/19/2005 4:01:25 AM

page two forgot to mention:


HEEEEEEEEEEY BIG GIRL

9/19/2005 6:47:03 AM

Maybe if Clinton keeps talking he will get Bush impeached...no...doubtful

9/19/2005 10:51:25 AM

Well defending freedom isn't free.

9/19/2005 11:12:42 AM

buck o' five

9/19/2005 11:32:05 AM

Quote :

"Typical Clinton. Typical liar. Typical hypocrite. Bill Clinton - September 18, 2005: “But the administration, then, decided to launch this invasion virtually alone and before the U.N. inspections were completed, with no real urgency, no evidence that there were any weapons of mass destruction there.” Bill Clinton – February 4, 1998: "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." Bill Clinton – February 17, 1998: "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." Stated Mission of Operation Desert Fox - December 1998: "To strike military and security targets in Iraq that contribute to Iraq's ability to produce, store, maintain and deliver weapons of mass destruction." "

I mean, seriously. . . None of those latter Clinton quotes have shit to do w/ invading a country and usurping its leader. They have everything to do with thwarting said country's ability to make those weapons, in 1998. By 2002, none could be found.

s'all I gotta say.

9/19/2005 11:57:22 AM

i guess the first few months when we couldnt find Saddam meant he wasnt there either...Iraq is a small country and everthing is easily accountable for

9/19/2005 11:58:52 AM

Quote :

"few months"

hahahahahhahahahhahaha. . .a man, capable of mobility, and manipulation, was able to hide

DUUUUUUURRRRRRRR

wow. we practically run the fucking place now, and haven't even stumbled on the goddamned things

9/19/2005 12:04:41 PM

Quote :

"we practically run the fucking place now"

YEAH

an army, capable of mobilizing objects, was able to hide weapons, with a 2-month warning about UN inspectors, what a concept

9/19/2005 12:09:29 PM

PvtJoker, I would add that the fact that there were no weapons of mass destruction only goes to show how successful Clinton's targeted strikes were.

But, seriously, I have to comend President Clinton for going out on a limb like this. This couldn't have been motivated by anything other than a sincere concern for the nation's welfare. If he only wanted spotlight, then why did he wait 5 years to say anything (when his words would have least impact on an electorial decision)? Hell, for the past five years President Clinton has actually defended Bush's decision to go into Iraq. I think Katrina was the straw that broke the camels back.

9/19/2005 12:09:58 PM

Bill Clinton is 100 times the man Bush is, and 1,000 times the president.

9/19/2005 12:42:45 PM

clinton still lives at the white house right?

with president hillary clinton right?

9/19/2005 12:44:20 PM

Quote :

" an army, capable of mobilizing objects, was able to hide weapons, with a 2-month warning about UN inspectors, what a concept "

Look man

I'm not going to make any crazy assumption and believe that you can comprehend more then plain talking points but lets just say that if your boy Karl Rove isn't pushing the WMD issue anymore then they probably don't exist.

9/19/2005 12:45:34 PM

you know if you call a drug dealer and tell him the DEA is gonna search his house in 2 months

and the DEA doesnt find any drugs when they do that search, 2 months after warning him

he must've never had drugs in the first place...since they're not there now

9/19/2005 12:48:33 PM

its fun to try to compare two things that are very different.

9/19/2005 12:50:53 PM

Oh God

When someone resorts to an analogy between two completely unreleated cases then I know they don't have a point.

[Edited on September 19, 2005 at 12:51 PM. Reason : Beat me to it Sober.]

9/19/2005 12:51:13 PM

yeah cause those scenarios are so different...

if Saddam had gotten a 2 month warning and actually had WMDs, he wouldnt have moved them

cause the circumstances are so different

hey remember when Clinton admitted Iraq had WMDs...how bout when Kerry and Edwards voted to go to war...yeah

Osama doesnt exist cause we cant find him

9/19/2005 12:53:07 PM

Now you're just throwing snot at the wall hoping something sticks.

Please to quit making yourself look like dumb kid, kthnx.

9/19/2005 12:56:38 PM

i guess everyone would think a better example would be if a former drug dealer was searched and nothing was found...must mean he doesnt sell drugs anymore

i love how everybody says my analogies are absurd and have nothing to do with hussein and iraq...its not like they're both situations of "bad people" who have "illegal things" and get searched with warning

9/19/2005 1:10:51 PM

I cant decide whether to giggle or be exasperated

9/19/2005 1:18:57 PM

Because drugs are exactly like weapons of mass destruction.

You can move them both quickly without being noticed.
You can hide them both easily.
And most importantly, drugs can be used as effective weapons against the invading DEA agents, just like wmds. So you have just as much incentive to get rid of the weapons as you would the drugs. Right?

WHAT A BRILLIANT FUCKING ARGUMENT

WHAT A MOTHER FUCKING INSPIRED BIT OF REASOING

OMFGBBQHOLYCRAP

[Edited on September 19, 2005 at 1:22 PM. Reason : ``]

9/19/2005 1:22:15 PM

i totally forgot that there have never ever been UN Weapons Inspectors in iraq

never

9/19/2005 1:22:33 PM

I guess I should just give up...Saddam would be a better President than Bush...thats the real truth

9/19/2005 1:22:43 PM

he is a hard worker

9/19/2005 1:23:04 PM

Your "analogy" is stupid on the grounds that "it" makes "no" sense. If "you" can't see that "drug dealers" have "no relation" to insane dictators that thats "a problem" which you have to "work out."

9/19/2005 1:23:15 PM

^^^ falsetto concessiono

my favorite tune.

[Edited on September 19, 2005 at 1:40 PM. Reason : ``]

9/19/2005 1:23:38 PM

boy those unneccessary quotation marks sure add some flair to your pwntage

hey why dont you give me a fitting analogy then, since you're the expert

9/19/2005 1:24:49 PM

I don't need to conjure analogies out of my massive hairy ass to show that there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

9/19/2005 1:27:20 PM

yeah i didnt think you would be up for anything that takes more skill than adding a bunch of quote marks...nice copout

Quote :

"there are no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq."

so i guess it would be too much to ask that you show me evidence that all the weapons they had were destroyed? cause even your boy clinton admitted that saddam HAD them

wheres the proof that they were destroyed? or i guess as long as they havent been found in iraq, that means they are no longer a threat to anyone

9/19/2005 1:29:14 PM

You're asking the wrong questions kid.

Let me help you out:

Quote :

"so i guess it would be too much to ask that you show me evidence that they all the weapons they had were destroyed had weapons?"

Cause correct me if I'm wrong but our intel on the matter isn't exactly spot on.

[Edited on September 19, 2005 at 1:37 PM. Reason : plz 2 implement preview]

9/19/2005 1:36:55 PM

Quote :

"so i guess it would be too much to ask that you show me evidence that all the weapons they had were destroyed had weapons?"

OMG GRAMMAR
[Edited on September 19, 2005 at 1:38 PM. Reason : fixed the quote]

9/19/2005 1:37:09 PM

yeah cause iraq NEVER had WMDs...you tell em SandSanta...even when they USED WMDs...they never had them...its not a question of if they've destroyed them yet, now its a question of if they EVER had them

I think the Kurds would vouch that they NEVER had them

fucking dumbass

9/19/2005 1:39:06 PM

Oh ok.

Good call.

If we're going to count military grade nerve gas as an WMD then every police department in the United States has a private stash.

9/19/2005 1:43:39 PM

^yeah well thats the definition of WMD...in layman's terms for you, since you are no good at reading, a WMD is a weapon that can cause serious damage to a large number of people by release of a chemical or biological agent

but oh well, you're wrong again, no surprise

9/19/2005 1:46:10 PM

No TreeTwistah, I just wanted you to admit that we invaded Iraq and lost over a thousand American lives and billions of dollars because of nerve gas.

/Peace

9/19/2005 1:49:24 PM

STORM THE POLICE
THEY HAVE WMD'S

9/19/2005 1:52:40 PM

^^woah woah woah woah WOAH

SLOW DOWN BUDDY

take a deep breath......exhale.....relax

slow down

you are coming across as a moron in too many threads at once

^LEAVE IRAQ ALONE

THEY ARE A PEACEFUL NATION

9/19/2005 1:52:58 PM

Quote :

"you are coming across as a moron in too many threads at once"

9/19/2005 1:57:01 PM

oh the quote trick! oh man thats a good one! turn my words against me! instead of your normal all caps humorous yet non-mainstream phrase! oh what a laugh riot!

9/19/2005 2:03:54 PM

YOU ARE COMING ACROSS AS A MORON IN TOO MANY THREADS AT ONCE

9/19/2005 3:35:13 PM

my God

TreeTwista is now the most vague, uninformed Soapbox poster now

this can not be.

Ok, at least he's not clinically insane like salisburyboy

but seriously, by all your logic, we should be invading about 2 dozen countries by now.

[Edited on September 19, 2005 at 5:25 PM. Reason : eh?$#42]

9/19/2005 5:23:10 PM

He's just trolling.

p.s. OH WE BLACK

9/19/2005 7:56:12 PM

Quote :

"Stephanopoulos is going to let him have diarrhea of the mouth. "

Quote :

"the only legacy they really have is one of oral sex in the Oval Office, utilizing cigars and interns"

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_091905/content/truth_detector.guest.html

9/20/2005 8:13:43 AM