Muslims taste like chicken pork

[Edited on December 21, 2006 at 5:40 PM. Reason : .]

12/21/2006 5:37:23 PM

Quote :

"PinkandBlack, I bet you're of the opinion that women who are raped had what was coming to them then, because if you're blind enough to ignore the rise of rapes in Europe at the hands of muslim men for the sake of diversity or whatever other liberal iconic belief you embrace today then I truly feel sorry for the women of this country if your other political pols reflect your valu"

That is the most convoluted shit I've ever seen in my life. Does santorum drip from your asshole and hit keys on your keyboard for you?

12/21/2006 6:18:53 PM

Dude, just stick to delivering pizzas or cleaning out toilets or whatever job you may have.

12/21/2006 7:37:40 PM

I just saw the muslim rep on CNN. He actually brought up some good points. He's a very filtered-down version muslim though, kinda like OJ back in the day....but good points none the less.

12/21/2006 7:44:58 PM

he's one of the good ones

12/21/2006 8:35:13 PM

Quote :

"It's not a shot at Catholics, per say, moreso a shot at a poster who wears the church on his sleeve and then goes and spews junk like he does about keeping out the Muslims so they dont rape our women. Remember that whenever him or 2K posts."

Noted. Sorry for jumping on you.

12/21/2006 9:27:46 PM

I bet Sweden still has a much lower rape rate than the US does. Especially if you count all the people raped in US prisons (and you should).

12/21/2006 10:56:12 PM

Immigration pretty much has nothing to do with Goode's problems.

He's an idiot for getting so bent out of shape because someone else is a different religion than him.

Quote :

" ^^ So world peace and good will towards others is disgusting? You people..."

That's not the issue. It's not that people hate peace and good will, it's that those are meaningless platitudes that do nothing to address the problems of the world. And it's idiotic to suggest that "spreading Christianity" would solve anything, because that's ALSO not going to help anyone (and would probably cause MORE problems).

And the crime problems Sweden is having is more of an economic issue than a cultural issue with Muslims.

Being a Muslim is NOT a factor in causing someone to become a rapist. Denying someone entry in to the US on the grounds that they are Muslim and they will increase rapes is completely idiotic. Only a dumbass racist asshole could suggest something like that.

12/22/2006 12:19:29 AM

Hey genius, muslim isn't a race.

12/22/2006 5:35:52 AM

And that is the only thing he refutes. It would be funnier if it wasn't so predictable.

12/22/2006 6:58:05 AM

^^^ Why is it stupid to spread Christianity? Because you don't believe in it? Wow, how openminded of you. How does the message of world peace and good will towards others an idiotic concept?

There are plenty of reasons to deny muslims access to this country. Sweden is merely one example. How about the recent London bombings? Muslims run amuck over depictions of Muhammad? Nevermind that the 19 terrorists involved in 9/11 came here, were trained here, and then carried out their mission. Um, hello McFly, if that doesn't send up some kind of warning signal then nothing will.

12/22/2006 9:39:24 AM

It certainly doesn't send a warning symbol to me. There are bad apples in every bunch, it doesn't mean we should ban apples.

12/22/2006 9:41:38 AM

So we shouldn't tighten the reigns on who is allowed to enter this country and we should have an opendoor policy?

12/22/2006 9:43:16 AM

You probably don't want my opinion on it. I'm actually much closer to open borders than I am to closing them down.

12/22/2006 9:44:30 AM

im just happy to see someone sworn in on something besides the bible. has this ever happened before?

testing the whole separation of church and state thing.

12/22/2006 9:54:49 AM

because sticking a different religious book in there sure does that!!!1

12/22/2006 11:20:19 AM

when members of congress are sworn in, there is no religious book present. the religious texts are only used in private ceremonies. in the official ceremonies they simply raise their hand.

12/22/2006 11:28:41 AM

Quote :

"why is it stupid to spread Christianity? Because you don't believe in it? Wow, how openminded of you. How does the message of world peace and good will towards others an idiotic concept?"

No, thinking by spreading any one religion is the only way to promote peace and goodwill is stupid.

no matter which one it is. period. this is why we have such a rad time getting along in the middle east.

12/22/2006 12:14:38 PM

Has anyone heard this guy talk??? I cannot understand a word he says..... I would think that to be in a government office you should be able to speak english clearly... the muslim guy he is complaining about is probably more literate.

12/22/2006 12:23:17 PM

Quote :

"^^^ Why is it stupid to spread Christianity? Because you don't believe in it? Wow, how openminded of you. How does the message of world peace and good will towards others an idiotic concept?"

Maybe it's stupid to spread Christianity because it's a weakminded form of life-denying ethics based upon bedtime stories even children don't believe.

[Edited on December 22, 2006 at 12:30 PM. Reason : .]

12/22/2006 12:30:35 PM

Blah blah blah

There is nothing weakminded about having faith.

12/22/2006 2:23:28 PM

I have faith in my car.

12/22/2006 2:27:17 PM

Quote :

" There are plenty of reasons to deny muslims access to this country. Sweden is merely one example. How about the recent London bombings? Muslims run amuck over depictions of Muhammad? Nevermind that the 19 terrorists involved in 9/11 came here, were trained here, and then carried out their mission. Um, hello McFly, if that doesn't send up some kind of warning signal then nothing will."

Hahaha, if I had known you were a retard, I wouldn't have wasted my time arguing with you.

12/23/2006 2:34:49 AM

this guy is only as "good" or "bad" (depending on your view) as his government:

US blocking transfer of money by Muslims

Quote :

"DUBAI, July 2: Money transfer agencies like Western Union have delayed or blocked thousands of cash deliveries on suspicion of terrorist connections simply because senders or recipients have names like Mohammed or Ahmed, company officials said. In one example, an Indian driver here said Western Union prevented him from sending US$120 to a friend at home this month because the recipient’s name was Mohammed. “Western Union told me that if I send money to Sahir Mohammed, the money will be blocked because of his name,” said 36-year-old Abdul Rahman Maruthayil, who later sent the money through UAE Exchange, a Dubai-based money transfer service. In a similar case, Pakistani Qadir Khan said Western Union blocked his attempt this month to wire money to his brother, Mohammed, for a cataract operation. “Every Mohammed is a terrorist now?” Khan asked. Western Union Financial Services, Inc., an American company based in Colorado, said its clerks simply are following US Treasury Department guidelines that aim to scrutinize cash flows for terrorist links. Most of the flagged transactions are delayed a few hours. Some are blocked entirely. In many cases, would-be customers like Maruthayil simply find another way to send the funds often through informal exchanges with less stringent monitoring. But critics of the programme say it is far too broad. The number of people inconvenienced in the Emirates alone, which closely cooperates with US counter terror operations, is thought to be significant. One Western Union clerk said about 300 money transfers from a single Dubai franchise were blocked or delayed each day none of which ever turned up a terrorist link. In Washington, US Treasury spokeswoman Molly Millerwise said foreign banks have used the department’s list of terrorist names to freeze US$150 million in assets since it was released after Sept. 11. Ms Millerwise didn’t know the value of money transfers blocked using the list, but she said frustrations endured by those with certain names were regrettable but necessary. “We have an obligation to do all we can to keep money out of the hands of terrorists,” Ms Millerwise said. The list of names, available on the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control Web site, contains hundreds of Mohammeds. Western Union’s caution is perhaps understandable. Sept. 11 hijacker Mohammed Atta sent money from two Western Union agencies in Maryland before boarding a plane he helped crash into New York’s World Trade Centre. In Dubai, a Western Union branch manager said he was forced to obey US rules he and others consider too broad.—AP"

[Edited on December 28, 2006 at 6:00 AM. Reason : ]

12/28/2006 5:59:55 AM

If this is the kind of shit that homeland security tries to do, i really have no faith in them protecting us at all.

Name based money flow control is patently stupid because the actual terrorists that need to transfer money are smart enough to use falsified name information.

This is some junior high shit.

12/28/2006 8:27:33 AM

Quote :

"rougewolf said: This quote by Goode is disgusting, and I welcome the day when bigotry and hate like this is extingiushed from mankind. "

I agree.

Sincerely,

Maximilien Robbespierre

12/28/2006 12:19:19 PM

Quote :

"I can think of plenty of terrorists that were educated in the United States."

Don't forget about me.

Sincerely,

General W.T. "Final Solution" Sherman

12/28/2006 12:24:51 PM

we managed to find our local member of the Dumshits of America

12/28/2006 2:18:25 PM

^^ although i'm glad the good guys won the Southern War of Aggression

you know, the war started when Fort Sumter was attacked

12/28/2006 3:30:43 PM

^ True enough. If I could travel back in time I would advice the south not to attack. All the war accomplished was the curtailment of state's-Rights and the explosion of Federal powers.

I think America would be a much better place if the Civil War had never been fought. Of course, I'm assuming slavery was on the way out anyway, I might be wrong, in which case it would be better to spend my energies preventing the assasination of William McKinley.

12/28/2006 3:45:25 PM

Quote :

"although i'm glad the good guys won the Southern War of Aggression"

Why don't you actually analyze the historical record before you go off about "good guys" and presumably, bad, evil secessionists. Your simplistic morality play is just that - simplistic and incomplete.

Why don't you tell the Southerners who were killed in attacks by the Union on civilian populations how "good" the feds were. Or, why don't you try explaining that to the Plains Indian, a people who were essentially exterminated by federal forces with the help and inspiration of General Sherman and his genocidal "final solution" to the Indian problem.

Quote :

" you know, the war started when Fort Sumter was attacked"

I wish the South didn't the first shot. I am curious though, how anything short of staying in the Union and continuing to pay Lincoln's beloved tariff (Fort Sumter was a collection post for this) would have prevented a confrontation there. Please explain to me how the Confederacy could claim to be a sovereign entity and allow a federal collections post in its territory.

Lincoln started the war in earnest by ordering a massive invasion of the South after a skirmish in which no one died in combat (according to my understanding, the first formal combat casualties of the war were when Lincoln's army of freedom and wonder fired on a group of war protesters in Maryland).

12/29/2006 10:09:29 AM

jesus, are you guys actually arguing about the Civil War?
Get over it and STFU

12/29/2006 10:44:59 AM

Quote :

"Maximilien Robbespierre"

Power corrupts. Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.


And yes let not argue about the Civil War, we have more pressing things to piss away our time with.

12/29/2006 12:53:15 PM

Quote :

" I wish the South didn't the first shot. I am curious though, how anything short of staying in the Union and continuing to pay Lincoln's beloved tariff (Fort Sumter was a collection post for this) would have prevented a confrontation there. Please explain to me how the Confederacy could claim to be a sovereign entity and allow a federal collections post in its territory."

Lincoln's beloved tariff? Lincoln wasn't even in power when the south attacked fort Sumter.

12/29/2006 12:58:39 PM

Quote :

"Lincoln wasn't even in power when the south attacked fort Sumter."

You're wrong. Fort Sumter happened April 12-13, 1861. Abraham Lincoln gave his first Inaugural Address on March 4, 1861.

Quote :

"we managed to find our local member of the Dumshits of America"

You're absolutely right. We have.

And apparently, according to your profile, you actually hold a degree in history from NCSU. Scary stuff.

12/29/2006 2:28:27 PM

Quote :

"Power corrupts. Absolute power, corrupts absolutely."

Great quote. Care of the great British historian, Lord Acton who also had this to say about the War Between the States in a letter to Robert E. Lee:

Quote :

"I mourn for the stake which was lost at Richmond more deeply than I rejoice over that which was saved at Waterloo."

12/29/2006 2:33:52 PM

Lots of ownage going on here. Kudos, oldright!

12/29/2006 4:38:02 PM

In case anyone was wondering, the North didn't win the Civil War. And the South didn't either.

North Carolina did. Cause we rock.

Seriously, I love this state. Our history kicks everybody else's histories' asses, especially South Carolina's.

12/29/2006 4:41:34 PM

^ Probably the 2nd thing you've said that I've agreed with!

12/29/2006 4:46:40 PM