bous All American 11215 Posts user info edit post |
i'm dressing up as a huge penis and going to the midnight showing! 11/13/2005 11:57:13 PM |
scottncst8 All American 2318 Posts user info edit post |
friday can't get here soon enough, then it's imax time! 11/14/2005 8:08:46 PM |
BEU All American 12512 Posts user info edit post |
bttt cause it doesnt need it 11/14/2005 8:45:29 PM |
miska All American 22242 Posts user info edit post |
c'mon thursday night!] 11/14/2005 9:25:43 PM |
Cif82 All American 10455 Posts user info edit post |
Got my tickets for the 10pm showing on friday night in statesville. I havent anticipated a movie like this in a LONG time. 11/14/2005 10:59:09 PM |
Vulcan91 All American 13893 Posts user info edit post |
Harry Potter has good taste in music
11/15/2005 7:12:54 PM |
wolfnuke All American 875 Posts user info edit post |
We finished assembling the film yesterday and will be doing our first technical screenings tonight, so this is going to be a fun day. 11/16/2005 9:07:10 AM |
FilipinoGuy All American 1086 Posts user info edit post |
Already got my tix for Fri 11/16/2005 11:53:45 AM |
radhar All American 7475 Posts user info edit post |
I just got this article in my INbox its pretty hilarious
http://youcantmakeitup.blogspot.com/2005/11/harry-potter-legal-age-countdown-clock.html
[Edited on November 16, 2005 at 12:46 PM. Reason : harry potter hottie?] 11/16/2005 12:36:15 PM |
wolfnuke All American 875 Posts user info edit post |
Watched it tonight, but I can't talk about it until after it opens. I'll just say that I personally did not like it and seriously hope that the next movie follows the book. 11/16/2005 8:46:49 PM |
RRBM Veteran 188 Posts user info edit post |
^
You shouldn't say you didn't like it. That is talking about it.
[Edited on November 16, 2005 at 11:51 PM. Reason : p] 11/16/2005 11:50:33 PM |
miska All American 22242 Posts user info edit post |
haha, he told me all sorts of things about the movie and i love him all the more for it 11/17/2005 1:36:28 AM |
wolfnuke All American 875 Posts user info edit post |
Ok, I can talk about it (otherwise it would be difficult to discuss anything at work), I'm just not supposed to mention any specifics. Even though I say I didn't like it doesn't mean anything, I seriously doubt anyone on this board values my opinion enough to influence whether to see a movie or not. 11/17/2005 2:58:40 AM |
jbtilley All American 12797 Posts user info edit post |
^The CGI I saw in the trailers (especially for the lake people) looked kinda shoddy. How did it hold up?
I pretty much know I'll walk away dissapointed with this one. It was my favotire book, so I'm sure the movie won't live up to the high standard I've set. 11/17/2005 8:10:39 AM |
BiggzsIII All American 5016 Posts user info edit post |
I think I am going to try and wait till Turkey day holiday, let all the iddy biddy kids go and the parents so I can really enjoy the movie
III & FH ...A??? 11/17/2005 9:08:32 AM |
miska All American 22242 Posts user info edit post |
12 hours 11/17/2005 12:07:37 PM |
Smath74 All American 93278 Posts user info edit post |
Just saw it. I liked it for the most part. it definitely didn't cover as much as the book, but that's to be expected considering how long the damn book is. 11/18/2005 2:49:47 AM |
Sugarush4u All American 16554 Posts user info edit post |
ahh the movie was by far my favorite (probably because the book is my favorite too)...I wish they had a longer version of it too...if they have an extended version on dvd i'm so getting it 11/18/2005 2:58:27 AM |
JTHelms All American 4696 Posts user info edit post |
I didn't like it very much... they rushed a lot of parts (I know, the book is huge) but they could have spent a little more time developing the relationships between the characters - for example, when ron was mad a harry, hermione's relationship with victor, hagrid's relationship with whats-her name, etc. 11/18/2005 3:04:25 AM |
moron All American 34142 Posts user info edit post |
If someone didn't read the book, will this movie suck?
I liked the first HP movies, and i've only read the first book (for a class in HS). 11/18/2005 3:22:08 AM |
occamsrezr All American 6985 Posts user info edit post |
I thought it was pretty good. Though, I could have definitely used a bit more development in the characters.
Did anyone else think that Hermoine's acting was just a little shitty? 11/18/2005 3:24:59 AM |
joepeshi All American 8094 Posts user info edit post |
I liked it, but I liked the 3rd one the best.
^I thought her acting was better...this one was funnier though.
[Edited on November 18, 2005 at 3:27 AM. Reason : fff] 11/18/2005 3:25:56 AM |
Wolfrules All American 1880 Posts user info edit post |
I haven't read the books.. and I thought it was a good movie.. 11/18/2005 3:27:10 AM |
mdalston All American 1028 Posts user info edit post |
brendan gleeson is hilarious, and ralph fiennes is a badass.
the third one is a little more consistent throughout i felt, and my friend thought gambon's dumbledore was terrible... but i think this movie is as good as 3 if not better... and 3 is the better book
the graveyard scene was NAILED. 11/18/2005 3:36:11 AM |
gapgurl4u2c All American 1306 Posts user info edit post |
I liked the movie, but from the beginning I kept thinking it was straying a lot from the book...I went and saw it at IMAX and overall was pretty pleased...the World Quidditch Cup was awesome...too bad they didn't really show any of the game... 11/18/2005 3:36:42 AM |
Nerdchick All American 37009 Posts user info edit post |
WELL-MANNERED FRIVOLITY 11/18/2005 3:51:38 AM |
ussjbroli All American 4518 Posts user info edit post |
^^ yeah, i would have liked to see some of the cup. they also left out some things, like rita as the bug animagus, etc that i really would have liked to see. all in all though, a good HP movie. i can't wait for pheonix though 11/18/2005 3:56:42 AM |
sarijoul All American 14208 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | ". . . .and i've only read the first book (for a class in HS)." |
wow. . . just wow.11/18/2005 4:32:29 AM |
BDubLS1 All American 10406 Posts user info edit post |
so you don't find out that rita was a beetle? And that is how she was getting her scoops? well that's shitty...that's a kinda big part of the 5th book...how they bribe her, etc... oh well not that big of a deal...
and it is hard to establish relationships/bonds between characters in a movie...that is where a book has the advantage everytime...
i'm glad to hear they nailed the graveyard scene... i can't wait to see it
[Edited on November 18, 2005 at 8:50 AM. Reason : yep] 11/18/2005 8:49:59 AM |
CalledToArms All American 22025 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "". . . .and i've only read the first book (for a class in HS)."
wow. . . just wow." |
why wow?11/18/2005 9:52:10 AM |
Smath74 All American 93278 Posts user info edit post |
I didn't think they included enough of Snape in the movie... he is, after all, the best character, except hermione. 11/18/2005 10:09:29 AM |
tracer All American 13876 Posts user info edit post |
yea i thought snape got the short end of the stick as far as screen time. 11/18/2005 3:52:37 PM |
ussjbroli All American 4518 Posts user info edit post |
^ he did maximize what time he did have though 11/18/2005 4:29:54 PM |
miska All American 22242 Posts user info edit post |
How many scenes did Draco have? He wasn't in there nearly as much either. 11/18/2005 4:32:10 PM |
Officer Cat All American 931 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "the graveyard scene was NAILED." |
absolutely.11/18/2005 5:58:48 PM |
BigPapa All American 4727 Posts user info edit post |
I liked the movie some of the people on here just like to be overly critical of movies, but to each their own. I was entertained pretty good adaptation of the book, you can't include everything from the book. 11/18/2005 7:01:24 PM |
spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
It grossed about $32 million yesterday. At least 100mil+ this weekend. 11/19/2005 5:10:37 PM |
BEU All American 12512 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | ""the graveyard scene was NAILED."" |
god damn amen. I loved voldemort.
My friend who is a fillm major argues that it could have been made into 2 films with the 1st ending somewhere after the first challenge. If you include everything in the books it could happen.
IMO it would work because the first half movie wouldnt get much accomplished and leave everyone who hasnt read the books hanging.11/19/2005 5:43:15 PM |
PackMan92 All American 8284 Posts user info edit post |
overall I enjoyed the film
krum looked fat hermione is hot voldemort was cool
blah blah blah, def. worth the $ to go see 11/20/2005 2:43:28 AM |
rwoody Save TWW 37694 Posts user info edit post |
SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE 11/20/2005 3:35:23 AM |
Sonia All American 14028 Posts user info edit post |
If you didn't read the book, you'll be asking the person who dragged you into the theatre "Why are they doing... How'd they get from here to... Why is Harry... WTF is this buggery... Wait weren't they friends 30 seconds ago?" and you'll miss half the movie because the pacing is off.
If you read the book, you'll at least know what's SUPPOSED to be going on but every time you see that something completely retarded was added you'll want to throw the chicken fries you snuck into the theatre at the screen. I didn't mind a lot of stuff getting edited out of the movie. There's no way you're going to fit that book into a movie under three hours. But adding stuff that didn't happen that completely changes meanings and relationships later on was ridiculous.
GO SEE IT ANYWAY
THEN YOU CAN AGREE WITH ME ABOUT HOW HORRIBLE IT IS
PS: They could've cut out the Foe Glass since they didn't even use it at the end where it made its most dramatic impact. 11/20/2005 12:08:25 PM |
BEU All American 12512 Posts user info edit post |
well, its introduction took about 5 seconds, so I am sure you could of come up with something else 11/20/2005 4:48:45 PM |
Kainen All American 3507 Posts user info edit post |
^ nice try in a losing effort to be critical Sonia. Doesn't work.
Few will agree with you your take - the movie was great, go rear up on something else.. 11/20/2005 5:50:48 PM |
CalledToArms All American 22025 Posts user info edit post |
ive never seen a HP movie
few books i gave the chance were boring enough for me 11/20/2005 5:51:49 PM |
Docido All American 4642 Posts user info edit post |
Movie was ok. I agree with it being rushed and I still stand by my assesment that the casting and direction on Krum and Fleur sucked ass. 11/20/2005 6:46:59 PM |
mcbob202 New Recruit 28 Posts user info edit post |
Ok, I was very disappointed with the movie. I don't mind that they didn't include everything from the book (let's be honest, the SPEW part was boring anyway) but what they did include was in many cases inaccurate. The special effects were great but the acting sucked (ie: Dumbledore, Krum, and to some extent Prof. Moody). If you like shiny things and large views of the castle this movie is for you; if not, wait till the $1.50 11/20/2005 7:10:15 PM |
toemoss All American 2950 Posts user info edit post |
I thought the movie was great.. definitely the best one so far...
But one thing REALLY pissed me the fuck off though.
The whole intro to the quidditch world cup was badass, AND THEN THEY DON"T SHOW THE FUCKING MATCH!!! What The Fuck!!!!!1
I remember when I was reading the book i thought the match was gonna be awesome in the movie, and they cut away from it right as it's about to start.
[Edited on November 20, 2005 at 7:20 PM. Reason : é] 11/20/2005 7:19:56 PM |
Officer Cat All American 931 Posts user info edit post |
Quote : | "My friend who is a fillm major argues that it could have been made into 2 films with the 1st ending somewhere after the first challenge. If you include everything in the books it could happen. " |
Quote : | "Mike Newell decided against the studio's original idea of adapting the 734 page book into two separate films to be released several months apart, figuring that he could cut enough of the book's bulky subplots to make a workable film. It was Alfonso Cuarón, the director of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) who convinced him. " |
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0330373/trivia11/20/2005 8:08:02 PM |
BEU All American 12512 Posts user info edit post |
IMHO I think they could have tacked on another half hour to slow the first half down. I dont care how long the movie is, once voldemort comes back, nobody is wondering how much longer its going to take.
And I really wish they had someone else as dumbledore
[Edited on November 20, 2005 at 10:15 PM. Reason : u] 11/20/2005 10:07:41 PM |
spookyjon All American 21682 Posts user info edit post |
It was pretty good. Could have been a bit longer. Myrtle trying to get a gander at Harry's peter was a bit odd.
Daniel Radcliffe can't act for shit. Fleur Delacour has the bomb-ass titties. 11/20/2005 10:14:39 PM |