You're right, I am angry that this section has to be subjected to your derailling of any and every thread you post in.

Quote :

"Answer this Quote : "Look, either you are pretty clever, and just playing dumb thinking you are trolling us because we keep responding, or you are really this dumb. Which is it?""

10/20/2006 12:42:43 PM

the answer is neither

wow a revelation! something else you cant comprehend!

10/20/2006 12:43:36 PM

please show me where i sided with an aggravated assaulter.

10/20/2006 12:44:02 PM

No, you're real fucking dumb, its evident with every post.

Look on the bright side, at least you aren't a troll.

10/20/2006 12:45:17 PM

BATTLE OF THE TIGERSHARKS!

10/20/2006 12:49:11 PM

^^^in that thread

^^again, your anger boils to your normal irrational ways

10/20/2006 12:52:12 PM

show me the specific post, otherwise, youre just making things up.



[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 12:53 PM. Reason : df]

10/20/2006 12:52:43 PM

if you cant find it you're really a dumbass and you're confirming that

10/20/2006 12:53:23 PM

i only posted 3 times in that entire thread. its not hard to see that you're just making stuff up.

10/20/2006 12:56:24 PM

its not hard to see that you're a dumbass

but thanks for re-iterating and confirming it for everyone

10/20/2006 1:00:21 PM

haha....im still waiting: please show me the post where i sided with an aggravated assaulter.

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:03 PM. Reason : d]

10/20/2006 1:03:05 PM

you're just proving again and again how much of a dumbass you are since you can't easily find that evidence

10/20/2006 1:04:02 PM

if its so easy, why don't you just show me?

10/20/2006 1:04:23 PM

i'm trying to give you a chance to prove that you're not a dumbass but apparently you can't

10/20/2006 1:06:17 PM

if its so easy, why don't you just show me?

10/20/2006 1:06:55 PM

tree, leave. just fucking leave. you're a complete disgrace.

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:07 PM. Reason : ,l]

10/20/2006 1:07:02 PM

^^^

10/20/2006 1:07:21 PM

so you can't show me. its ok to admit when you're wrong.


[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:12 PM. Reason : df]

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:12 PM. Reason : d]

10/20/2006 1:11:27 PM

i was trying to give you a chance to prove that you weren't a total dumbass but its alright...there are dumbasses in the world...we can't all be geniuses

10/20/2006 1:12:13 PM

do you want to try to convince everyone again that easy isnt an adverb?

10/20/2006 1:12:55 PM

I would probably change the subject too if I couldn't convince people that I wasn't a dumbass

sober...don't worry about it...you're a dumbass but so what...at least you vote

10/20/2006 1:13:34 PM

its perfectly on subject.....we were talking about dumbasses weren't we?

10/20/2006 1:14:45 PM

we were talking about you getting a chance to convince everyone that you werent a dumbass but you couldnt do it because its technically impossible since you are a dumbass

but i wouldnt expect a dumbass to even know what we were talking about

10/20/2006 1:15:48 PM

Quote :

"i was trying to give you a chance to prove that you weren't a total dumbass but its alright."

what are you TALKING about. god you're a fucking retard. sober posted 3 times in that thread.

THREE. in the about 20 words he wrote, NONE of them were tantamount to "siding with an aggravated assualter"


[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:16 PM. Reason : .]

10/20/2006 1:15:55 PM

ok, ill bite. here are my 3 posts in that thread.

i said this because the thread was titled "Black woman kills white woman and is not punished "

Quote :

"did you read the article?she wasnt sentenced to jail....she was still punished: 200 hours community service and $35,000 in restitution."

this quote is talking about the same thing:

Quote :

"she did get punished, just not by jail time."

and this post is pointing out the obvious:

Quote :

"imagine that, treetwista turned another thread to shit."

since none of those show me siding with an aggravated assaulter, i guess you're wrong....but i dont think anyone expected anything different.

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:21 PM. Reason : df]

10/20/2006 1:19:08 PM

more like you're obviously a dumbass for claiming i turned a thread to shit that was already shit before i showed up

Quote :

"ok, ill bite"

haha...sucker

10/20/2006 1:21:36 PM

so, you are wrong. again.

10/20/2006 1:25:07 PM

so you sent me that PM because i pissed you off? or hurt your feelings? or what?



[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:26 PM. Reason : df]

10/20/2006 1:26:08 PM

when you go to a comedy club sober, and the comedian tells a joke, do you get riled up and say "that is not true!"?

10/20/2006 1:30:09 PM

Quote :

"I would probably change the subject too if I couldn't convince people that I wasn't a dumbass"

10/20/2006 1:33:08 PM

Quote :

"I would probably change the subject too if I couldn't convince people that I wasn't a dumbass"

10/20/2006 1:33:28 PM

thank god this jackass doesn't vote.

10/20/2006 1:41:32 PM

too bad you do

course it doesnt matter because your party wont win

/hannity/treetwista10

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:43 PM. Reason : .]

10/20/2006 1:42:09 PM

what party would that be?

10/20/2006 1:45:09 PM

i think thats pretty obvious

but whats obvious to me, some might be oblivious to

but if i was to register to vote, and i voted a completely democrat ticket, you wouldnt like that?

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 1:47 PM. Reason : .]

10/20/2006 1:45:59 PM

no. i'd like it if you voted for brad miller. but honestly, i haven't investigated the local races yet. i will in the week leading up to the election.

10/20/2006 1:48:14 PM

would you have a problem with hannity, on his show, telling people not to vote for brad miller's opponent because he wont win?

10/20/2006 1:49:14 PM

yes.
i think it's a bad message to tell people not to vote simply because it seems that certain candidates won't win.

10/20/2006 1:50:40 PM

but aside from what you think based on your own opinions

does hannity have a right to say that? aka, if he does have a right, however potentially immoral or biased, cant he legally say it? isnt he entitled to share his opinion?

10/20/2006 1:52:02 PM

He can say whatever he wants so long as it falls under the guidelines of his employer and doesn't voilate US broadcast decency laws.

10/20/2006 1:52:45 PM

Quote :

"sarijoul All American 4377 Posts user info edit post yes. i think it's a bad message to tell people not to vote simply because it seems that certain candidates won't win."

Whoa whoa whoa.

You're gonna blow his mind if you don't slow down.

10/20/2006 1:52:50 PM

^^i agree and i dont think foxnews (his employer) has a problem with him attempting to decrease democrat votes nor do i think what he said is in any way "indecent"

10/20/2006 1:54:43 PM

i think legally he can say whatever he wants (excluding some certain peace-threatening examples) but this just goes further to discrediting fox's news value.

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 2:01 PM. Reason : .]

10/20/2006 2:01:39 PM

FAUX NEWS. WE REPORT WE DECIDE

10/20/2006 2:06:40 PM

if all it does is discredit peoples' views about fox news, 99% of whom already have issues with fox news, then i dont think it really sways many peoples' opinions

10/20/2006 2:11:13 PM

and that is a sad state of a news network. when something this stupid doesn't do a bit to damage its already-ruined reputation.

10/20/2006 2:12:24 PM

they shouldn't be able to call themselves fair and balanced with this blaant bias

10/20/2006 2:12:46 PM

i think you guys maybe overlooking that some other news sources on the other side of the political spectrum have the same things happening

its not just fox news

10/20/2006 2:14:36 PM

tell me another example of a news network that is so blatantly trying to skew votes.

[Edited on October 20, 2006 at 2:19 PM. Reason : .]

10/20/2006 2:18:50 PM

^^They aren't calling themselves "Fair and Balanced"

10/20/2006 2:19:24 PM