This is old. We found this stuff at the beginning of the war. We kept finding it in a steady stream. They just went back and counted how much they found up until now.

They're the degraded weapons we sold to Saddam in the 80s. They have a shelf-life of about two years.

Where are the munitions plants? Where are the WMDs?

Obviously the factories were mobile, and disassembled and smuggled into Iran, along with the nukes and nerve agents Iraq was constructing. We should invade Iran! And then Syria, when they move them there!

Quote :

"why don't you guys spend sometime digging up which companies sold him those chemicals"

shhh...
http://cns.miis.edu/research/wmdme/flow/iraq/seed.htm

Quote :

"# Between 1985-89, US firms exported Bacillus anthracis (anthrax), Clostridium botulinum, Histoplasma capsulatam, Brucella melitensis, Clostridium perfringens (gas gangrene), Clostridium tetani (tentanus), Escherichia coli, and "dozens of other pathogenic biological agents," to Iraq.[9] # Between 1985-89, the US firm ATCC sent Iraq up to 70 shipments including 21 strains of anthrax, 15 Class III pathogens, E. coli, Salmonella cholerasuis, Clostridium botulinum, Brucella meliteusis, and Clostidium perfringens. [This may include shipments already listed to the Agriculture and Water Resource Department, Atomic Energy Commission, and College of Medicine].[10]"

Technically, this is anti-Reagan. But Tree-Twista only knows one president's name, so he'll say it's anti-Bush somehow, and dismiss it.

[Edited on June 22, 2006 at 4:28 PM. Reason : fun things]

6/22/2006 4:14:21 PM

Quote :

"the point is that if the UN inspectors come into Iraq and search for months and dont find any WMDs...not even these pre-1991 defunct WMDs...yet our soldiers find over 500 of them by accident...again logic would say if you find something, its proof it exists...if you dont find something, its not proof it doesnt exist...sigh"

How can you expect to argue intelligently about something you obviously haven't adequately prepared to discuss?

The UN inspectors did find the pre-1991 defunct WMDs, and they also oversaw and documented the destruction of many tons of other warheads between 1991 and 1998. Nobody is over there looking for just any WMD; that's just the soundbite that was put on repeat before the war.

The fact of the matter is that we and the UN are and were looking for PREVIOUSLY UNDOCUMENTED WMDs that the US and UN inspectors weren't already aware of.

6/22/2006 4:19:20 PM

^ This man gets the gold star.

6/22/2006 4:26:31 PM

look who you are talking about....argueing about something he "hasn't adequately prepared to discuss" is his favorite thing to do.

6/22/2006 4:28:00 PM

Gamecat I give you a most prestigious award for your last post:



Wear it with pride.

6/22/2006 5:02:23 PM

weapons of mass distraction

6/22/2006 5:15:54 PM

Quote :

"The UN inspectors did find the pre-1991 defunct WMDs, and they also oversaw and documented the destruction of many tons of other warheads between 1991 and 1998."

i'm talking about the UN inspectors right before the current Iraq war...not the inspections after the first Gulf war...but go ahead and pass out your liberal gold stars and suck the UN's dick...i know you're very proud of yourself for calling out a moron like me and pointing out that the UN inspectors DID find WMDs when I said they didnt find them...but you failed to address the UN inspections in 2003

6/22/2006 5:46:02 PM

You mean the inspections that were a reinstatement (i.e. "continuation") of the ones you're talking about??

6/22/2006 6:45:04 PM

i mean in early 2003, a couple months before the US launched airstrikes...i mean those inspections

but i guess you could say that they were continuations of the inspections in the 90s

but by that same rationale i could say this war is a continuation of the first desert storm and that Bush Sr, Clinton and Bush Jr have all been Presidents during the same war

6/22/2006 6:50:10 PM

6/22/2006 6:52:01 PM

Tree, I'm honestly a little confused by you. Help me out a little bit (I'm not being an ass, just want to clarify). In this 1st quote, you're implying that we aren't there b/c of WMDs, as if it were a liberal talking point.

Quote :

"now the war wasnt about not finding WMDs now its about wasting tax money whats the trendy liberal talking point gonna be next week? "

Later on, you then make this statement:

Quote :

"1. we didnt go to war over WMDs"

My question is do you believe we didn't go to war over WMDs, and if so, why are you talking about the liberals making this a talking point?

6/22/2006 8:17:04 PM

Quote :

"Oh great.. Treetwista takes over another thread and shits on it without adding anything of value."

6/22/2006 8:24:06 PM

500 shells is what percentage (weighted by importance) of what we thought was there? 1%? This was totally worth the costs, dudes!

6/22/2006 9:38:57 PM

Quote :

"Iraq chemical weapons too old to use: US intelligence officials Jun 22 3:12 PM US/Eastern Email this story The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said. Republican lawmakers have cast the disclosure that about 500 chemical weapons have been found in Iraq as evidence that Saddam Hussein had a stockpile of the weapons before the March 2003 US invasion of Iraq. But the intelligence officials, who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity, said the weapons were too degraded to have posed a threat to US forces in March 2003. They said all chemical weapons found since 2003 were produced before the 1991 Gulf War and they had no evidence Saddam was producing or stockpiling chemical weapons after that. "Generally they are in poor condition," one official said. "We assess that they are not in condition to be used as designed. And detailed analysis of the toxic agents shows they are degraded and represent a much lower hazard," he said. The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "I would simply say we have seen a degree of improvisation on the part of the insurgency with regard to conventional munitions," said an official. "They might apply that same degree of improvisation if in fact they came in contact with these types of munitions. And again we have no evidence that they have," the official said. The weapons were found "in small numbers over time" since 2003, an official said. They were recovered in one, two or three at a time -- not in large caches, the officials said. "We would characterize these recovered munitions as being consistent with weapons that have been not maintained, that have not been part of an organized inventory," he said. Senator Rick Santorum and Representative Peter Hoekstra, both Republicans, on Wednesday made public information from a classified report prepared in April on the subject by the National Ground Intelligence Center that said 500 chemical weapons have been recovered. The intelligence officials said "key points" from the report were declassified at the request of Hoekstra, who chairs the House Intelligence Committee. The "key points," however, ommitted the fact that the 500 weapons all were of a pre-1991 vintage. The officials indicated that the age of the weapons was not considered classified but were unable to explain why it was not included in the key points given to the senators. "

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/060622191218.0qmfazt6.html

6/23/2006 8:12:54 AM

to be honest our country is soo fucking chicken shit right now even if they did find wmds the whole country would shit itself and the stock market would crash etc.

now i think bush is retarded but i think his administration is smart enough to not tell the bunch of fucking sheep that is our country that there is a pack of wolves waiting over the hill to attack.

6/23/2006 8:30:02 AM

^ What the fuck are you even talking about?

6/23/2006 10:24:32 AM

Quote :

"now the war wasnt about not finding WMDs now its about wasting tax money whats the trendy liberal talking point gonna be next week?" Later on, you then make this statement: Quote : "1. we didnt go to war over WMDs" My question is do you believe we didn't go to war over WMDs, and if so, why are you talking about the liberals making this a talking point? "

We went to war for a number of reasons...about 19 different reasons if I recall...ONE of those reasons was the threat of Saddam's regime having WMDs...my comment about "now the war is about tax money" was in response to someone, upon hearing that we DID find WMDs, claiming their problem with the war was the tax money they have had to pay...There have been tons and tons of people complaining about the Iraq war and up until a few days ago most of their biggest complaints were that "Bush said Saddam had WMDs, we didnt find WMDs, therefore the war is unjust"...yet when it comes out that we did find WMDs, the "where are the WMDs" argument doesnt work anymore, so they come up with a new talking point, like how they dont like the tax money spent on the war...because they cant make the "Where are the supposed WMDs" argument because we found WMDs...watch the next poster say that depleted mustard and sarin gas is completely harmless...why do I even bother arguing with you pacifist hypocrites

6/23/2006 10:28:26 AM

Quote :

"i mean in early 2003, a couple months before the US launched airstrikes...i mean those inspections but i guess you could say that they were continuations of the inspections in the 90s"

I'm confused here. Is there something else you could call them? I mean, it wasn't like the inspectors in 2003 were from a different organization or anything. It was exactly the same team.

Quote :

"but by that same rationale i could say this war is a continuation of the first desert storm and that Bush Sr, Clinton and Bush Jr have all been Presidents during the same war"

Explain how that's the same rationale.

6/23/2006 10:33:25 AM

^yes it was United Nations inspectors both times

but damn the inspections were years and years apart

all I said was that the UN inspectors didnt find anything when they went into Iraq in early 2003

whats so hard to understand about that

6/23/2006 10:50:26 AM

I would say this is a derail, but it really isn't seeing as how you've already firmly landed yet another thread into the soap box shitbarn.

Do you seriously have a mental handicap? Did you do too many drugs? What is your malfunction? I'm being dead serious, this not an insult. I'm curious what the hell happened to you.

6/23/2006 10:52:06 AM

dead serious? not an insult? what happened to me? when have you ever met me?

maybe if any of you liberal fucks could read you could win a god damn presidential election

you're all dumber than bush

LETS ALL TROLL TREETWISTA SINCE HE ISNT A PUSSY LIBERAL LIKE US...OMG HE DOESNT THINK BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER, WHAT THE FUCK IS HE THINKING...HEY GUYS LETS TROLL HIM ON THE INTERNET AND KEEP LOSING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

6/23/2006 10:54:03 AM

Sigh. I'm fiscally conservative. What about that is hard for you to understand?

The only person that says "LIBERALSSSSSSS " is a person who doesn't understand a fucking thing about politics. You can be conservative or liberal on social or fiscal issues. Some people are liberal on both, but to just label people who don't agree with you as liberal hippies who hate Bush no matter what? Maybe some of us actually don't agree with most stuff he does. There are plenty of reasons for the fiscally conservative to dislike him, and many more for the social liberal.

Every post of yours is a lame strawman. Every. Single. Post.

I've never met you, and I don't think I'd ever want to meet you. Seeing as you cannot form a cogent, relevent argument when you have all the time in the world to think out and type a post, I'm not confident you could hold decent conversation.

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 10:59 AM. Reason : .]

6/23/2006 10:58:57 AM

LETS ALL TROLL TREETWISTA, HE DOESNT HATE BUSH AS MUCH AS WE DO, HE'S OBVIOUSLY TROLLING, LETS SWEAT HIS NUTS LIKE JONGUTH AND SOBER46 AND AMKEENER

but seriously in regards to WMDs...how come so many people claim there werent WMDs...then we find them...and now they come up with new things to bitch at

6/23/2006 11:00:56 AM

You need to be banned as badly as salisburyboy. You contribute nothing. You think that because most people disagree with Bush, that everybody has rabid, blind hatred. Some people DO, sure, but a lot of us don't.

It's annoying to see your same trite arguments in every thread.

6/23/2006 11:03:35 AM

I agree, he sucks

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 11:13 AM. Reason : !]

6/23/2006 11:13:22 AM

agreed....i dont troll him as much as i just point out how stupid the majority of his posts are.

theres really no point in trying discuss anything with him. He all of a sudden feels that hes an expert at every topic, and if you don't agree with his stance, he just results to sarcasm and personal attacks.

i think i liked him better when he just talked about pot and made up retarded rap songs.

6/23/2006 11:16:05 AM

i just result to sarcasm and personal attacks?

Quote :

"i just point how how stupid the majority of his posts are"

Quote :

"I agree, he sucks"

Quote :

"do you seriously have a mental handicap? did you do too many drugs?"

yalls problem is you think everyone should think like you, when the majority of the country really thinks like me...see 2000 and 2004 elections for reference

but let me guess, this thread, which is about WMDs, will not get any more comments about WMDs, just comments bashing me personally, right? Just like I said, we found WMDs and the talking point "where are the WMDs" doesnt work any more...so sorry to burst your bubbles, but Iraq had WMDs

anybody have anything to say regarding WMDs? cause if not, quit trolling

6/23/2006 11:20:24 AM

Quote :

"i just result to sarcasm and personal attacks? "

yup, and i guess i should have added "and you drag the rest of the thread down with you."

6/23/2006 11:26:51 AM

The problem with TreeTwistah is that he doesn't really understand anything he argues about and takes opposing viewpoints as personal potshots. In this thread, at two people explained that those "WMD's" found posed no real danger to the US, one citing an article and yet TreeTwista is all like "WMD FOUND!"

Why? Because he associates WMD with "bad" and the droning soundbites from 2002 are burned in the back of his mind. Nevermind the fact that those Cold War era weapons probably couldn't exterminate the rat infestation at Bragaw , the mere fact that they were labeled as WMD's is enough to set TreeTwistah off on a "im right, we're right!" crusade.

Our trolling of you, tree, isn't intended to educate you or change your mind. You're pretty much hopeless when it comes to holding a logical debate. Rather, our trolling of you is intended for people who aren't as stubborn as you.

6/23/2006 11:28:08 AM

^ Truth.

6/23/2006 11:30:33 AM

Quote :

"anybody have anything to say regarding WMDs? cause if not, quit trolling"

6/23/2006 11:36:29 AM

Quote :

"In this thread, at two people explained that those "WMD's" found posed no real danger to the US,"

yeah you're right...those "WMD's" posed no real danger...they're pretty safe

oh wait, look what i already posted on the first page

Quote :

"While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal"

straight from the GOVERNMENTS DECLASSIFIED SECTION OF THE REPORT http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

but that shit gets ignored by people if it conflicts with their agenda

6/23/2006 11:40:56 AM

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

6/23/2006 11:52:50 AM

oh what a big surprise, you ignore the part of that report that says chemical warfare agents are still hazardous and potentially lethal

big, huge, massive surprise that you ignore that part

Quote :

"The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their intended use, US intelligence officials said."

6/23/2006 11:55:13 AM

YES THEY'RE POTENTIALLY LETHAL.

BUT THEY ARE NOT USABLE TO CREATE ANY "MASS DESTRUCTION".

MEANING THEY ARE POTENTIALLY LETHAL CHEMICALS, BUT NOT WEAPONS ANYMORE.

BY THIS LOGIC YOU HAVE WMD'S UNDER YOUR KITCHEN SINK

6/23/2006 11:56:28 AM

whatever you say hippie liberal bush hater

6/23/2006 12:03:27 PM

Quote :

" -These are not the weapons of mass destruction that you are looking for"

6/23/2006 12:09:22 PM

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_postreply.aspx?topic=415840

I think this guy is trolling this section. It's the only way I can explain the sheer stupidity that passes in front of my eyes with the screename TreeTwista10 out in the left margin.

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 12:13 PM. Reason : x]

6/23/2006 12:13:33 PM

Kerry and Clinton wanted to find WMDs too.

6/23/2006 12:14:14 PM

I wait with great anticipation what lovely nugget of a post he will deliver next!!!

6/23/2006 12:18:45 PM

Quote :

"yet when it comes out that we did find WMDs, the "where are the WMDs" argument doesnt work anymore, so they come up with a new talking point, like how they dont like the tax money spent on the war...because they cant make the "Where are the supposed WMDs" argument because we found WMDs...watch the next poster say that depleted mustard and sarin gas is completely harmless...why do I even bother arguing with you pacifist hypocrites"

I know you have WMDs. Your laundry detergent could potentially be used to cause a possible increase in the general amount of sicknesses reported over a certain area given specific variables are accounted for, give or take. Why don't you hand over the WMDs, so that we don't have to detain you and consolidate all your possessions?

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 12:23 PM. Reason : hay guyz i edited]

6/23/2006 12:21:55 PM

Quote :

"YES THEY'RE POTENTIALLY LETHAL. BUT THEY ARE NOT USABLE TO CREATE ANY "MASS DESTRUCTION". MEANING THEY ARE POTENTIALLY LETHAL CHEMICALS, BUT NOT WEAPONS ANYMORE. BY THIS LOGIC YOU HAVE WMD'S UNDER YOUR KITCHEN SINK"

no, i dont have any mustard gas or sarin gas under my sink

but i guess you interpret something thats "too degraded for its intended use" as automatically becoming safe? here's where the US Govt disagrees strongly with you, from the same PDF report:

Quote :

"Pre-Gulf War Iraqi chemical weapons could be sold on the black market. Use of these weapons by terrorists or insurgent groups would have implications for Coalition forces in Iraq. The possibility of use outside Iraq cannot be ruled out. The most likely munitions remaining are sarin and mustard-filled projectiles. The purity of the agent inside the munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process, potential additives, and environmental storage conditions. While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially lethal. It has been reported in open press that unsurgents and Iraqi groups desire to acquire and use chemical weapons."

but i guess a clever Obi Wan Kenobi picture means more to you guys than the declassified government report that I just quoted

6/23/2006 12:22:45 PM

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

Quote :

"not suitable for intended purposed... potential hazard if obtained "

Quote :

"not suitable for intended purposed... potential hazard if obtained "

Quote :

"not suitable for intended purposed... potential hazard if obtained "

Quote :

"not suitable for intended purposed... potential hazard if obtained "

Quote :

"not suitable for intended purposed... potential hazard if obtained "

Quote :

"not suitable for intended purposed... potential hazard if obtained "

Quote :

"no evidence... Iraqi insurgency... chemical weapons"

Quote :

"no evidence... Iraqi insurgency... chemical weapons"

Quote :

"no evidence... Iraqi insurgency... chemical weapons"

Quote :

"no evidence... Iraqi insurgency... chemical weapons"

Quote :

"no evidence... Iraqi insurgency... chemical weapons"

Quote :

"no evidence... Iraqi insurgency... chemical weapons"

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 12:28 PM. Reason : arguing with dumbass]

6/23/2006 12:24:27 PM

^^You need to get out of this section.

People like you seriously have no place here.

You have no capability to reason at all, if I were to go through and point out each logical disconnect you've had even in the last post, I'd be wasting my time more than I already am.

You fail the soap box. You just aren't smart enough. That's pretty sad. You really oughta leave.

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 12:25 PM. Reason : .]

6/23/2006 12:24:45 PM

Quote :

"i guess you interpret something thats "too degraded for its intended use" as automatically becoming safe?"

Quote :

"YES THEY'RE POTENTIALLY LETHAL. BUT THEY ARE NOT USABLE TO CREATE ANY "MASS DESTRUCTION". MEANING THEY ARE POTENTIALLY LETHAL CHEMICALS, BUT NOT WEAPONS ANYMORE"

tree, can you read?

[Edited on June 23, 2006 at 12:25 PM. Reason : /]

6/23/2006 12:24:45 PM

^so because they're not technically weapons, the chemicals are safe? they cant be used to create weapons?

6/23/2006 12:25:36 PM

IS IT A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION? Answer that question. You keep wavering about all over the argument. We have contended for many posts now that they aren't mass destruction capable. Did you even read those posts? Where in the shit you just posted...

shit, I see that jwb mostly just covered it.

6/23/2006 12:26:06 PM

Leave the section you're too dumb to post here.

Please.

6/23/2006 12:26:19 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

READ...THE...GOVERNMENTS...REPORT...IDIOT

6/23/2006 12:26:43 PM

Quote :

""The munitions have been tested and computer simulation models created to determine what effect they might have under a variety of scenarios, the officials said. Although not suitable for their intended purposed, the officials said such weapons remain a potential hazard if obtained by insurgents and modified in ways they would not discuss. The officials, however, said they had no evidence that any element of the Iraqi insurgency has possession of chemical weapons. "

whats that from? cause its not from the government report i kept posting

6/23/2006 12:27:55 PM