^^^my god you just don't get it...

[Edited on September 28, 2005 at 10:08 AM. Reason : k]

9/28/2005 9:51:40 AM

i still don't get whats wrong with the solstice

9/28/2005 10:31:44 AM

Quote :

"i still don't get whats wrong with the solstice"

I'd buy one. I'm honestly not sure which is better, the new Miata or the Solstice. Miata might win out just barely...

9/28/2005 12:49:19 PM

The Miata weighs around 400lbs than the Solstice.

It'd be my pick, even though it costs another $2-3k.

9/28/2005 1:38:17 PM

[less]

9/28/2005 1:39:10 PM

if you cant run under a 15 in the 1/4 you dont have a sports car

and im not saying a car that runs < 14's is a sports car automatically

9/28/2005 1:43:38 PM

^

Quote :

"Sports cars aren't defined by test track numbers. "

9/28/2005 1:51:37 PM

a miata is a sports car.. an STI/EVo is not by any stretch.

sports car = 2 seater, RWD, convertable. S2000, Z3, Z4, miata, solstice

9/28/2005 1:52:16 PM

a sports car need not be a convertible

and i'd say that an STi and EVO are borderline. not by the strictest definition, but if i was being loose enough in my definition to include, say, Supras or 300ZXs, i'd likely include the STi and EVO.

9/28/2005 1:55:49 PM

are we seriously having this discussion?

mustang: not a sports car
z28: not a sports car
miata: sports car (& roadster)
convertible: not sports car requirement

if you don't understand why you're just plain dumb

9/28/2005 5:48:39 PM

get a a4 and chip it. i heard then you will have a sports car.

9/29/2005 1:12:33 AM