2

1/27/2009 5:50:36 PM

its really just weak game.


if you arent happy with the girl you have, be a man and dump her.


sounds like he is needs security

1/27/2009 5:51:03 PM

Quote :

"GIRL, HE IS NEEDS SECURITY *z-snap* "

1/27/2009 5:52:04 PM

^^

And, as a general rule, I never mess with committed guys. Way too much drama, and I know how she would feel if she found out.

[Edited on January 27, 2009 at 5:52 PM. Reason : ^s]

1/27/2009 5:52:23 PM

recipe for disaster.

although i think the girl is vindicated of any negative karma because shes not the one committing adultery (need confirmation on this one).

1/27/2009 5:53:50 PM

I'm inclined to disagree.

1/27/2009 5:55:19 PM

^^ if she knows about the girlfriend then she is just as guilty

1/27/2009 5:56:13 PM

Quote :

"asks you to be his girl on the side "

Haha who does this?

Just get drunk and fuck.

1/27/2009 6:05:03 PM

i would add my real opinion to this thread, but I'm being post stalked.

1/27/2009 6:13:31 PM

Quote :

"to me, this is unacceptable any way you look at it."

agreed.

If he is looking for stuff on the side he might as well break it off from the girl he is in a "relationship" with. what a douchebag.

1/27/2009 6:16:02 PM

I'm having much more fun thinking of possible tww'ers this could have been posted for

1/27/2009 6:19:05 PM

lol, who could it be?!

1/27/2009 6:20:13 PM

i'll give you a clue, its not for a guy. it is for a female twwer who is in a relationship with a guy but is looking to hookup with a girl.

1/27/2009 6:22:23 PM

Quote :

"If a guy, who is fun to be with and attractive, asks you to be his girl on the side - when you know he is in a committed relationship... would you do it? What would make you say yes, what would be no"

I would never say yes.

I like guys who have integrity and are honest.

This kind of two face act is NOT appealing.

Also, who know how many other girls he is doing on the side? I don't want to get that herp yo.

1/27/2009 6:22:26 PM

Yeah -- if you ask them, they get all moral and shit. You have to ply them with alcohol first and then just roll with it.

1/27/2009 6:23:58 PM

haha


waiting on everyone's opinion to suddenly change after the announcement that its supposedly a girl

1/27/2009 6:24:59 PM

Quote :

"it is for a female twwer who is in a relationship with a guy but is looking to hookup with a girl."

Quote :

"ps. he is hung "

TRANNY MUCH?

1/27/2009 6:30:12 PM

lol

1/27/2009 6:30:37 PM

lol smoking gun evidence that the girl-girl post was supposed to be some sort of distraction

1/27/2009 6:30:55 PM

haha damn. well its not a he or a she. its actually a raccoon who is having issues.

1/27/2009 6:33:45 PM

a night bandit!

1/27/2009 6:34:23 PM

haha

the thought process was solid, minus the cock reference in the first post

1/27/2009 6:36:50 PM

yo GoldenGirl, you can be my main squeeze, no need to make a thread

1/27/2009 6:40:13 PM

I would not knowingly do this because I know how much it sucks to be run around on.

However, if this is an open/swinger relationship situation where everyone's cards are on the table that's different. Then it just depends on everyone being cool with it and not being crazy.

People treat sex like a non-renewable resource and guess what? IT'S SO TOTALLY RENEWABLE and we can do whatever we want with it.

1/27/2009 6:54:17 PM

holla

1/27/2009 6:56:02 PM

WHORE

1/27/2009 7:01:28 PM

1/27/2009 7:02:22 PM

^^thanks chris.

[Edited on January 27, 2009 at 7:07 PM. Reason : r]

1/27/2009 7:02:23 PM

omg its me i admits

1/27/2009 7:04:08 PM

Quote :

"ps. he is hung "

1/27/2009 7:05:28 PM

1/28/2009 3:09:57 AM

how did i miss this

Quote :

"ps. he is hung "

wooooooOOOOOOOOOooohhhhh!






this one time i saw brittany spears trying to play connect four with ritz crakers covered in peanut butter and i thought it was the dumbest thing i'd seen, then i saw kiwi's paintings, then i saw this.

1/28/2009 3:27:36 AM

join a swingers club...problem solved

1/28/2009 7:38:28 AM

Quote :

"this one time i saw brittany spears trying to play connect four with ritz crakers covered in peanut butter and i thought it was the dumbest thing i'd seen, then i saw kiwi's paintings, then i saw this. "

1/28/2009 7:41:46 AM

Quote :

"my cocks probably longer and thicker and more turgid that 99 percent of you fucks and even for me, its hard to juggle more than 3 or more girls at once without things getting confusing"

_____________________/

1/28/2009 7:58:06 AM

Quote :

"are you asking for permission to be a slut?"

thread backfire? or retardedness galore - you decide, next episode ONNNNNN



AS
THE
WOLFWEB
TURNS

1/28/2009 8:43:19 AM

Women.

HA ha

[Edited on January 28, 2009 at 8:51 AM. Reason : -]

1/28/2009 8:48:29 AM

Metricula:

Quote :

"However, if this is an open/swinger relationship situation where everyone's cards are on the table that's different. Then it just depends on everyone being cool with it and not being crazy. People treat sex like a non-renewable resource and guess what? IT'S SO TOTALLY RENEWABLE and we can do whatever we want with it."

Exactly. Exactly.

You all are ready to hang this guy, but no one else (I don't think,) has said or asked anything about whether the partners in these relationships know about or approve of the proposed polyamory. Admittedly, most of the time, especially in areas like raleigh that have a large monogamist religious population, relationships referred to as "committed" are assumed to be monoamorous, but still -- you at least need to ask before you pick up your pitchforks and torches.

You see, the phrase "committed relationship" does not mean "monoamorous relationship". Of course, like I said, I'm aware that people frequently mean "monoamorous" when they say "committed", but that isn't proper. Two of the main general reasons people misuse that phrase are:
1) All people simply repeat words they hear, never stopping to decide if they're "proper". And this, I understand.
2) A (religious and/or social) agenda to suggest that all "committed" relationships should be monoamorous. (Not acceptable)

It's unfortunate that GoldenGirl wasn't more clear in the first post. However, since she hasn't corrected the screams of "Cheaters!!" "Burn Him" "Kill the Slut!!", I can reasonable assume that in this case, she is referring to actual cheating, wherein both partners are committed not only to the relationship, but also to being monoamorous.

I can not emphasize enough, however, that it is completely improper to use the phrase "committed relationship" to simply mean "monoamorous relationship". All that "committed" means is "obligated or loyal to, often exclusively", and even then, instances of exclusivity refer to the actual commitment, not some other aspect of it.

[Edited on January 28, 2009 at 8:54 AM. Reason : ]

1/28/2009 8:52:06 AM

this sounds like how people get shot

1/28/2009 8:54:01 AM

^^

Semantics. Take that shit back to the Soap Box.

Quote :

"People treat sex like a non-renewable resource and guess what? IT'S SO TOTALLY RENEWABLE and we can do whatever we want with it."

Even Catholic priests treat it as a renewable resource.

[Edited on January 28, 2009 at 8:55 AM. Reason : -]

1/28/2009 8:55:20 AM

^

Don't be dumb.

Quote :

"semantics 1) Linguistics. The study or science of meaning in language. 2) Linguistics. The study of relationships between signs and symbols and what they represent. Also called semasiology. 3) The meaning or the interpretation of a word, sentence, or other language form: We're basically agreed; let's not quibble over semantics."

You see, we're not agreed -- There isn't enough information for anyone to be agreed. Many of you are agreed that she meant "monoamorous", but others, including myself, have pointed out that if the relationship is polyamorous, then the entire situation is different from the one being discussed. Until she confirms what she meant, we're not basically agreed; so we can quibble over semantics.

1/28/2009 9:08:55 AM

Quote :

"Is he also good-looking, sexy, an excellent lover? Is he an interesting person with good conversational skills and an easy-going nature?"

did you miss the part where she said hes on TWW

1/28/2009 9:10:24 AM

Quote :

"my cocks probably longer and thicker and more turgid that 99 percent of you fucks and even for me, its hard to juggle more than 3 or more girls at once without things getting confusing Thats why you color code them by mixing up the races too...you won't call your white girl Tamika by mistake"

this is gold and it is shameful that only one poster has acknowledged it.

1/28/2009 9:10:28 AM

Quote :

"Metricula: Quote : "However, if this is an open/swinger relationship situation where everyone's cards are on the table that's different. Then it just depends on everyone being cool with it and not being crazy. People treat sex like a non-renewable resource and guess what? IT'S SO TOTALLY RENEWABLE and we can do whatever we want with it." Exactly. Exactly. You all are ready to hang this guy, but no one else (I don't think,) has said or asked anything about whether the partners in these relationships know about or approve of the proposed polyamory."

If that was the case, we wouldn't be seeing this thread. Nobody is gonna ask for permission to be a hussy if it's already been given.

1/28/2009 9:10:31 AM

DaBird...I wanted to high five him and all, but I figured it wouldn't be the same coming from a girl.

1/28/2009 9:12:23 AM

Slave Famous usually brings the funny.

1/28/2009 9:15:08 AM

I will agree with you on that.

1/28/2009 9:21:49 AM

this thread is about mildew
wait and see

1/28/2009 9:25:21 AM

haha for your comments.

Quote :

"did you miss the part where she said hes on TWW"

haha there are hot guys on tww they just don't post!

and ^nope he's on tww but he lurks more then anything. if he posts its in the car and sport thread not here. but that's all i will say

1/28/2009 9:33:56 AM

i could use a friend with benefits right now

1/28/2009 9:35:10 AM