$2 per gallon
4/10/2006 10:08:40 AM
^^depends on where you are. several larger cities are debating on requiring special blends. ultra low sulfur diesel is coming out this year too in heavy swing. as a side. it is funny how regulators make these new requirements without bothering to check the technical problems associated. i.e. sulfur in diesel is actually a good thing in diesel and it contributes to lubricity. ultra low will not have enough so fuel makers have had to come up with lubricity additives ($ goes up) to prevent engines from seizing up. i.e. sulfur in gasoline. several car manufacturing companies use silver in fuel tank equipment. the required technology associated with making low sulfur gasoline reduces one type of sulfur but not another (one that negatively interacts with silver). as a result when LSG came out, a lot of fuel gauges failed. regulators didn't bother to consult with fuel makers or auto makers to see the repercussions of their requirement. i.e boutique blends. to reduce emissions in various cities, officials would rather see people pay more at the pump than improve signals and traffic flow. most studies show that improved traffic would be a far better improvement in emissions than the new fuel. anywho, buy shell, k. or exxon.
4/10/2006 10:52:26 AM
over off of wilmington st in the garner area, its usually cheaper by 0.05 or so...i saw ranges just now from 2.65 to 2.80
4/10/2006 10:53:33 AM
^^ Why don't you guys get your junk together and gradually introduce these additives into the fuel/changes in the mix/ethanol/whatever. You know... this month you have converted 20% of the fuel being produced over to the new formula and next month you'll be up to 60%, etc.Instead you make sweeping changes at the last minute and cause shortages in supply for the raw materials used in the new formulas. It almost seems like that is how you want it to be so you can give the formula change excuse as a reason why the price at the pump is so high. Anything to keep the price up.I vaguely remember the price at the pump excuse during the winter months being attributed to some sort of additive to help gas hold up under the colder temperatures. Then everyone was surprised to hear how gas would go up again because they had to change the blend for the summer months - which consisted of not putting in that additive - which meant it should have been cheaper.Be postwarned that I do not know what I am talking about. I just remember hearing people complain about this.[Edited on April 10, 2006 at 11:11 AM. Reason : -]
4/10/2006 11:10:13 AM
haha because it isn't as simple as converting gas a to gas b. individual cities have different formulations - as in chicago's is different from LA's which is different from Atlanta's on and on til infinity. our blending engineer lovingly calls it the 33 flavors of gas. refining units don't just spit out gasoline. gasoline is a concoction of up to 20 different blendstocks, including naphtha, straight run, alkylate, etc. different components and recipes are used to meet the various requirements in these cities - i.e. sulfur, RVP, benzene, etc. we literally batch process a lot of the boutique blends. sorry, unless you want to petition these cities to go to one low emissions stock, then that is what you will get. the EtOH is coming on because of regulation. it isn't something we'd prefer to go to as is presents shit tons of logistical problems. any and all additives or special formulations will increase your cost. if we are required to use a more expensive additive or formulation, the consumer gets to pay for that. (i believe the winter/summer thing you are thinking of is for volatility - in summer you want less volatile components to decrease emissions in the hot weather and less volatile components are more expensive to make. also you can't just gradually change. units are configured for summer or winter mode. it can be compared to flipping a switch.)anywho, back to work.
4/10/2006 11:24:19 AM
Nice to know at any rate... thanks.
4/10/2006 11:31:24 AM
4/10/2006 12:00:18 PM
^ All that sounds fine and dandy, but it lacks one thing: realism.Do you have any idea how many vehicles that run on gasoline only are moving around the world as we speak? Even if another energy source comes out, people will still use their gasoline powered cars. And not just cars, I'm talking lawnmowers, go-karts, and the billions of things with engines in them. We ain't switching away from gasoline anytime soon and not until it's absolutely necessary, which will cause a huge deal of havoc but you can bet the bank that is what happens.And gas is unlike any other good in that it has no realistic long-term substitutes. People will buy gas no matter what for at least decades to come. If gas suddenly went to $5/gallon, the amount of people driving around would probably only decrease 1-3%, because other than bussing it or carpooling (Americans hate the inconvience), there's no other way.If you're reaction is "NO WAY", chew on this: If someone told you in 2003 that gas prices would increase over 300% and *remain there* within 2-3 years, would you have believed them? People adapt their lifestyles in order to afford gasoline. It simply does not follow normal market trends in any way, shape or form. How can you expect it to when 1) it's delivered by criminals and 2) there's no long-term alternative or way to make gasoline users switch to anything else.[Edited on April 10, 2006 at 12:43 PM. Reason : s]
4/10/2006 12:42:42 PM
4/10/2006 5:21:42 PM