lol 2

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 10:47 PM. Reason : 2]

1/5/2009 10:47:38 PM

Give me a paint proof room and I could do that poop painting up there.....dripping paint is easy peasy

1/5/2009 10:47:52 PM

Quote :

"LETS SEE YOUR ARTWORK BUDDY"

i drew that years ago

1/5/2009 10:49:03 PM

I need to post some of my shit. I've given away 3/4 of it though.

1/5/2009 10:50:15 PM

Cartoons with ink aren't hard.



this?

1/5/2009 10:50:48 PM

Quote :

"lol, you mean boat?"

now that he mentions it

that shit does look like a con tower on a sub that ran aground lol

1/5/2009 10:51:27 PM

i think all of the paintings are ok, but they seem off balance to me or something...hard to explain

1/5/2009 10:51:45 PM

7.50






pesos

1/5/2009 10:51:57 PM

I KNOW RITE, ITS A U-BOAT


I am liking the beach/water scenes

1/5/2009 10:52:03 PM

^^^ I see it too. I think it might just be the angle of the photograph though.

1/5/2009 10:52:48 PM

my official stance:

i wouldn't buy any of this. but i've seen worse, and i applaud your gall for posting your stuff on TWW.

1/5/2009 10:53:25 PM

Yea angle of photo, and I couldnt get the three canvases to line up straight plus I have no patience

haha thanks joel. I used to do art all the time and was getting good. They say you dont grow unless you work at it a lot, after 5 years or so I'm back into deep. I'm not amazing which is why I'm asking what people would pay for my stuff. Only way to learn if I've got it is to put it out there.

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 10:55 PM. Reason : kk]

1/5/2009 10:53:43 PM

Quote :

"Cartoons with ink aren't hard."

you said art so i posted some of my "art"...i have NOT used finger paint since i was in grade school

i just came in here to say i cant believe you dont know jackson pollock is yet you think his work

is shit and yours is better...thats hard for me to believe

i really hope you are just trolling but i doubt it.

1/5/2009 10:55:53 PM

i think that kiwi is too stupid to troll

1/5/2009 10:57:50 PM

Not saying it's better, no one is offering millions of dollars for my stuff but I can't believe that something like the painting posted can go for that much. The effort is crazy minimal. Doesn't matter who did it.

Kinda like picasso's line dog painting, wtf really?

1/5/2009 10:57:58 PM

It's hard for me to believe that anyone actually likes Jackson Pollock paintings.

Seems like just a massive bandwagon to me.

1/5/2009 10:58:30 PM

Quote :

"the effort is crazy minimal."

nope you are not trolling....you just dont have a clue. you say it was effortless but its apparent you have never seen any footage of his painting style and how long it took him to make those.

i would buy this in a second if i could ^



[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:01 PM. Reason : dfg]

1/5/2009 10:59:53 PM

Nope. I don't know much about famous artists. I just do my own thing.

I have an appreciation for art that looks like something instead of speckled blobs though.

1/5/2009 11:01:35 PM

well, in all seriousness, whether he's deserved his fame. . .Pollack did his work during an era when abstract expression was like 'WAT?', socially. pretty much, if you did anything in the 50s that was unnerving, unsettling, or confusing artistically, you were going to be famous by the 60s.

i mean, seriously.

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:02 PM. Reason : to be fair. kinda like shock writers of the 60s, DH Lawrence in his day, etc.]

1/5/2009 11:01:46 PM

for anyone who hasn't seen it yet

1/5/2009 11:02:25 PM

1/5/2009 11:02:49 PM

that silly jackson pollock and all his silly blobs of ink

1/5/2009 11:05:23 PM

haha nice Woodfoot

To each their own, gunzz I can paint that for you and sell it for 1/358645876th of the price.

1/5/2009 11:06:08 PM

ummmm. . .i don't think those are Pollack pieces, gunzz.

1/5/2009 11:06:39 PM

5-15

1/5/2009 11:07:02 PM

Quote :

"The effort is crazy minimal"

so fucking what

i bet you spent a long time on your derivative, cliche, pseudo-asian, tricut sakura painting, but at the end of the day, if you get $50 for it on etsy you've ripped someone off

1/5/2009 11:07:27 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He7Ge7Sogrk

1/5/2009 11:07:38 PM

Quote :

"lol sorry, I don't consider that art. I think I did that shit straight outta the womb. If you want to pay me 148 million I'll repeat it though"

no, you wouldnt, you stupid fucking vapid cunt.


you seriously post some mickey mouse bullshit here and then have the gall to say you could emulate Jackson FUCKING Pollock after you didnt even know who the fuck he was


GET THE FUCK OFF THIS SYSTEM.

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:08 PM. Reason : STUPID BITCH.]

1/5/2009 11:07:46 PM

kiljadn ftw

1/5/2009 11:08:42 PM

and calling blobs of dripping paint isn't cliche? People who buy those are just too lazy to give some paint to their kids for a few minutes

lol@the anger

go smoke a bowl dumbass

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM. Reason : lolol]

1/5/2009 11:08:43 PM

I Knew who he was, but that doesn't mean I'd ever have his art in my house (regardless of if I could afford it).

1/5/2009 11:09:37 PM

kiljadn ftw

good to see some of you people have an eye for art

1/5/2009 11:09:38 PM

Quote :

"ummmm. . .i don't think those are Pollack pieces, gunzz."

ahhh, they are not. i had to back to the gallery to see that the painting was named after jackson pollock

1/5/2009 11:10:11 PM

hahahaah If that's your eye for art then do me a favor and never pick up a paint brush.

1/5/2009 11:10:37 PM

Quote :

"i applaud your gall for posting your stuff on TWW."

you're talking about a girl that posted bikini shots on tdub here mang.

1/5/2009 11:10:50 PM

yeah, those definitely are NOT Pollack pieces, gunzz.

also, Pollack used several techniques. he wasn't just splatting paint on a canvas. the beauty of pollack was that he was ever expressive, and often would observe his pieces for hours upon "completion" only to find it didn't quite convey what he wanted. he'd often just take a straw or something and drizzle what to us would seem completely inconsequential, but to him meant completion--a full conveyance of something. something completely internal, that we'll never fucking get.

that's why he wins.

^oh yeah.

I'd love some Pollack pieces. . .but yeah, paying in the fucking millions for ANYTHING is retarded. especially someone's painting.

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:13 PM. Reason : asdfasdfasdfasd]

1/5/2009 11:11:53 PM

Quote :

"$295 FUCKING DOLLARS"

ahahahahahahaahha

1/5/2009 11:12:47 PM

Its cool, I don't (think I) have any otherworldly artistic talent. I leave that to my grandfather, mom, and sister.

1/5/2009 11:12:59 PM

Knowing who someone is is one thing, and if you don't it's excusable

critiquing someone else's work is another thing entirely

a true artist doesn't talk shit about someone else's work and then proceed to make ludicrous claims about how they could do the same thing

you know why?


BECAUSE A REAL FUCKING ARTIST PUTS THEIR EMOTIONS INTO WHAT THEY DO


AND AS A RESULT, NO ONE CAN FUCKING REPLICATE IT


ESPECIALLY NOT SOME 4TH GRADE LEVEL ART CLASS DROPOUT WITH SOME SHIT CANVASS SHE BOUGHT AT MICHAEL'S WITH SOME SHIT GRADE WORK POSTING ON THE FUCKING WOLFWEB.



GET THE FUCK OFF THIS SYSTEM.

1/5/2009 11:13:19 PM

Quote :

"calling blobs of dripping paint isn't cliche"

its not like he created a specific "style" that is still being mimicked to this day or anything.

what kind of mark will you, kiwi, leave on the art world

1/5/2009 11:13:44 PM

Maybe Pollack was just on drugs,

1/5/2009 11:13:53 PM

^^^ god damn he is on fire

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:14 PM. Reason : ^^^

1/5/2009 11:14:07 PM

oh you guys should see the one she's selling for $500

1/5/2009 11:14:53 PM

Wow...uh...angry much?

1/5/2009 11:15:11 PM

Quote :

"BECAUSE A REAL FUCKING ARTIST PUTS THEIR EMOTIONS INTO WHAT THEY DO "

lol

only emos can do art!!!!!!!!

The guy did right, his artwork is making bank!

1/5/2009 11:15:41 PM

i don't think pollack was a user. he was, however, FUCKED up; a VERY internalizing, private person.

^oh lord. you're really throwing "emo" out there? ok, get out. seriously, now you're just attempting to mock and deride the emotionality of expressive art because yours is devoid of any. true art is absolute shit without emotion.

get. out.

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:17 PM. Reason : asfdasfdasdfwe]

1/5/2009 11:15:44 PM

Quote :

"he'd often just take a straw or something and drizzle what to us would seem completely inconsequential, but to him meant completion--a full conveyance of something. something completely internal, that we'll never fucking get."

So in actuality it could have zero meaning at all.

1/5/2009 11:16:33 PM

BITCH ARE YOU FOR REAL???

1/5/2009 11:16:53 PM

i don't think you're supposed to be selling artwork your fiance did unless you're a declared coalition

1/5/2009 11:16:54 PM

He fooled you guise

yeah you can as a group, lots of people do. I told him it wouldn't sell but we have a bet going on so I put it up

NICE TRY THOUGH

[Edited on January 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM. Reason : hahahaahah you fuckers]

1/5/2009 11:17:09 PM