Quote :

"and in 5 years in office, "

3 major terrorist attacks, an illegal war with Iraq, skyrocketing gas prices, and almost 2000 dead american soldiers. Quite a fucking accomplishment. Your voting rights should be revoked.

8/24/2005 12:38:11 PM

Just think, things could be worse... we could have all that AND John Kerry in office

8/24/2005 12:59:26 PM

Quote :

"yes that was sarcasm i thought it was pretty obvious also, i think it made my point very well"

eh, I missed it. We really do need [sarcasm] tags sometimes...

8/24/2005 1:01:10 PM

I don't see any reason to hate the president unless he is absolutely a dictator with no sense whatsoever of what he is doing to his people, etc etc. Do you honestly believe everything would be hunky-dory if Gore was in office instead of Bush? Or Kerry now? There's no way to know how things would have turned out - I would bet we still would have been attacked, since they hate the US and our freedoms, not the President that is in office at the time. I personally can not feel as negatively emotionally charged toward someone in the opposite party because I do agree with some of their viewpoints as well. Just because I agree with more on the Republican side, doesn't mean I'm going to put everyone else down like some supremist.

I work at Cup A Joe and we have a "Bushisms" calendar, and I have to listen to the lesbians that laugh and loudly exclaim about what a moron we have in office, how stupid he is, how much they hate him. I always gathered that liberals (or can we call them that - I keep reading about how they aren't technically "liberal") preach about being socially aware, all about peace, love, harmony, acceptance, but I see such hatred coming from them when it comes to conservatives that happen to disagree with some of their beliefs. Some will say "I'm a Christian but I follow Jesus's teachings more than the Old Testament" or whatever the case may be, particularly the peace and forgiveness that Jesus preached. WTF get over yourselves and instead of being hateful do something constructive toward the change and practice what you preach. Don't put others down as a general group just because you hate certain other (intolerant) members of that group.

/rant

[Edited on August 24, 2005 at 10:06 PM. Reason : there's intolerance on both sides]

8/24/2005 10:05:22 PM

3 major terrorist attacks?

lets see, 9/11...

I DONT SEE THE OTHER TWO!

8/24/2005 10:06:53 PM

^
you know full well he wasn't counting 9/11, teh L3ft always forgets about that one. he's undoubtedly talking about Madrid, London, and the third one probably has something to do with an Israeli attack on Palestinians somewhere...

---

Quote :

"Wtbrowne32: Just think, things could be worse... we could have all that AND John Kerry in office "

Don't know who this guy is, but I approve. Carry on

[Edited on August 24, 2005 at 10:25 PM. Reason : ---]

8/24/2005 10:24:11 PM

Quote :

"3 major terrorist attacks? lets see, 9/11... I DONT SEE THE OTHER TWO! "

um...

8/24/2005 10:31:32 PM

I noticed that, too, but I'm also trying to figure out how the left manages to forget about it.

8/24/2005 10:33:17 PM

Quote :

"3 major terrorist attacks? lets see, 9/11... I DONT SEE THE OTHER TWO!"

There were 3 targets on 9-11.

8/24/2005 10:38:13 PM

And if you count other countries their were 3 major ones too. Britain and Spain

[Edited on August 24, 2005 at 10:39 PM. Reason : .]

8/24/2005 10:39:12 PM

some people really think that 9/11 was the last terrorist act to happen and terrorism hasn't increased

8/24/2005 11:06:32 PM

and it's all W's fault too...

8/24/2005 11:12:53 PM

i never said that or implied that
i was just making a point about how naive some people are

thanks for trying to twist my words though

8/24/2005 11:13:59 PM

it's all about [context] brother. tell me that's not the over-riding theme of the terrorism comments here...

8/25/2005 5:48:24 AM

come on. calling 9/11 three separate terrorist attacks is bullshit and you know it.

blaming dubya for london and madrid is also stupid. unless you want to start claiming that dubya should be running England and Spain in addition to the US

8/25/2005 2:44:48 PM

What was the terrorist response of Spain's declaration to aid the US in the war on terror? Attacks. What happened. An attack. For Brits it was a givin. It is Bushes fault since he didn't take care of Osama Bin Ladin in time. I mean who the fuck is Bin Laden when we got the best intelligence in the world. So there you have it, Bush's fault.

8/25/2005 2:53:51 PM

Quote :

"...since they hate the US and our freedoms..."

Come on, PLEASE, you can't be serious. They hate our freedoms?!?! God how I love that line...

8/25/2005 2:55:33 PM

9/11 was not the last attack on us interests
and i am not counting it as 3 things
and i am not talking about spain or britain

8/25/2005 2:59:08 PM

Quote :

"What was the terrorist response of Spain's declaration to aid the US in the war on terror?"

so bush is supposed to run spain's security as well? face it. the fact that they attacked SPAIN and not the US should tell you something... AKA, the US is/was doing something right at that point, so they went and attacked somewhere softer... then they just say "ITS BUSH'S FAULT!" yeah, it's bush's fault for beefing up security so they couldn't attack the US so easily.

but keep drinking your kool-aid and being an idiot, man...

8/25/2005 10:20:26 PM

he did sell the war to the un
he did petition congress for it
he did seek out the coalition
he had to beg countries with populations larger than the average new england state to "stay the course"

so yeah, i'd say he is at least partly to blame if the 3/11 bombings were in response to Spains activity in the iraqi war

8/25/2005 10:56:00 PM

Quote :

"the fact that they attacked SPAIN and not the US should tell you something... AKA, the US is/was doing something right at that point, so they went and attacked somewhere softer... - but keep drinking your kool-aid and being an idiot, man..."

Oh, I get it. We can all rest at ease knowing aaronburro has all the inside information. Golly I didn’t know you were so well informed. Please enlighten us on how the terrorist mind works. And while your at it maybe you can track down that old bin laden character for us. We sure appreciate your contributions aaronburro

8/25/2005 11:15:45 PM

hey, as long as dubya can run spain, ok?

8/26/2005 12:12:43 AM

Out of all your some 12,585 odd posts, that has to be one of your dumbest. You just think Dubya's doing a fine job, ok?

*pats on head*

8/26/2005 3:08:11 AM

i read all the way til the bacon part at the beginning where it says some girly man liberal meat packing bullshit

OK SHIT LIKE THAT IS WHY SOME PEOPLE MAKE POLITICS GAY

YOUR MEAT YOU BUY IN THE FUCKING GROCERY STORE WILL BE SAFE TO EAT NO MATTER IF ITS A REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT IN OFFICE

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST

8/26/2005 5:29:39 AM

Quote :

"YOUR MEAT YOU BUY IN THE FUCKING GROCERY STORE WILL BE SAFE TO EAT NO MATTER IF ITS A REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT IN OFFICE"

well yes, now
but it hasn't always been that way

go read the first 80 pages of "The Jungle"

8/26/2005 8:22:43 AM

Quote :

"Out of all your some 12,585 odd posts, that has to be one of your dumbest. You just think Dubya's doing a fine job, ok? "

i'm not surprised that your "education" has failed you. because somehow in all of my saying "dubya is not responsible for what happens in spain" you picked up "I LUV DUBYA!!! HE'S THE BEST!!!"

try reading next time asshat so I don't have to call you out on your fucking stupidity

8/26/2005 9:06:38 AM

^^Well, yeah, but I don't think that the one-time party of slavery and Jim Crow should be in too big of a hurry to talk about how things used to be so very long ago.

Now someone will scream, "OMF LIBERAL =/= DEMOCRAT," even though they've been talking in Republican/Democrat terms for this whole thread.

8/26/2005 2:05:34 PM

wow
it took us three pages for someone to jump on slavery

gg man

really, really good stuff here

8/26/2005 2:57:00 PM

Dont back track on your own statements aaronburro

Quote :

"then they just say "ITS BUSH'S FAULT!" yeah, it's bush's fault for beefing up security so they couldn't attack the US so easily."

You cant hide ignorance.

8/26/2005 8:11:31 PM

Yeah, bringing up slavery was inane, and I apologize. That issue is more than a hundred years old and nowadays everyone agrees on the subject, which makes it completely different from meat safety standards.

8/26/2005 10:02:00 PM

remind me again where saying "Bush beefed up security" is analagous to saying that approve of everything dubya has done...

dumbass. do you like getting pwnt or what?

8/26/2005 10:33:20 PM

BTW, when Clinton went after bin Laden with those missile strikes, all the repugnicans started screaming, "NO WAR FOR MONICA!!!"

[Edited on August 27, 2005 at 12:23 AM. Reason : .]

8/27/2005 12:21:48 AM

Not this one.

This one was screaming, "NO INEFFECTUAL MISSILE STRIKES USED AS A MORE POLITICALLY EXPEDIENT ALTERNATIVE TO REAL MILITARY ACTION," which admittedly doesn't roll off the tongue quite as well.

8/27/2005 12:25:31 AM

yeah, and look at what good clinton's strikes did. he sure got osama, didn't he? oh yes indeedy!

8/27/2005 12:26:28 AM

Quote :

"so bush is supposed to run spain's security as well? face it. the fact that they attacked SPAIN and not the US should tell you something... AKA, the US is/was doing something right at that point, so they went and attacked somewhere softer... then they just say "ITS BUSH'S FAULT!" yeah, it's bush's fault for beefing up security so they couldn't attack the US so easilybut keep drinking your kool-aid and being an idiot, man..."

Then what the hell are you arguring about. I never put words in your mouth. Only a complete retard that was blind would believe in all of Bush's foreign policy. You put words in my mouth when you said I think he should be running Spain's security just because I cleary linked their bombing to our incompetency. Get your facts together, drink your koolaid, and shut the fuck up.

8/27/2005 10:43:13 AM

what
the
fuck?

you're the one here saying that bush is responsible for what happened in spain. and yet bush has NO FUCKING CONTROL over what happens in spain. the only way he could be responsible is if he were in control of spain. then what happens there is under his control. trying to rationalize it away by saying "THEY HATE BUSH SO THEY ATTACKED SPAIN SO ITS BUSH'S FAULT THAT SPAIN GOT BOMBED!!!!!!!" is fucking stupid.

so spain had its legs so fucking wide open that even fat albert could sneak in there unnoticed. and somehow its bush's fault? come on...

Quote :

"Only a complete retard that was blind would believe in all of Bush's foreign policy."

so tell me, oh great wise one, how the fuck does FOREIGN POLICY have one god damned thing to do with BEEFING UP OUR LOCAL SECURITY POLICY? do you get the fucking point? FOREIGN POLICY:LOCAL SECURITY. FOREIGN:LOCAL. NOT HERE:HERE.

get it now? now shut the fuck up

[Edited on August 27, 2005 at 11:14 AM. Reason : ]

8/27/2005 11:12:48 AM

Quote :

"and yet bush has NO FUCKING CONTROL over what happens in spain."

NO FUCKING SHIT. And no I'm not saying bush is directly responsible, what the hells a matter with you.

Quote :

""THEY HATE BUSH SO THEY ATTACKED SPAIN SO ITS BUSH'S FAULT THAT SPAIN GOT BOMBED!!!!!!!""

You said that load of crap and that what i'm calling you out for.

Quote :

"how the fuck does FOREIGN POLICY have one god damned thing to do with BEEFING UP OUR LOCAL SECURITY POLICY? do you get the fucking point?"

This has everything to do with it and you know damn well it does. Bush's attempt at showing the terrorist cells that we mean business is doing exactly the opposite. It only make them more zealous and smarter. Which is the obivious, you may agree, i dont know what your stances are, but dont twist my fucking words.

[Edited on August 27, 2005 at 3:43 PM. Reason : .]

[Edited on August 27, 2005 at 3:43 PM. Reason : .]

8/27/2005 3:42:44 PM

Quote :

"1. Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a conservative radio host. Then it's an illness and you need our prayers for your recovery. 2. The United States should get out of the United Nations, and our highest national priority is enforcing U.N. resolutions against Iraq. 3. Government should relax regulation of Big Business and Big Money but crack down on individuals who use marijuana to relieve the pain of illness. 4. "Standing Tall for America" means firing your workers and moving their jobs to India. 5. A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body, but multinational corporations can make decisions affecting all humankind without regulation. 6. Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary Clinton. 7. The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay. 8. Group sex and drug use are degenerate sins unless you someday run for governor of California as a Republican. 9. If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won't have sex. 10. A good way to fight terrorism is to belittle our longtime allies, then demand their cooperation and money. 11. HMOs and insurance companies have the interest of the public at heart. 12. Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy. Providing health care to all Americans is socialism. 13. Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but creationism should be taught in schools. 14. Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney did business with him and a bad guy when Bush needed a "we can't find Bin Laden" diversion. 15. A president lying about an extramarital affair is an impeachable offense. A president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is a solid defense policy. 16. Government should limit itself to the powers named in the Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet. 17. The public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades, but George Bush's driving record is none of our business. 18. You support states' rights, which means Attorney General John Ashcroft can tell states what local voter initiatives they have a right to adopt. 19. What Bill Clinton did in the 1960s is of vital national interest, but what Bush did in the 1980s is irrelevant. 20. Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is communist; but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony. "

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=56066

8/27/2005 10:28:19 PM

Quote :

" NO FUCKING SHIT. And no I'm not saying bush is directly responsible, what the hells a matter with you. "

lets see, I reamed pryderi for saying there were 3 terrorist attacks that bush was responsible for by saying there has only been one turrist attack that bush was responsible for. You then come in and say "WHAT ABOUT SPAIN AND ENGLAND!!!!!!!" Sounds to me like you were saying dubya was responsible for those...

Quote :

" You said that load of crap and that what i'm calling you out for."

Quote :

"What was the terrorist response of Spain's declaration to aid the US in the war on terror? Attacks. What happened. An attack. For Brits it was a givin. It is Bushes fault ..."

Sounds to me like YOU are the who said that, not me...

Quote :

"This has everything to do with it and you know damn well it does. Bush's attempt at showing the terrorist cells that we mean business is doing exactly the opposite. It only make them more zealous and smarter."

So we should just let the terrorists blow us up with impunity? this is RICH, I tell you. RICH!!! There IS NO FOREIGN POLICY when dealing w/ terrorists. By definition, a terrorist is independent of a country. He might be sponsored by a country, but he is not a representative of that country. Foreign policy in this case would be used ON THE COUNTRY to get the afore-mentioned country to stop supporting terrorists. Now it may be true that Bush is pissing off terrorists w/ his foreign policy (and he probably is, might I add), but beefing up security (IE, something focusing solely on a local security policy) does NOT piss off terrorists inherently, unless part of our security policy is to rape every muslim woman that comes through the airport.

Quote :

"but dont twist my fucking words."

There is no twisting going on. Just me pwning you thoroughly.

8/27/2005 10:32:54 PM

Quote :

"So we should just let the terrorists blow us up with impunity? this is RICH, I tell you. RICH!!! There IS NO FOREIGN POLICY when dealing w/ terrorists. By definition, a terrorist is independent of a country. He might be sponsored by a country, but he is not a representative of that country."

Jesus Christ..., I'm speechless. Thanks for pointing out the goddamn obivious here

Quote :

"By definition, a terrorist is independent of a country. He might be sponsored by a country, but he is not a representative of that country."

Now let me clue you in on something. Foreign policy covers more than unjustified acts of agression against a third world countries goverment. It deals with covert infiltrations with such said terrorist organizations. Something apparently absent with the so called "War against Terrorism" I.E. Suadi Arabia which i'll remind you harbors the Bin Laden family, which i'll remind you, has direct business relationship with the Bush's oil conglomerate in texas. Now you go on saying that all this bullshit of Spain's recent attack was soley bush's fault is my words and that i'm a stupid son of bitch.

Quote :

"unless you want to start claiming that dubya should be running England and Spain in addition to the US"

That was your first post in response to the blaming of foreign terrorist attacks was it not? It is undeniably true that our government has no jurisdiction in said terrotories. My statement -

Quote :

"What was the terrorist response of Spain's declaration to aid the US in the war on terror? Attacks. What happened. An attack. For Brits it was a givin. It is Bushes fault since he didn't take care of Osama Bin Ladin in time. I mean who the fuck is Bin Laden when we got the best intelligence in the world. So there you have it, Bush's fault."

was an accusation that our government didn't do there homework and now other countries, who had first wanted to help our cause, now are neutral since they see that our war is flawed; due to our incompetence at fighting the right enemy at the right time.

Therefore your stance that the our administration is correct in beefing up security in response to it's negligable acts of war is void.

Quote :

"I reamed pryderi for saying there were 3 terrorist attacks that bush was responsible for by saying there has only been one turrist attack that bush was responsible for."

Quote :

"come on. calling 9/11 three separate terrorist attacks is bullshit and you know it."

EXCUSE ME? you redeemed where?

Quote :

"Quote : "but dont twist my fucking words." There is no twisting going on. Just me pwning you thoroughly"

The only pwning going on is by yourself. Becuase with each post you show how belligerant and ignorant you are.

[Edited on August 28, 2005 at 1:02 AM. Reason : .]

8/28/2005 1:01:08 AM

good thread

[Edited on August 28, 2005 at 1:03 AM. Reason : -]

8/28/2005 1:03:08 AM

Quote :

"lets see, I reamed pryderi for saying there were 3 terrorist attacks that bush was responsible for by saying there has only been one turrist attack that bush was responsible for."

Oh I'm sorry you meant reamed as in, I cleaned pryderi's ass out on his stance that 9/11 wasn't a set of 3 attacks against Tower 1 and 2 plus the pentagon bombing, and that he has no foundation in his argument. But you decieded to conviniently divert your obivious stupidity by saying that is was me who was wrong in blaming Bush for all of Spains hardships.

I there inturn reminded you that our allied nations were suffering similair attacks do to their said alliance with us. Yet you think this statement

Quote :

"What was the terrorist response of Spain's declaration to aid the US in the war on terror? Attacks. What happened. An attack. For Brits it was a givin. It is Bushes fault since he didn't take care of Osama Bin Ladin in time. I mean who the fuck is Bin Laden when we got the best intelligence in the world. So there you have it, Bush's fault."

meant that my issue was that I had expected Bush to be more involve with Spain's national security. Somewhere in your mind you came up with this shit and that is what you pursued as your argument. My response to that is this- "whatever man, you're putting words in my mouth when your obviously never had anything smart to say.

Quote :

""3 major terrorist attacks? lets see, 9/11... I DONT SEE THE OTHER TWO!""

Someone else tell me I dont got this motherfucker figured out.

[Edited on August 28, 2005 at 1:56 AM. Reason : .]

8/28/2005 1:55:18 AM

I'm not done with your idiotic banter aaronburro.

Quote :

"Foreign policy in this case would be used ON THE COUNTRY to get the afore-mentioned country to stop supporting terrorists."

I can only laugh when I read this. Let me start out by saying your ideology is so fucking whack it's pathetic. If you think killing taliban officials or Baathist Sunnis that were of Sadam's Dictatorship in the two invasions is going to somehow hamper Al Quaeda's purpose you are a complete and utter imbecile.

Quote :

"but beefing up security (IE, something focusing solely on a local security policy) does NOT piss off terrorists inherently, unless part of our security policy is to rape every muslim woman that comes through the airport."

Now tell me, wtf does local policy have to do with enraging Islamic fundamentalist. Secondly, dont you think the terrorist aren't already pissed off, enough so, that raping every muslim woman that comes through an airport is as meaningless, as their fellow muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan being killed. These people are jihadist and when you say "does not piss off inherently," you obviously dont know that their beliefs involve war at every cost with the infidel nations of the west.

8/28/2005 2:55:11 AM

Quote :

"Foreign policy covers more than unjustified acts of agression against a third world countries goverment. It deals with covert infiltrations with such said terrorist organizations."

that couldn't be any less foreign policy if it tried. but thx for playing...

Quote :

"Now you go on saying that all this bullshit of Spain's recent attack was soley bush's fault is my words and that i'm a stupid son of bitch. "

i hate to break it to you, but when you say "IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT!" I will tend to think that you are saying "it is bush's fault." Please forgive me for taking your words for what they mean. I will never do it again...

Quote :

"Therefore your stance that the our administration is correct in beefing up security in response to it's negligable acts of war is void. "

what
the
fuck

So you are again saying that after 9/11 we should just have let everything be the same? i'm not talking one fucking bit about iraq. I'm talking about us changing our god damned local security measures. If we go out and nuke three muslim nations tomorrow that has NOTHING to do with us putting retinal scanners in airports.

Quote :

"you redeemed where?"

please allow me, once again, to say WHAT THE FUCK. that makes 100% no sense. we are all dumber for having read that.

Quote :

"The only pwning going on is by yourself. Becuase with each post you show how belligerant and ignorant you are."

You are the one getting pwnt for trying to think there is any relation between foreign policy and local security policies. And then trying to say that covert military ops are a fucking form of foreign policy. They are probably THE WORST form of policy (if you want to call it that) when dealing w/ a gov't, and they are definitely NOT diplomatic. If you get caught, you are FUCKED. When you send a diplomat over to a country, 99999 times out of 100000, if someone sees him, your country isn't fucked right off the bat.

8/28/2005 9:14:05 PM

Quote :

"A Day in the Life of Joe Republican"

Why has no one posted this yet?

8/28/2005 10:53:34 PM

Well, it's a stupid partisan cartoon, so I guess that it could really go with any of your stupid partisan threads.

8/29/2005 12:36:36 PM

OH YEAH!!!!!???

11/17/2005 3:41:26 PM

i swear im a moderate!!!!!!!!!

11/17/2005 4:13:15 PM

why do you have to bump all of your stupid ass threads?

i mean, they were bull shit the first time... 2 month old bull shit is still bull shit...

11/17/2005 4:34:40 PM

You're going to be pissed off on January 17th, 2006

11/17/2005 9:20:27 PM