I has made a bunch of stupid threads in the past.

Like seriouusly.

OMG TWO!

[Edited on July 3, 2011 at 10:35 PM. Reason : 2]

7/3/2011 10:35:31 PM

i only post classics

7/3/2011 10:42:12 PM

hm img cache problems

[Edited on July 3, 2011 at 10:43 PM. Reason : you're still a dumbass geniusboy]

7/3/2011 10:43:30 PM

I beg to differ dumbass.


img cache problem? observe closer.

7/3/2011 10:53:38 PM

I figured out what the numbers mean thanks to fred.


1309158000 isn't a post ID#, it's a time increment.

It means TWW has been around for 1309158000 minus 1052204400 seconds old at the time of the original graph.

However that doesn't explain why the date doesn't change when I switch numbers. or did it?











[Edited on July 3, 2011 at 11:08 PM. Reason : .]

7/3/2011 11:05:56 PM

classic GenieSex

7/3/2011 11:10:57 PM

How do I find my graph??.?

7/3/2011 11:14:22 PM

Substitute your user ID# into the URL. Yours is 12431



http://ken.kaisia.com/tww/history/avgposts.php?userid=12431&start=&end=1309158000

[Edited on July 3, 2011 at 11:16 PM. Reason : .]

7/3/2011 11:15:30 PM

or alternatively visit this site:
http://ken.kaisia.com/tww/history/

enter your username for a whole # of graphs


you are such a douche geniusboy

Quote :

"However that doesn't explain why the date doesn't change when I switch numbers. or did it? "

first off, congratulations on figuring what a timestamp looks like. second, yes, changing them will generate separate images, but only the latest will show when you post multiple. (i did observe closer, dumbass)

7/3/2011 11:21:12 PM

go hack some magnets

7/3/2011 11:26:01 PM

7/3/2011 11:33:17 PM

Quote :

" first off, congratulations on figuring what a timestamp looks like. second, yes, changing them will generate separate images, but only the latest will show when you post multiple. (i did observe closer, dumbass)"

1) How is it a timestamp? I figured out it was timed event by subtracting T2 from T1 and T3 from T2. Both differences yielded the same number of 31,536,000. Using intuition, I divided the number by 365. Then by 60. Then by 60 again. This yielded 24.

Again 60x60x24x365 = # of seconds in a year.

How is that a timestamp?


2)"second, yes, changing them will generate separate images, but only the latest will show when you post multiple."

"Them" is ambiguous. Changing WHAT will generate separate images? Are you talking about complete links or start and end values.
"only the latest will show" Only the latest WHAT will show?
"when you post multiple." Again "When you post multiple WHAT?"


Did you intentionally leave out the "what"? Why did you do that?

7/4/2011 5:11:07 AM

it's a timestamp b/c it's generated using this function http://php.net/manual/en/function.strtotime.php

Quote :

"The function expects to be given a string containing an English date format and will try to parse that format into a Unix timestamp (the number of seconds since January 1 1970 00:00:00 UTC)"

7/4/2011 9:10:21 AM

Maybe geniusboy should quiet down and observe more before he posts



[Edited on July 4, 2011 at 9:27 AM. Reason : 30166]

7/4/2011 9:26:20 AM

i think its funny how everyone posts a bunch and then shuts up and learns for a while then comes back.

7/4/2011 9:41:58 AM

7/4/2011 12:11:04 PM

7/4/2011 12:17:51 PM