3

10/31/2006 10:24:36 AM

Quote :

"So what if it is. It still means bringing the building down in a controlled fashion. This does not add any credence to your argument, so why even mention it?"

No, it means physically pulling the building down with cables.

Why would the term "pull it" still apply to a situation where there are no cables?

"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

Even if thats what he meant, why would Larry Silverstein tell the fire department commander to pull it?

[Edited on October 31, 2006 at 12:27 PM. Reason : .]

10/31/2006 12:24:19 PM

HI

I'M NOT A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

I'M NOT EVEN A DEMOLITION EXPERT

I'M JUST A FAGGOT ON THE INTERNET

BUT THAT QUALIFIES ME TO SAY THAT I KNOW FOR A FACT THE TWIN TOWERS WERE BROUGHT DOWN BY A DEMOLITIONS TEAM

WHY YOU ASK?

WELL ITS OBVIOUS! THE BUILDINGS CAME STRAIGHT DOWN AND DIDN'T TOPPLE OVER!

10/31/2006 12:28:06 PM

im an "active american" which qualifies me to talk about structural engineering

10/31/2006 1:05:12 PM

Alex Jones is a self declared terrorism expert.

10/31/2006 1:10:19 PM

the truth comes out, jar jar was "in on it"

10/31/2006 1:49:11 PM

DissentNow is not an alias. I work with him, and he discovered TWW a week or so ago.

10/31/2006 2:01:08 PM

he is overthrower

10/31/2006 2:03:09 PM