Carney is this years Rackers

9/24/2006 11:10:39 PM

woo gabriel blows up

9/24/2006 11:14:42 PM

you would really put Pennington last? Delholme has been far worse in the past 2 games than he has


i need some other opinions

Rank the following
Plummer
Delholme
Favre
Pennington
Brunell



I also have C.Williams (TB) whom I am very tempted to drop and add Tatum Bell--opinions?

I have got to solidify my QB position which has been shaky as fuck during the start of this season

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 11:19 PM. Reason : .]

9/24/2006 11:16:23 PM

ehhh who cares

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 11:23 PM. Reason : f]

9/24/2006 11:21:11 PM

Quote :

"you would really put Pennington last?"

He has a pretty brutal stretch coming up with almost no run support. Indy, Jax, and Miami... He has been remarkably poised for someone who hadn't seen too much game action in over a year though and he is a smart player.. it's just a matter of giving him SOME running game to work with..

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 11:21 PM. Reason : x]

9/24/2006 11:21:20 PM

so would you keep him or drop him

and if i drop him, who out of the QBs I listed above, would you pick

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 11:34 PM. Reason : ..]

9/24/2006 11:33:34 PM

brunell

the pass D of the NFC East is pretty weak, portis is back and he has 3 good WR's to throw it to

9/24/2006 11:35:15 PM

yeah i guess you're right

9/24/2006 11:43:57 PM

fuck, I had a lead going into tonight.

why the hell did i start Watson instead of Crumpler at the last minute?

Javon Walker blew up and therefore I fell to 0-3. Put up my season high so far but still got beat. The team I played had Westbrook, Walker, and McNabb amongst others. Damnit.

[Edited on September 24, 2006 at 11:48 PM. Reason : r]

9/24/2006 11:48:25 PM

fuck. accidentally released atlanta D to waivers. now have to settle for New Orleans America's D. Thought it was going to drop atlanta and pick up a player for week 4, not week 3.


[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 12:57 AM. Reason : dfsd]

9/25/2006 12:56:07 AM

so i need to get a RB terribly bad

i have edge and lamont and just picked up jones-drew


who can i trade mcnabb for, i need a dominate guy and everyone needs a QB, i have peyton and Mcnabb...who should i go for, anyone besides LT, that wont work i know, i asked.

9/25/2006 1:37:02 AM

westbrook!

9/25/2006 1:38:02 AM

trade mcnabb for westbrook?

any other ideas

9/25/2006 1:42:23 AM

Gore and Rudi Johnson are the only other really high scoring RBs.
]

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 1:51 AM. Reason : what kind of league allows you to have manning and mcnabb?]

9/25/2006 1:49:12 AM

the kind that totally overlooked McNabb when i got to him, i practically have a monopoly on QBs but screwed up on RB by draftin Lamont Jordan it seems, him and Edge are all i got really

9/25/2006 1:54:22 AM

In all the leagues I drafted McNabb didn't go until the 4th-6th round, because at the time he didn't have any good recievers.

Or as one of the dudes I was drafting with put it when he was picked, "McNabb's best reciever is Mark Wahlburg."

9/25/2006 1:59:13 AM

that doesnt help me

9/25/2006 2:00:14 AM

McNabb and Peyton for LT Delhomme and Cadillac?

i wont have a goooood QB then but i can pick up someone im sure thats decent, i have no runnin game now but then i wont have a passing game hardly with delhomme


should i do it?

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 2:14 AM. Reason : d]

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 2:15 AM. Reason : f]

9/25/2006 2:13:38 AM

No, not both

Peyton for LT

9/25/2006 3:24:23 AM

How many QBs do you start in that league? If 1, then yes you should take the trade without hesitation, and someone would have to be insane for offering it.

9/25/2006 3:29:05 AM

yea we start one QB, i tried peyton for LT and he wouldnt do it, but he will do this one

9/25/2006 3:33:43 AM

mcnabb and westbrook's number's will even out. their schedule gets brutal in the 2nd half of the season. (fantasy playoff time)

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 8:29 AM. Reason : 4]

9/25/2006 8:29:38 AM

Would any of you keep Culpepper and Chambers at this point?

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 9:21 AM. Reason : Plummer, Delholme, and Pennington are all available and Chris Chambers hasnt done shit]

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 9:28 AM. Reason : would anyone trade Larry Fitzgerald for Cadillac Williams?]

9/25/2006 9:18:36 AM

^ I would keep them both for one more week and hope that something happens.

They play Houston in week 4. If they dont produce, Culpepper will no longer be worthy of a roster spot.

You may want to hold on to Chambers for a bit longer.

9/25/2006 9:33:16 AM

well my receivers are Burress, A.Johnson, Wayne, and Chambers

another guy in my league is offering L.Fitzgerald for C.Williams


my RB is LT and my backups are S.Jackson, J.Jones and C.Williams

9/25/2006 9:35:33 AM

bttt cmon i gotta go to class and need to fix this before everyone else wakes up and ruins my plans

9/25/2006 9:49:52 AM

how many RBs do you start?

i lost by 3 points this week thanks to plaxico burress, randy mcmichael and kurt warner and their AWFUL showings...

9/25/2006 10:36:14 AM

you can start one RB and one W/R

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 10:48 AM. Reason : yeah burress caused me to lose as well]

9/25/2006 10:48:05 AM

i think 9 times out of 10 i would start LT and Jackson, so I would make the trade

9/25/2006 10:54:01 AM

especially with this Simms situation (out 2-4 months), defenses are going to load the box and make the new QB throw.

I dont like Cadillac that much going forward.

Trade him in a hurry, especially for a top 5 receiver.

9/25/2006 11:16:47 AM

next week:

Atlanta's defense vs. Arizona

or

Seattle's defense @ Chicago?

9/25/2006 11:18:06 AM

ATL.

Bears are playing at home and Grossman, as well as his O-line, have been playing superb.

Abraham will likely be back for the Falcons, and there speed, especially at home, will destroy Kurt Warner.

9/25/2006 11:19:46 AM

Quote :

"Grossman, as well as his O-line, have been playing superb"

you mean until yesterday right

9/25/2006 11:31:06 AM

no, I mean that they have been playing great.

He has been sacked only 1 time in three games.

the lowest in the league by a long shot.

Granted, they are better at pass protection than run blocking, but suprisingly, CHI is throwing much more this season than anyone anticipated.

Start ATL.

9/25/2006 11:39:18 AM

maybe the O-Line has been playing well and Grossman definitely is playing 10x better than last year

but yesterday he was 23/41 (56%) with 1 TD and 2 INTs

9/25/2006 11:42:31 AM

my point is that defenses facing them arent going to get alot of sacks, nor would they get the chance to force fumbles, deflect passes, or do the other things that typically score points for Defenses in Fantasy Football.

Arizona is just the opposite. Warner had 1 fumble, 3 Interceptions, was sacked once, and had 6 passes deflected. They have no offensive line, therefore Warner is either hurried, sacked, or forced to throw an pass that is picked or at least deflected.

once again...START ATL.

9/25/2006 11:54:30 AM

cool

only reason i would start Seattle is if New Orleans' offense rapes ATL tonight but I don't see that happening

9/25/2006 11:56:58 AM

agreed, start ATL

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 2:31 PM. Reason : what do you guys think, Culpepper vs HOU or Pennington vs IND]




keep in mind that Culpepper is Culpepper and he has been terrible so far

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 2:33 PM. Reason : Pennington has not but IND is a good team]

9/25/2006 2:29:45 PM

Not a huge deal Fantasy wise, but it's my job to report the news:

Quote :

"The 49ers will be without Vernon Davis for a while. The rookie tight end suffered a broken right fibula in Sunday's loss to the Eagles and is expected to miss about four weeks, according to the San Jose Mercury News. Eric Johnson will be the starter in San Fran while Davis is out, and he is a solid choice for those scanning the wavier wire in need of a tight end. Johnson caught a team-high seven passes from Alex Smith on Sunday and is an excellent safety valve for the young quarterback. Those who have Davis in re-draft leagues shouldn't worry about dropping him if they need that roster spot for someone who will play in the next month."

Drop that bitch if you aren't in a keeper league.

9/25/2006 3:13:32 PM

^

Would you drop Cooley in favor of Johnson given the news of Davis's broken leg? Cooley hasn't done shit this year and with all of the receivers Brunell has got (Moss, Randle El, Givens, etc) I am worried that he'll be a 2 catches, 20 yards guy all season.

9/25/2006 3:26:07 PM

yes.

normally I wouldnt, but considering Davis will be out, as well as possibly Gore, Johnson will be getting some looks.

If Cooley were to do ANYTHING, this past week against the Texans was it.

Cooley is dead to me.

9/25/2006 3:48:17 PM

^ cool thanks. I still don't know why I took Cooley over Winslow in the draft. Cooley was such a stud at the end of the year last year, but damn he has sucked - some of that is due to Portis being out and Brunell having a girl's arm, but still I'm going to regret that shit all year.

9/25/2006 4:11:28 PM

Washington went from using Cooley as the H back to as their Blocking TE. Sellers is their H back now and Gibbs said during the Preseason that this was to give Brunell more time to throw to Santana Moss and the newly acquired Randel-El and Brandon Lloyd

[Edited on September 25, 2006 at 4:24 PM. Reason : .]

9/25/2006 4:22:12 PM

^ Well I admit that I didn't know all of that shit. But I did know that many people were high on Cooley before the season and were saying that he would put up similar stats.

9/25/2006 4:24:48 PM

sorry about the

I am at work and most of my posts at work are

9/25/2006 4:26:06 PM

^ I don't mind if you call me dumb - I should have never taken Cooley and done my research. Oh well, hopefully Johnson will be a decent replacement.

9/25/2006 4:33:56 PM

i didnt say dumb

i was just saying gibbs said this b4 preseason games, which should have tipped people off

9/25/2006 4:38:47 PM

Quote :

"Cooley is dead to me."

He was dead to me after week 1.

9/25/2006 5:11:02 PM

anyone thing Betts and Jones-Drew may be the key backs in their respective teams now that they had great showings? i picked them both up but i dont know if they are worthy of starting over Edge and Lamont at this time

9/25/2006 5:19:13 PM

Certainly one of em over Lamont, he's not doin jack this year. You couldn't flip a dime thru the holes that the Oakland oline create for him.

9/25/2006 5:20:18 PM