2
11/13/2008 4:12:43 PM
Why is it that some of "you people" think that racist have to be uneducated? What kind of education is supposed to make a person with racist views become un-racist? If my education (and academic environment) has done anything, it has caused me to be more racist.
11/13/2008 5:00:14 PM
You're proving our point by posting shit like that
11/13/2008 5:04:33 PM
You dont have a good answer to my question.
11/13/2008 5:08:57 PM
11/13/2008 5:19:36 PM
We shouldn't resort to punitive violence.That's what a nigger would do.Their names should not be released. They should suffer academic suspension, quietly.NAACP is as big of a joke as the KKK.
11/13/2008 5:24:26 PM
^ I'm not saying anyone SHOULD beat them up, i'm saying I can see why someone WOULD want to, and I wouldn't judge someone too harshly if it came to pass. At least spit on them as they walk by.And the NAACP is NO WHERE CLOSE to the KKK. Sorry.[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 5:26 PM. Reason : ]
11/13/2008 5:25:46 PM
11/13/2008 6:11:16 PM
11/13/2008 6:18:25 PM
i think everyone that has posted in this thread is a blatant racist and every last one of you are going to be in trouble with the NAACP
11/13/2008 6:38:03 PM
^^ I have that affect on people
11/13/2008 6:38:04 PM
^^ I DO AGREE THAT WE WILL ALL BE IN TROUBLE WITH THE NAACP IF THEY FIND THIS WEBSITE.ANYBODY WANT TO SEND THEM A LINK TO THIS THREAD AND THE OTHER NAACP THREAD?
11/13/2008 6:38:52 PM
you mean there are more NAACP threads? Oh shit I'm about to go find it and read the fuck out of that thread!
11/13/2008 6:41:56 PM
OK
11/13/2008 6:45:42 PM
noNAACP's viewpoint does not relfect the viewpionts of learned freedmen
11/13/2008 6:47:20 PM
i bet they make a lot of money, or are they a nonprofit? I'm just trying to determine what really drives them to succeed.
11/13/2008 6:48:44 PM
those assholes are not nonprofit
11/13/2008 6:49:35 PM
WHATEVER THE FUCK THEY ARE THAT FAT GUY HAS A LOT OF MONEY FOR DRUGS AND BUCKETS OF CHICKEN.I CAN ALREADY HEAR HIM BREATHING HARD WHILE HE STUFFS LARGE FRIED CHICKEN PIECES INTO HIS MOUTH WHILE HIS FACE IS COVERED IN GREASE AND A NAPKIN IS STUFFED IN HIS COLLAR. ]
11/13/2008 6:51:20 PM
nonprofit you say. so their motive isn't money.. possibly power, I don't think it is an organization for the greater good of society seeing as they only advance colored people at a time when the ruler of the free world is black. also I wonder if those kids were on drugs when they were painting the tunnel with their vulgar?[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 6:58 PM. Reason : .]
11/13/2008 6:58:08 PM
NAACP, along with PUSH / Rainbow coalition, and whatever the hell Al Sharpton runs are all racketeering organizations. They exhort money from legitimate businesses by threatening to boycott or create bad press unless the businesses donate money to them.[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:00 PM. Reason : 2]
11/13/2008 6:59:46 PM
I think it was a legitimate group with a legitimate goal back in the 60's. But its been "corrupted" and does not serve the purpose it once did. Now it seems to appeal more to the uneducated man who is more likely to believe everything they say. But it does not make me dislike black folks.[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:02 PM. Reason : ]
11/13/2008 7:01:49 PM
I think the NAACP is a NPO, but that's pretty irrelevant, because lots of things are NPOs.
11/13/2008 7:02:58 PM
is there a group that advances white people? If not then that is racist.
11/13/2008 7:03:51 PM
11/13/2008 7:05:52 PM
where are the people that usually say "if you ignore racism, then it goes away"?
11/13/2008 7:12:22 PM
^^ it is racist, whites don't have a group to help them advance as a people. we are going to get left behind.[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:15 PM. Reason : .]
11/13/2008 7:14:02 PM
^ Majority groups are implicitly advanced by nepotism.[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:18 PM. Reason : in case you're not trolling]
11/13/2008 7:17:56 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/us/politics/13apply.html?no_interstitial
11/13/2008 7:20:19 PM
nah, i just dislike them period, they're a drain on society
11/13/2008 7:20:46 PM
basically the argument comes down to this. what is worse? being racist vs. destroying said racists life.they are both real shitty things to do[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:22 PM. Reason : .]
11/13/2008 7:21:37 PM
if it wasn't for the ncaacp I'd have married a nigger YEARS ago. but they apply a stigma to the race that is just so hard to shake emotionally. intellectually , its easy to dismiss, but there's always that doubt "hey if I talk about hawkings radiation will she divorce me for refering to "BLACK HOLES"[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:53 PM. Reason : -i]
11/13/2008 7:24:34 PM
I like your reasoning, sir. That's analogous to saying "which is worse? killing someone, or destroying that muderer's life by sending them to prison"before I was in a fog....but I know see the lighted path
11/13/2008 7:24:35 PM
^^^ it's only a shitty thing to do if they have any chance of reformation.I wonder though if they're actually racists, or just dumb kids thinking they were being funny...? [Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:25 PM. Reason : ]
11/13/2008 7:24:37 PM
^ being a liberal as I'm certain you are, you of all people should know a wrong doesn't make a right. also you are questioning if there will be any sort of reformation. Isn't there a better way to go about this?[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 7:29 PM. Reason : .]
11/13/2008 7:27:15 PM
^ It's not wrong to send a message to society at large that stupidity isn't tolerated.And what do you mean "also you are questioning if there will be any sort of reformation"?And an expulsion or suspension isn't going to ruin these kids' lives. It'll make it a bit harder for a short while, but sometimes people just need to learn actions have consequences.
11/13/2008 7:34:51 PM
I DISAGREE, AN EXPULSION ON THESE GROUNDS WILL PRETTY MUCH PREVENT THEM FROM EVER GETTING INTO ANY OTHER UNIVERSITY.
11/13/2008 7:44:55 PM
^ I don't think that's the case, but they should have thought of that before painting about killing our nigger president.
11/13/2008 7:51:23 PM
11/13/2008 7:53:35 PM
11/13/2008 7:55:03 PM
11/13/2008 7:56:31 PM
i was on the bus today and heard a black guy and girl discussing how upset they were that tom stafford was putting car breakins at a higher priority than this 'issue of safety'.the black girl also referred to the "ncaa" twice.
11/13/2008 8:00:14 PM
11/13/2008 8:01:02 PM
^^^the only reason the tunnel was created was as a trick to get people to stop spray painting everywhere else. A lot of colleges have a spray-painting wall for similar purposes.It's not a political statement for the university about free speech. You have the freedom to express yourself with spray paint, without getting charged with vandalism. The idea of a "free speech zone" is inherently incongruent with the idea of "free speech" and you're frankly an idiot for thinking this is a free speech issue.On TOP of that, even free speech as defined in the constitution has practical limits, and these kids breached those limits in the context of free speech at the university.[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 8:02 PM. Reason : ]
11/13/2008 8:02:29 PM
who are you to tell them how safe or unsafe they should feel?[Edited on November 13, 2008 at 8:03 PM. Reason : .]
11/13/2008 8:02:49 PM
11/13/2008 8:03:44 PM
^ that's the Internet version of a concession.
11/13/2008 8:06:23 PM
11/13/2008 8:08:37 PM
11/13/2008 8:09:07 PM
11/13/2008 8:09:57 PM
THE POINT IS THAT THEY DIDN'T BREAK ANY LAWS SON.STEP OUT DA BAR SON.
11/13/2008 8:10:59 PM