or just page 2

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM. Reason : that too]

1/30/2012 2:45:25 PM

Quote :

""if you don't want to give your kid some wants even though you should be able to afford them if you weren't a selfish douche... well then i think you're an asshole.""

This doesn't have anything to do with "child support" because what you do with the money isn't your decision. It's the mother's decision. Father has no say on how the child support is spent.

1/30/2012 2:48:40 PM

Supporting the right to opt out should take place right before the dick goes into the vagina hole, right? I supoprt the right for you to wear a fucking condom, you douche cunt.

1/30/2012 2:48:44 PM

Quote :

"For once, I at least partially agree with GeniuSxBoY. The legal system treats unmarried men as little more than ATMs for their children's mothers to draw from. It's a system that encourages women to follow their natural desires to have children without going through the motions of setting up a proper environment in which to raise the child. It demands money based on the father's income, yet it gives the father little to no control over how that money is spent. [quote]I doubt you could find a 24 hour nanny that didn't expect that much payment for 13 years of work."

Anyone who sees their own children as a job that they should be paid for doesn't deserve to have them in the first place.

Quote :

"You do realize that $420,000 over the course of 13 years is $32,307.70, right? I'd like to find a live-in nanny for that amount."

Averaging $32,307/year over a period of 13 years on a healthy child is a ridiculous amount of money. And is it so wrong to assume that the woman should provide some of the child's costs? Assuming the costs were split evenly that would imply that they are spending $64,614 per year on the child. In either case we're talking about new jet skis every year, tons of toys, and an Escalade for the kid's 16th birthday.

I support the right of men to "opt out" of being a parent at the early stages of the pregnancy or at the time he is notified. Women have full control of their bodies and full control of the pregnancy. The act of sleeping with a woman should not enter a man into a 19 year contract to pay for a child.

Just because you take a test drive shouldn't mean you have to buy the car. [/quote]

since it was at the bottom of the page

1/30/2012 2:50:10 PM

Quote :

"Supporting the right to opt out should take place right before the dick goes into the vagina hole, right? I supoprt the right for you to wear a fucking condom, you douche cunt."

That's funny that women have the luxury of opting out AFTER the penis enters the vagina regardless if the male wants the baby.

1/30/2012 2:50:20 PM

Quote :

"Averaging $32,307/year over a period of 13 years on a healthy child is a ridiculous amount of money. And is it so wrong to assume that the woman should provide some of the child's costs? Assuming the costs were split evenly that would imply that they are spending $64,614 per year on the child. In either case we're talking about new jet skis every year, tons of toys, and an Escalade for the kid's 16th birthday. "

You do realize these figures are for two children, right?

And sure, maybe they're high, but they aren't unrealistic. And the guy had the opportunity to have the payments lowered, and he chose to pay nothing instead.

Quote :

"Supporting the right to opt out should take place right before the dick goes into the vagina hole, right? I supoprt the right for you to wear a fucking condom, you douche cunt."

This.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:51 PM. Reason : ]

1/30/2012 2:50:45 PM

Quote :

"That's funny that women have the luxury of opting out AFTER the penis enters the vagina regardless if the male wants the baby."

Blame biology.

Bottom line...you know the consequences of your actions (although YOU seem to like to make excuses for them).

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:52 PM. Reason : .]

1/30/2012 2:51:54 PM

So does she. So don't expect child support.

1/30/2012 2:52:38 PM

yeah... in this case you just picked an asshole who didn't like condoms and didn't want a kid.

1/30/2012 2:53:06 PM

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh I fucked a girl and got her preggo and now they want me to pay wwwwHHHAAAAAT?? wwaaaaaaahhhhh

you know who doesn't have this problem..........................





Jay Z and virgins. take a note

1/30/2012 2:53:08 PM

^^^ How would you feel if she left you with the kids?

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:53 PM. Reason : .]

1/30/2012 2:53:12 PM

lolol, ilu punchmonk

1/30/2012 2:53:35 PM

it is a two way street for sure but a personal decision to have sex without a condom should come into question and not just be on the woman to make the decision to raise a child.

Running in circles here. Just wear a fucking condom unless you want a kid. It is not too difficult to comprehend. Sorry it does not feel like rawdogging it but that was a choice. Think before you put your sperm all up into a crazy bitch.

1/30/2012 2:53:52 PM

Quote :

"How would you feel if she left you with the kids?"

He would just want the system to pay for them. He's been pretty clear about that. Government should support all these people who don't want to pay for their own children.

^And I'm thinking the woman isn't the "crazy bitch" in GenuisBoy's relationship...

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:55 PM. Reason : ]

1/30/2012 2:53:58 PM

ask theDuke866 how fair it is

1/30/2012 2:54:30 PM

Quote :

"Supporting the right to opt out should take place right before the dick goes into the vagina hole, right? I supoprt the right for you to wear a fucking condom, you douche cunt."

It's 2012. Two people should be able to enjoy one anothers company for the sole purpose of the enjoying one anothers company. Having sex should be having sex, not having children, unless otherwise discussed. As a woman you should to take ownership of your body and what you consent to.

1/30/2012 2:54:57 PM

^And he's consenting to child support if he has sex with a woman without a condom. It's 2012, a man should know what he's consenting to.

1/30/2012 2:55:50 PM

^^^^ nahh he doesn't want that either... he's made that clear in other threads... he just thinks the kids mother etc. should be neglected and live whatever miserable existence they can afford without burdening the father.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM. Reason : .]

1/30/2012 2:56:30 PM

^^ I'm not arguing that that is the case.
I'm arguing that it shouldn't be the case.
It's no different than any of the other unjust laws that have been repealed or replaced over the years.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 2:58 PM. Reason : s]

1/30/2012 2:56:53 PM

Quote :

"It's 2012. Two people should be able to enjoy one anothers company for the sole purpose of the enjoying one anothers company. Having sex should be having sex, not having children, unless otherwise discussed. As a woman you should to take ownership of your body and what you consent to. Wear a condom or deal with it."

ftfy

1/30/2012 2:57:52 PM

I wore a condom. The problem is that she poked holes in it. I dont feel responsible for my child.... Fuck that guy.

1/30/2012 2:58:24 PM

Just out of curiosity I know that if a woman gets married after divorce alimony basically stops correct? What about child support? If a woman has a kid and gets divorced and remarries how does that work?

1/30/2012 2:58:42 PM

Still responsible for your kid, even if the ex remarries.

And I can't remember if there's a provision that says the first kid gets more than the ones you have in a second marriage, or not. Like you can't have future children to cut down on your previous child support obligations. I'm not sure if I'm remembering that incorrectly from my family law course.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:00 PM. Reason : ]

1/30/2012 2:59:16 PM

Quote :

"It's 2012. Two people should be able to enjoy one anothers company for the sole purpose of the enjoying one anothers company. Having sex should be having sex, not having children, unless otherwise discussed. As a woman you should to take ownership of your body and what you consent to. Wear a condom or deal with it."

Condoms aren't 100% effective.
Are you at least agreeing that a person who wears one has made it clear that they have no intentions of having a child and therefore be able to opt out of being a parent?

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:00 PM. Reason : s]

1/30/2012 2:59:21 PM

Condoms sucks. This is why you should always cum on her face, even if she protests.

1/30/2012 2:59:21 PM

Also, does child support stop at 18 even if the kid has not graduated from high school?

1/30/2012 2:59:26 PM

I think it averages their combined income as her income and the child support is re-calculated at that, but i'm not positive.

1/30/2012 3:00:02 PM

^^yes.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:00 PM. Reason : .]

1/30/2012 3:00:09 PM

1/30/2012 3:00:10 PM

Quote :

"Also, does child support stop at 18 even if the kid has not graduated from high school?"

Reaches 18, or graduates high school, whichever is later.

1/30/2012 3:00:33 PM

Oh...I never wear condoms. I'm also okay with supporting a child if it comes to that.

1/30/2012 3:01:17 PM

Lol, i love that cunt punch picture.

1/30/2012 3:01:53 PM

Quote :

"I think it averages their combined income as her income and the child support is re-calculated at that, but i'm not positive."

If child support is already set, the father can file for a change of condition, and they will reevaluate how much money is allocated. But there are plenty of cases that say the step-Dad is not guaranteed, nor does he have to contribute anything to the child, so his income is not considered.

1/30/2012 3:01:58 PM

what if your child were to hypothetically die?

1/30/2012 3:02:10 PM

hahahaaha....BigMan....funnar!

1/30/2012 3:02:44 PM

once again the BoY has demonstrated he's no GeniuS

1/30/2012 3:03:59 PM

Condoms can come off during the act. I once wore a rubber back 3-4 years back, nailing this real ugly bitch from Winston Salem. Borderline heinous. I don't even recall what prompted me to bang her in the first place. Probably Peppermint Schnapps. Anyway, we're getting busy, I'm getting closer, hips locked, on the balls of my feet, right on the cusp of release. As I pull out for my patented eight roper, the condom was gone. Sucked right inside of her. Scared me to death.

1/30/2012 3:09:56 PM

^ best part about being married... (well not the best... but awesome)


condom malfunctions aren't stressful.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:11 PM. Reason : .]

1/30/2012 3:11:19 PM

Crazy ol' Geniusxboy...




saying crazy things like crazy ol' ron paul...

1/30/2012 3:11:22 PM

^^^ITT Slave Famous has a needle-dick

1/30/2012 3:12:30 PM

If you sounded like Ron Paul, I think you'd have more people agreeing with your posts.

1/30/2012 3:12:30 PM

Quote :

"Probably Peppermint Schnapps."

1/30/2012 3:13:14 PM

Actually, I have the nicest mushroom head this side of Chris Charming. The condom malfunctioned, not me. But the point of that anecdote was that even with proper protection, shit can happen.

1/30/2012 3:14:16 PM

Child-rearing should be subject to an explicit contract made between the parents that is separate from and survives the end of marriage.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM. Reason : ^but methinks the shaft wasn't thick enough to hold on

1/30/2012 3:14:29 PM

Quote :

"If you sounded like Ron Paul, I think you'd have more people agreeing with your posts. "

Agreeing with me has nothing to do with the validity of my thoughts. People agree with newt and romney and herman cain, michelle backman and their thoughts are fucking beyond uneducated pathetic.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM. Reason : .]

1/30/2012 3:14:56 PM

you have no validity thus no one supports your hypothesis.

1/30/2012 3:16:05 PM

-

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM. Reason : nevermind, you edited the shit out of that idiocy]

1/30/2012 3:16:10 PM

The validity of your thoughts happens to be why people tend not to agree with you.

[Edited on January 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM. Reason : v--Which of us are you talking to?]

1/30/2012 3:16:27 PM

You have no idea what you're arguing.

1/30/2012 3:17:14 PM

you think your thoughts are valid simply because they exist.

thats a problem, but one that can be controlled with modern medicine.

1/30/2012 3:19:26 PM