I thought I saw Sarose the other day at a restaurant...had to do a double take but it wasn't her.

[Edited on August 18, 2012 at 1:56 PM. Reason : dur]

8/18/2012 1:42:00 PM

Part of me wonders if that story wasn't just a big ad for pinkmeth.com

Prior to that article I had never heard of it but have since visited many times, all of which were for educational purposes of course.

Some of the items on there are so-so but there are a few real gems. The awkward part of me is that the information of those cataloged is posted as well. Its one thing to post pictures of someone who took photos of themselves but its reaching depravity when the facebook, twitter, linked in and DOB of the individual is listed as well. These women haven't committed any crime except for, perhaps, ignorance, but there lives could be forever damaged.

Can you imagine going to a job interview and when they eventually google you pornographic pictures appear under the "images of" caption up top.

8/19/2012 3:18:40 PM

^^I went to Sakura many years ago with a friend. She was there. Fuckin obnoxious. Talked like a valley girl. I'm pretty sure everyone in there could hear her conversation, loud and clear.

8/19/2012 3:22:15 PM

Hahahaha I'd forgotten about Sarose.

8/19/2012 3:53:31 PM

lol @ the pic of will quick's sister

at least i think that's what that is

8/19/2012 3:55:00 PM

I hear ya, mrfrog. I don't know what they should do.

8/19/2012 5:25:34 PM

The internet community dynamic behind this is really interesting.

So, first there was a Reddit where people shared the fusked pictures.... but they had rules, specifically meant to protect and not connect the pictures to the people. In fact, it kind of shows that it was a community of decent people, they just wanted novel pictures of boobs.

It would seem that Pinkmeth is associated with, you guessed it, /b/. I have to say, if someone is shocked and appalled that internet users would do this... they don't know /b/. They censor phone # and addresses on Pinkmeth, so it's wrong to say they are totally without-rules. I think they do this to avoid running afoul of harassment/stalking laws. Nonetheless, giving everything they can about the women's "internet presence" is totally game. Legally, I don't see how the distinction is entirely defensible, but I guess I do somewhat. Facebook doesn't connect to the physical person, so there's no physical danger.

I almost kind of want to make a Wikipedia page for Pinkmeth. There's more than enough supporting references. But still, I understand the game, the more people talk about it, the higher the search hits rise, which is kind of the source of its power.

Still, if someone got fired from say... the army, b/c of this, I think she should be able to sue the organization. But that's because I'm liberal scum.

[Edited on August 19, 2012 at 10:47 PM. Reason : ]

8/19/2012 10:46:57 PM

Quote :

"if someone got fired from say... the army, b/c of this, I think she should be able to sue the organization. "

She could sue and she would lose.
Bottomline - Don't let someone take nude pics or video of you.

8/19/2012 11:02:34 PM

for being about pictures of boobs, this thread sure does lack for them

8/19/2012 11:05:14 PM

well there are a few people on there who i would recommend but the moral dilemma is do i post their names only to have the internet further link them to those photos?

and to frog's point, while they don't post the numbers they sure post enough information that would allow someone to get the phone number, find where that person works, etc... etc...

I suppose all of that could be done anyway since they have a public facebook page and thus I must only really be against the aggregation of internet information, which I suppose is stupid.

8/20/2012 9:26:33 AM

Quote :

"JLCayton All American 1519 Posts user info edit post lol @ the pic of will quick's sister at least i think that's what that is"

It was

8/20/2012 9:48:16 AM

Quote :

"or being about pictures of boobs, this thread sure does lack for them"

8/20/2012 9:55:23 AM

all this thread did is make me wonder something i've never thought before.


"what do klatypus's boobs look like i wonder"

8/20/2012 10:13:43 AM

Klaty doesn't have boobs.

8/20/2012 3:04:22 PM

^^ Pretty nice actually. Soft, but somehow still perky.

8/20/2012 8:47:46 PM

Is Klatypus hot or a typical TWWer?

8/20/2012 10:45:28 PM

she's hot

8/20/2012 10:46:34 PM

I didn't need more convincing to never take nudes but this pretty much seals it up.

And I agree, I have never understood the appeal of taking naked pics. Besides, some of the faces that are made during "sexy time photo sessions" don't need to be documented...

8/20/2012 11:09:39 PM

lol @ Seth

8/20/2012 11:10:29 PM

She's definitely better looking than your average TWW girl.

8/20/2012 11:11:33 PM

I'm sure there are pics of my cock on the interwebs from various exes sources. At least I was smart enough to exclude my face.

8/20/2012 11:12:05 PM

There are certain gals from my past who I expect to pop up on pinkmeth or similar sites sooner or later.

This next generation of kids is going to be so fucked up from the existence of undeniable evidence of their mom's being sluts being accessible to their friends.

8/20/2012 11:13:10 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAZhXAh7BC0&list=PLC786485413C61FB6&index=1&feature=plcp

8/21/2012 12:10:32 PM

It's gonna be slim pickins in the future for senators, congressmen/women and presidents as just about everyone is going to have something in their life that will screw them up and is well documented on the internet. If not that person, then their spouse.

Time to really scrutinize your potential spouses to make sure they don't screw up your future

8/21/2012 1:21:05 PM

maybe we're in for a better class of politician with facebook documenting their idiocy

lol ya right

8/21/2012 1:26:19 PM

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/involuntary-porn-site-tests-the-boundaries-of-legal-extortion/

Quote :

"If you think IsAnyoneUp couldn't be any sleazier, then IsAnybodyDown's seems determined to prove you wrong. A link on IsAnybodyDown reading "Get Me Off This Site!" leads to the website of "Takedown Hammer," an "independent third party team" that, for a modest fee of $250, will "issue a successful content removal request on your behalf." It brags of 90 successful removals from IsAnybodyDown.com. It seems pretty obvious that "Takedown Hammer" isn't actually independent of IsAnybodyDown. Indeed, copyright and First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza has found circumstantial evidence that IsAnybodyDown and Takedown Hammer are, in fact, both owned by a man named Craig Brittain."

Putting the nature of the atrocity aside, I must admit the lol'd pretty hard reading about the business model.

11/13/2012 9:45:31 AM