1/31/2010 12:00:06 AM

2

1/31/2010 12:00:08 AM

you might as well link nationalinquirer.com nationalenquirer.com

1/31/2010 12:00:50 AM

it's not child porno if the reason for the video or picture are not for pornographic reasons...which this is obvious that it's the parents filming it and there are no intentions of it being considered pornography.

1/31/2010 12:06:45 AM

^you're wrong cause foxnews says its child porn

1/31/2010 12:08:52 AM

He's right. I definitely linked a foxnews.com story about it at some point.

1/31/2010 12:09:44 AM

lol...fox news...they also showed Palin at a campaign speech and said she was doing a book signing...they tried to make it look like a bunch of people showed up to the book signing...

but just fyi my source comes from being trained in ways to recognize child abuse.

1/31/2010 12:10:35 AM

fox news also told me that only the blacks abuse their children. clearly this is nothing of the sort.

1/31/2010 12:12:48 AM

wat?


I guess you're trolling....anyway, I'm just making everyone aware that they don't need to be scared to post that video because of fear of being persecuted for posting child pornography.

[Edited on January 31, 2010 at 12:14 AM. Reason : ]

1/31/2010 12:13:36 AM

someone changed the original video?

1/31/2010 12:18:25 AM

persecuted or prosecuted?

1/31/2010 12:22:19 AM

both

1/31/2010 12:22:49 AM

Tarheels.

7/10/2010 9:55:28 PM

came here to post ^

7/10/2010 9:55:51 PM

LOL

7/10/2010 9:56:27 PM